scholarly journals Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid-an Acceptable Option in Screening of Cervical Cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (S) ◽  
pp. 879-883
Author(s):  
Summera Aslam ◽  
Ahmed Zunair Wasim ◽  
Lubna Javed ◽  
Tayyiba Wasim
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Cervical Carcinoma ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objectives| To evaluate the accuracy of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) and Papanicolaou (Pap) smear as screening tests for cervical carcinoma and compare it with cervical biopsy as a gold standard. Methods| This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Gynae Unit 3 Services Institute of Medical Sciences from Jan 2016 to December 2016. All the married patients between 18 to 64 years of age were included in the study. Every patient underwent VIA, Pap smear and colposcopic directed biopsy from aceto white area as well as from 2:00 clock and 5:00 clock position. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of VIA, Pap smear and both tests and compared them with histopathology of biopsy specimen. Results| 476 women were screened in the study. Out of these, 110 (23.10%) patients were VIA positive and 40 (8.40%) patients were positive with Pap smear. Thirty seven (7.77%) patients were positive on both VIA and Pap smear. A total of 43 (9.03%) patients had cervical pre-malignancy on biopsy. The sensitivity of VIA and pap was 97.67%, 94.87% while specificity was 84.29% and 99.31%respectively (p=0.001). The PPV of VIA and pap was 38.18% and 92.5 %( p=0.00) while NPV was 99.7% and 99.5% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of both tests combined was 94.59% and 99.54% while the PPV and NPV was 94.59% and 99.54% respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of VIA was 85.5%. Conclusion| VIA has high sensitivity and NPV which makes it an effective screening test for cervical carcinoma in developing countries like Pakistan. Pap smear can be combined to VIA positive cases to improve its specificity.

scholarly journals Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of Visual Inspection of Cervix with Acetic Acid and Pap Smear for Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Is VIA Superseding Pap Smear?

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal Patil ◽  
G Durdi ◽  
KS Lakshmi
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Cross Sectional

ABSTRACT Objectives To estimate diagnostic efficacy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in comparison to Pap smear. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried over a period of 24 months on 200 women attending colposcopy clinic at KLES Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Center, Belgaum, India. All women enrolled in study underwent Pap smear, VIA, colposcopy and biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, false-positive rate and false-negative rate were calculated for VIA, Pap smear and colposcopy with biopsy as the reference standard. Results In our study, sensitivity and specificity of VIA were found to be 86.95% and 72.51% respectively, and that of Pap smear 37.68% and 92.36% respectively. Colposcopy showed higher sensitivity (94.20%) and specificity (94.65%). Conclusion VIA is a suitable primary screening procedure alternative to Pap smear as it has high sensitivity and negative predictive value.

scholarly journals Perceptions and Attitude of Women of Luderitz, Namibia on Pap Smear

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Hausiku ◽  
Koffi Kouame ◽  
Yapo Guillaume Aboua
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cervical Carcinoma ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Multiple Sexual Partners ◽  
Motivation Factors ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Cervical cancer is one of the leading malignancies globally and has taken third place in Namibia amongst women aged 15-44 years. Infection with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) has been proven to increase women’s susceptibility to developing cervical carcinoma. Sadly, Namibia carries a twin burden of HIV and cervical cancer. Namibians are aware of HIV/AIDS, but remain poorly informed about cervical cancer. Furthermore, among those who are aware of the disease, low utilisation of screening tests have been reported. Objective: The purpose was to explore perceptions and attitudes held by women about cervical cancer, reasons for low uptake of Pap smear testing amongst those who are aware of the malignancy as well as unearth motivation factors that has fuelled women to go for screening. Methodology: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling as a sampling technique. The survey instrument used was a self-administered questionnaire. It consisted of both closed and open ended questions. A total of 136 women were surveyed. Results and conclusion: The level of awareness for cervical cancer (92.6%) and Pap smear (93.4%) were high. Most were able to identify that pap smear test is used for screening for pre-cancerous lesions. However, knowledge about the impact of a HIV positive status along with co infection with HPV as the leading causes for progression of invasive cervical carcinoma was not well known. Knowledge about the other risk factors such as multiple sexual partners (39.7%), early sex debut (34.9%) and smoking was poorly demonstrated. This suggests that a high awareness level does not necessarily translate into having a good perception or understanding of a disease. A good attitude towards screening was observed although less than half of the study population reported ever having a test done.

scholarly journals VIA (Visual inspection with acetic acid) and VILI (Visual inspection with lugol’s iodine) as an initial approach with colposcopy as a next screening tool with its positive predictive value in low socioeconomic patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Anita Paswan ◽  
Anil Kumar ◽  
Kumudini Jha ◽  
Shail Kumari Sinha
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Cervical Carcinoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Lugol’S Iodine ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Cervical Cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide and India alone contribute the 1/4th of the world’s cases of cervical cancer. In view to this huge burden there was need to establish a feasible screening programme to detect cervical carcinoma at earliest in developing country.Methods: This is a prospective study of 500 women who fulfil the selection criteria. 50 pregnant patients for VIA (Visual inspection with acetic acid), 50 pregnant patients for VILI (Visual inspection with lugol’s iodine) and 400 non-pregnant women for VIA, VILI and colposcopy were enrolled. In positive cases, cervical biopsy with histopathological examination was done. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of each test were obtained and compared. Chi-square (X2) test was used to test the significance of difference between two proportions of a quantitative data.Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for VIA (85.1%, 84.1%, 41.7%, 97%), VILI (95.7%, 92.4%, 62.5%, 93.4%) and Colposcopy (83%, 86%, 51.3%, 96.6%) were statistically significant with its histopathological report.Conclusions: In a poor developing country like India where pap smear and colposcopy is not available in low resource setting VIA and VILI can prove a very helpful tool in picking up abnormal looking cervix which can then be confirmed by pap or colposcopy. It will go a long way in reducing the incidence of cervical carcinoma.

scholarly journals Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America: This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
L O Sarian ◽  
S F Derchain ◽  
P Naud ◽  
C Roteli-Martins ◽  
A Longatto-Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Cervical Screening ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Lugol’S Iodine ◽  
Cervical Disease ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objectives: To assess the performance indicators of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI) in four Latin American centres participating in the ongoing Latin AMerican Screening (LAMS) study, in settings with moderate incidence of cervical disease and with poorly to moderately well-organized cervical cancer screening. Setting: Three Brazilian centres (São Paulo, Campinas and Porto Alegre) and one Argentine centre (Buenos Aires) recruited a total of 11,834 healthy women to undergo VIA, VILI, conventional Pap smear and Hybrid Capture II (HCII). Methods: Women who had a positive result from any of these tests were subjected to colposcopy and biopsies (if necessary), and women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were properly treated. To control for verification bias, 5% of women with normal tests were referred for colposcopy, as were 20% of HCII-negative women. Results: Data on VIA ( n=11,834), VILI ( n=2994), conventional Pap smear ( n=10,138) and HCII ( n=4195) were available for test comparisons, calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Overall test positivity was 11.6% for VIA, 23.0% for VILI, 2.2% for Pap smear (LSIL threshold), 1.1% for Pap smear (HSIL threshold) and 17.1% for HCII. VIA was positive in 61.8% of the women with CIN 1, 57.0% of those with CIN 2, 35.0% of women with CIN 3 and in 21 of 28 (75%) of women with cancer. Approximately 10% of women with no detectable disease had an abnormal VIA. Regarding VILI, 83.3% of women diagnosed with CIN 1 and 62.5% of those with CIN 3 had an abnormal test. VILI failed to detect one of three cases of cancer. Both the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of VIA and VILI in detecting CIN 2 or CIN 3 could be significantly improved depending on the combination with Pap smear or HCII (sensitivity up to 100.0% and specificity up to 99.8%). Conclusions: The LAMS study failed to reproduce the performance figures obtained with VIA and VILI (as stand-alone tests) in some other settings, where the prevalence of cervical disease was higher. However, a combined use of VIA or VILI with the Pap test or HCII allowed specific detection of cervical abnormalities.

scholarly journals An Evaluation of the Arcus Corneae For Age Estimation

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 155-162
Author(s):  
Boonsak Hanterdsith
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Although the arcus corneae (AC) has long been used as an age indicator for forensic purposes, its diagnostic value has not been evaluated. To evaluate the AC as a predictor of chronological age, the author has studied the correlation of AC with respect to age of the deceased. A cross-sectional study was conducted of 342 Thai corpses at the Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Thailand. AC was graded into three levels: no AC, incomplete ring, and complete ring. One-way analysis of variance, chi-square test, binomial logistic regression, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were used for analysis. The Cohen’s kappa was used to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability. The prevalence of AC and the probability of complete AC were significant higher in corpses aged 60 years and above than in those under 60 years. Consequently, this study confirmed that the prevalence of AC was significantly correlated with the age of Thai individuals. If the complete AC is used as an indicator of age of 60 years and above, complete AC has high sensitivity (92.56%) but low specificity (72.85%), low positive predictive value (65.12%), but high negative predictive value (94.71%). For diagnostic value, the presence of AC can be used for age screening but not for absolute confirmation. The absence of AC indicates young age, incomplete AC indicates middle age, and complete AC indicates old age. The high intraobserver and interobserver reliability provides assurance of the value of AC as a means to estimate personal age.

scholarly journals Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of papanicoloau (PAP) Smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) in screening of cervical carcinoma, taking biopsy as gold standard.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (04) ◽  
pp. 863-869
Author(s):  
Shakila Yasmin ◽  
Tahira Munir ◽  
Ayesha Javaid ◽  
Khalid Fahim Yasin ◽  
Junaid Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cervical Carcinoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
False Negative ◽  
True Positive ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Study Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. Period: 05 August 2016 to 05 Feb 2017. Material & Methods: A total of 228 suspected patients of cervical carcinoma and age of 20-50 years were included. Patients with acute cervicitis, pregnant females, h/o abnormal cytology and obvious lesion on cervix were excluded. All the patients were underwent papanicoloau (PAP) smear and visual inspection using acetic acid. The results of papanicoloau (PAP) smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) were compared with cervical biopsy report. Results: In 110 papanicoloau (PAP) smear positive patients, 97 were True Positive and 13 were False Positive. Among, 118 papanicoloau (PAP) smear negative patients, 18 were False Negative whereas 100 were True Negative. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of papanicoloau ( PAP )smear in screening of cervical carcinoma was 84.35%, 88.50%, 88.18%, 84.75% and 86.40% respectively. In 114 visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) positive patients, 95 were True Positive and 19 were False Positive. Among, 114 visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) negative patients, 20 were False Negative whereas 94 were True Negative. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection using acetic acid ( VIA) in  screening of cervical carcinoma was 82.61%, 83.19%, 83.33% 82.46% and 82.89% respectively. Conclusion: This study concluded that papanicoloau ( PAP) smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) in screening of cervical carcinoma are highly sensitive, accurate and having almost equal diagnostic accuracy.

Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology in the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 626-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Basu ◽  
R. Sankaranarayanan ◽  
R. Mandal ◽  
C. Roy ◽  
P. Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
College Education ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Severe Dysplasia ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Potential Alternative ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Visual inspection of the cervix after application of 3–5% acetic acid (VIA) is a potential alternative to cytology for screening in low-resource countries. The present study evaluated the performance of VIA, magnified visual inspection after application of acetic acid (VIAM), and cytology in the detection of high-grade cervical cancer precursor lesions in Kolkata (Calcutta) and suburbs in eastern India. Trained health workers with college education concurrently screened 5881 women aged 30–64 years with VIA, VIAM, and conventional cervical cytology. Detection of well-defined, opaque acetowhite lesions close to the squamocolumnar junction; well-defined, circumorificial acetowhite lesions; or dense acetowhitening of ulceroproliferative growth on the cervix constituted a positive VIA or VIAM. Cytology was considered positive if reported as mild dysplasia or worse lesions. All screened women (N = 5881) were evaluated by colposcopy, and biopsies were directed in those with colposcopic abnormalities (N = 1052, 17.9%). The final diagnosis was based on histology (if biopsies had been taken) or colposcopic findings, which allowed direct estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Moderate or severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (CIN 2–3 disease) was considered as true positive disease for the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of screening tests. 18.7%, 17.7% and 8.2% of the women tested positive for VIA, VIAM, and cytology. One hundred twenty two women had a final diagnosis of CIN 2–3 lesions. The sensitivities of VIA and VIAM to detect CIN 2–3 lesions were 55.7% and 60.7%, respectively; the specificities were 82.1% and 83.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology were 29.5% and 92.3%, respectively. All the tests were associated with negative predictive values above 98%. VIA and VIAM had significantly higher sensitivity than cytology in our study; the specificity of cytology was higher than that of VIA and VIAM.

Comparison of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and the Pap Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parul Sinha ◽  
Pritika Srivastava ◽  
Anand Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Test Accuracy ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in the early detection of cervical cancer and compare it with the Pap smear. Study Design: This was a cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 3 months. A total of 316 patients who attended the Gynecology Outpatient Department of Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and gave their informed consent were included. Results: VIA was found positive in 38 patients (12.6%). Pap smear was positive in 31 patients (10.3%). Twenty-eight patients had a positive VIA and a positive Pap smear, 3 had a negative VIA and a positive Pap smear, 10 had a positive VIA and a negative Pap smear, and 34 had a negative VIA and a negative Pap smear. Conclusion: The sensitivity of VIA and the Pap smear was found to be nearly equal, 93.3 and 93.8%, respectively. The Pap smear was found to be more specific than VIA, i.e., 72.9 versus 60%. In terms of test accuracy, the Pap smear was found to have greater test accuracy, i.e., 77.3 versus 66.7% for VIA.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of test characteristics of acetic acid, lugol’s iodine and toluidine blue stains in cervical cancer screening

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 4857
Author(s):  
Ankita Kumari ◽  
Neha Singh ◽  
Shaila Mitra ◽  
Reena Srivastav
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Toluidine Blue ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lugol’S Iodine

Background: Cervical cancer rank second in female cancer and India alone account for one fourth of the global cervical cancer burden. The study was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of acetic acid (3%), lugol’s iodine and toluidine blue (1%) in detection of abnormal cervical lesions.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur over a period of one year from July 2016 to June 2017. The study included 200 women in age group 20-60 years with signs and symptoms suspicious of abnormal cervical lesion. The cases were subjected to detailed history, clinical examination, Pap smear, Visual inspection test, colposcopy followed by cervical biopsy.Results: Out of total 200 patients, 114 patients had acetowhite area on VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) test, 113 were VILI (visual inspection with lugol’s iodine) positive and 107 women stained positive with Toluidine blue but only 88 showed biopsy proven pre-invasive and invasive lesions. So, sensitivity of acetic acid, lugol’s iodine and Toluidine blue was 81.8%, 84.09% and 90.9% respectively. Similarly, the specificity of the three stains were 62.5%, 65.17% and 75.8% respectively.Conclusions: Toluidine blue (1%) has proved to be significantly more sensitive and specific stain as compared to acetic acid (3%) and lugol’s iodine (50% dilution) in diagnosing pre-invasive and invasive cervical cancer. Hence, it may aid as an important tool in screening and treating precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document