scholarly journals RADON RISK COMMUNICATION ISSUES: RESULTS OF THE ALL-RUSSIAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-41
Author(s):  
A.A. Davydov ◽  
◽  
A.M. Biblin ◽  
D.V. Kononenko ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Health Risk ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Internet Survey ◽  
Public Health Care ◽  
Opinion Survey ◽  
Public Opinion Survey ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Health Risk Factor

1,500 respondents took part in an Internet survey conducted in autumn 2020 in the Russian Federation. The survey was a part of the Radon Cross-Cultural Multilingual Public Opinion Survey (STEAM project) in the framework of the IAEA technical cooperation project RER9153. The survey was representative for the population of the country as per sex, age, and a region of residence. Random sampling error didn’t exceed 2.5 % for 95 % confidence interval. All respondents were given some information on radon that was as similar as possible in questionnaires published in languages spoken in all 22 coun- tries that took part in the STEAM project; it was done in order to provide an opportunity to make further cross-country com- parison of the survey results. The objective of the survey was to investigate what attitudes people had towards their health and towards radon as a possible health risk factor. The survey revealed that in the Russian Federation people were rather poorly aware about radon. Only 31.7 % re- spondents stated that they were to a greater or lesser extent informed about radon. The level of knowledge about radon as a health risk factor was at a comparable level. For the majority of respondents, information about radon received from Ro- spotrebnadzor and its subordinate research institute formed the perception of radon as a risk factor that requires actions to mitigate its impact on health. Medical specialists turned out to be the most trustworthy source of information about health risks, first of all, family doctors and physicians in polyclinics; people also trusted medical prevention centers, Rospotrebnad- zor, regional and local public health care authorities. Results of the presented survey that was the first social survey focusing on the radon problem and conducted throughout the country can be used as a basis for planning communication strategies within the framework of both national and regional radon programs.

scholarly journals RADON RISK COMMUNICATION ISSUES: RESULTS OF THE ALL-RUSSIAN PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-41
Author(s):  
A.A. Davydov ◽  
◽  
A.M. Biblin ◽  
D.V. Kononenko ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Health Risk ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Internet Survey ◽  
Public Health Care ◽  
Opinion Survey ◽  
Public Opinion Survey ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Health Risk Factor

1,500 respondents took part in an Internet survey conducted in autumn 2020 in the Russian Federation. The survey was a part of the Radon Cross-Cultural Multilingual Public Opinion Survey (STEAM project) in the framework of the IAEA technical cooperation project RER9153. The survey was representative for the population of the country as per sex, age, and a region of residence. Random sampling error didn’t exceed 2.5 % for 95 % confidence interval. All respondents were given some information on radon that was as similar as possible in questionnaires published in languages spoken in all 22 coun- tries that took part in the STEAM project; it was done in order to provide an opportunity to make further cross-country com- parison of the survey results. The objective of the survey was to investigate what attitudes people had towards their health and towards radon as a possible health risk factor. The survey revealed that in the Russian Federation people were rather poorly aware about radon. Only 31.7 % re- spondents stated that they were to a greater or lesser extent informed about radon. The level of knowledge about radon as a health risk factor was at a comparable level. For the majority of respondents, information about radon received from Ro- spotrebnadzor and its subordinate research institute formed the perception of radon as a risk factor that requires actions to mitigate its impact on health. Medical specialists turned out to be the most trustworthy source of information about health risks, first of all, family doctors and physicians in polyclinics; people also trusted medical prevention centers, Rospotrebnad- zor, regional and local public health care authorities. Results of the presented survey that was the first social survey focusing on the radon problem and conducted through- out the country can be used as a basis for planning communication strategies within the framework of both national and regional radon programs.

Perception of Traffic Noise Barrier Effectiveness: Public Opinion Survey of Residents Living near I-71

1997 ◽  
Vol 1601 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd A. Herman ◽  
Michael A. Finney ◽  
Craig M. Clum ◽  
E.W. Pinckney
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Traffic Noise ◽  
Department Of Transportation ◽  
Opinion Survey ◽  
Noise Barriers ◽  
Noise Abatement ◽  
Public Controversy ◽  
Public Opinion Survey ◽  
Project Area ◽  
Noise Barrier

The completion of the largest Ohio Department of Transportation traffic noise abatement project in 1995 was met with public controversy over the effectiveness of the noise barriers. A public opinion survey was designed to obtain the perceptions of the residents in the project area. In a departure from most surveys of traffic noise barrier effectiveness, the coverage was not limited to the first or second row of houses, but was extended to 800 m on each side of the roadway. It was found that the larger survey area was needed to avoid misleading conclusions. Overall perceptions of noise barrier effectiveness were found to vary with distance from the roadway and with noise barrier configuration.

scholarly journals Overuse of Medical Tests: A New Health Risk Factor?

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Martins
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Health Risk ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Medical Overuse ◽  
Risk Reduction Behavior ◽  
Reduction Behavior ◽  
Medical Tests ◽  
Health Risk Factor

Keywords: Medical Overuse; Practice Patterns, Physicians; Risk Factors; Risk Reduction Behavior.

scholarly journals Helicobacter pylori as a risk factor for gastric cancer: the evidence and primary prevention strategy

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Voynovan ◽  
Yu. V. Embutnieks ◽  
D. V. Mareeva ◽  
S. V. Kolbasnikov ◽  
D. S. Bordin
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Rapid Urease Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Urease Test ◽  
The Russian Federation

Russia is a country with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, a high incidence of gastric cancer, and its late diagnosis. HР infection has been recognized as the leading manageable risk factor for gastric cancer. Accurate diagnostic tests must be used to identify and control the effectiveness of HP eradication, and effective schemes must be implemented for HP eradication. The aim of this article was to analyze the latest consensus documents, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes that reflected the role of HP as a risk factor for the development of gastric cancer, as well as measures for the risk reduction. We describe in detail the diagnostic methods for HP infection, provide data on their use in the Russian Federation, and analyze the efficacy of eradication regimens. In all HPinfected individuals, HP leads to chronic inflammation in the gastric mucosa and launches a precancerous cascade (Correa's cascade). The risk of gastric cancer increases with severe atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia. Primary prevention of gastric cancer is most effective if the eradication is performed before atrophic gastritis develops. The available consensus documents underline the importance of HP infection identification by accurate diagnostics at this stage of chronic gastritis. In Russia, the primary HP diagnosis is based on histology (37.7%), rapid urease test (29.2%), and serology (29.7%). HP stool antigen test (31.3%), 13C-urea breath test (23.4%) and the histological method (23.3%) are most often used to control eradication. Currently, the first line of eradication therapy is recommended as triple therapy with clarithromycin prescribed for 14 days. It is recommended to use double dose of proton pump inhibitors and bismuth to increase the effectiveness of this scheme. A 14-days triple regimen enhanced by bismuth has been recommended as the first-line therapy in the Russian Federation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document