scholarly journals The legislative activity of the Duke of Mazovia Janusz I of Warsaw 1381-1429

1970 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 102-123
Author(s):  
Patrycja Herod
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Marriage And Family ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Legislative Activity ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Law Of Succession

The article presents the legislative activity of Janusz I of Warsaw who from 1381 was an independent ruler of the Eastern Mazovia. It also offers an analysis of 15 legal instruments including 14 statutes and one landed privilege, which is the oldest known act of this type from the region of Mazovia delivered 21st June 1414 in Nowe Miasto for both the Czersk and Warsaw nobility. The article further deals with the division of specific regulations into criminal and private law, which includes marriage and family law, the law of succession, property law, obligations, the right of peasants to leave a village belonging to a feudal master as well as court proceedings. The article finishes with the presentation of the research results.

scholarly journals DZIAŁALNOŚĆ USTAWODAWCZA KSIĘCIA MAZOWIECKIEGO JANUSZA I STARSZEGO 1381-1429

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 103-124
Author(s):  
Patrycja Herod
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Marriage And Family ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Legislative Activity ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Law Of Succession

The article presents the legislative activity of Janusz I of Warsaw who from 1381 was an independent ruler of the Eastern Mazovia. It also offers an analysis of 15 legal instruments including 14 statutes and one landed privilege, which is the oldest known act of this type from the region of Mazovia delivered 21st June 1414 in Nowe Miasto for both the Czersk and Warsaw nobility. The article further deals with the division of specific regulations into criminal and private law, which includes marriage and family law, the law of succession, property law, obligations, the right of peasants to leave a village belonging to a feudal master as well as  court proceedings. The article finishes with the presentation of the research results.

law, Roman, institutional scheme of

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Fortunat Stagl
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Part Family ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law Of Succession

The institutional scheme of Roman law was developed primarily by Gaius on the basis of a preceding tradition of law manuals. The scheme consists of dividing the law into a General Part, Family Law, Property Law, Law of Succession, Law of Obligations, and Civil Procedure. This scheme is apparent not only in Gaius’s Institutes but also in the whole of his didactic scheme, which can be discerned from descriptions of the curriculum in his time. Gaius’s larger didactic scheme is indebted to contemporary philosophical, rhetorical, and didactic currents, which made it possible for him to organise the law of Rome in such a solid and plausible way that the emperor Justinian adopted this scheme for his compilation, comprising the Institutes, the Digest, and the Codex.

scholarly journals The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality – Core Themes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Katharina Pistor
Keyword(s):  
Coercive Power ◽  
Private Law ◽  
The Core ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Abstract In this brief introduction, I summarize the core themes of my book “The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality”. Capital, I argue, is coded in law – predominantly in a handful of private law institutions. By relying on legal coding techniques, asset holders invoke the right to enforce claims against others, if necessary with the help of the state’s coercive power.

Quintilian and the Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 258-277
Author(s):  
Olga Tellegen-Couperus
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Legal Procedure ◽  
Legal Expert ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law Of Succession ◽  
The Relationship

How did Quintilian regard the relationship between rhetoric and law? It is only in the last book of his Institutio oratoria that Quintilian deals with this question. In 12.3 he states that the well-educated orator must have a broad knowledge of the law so that he will not be dependent on information from a legal expert. In the course of the book, Quintilian shows that he himself was well acquainted with Roman law for he often explains rhetorical technique by giving legal examples, and these examples deal with a wide variety of topics and refer to a wide variety of sources. The topics include criminal law and private law, particularly the law of succession, and legal procedure. The sources range from speeches by Cicero to fictitious laws and cases. Quintilian regarded rhetoric as superior to law but he will have agreed with Cicero that rhetoric and law were partners in dignity.

COHABITANTS IN PRIVATE LAW: TRUST, FRUSTRATION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN ENGLAND, GERMANY AND CANADA

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Sanders
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Relationships ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Party Autonomy ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
Legislative Action ◽  
The Law ◽  
Canadian Provinces ◽  
The Right ◽  
English Canadian

AbstractNeither in England, nor in Germany, nor in all Canadian provinces, does the law provide specific rules for the redistribution of property for unmarried cohabitants after the breakdown of their relationship. Instead, courts apply the law of trusts, contract and unjust enrichment with an eye to the characteristics of intimate relationships, as, for example, in decisions like the EnglishJones v Kernott([2011] UKSC 53) and the CanadianKerr v Baranow(2011 SCC 10). This article compares English, Canadian, and German case law and evaluates it both from a doctrinal perspective and as a part of a general approach towards cohabitation. The article concludes with an appeal for legislative action that strikes the right balance between party autonomy and protection of the weaker party.

scholarly journals KILKA UWAG O BADANIACH NAD ROMANIZACJĄ STATUTÓW LITEWSKICH

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Sławomir Godek
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
The Third ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Fertile Ground ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Law Of Succession ◽  
Made In

SOME REMARKS ON THE STUDY OF THE ROMANIZATION OF LITHUANIAN STATUTESSummary The article is dedicated to the issues connected with the reception of Roman Law in the Lithuanian statutes of 1529, 1566, and 1588. After an analysis of the existing scholarly accomplishments in the field, one cannot but conclude that the study of the influence of the Roman Law on Lithuanian codifications has hardly been started yet. Despite the fairly long tradition of research in this field, so far only selected elements of the first and second statutes have been analyzed in order to identify Roman constituents. The research carried out in 1930s by Raphael Taubenschlag, Franciszek Bossowski, and Karol Koranyi demonstrated which Roman Law noticeably influenced the statutory regulations pertaining to family law, law of property, law of succession, criminal and procedural law. Their observations partly confirmed the findings previously made in the nineteenth century by Aleksander Mickiewicz, Franciszek Morze, and Ignacy Daniłowicz. At the same time, nothing is still known about the scope of Romanization in the third Lithuanian statute or about the transformations which Roman elements underwent in each of the statutes. Without further study of the subject, one cannot assess the role of Roman law in the Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita).It seems that the most fertile ground for identification of Roman elements in the third Lithuanian statute is tutorship and succession law, especially testamentary succession. Some interesting and original observations could be made on the basis of a more thorough comparative analysis of the pertinent Roman and Lithuanian regulations.

scholarly journals BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW DISPUTES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (40) ◽  
Author(s):  
Njegoslav Jović
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
State Courts ◽  
Property Law ◽  
International Arbitration ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Primary Activity ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Right

In this paper, the author analyzes the benefits and limitationsof international arbitration in disputes that are subject to intellectual propertyrights. Intellectual property law disputes have special characteristics. In theevent of a dispute with an international element, there is a problem with thejurisdiction of state courts due to the principle of the territoriality of intellectualproperty rights. The titular of the right must initiate court proceedings in allcountries individually, leading to delays in procedures, multiplication of costsand uneven judicial practice. For these reasons, the author analyzes alternativedispute resolution through arbitration to determine whether this method ofdispute resolution is more acceptable to foreign courts.The author particularly pays attention to the WIPO Center for Arbitrationand Mediation as a permanent arbitration institution whose primary activity isthe resolution of disputes in the field of intellectual property rights.

Same-Sex Relationships

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna L. Grossman ◽  
Lawrence M. Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Marriage And Family ◽  
Same Sex Marriage ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Family ◽  
Traditional Marriage ◽  
The Right ◽  
Constitutional Analysis

This chapter describes what might be the last battleground over “traditional” marriage—same-sex marriage, and the social and legal revolution that brought us from an era in which it was never contemplated to one in which, depending on the state, it is either expressly authorized or expressly prohibited. Same-sex marriage has posed—and continues to pose—a challenge to traditional definitions of marriage and family. But, more importantly, the issue implies broader changes in family law—the increasing role of constitutional analysis; limits on the right of government to regulate the family; and the clash between the traditional family form and a new and wider menu of intimate and household arrangements, and all this against the background of the rise of a stronger form of individualism.

Reactive Law or Conservative Law? The Reform of Divorce Procedure in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-144
Author(s):  
Lei Shi
Keyword(s):  
Family Law ◽  
Divorce Rate ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Chinese Family ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Marriage And Family ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Law

Abstract A marriage can be terminated in two ways in China, by registration or by litigation. Recently, China’s crude divorce rate has been gradually rising. Reforms are being carried out by the judiciary by introducing more supportive measures in divorce litigation. The legislature is writing drafts of the marriage and family part in the Civil Code. In the third draft, proposed articles would change the law on divorce slightly. These reforms reflect some trends in the development of Chinese family law. With respect to some debates on these reforms, the author suggests there could be a better way to draw up drafts. At the level of the judiciary, the present family justice reform has its advantages, and this bottom-up reform should be adhered to.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document