scholarly journals PERBEDAAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alimah Amin ◽  
Siti Partini Suardiman
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Class E

<p class="E-JOURNALTitle">Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika siswa antara siswa dengan gaya belajar auditorial, visual, dan kinestetik, dan siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran TGT dan NHT, (2) mengetahui mana yang lebih baik prestasi belajar matematika siswa dengan menggunakan TGT atau NHT.Sampel dari enam Sekolah Dasar (SD) yang terdiri atas kelas IV sebanyak 92 siswa ditentukan dengan <em>cluster random sampling</em>. Pengumpulan dara dilakukan dengan menggunakan angket gaya belajar dan tes prestasi belajar. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah statistik deskriptif, <em>one way anova,</em> <em>uji independent t test.</em>Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) tidak terdapat perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara siswa dengan gaya belajar auditorial, visual, dan kinestetik pada pembelajaran TGT dan NHT, serta ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika siswa antara siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran TGT dan siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran NHT, (2) prestasi belajar matematika dengan model pembelajaran TGT lebih baik dari pada model pembelajaran NHT. Siswa SD masih senang bermain, sehingga tidak dominan dengan satu gaya belajar. Pembelajaran TGT bisa meningkatkan prestasi belajar matematika siswa karena siswa dituntut lebih aktif mulai dari diskusi sampai turnamen.</p><p class="E-JOURNALAbstrakKeywords"><strong>Kata kunci:</strong> prestasi belajar, gaya belajar, TGT, NHT</p><p class="E-JOURNALTitleEnglish"> </p><p class="E-JOURNALTitleEnglish"><strong>THE DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT SEEN FROM LEARNING STYLES AND LEARNING MODEL</strong></p><p class="E-JOURNALTitleEnglish"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p class="E-JOURNALAbstractBodyEnglish">This study aims to: (1) know the difference between mathematics learning achievement of students with auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning styles and receiving TGT and NHT learning (2) know which one has higher mathematics achievement between students who is TGT or NHT.92 students of grade IV from 6 elementary schools were taken as samples using cluster random sampling technique. Data collection was done by using learning style questionnaires and learning achievement tests. The data analysis technique used was statistics descriptive, one way anova, independent t test.The results of this study indicate that: (1) there is no difference in mathematics achievement between students with auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning style, (2) the are differences in mathematics achievement between students who received TGT learning and students who received NHT, (3) students with TGT learning model have higher mathematics learning achievement than those with NHT. Elementary school students still love to play, so they are not dominant with one learning style. TGT learning can improve students’' mathematics achievement as students demanded to be active from the discussion to the tournament.</p><strong>Keywords</strong>: achievement, learning styles, TGT, NHT

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA POKOK BAHASAN PELUANG DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN BOYOLALI TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidayat Bahktiar ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Group Technology ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)</p>

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

scholarly journals Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Think Pair And Share Melalui Pendekatan Inquiry Ditinjau dari Kemandiriran Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Inquiry Approach ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI METODE CERAMAH DAN DISKUSI PADA MATA KULIAH MATEMATIKA EKONOMI DITINJAU DARI JENIS KELAMIN MAHASISWA

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1:) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Dwi Oktaviana
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Achievement Data ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, metode ceramah atau metode diskusi; (2) manakah yang memiliki prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, mahasiswa laki-laki atau perempuan; (3) pada masing-masing model pembelajaran, manakah yang mempunyai prestasi belajar yang lebih baik, mahasiswa laki-laki atau perempuan; (4) pada masing-masing jenis kelamin, manakah yang memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik, metode ceramah atau metode diskusi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan populasi seluruh mahasiswa semester 5 di kelas pagi Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika IKIP-PGRI Pontianak. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik stratified cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 68 mahasiswa. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi metode dokumentasi untuk mendapatkan nilai MID mata kuliah Matematika Ekonomi tahun akademik 2015/2016 sebagai data kemampuan awal dan nilai UAS mata kuliah Matematika Ekonomi untuk data prestasi belajar matematika mahasiswa. Uji hipotesis penelitian menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan sebagai berikut. (1) Pembelajaran matematika ekonomi menggunakan metode ceramah menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang sama dengan metode diskusi. (2) Mahasiswa laki-laki maupun perempuan memiliki prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. (3) Pada masing-masing metode pembelajaran, mahasiswa laki-laki maupun perempuan memiliki prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. (4) Pada masing-masing jenis kelamin, pembelajaran matematika ekonomi menggunakan metode ceramah dan metode diskusi menghasilkan prestasi belajar matematika yang sama. Kata kunci: metode ceramah, metode diskusi, jenis kelamin Abstract The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) which learning method produces student’s better mathematics learning achievement, speech method or discussion method; (2) which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, male or female; (3) viewed from learning methods, which student’s have better mathematics learning achievement, male or female; (4) viewed from gender, which learning method produces better mathematics learning achievement, speech method or discussion method. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of 5th semester in morning class Program Study of Mathematics Education IKIP-PGRI Pontianak. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 68 students. The data collection technique was include the documentation method to get the 2015/2016 MID Test of Economy Mathematics subject for initial capability data before the experiment and Final test of Economy Mathematics subject for mathematics student’s achievement data. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. Based on these results it can be concluded as follows. (1) Economy mathematics learning using speech method produced the same mathematics achievement as using discussion method. (2) For male or female students have the same mathematics achievement. (3) Viewed from learning method, male or female students have the same mathematics achievement. (4) Viewed from gender, economy mathematics learning using speech method and discussion method have the same mathematics achievement. Keywords: speech method, discussion method, gender

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING MODELS AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TOWARD MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT BY CONTROLLING STUDENTS’ NUMERIC APTITUDE

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
NI Nyoman Kawiwati
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Learning Achievement

This research is to determine the effect of learning model and critical thinking skills toward mathematics learning achievement of class XI IPA students in senior high school in Gianyar by controlling students’ numeric aptitude. This research used treatment by level 2x2 design and analysis of covariance. The sample was 80 people using multistage random sampling. The results by controlling numeric aptitude are: students learning achievement taught using PAIKEM model is higher than those taught in conventional model. There is an interaction effect between learning model and critical thinking skills toward students’ mathematics achievement. Given high critical thinking skills, students taught using PAIKEM models displayed higher results compared to those in conventional learning who were best in a lower critical thinking skills. Finally, based on the results, it can be recommended to SMA Mathematics teachers to increase students’ Mathematics achievement by using PAIKEM model accurately and to see of students critical thinking skills.

scholarly journals Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Artikulasi dan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Habib Ratu Perwira Negara
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas masing-masing kategori model pembelajaran, motivasi belajar siswa dan interaksinya terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh kelas VIII SMP Negeri 5 Madiun yang terdiri dari 4 kelas. Penentuan sampel menggunakan cluster random sampling. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode tes dan metode angket. Uji hipotesis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan sel tak sama dengan taraf signifikansi 0,05. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah (1) prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Artikulasi lebih baik dari model pembelajaran Talking Stick, (2) jika ditinjau dari masing-masing tingkatan motivasi belajar, siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi prestasi belajarnya jauh lebih baik dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar sedang maupun rendah dan (3) model pembelajaran Artikulasi lebih efektif dari model pembelajaran Talking Stick untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa, untuk setiap tingkat motivasi belajar siswa.Abstract:  The aims of this research were to find out the effectivennes of each categories of learning model, motivation to study and their interaction towards student mathematics learning achievement. The population was all students of grade VIII Five Junior High School of Madiun City consisted of four class. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0.05. The conclution of this research that (1) the model of Articulation learning gives a better mathematics achievement than model of Talking Stick learning, (2) students with the high motivation to study had better achievement than students with the medium and low motivation to study, and (3) the model of Articulation learning was more effective than the model of Talking Stick learning to enhance students mathematics learning achievement for each level of students motivation to study.

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika ditinjau dari Minat Belajar Siswa SMP Negeri di Kota Rantepao

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
Baso Intang Sappaile ◽  
Nurwati Djaman ◽  
Yusem Ba’ru ◽  
Kadir Kadir ◽  
Muhammad Darwis
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Learning Interest ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan model pembelajaran  discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari minat belajar siswa. Metode penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain 2x2 faktorial. Tempat penelitian dilakukan di SMP Negeri di Kota Rantepao, tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Populasi penelitian adalah semua siswa kelas tujuh SMP Negeri Rantepao dan sampel diperoleh dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling dengan jumlah anggota sampel sebanyak 78 siswa.  Model pembelajaran sebagai variabel bebas, minat belajar sebagai variabel intervening, dan hasil belajar matematika siswa sebagai variabel respon. Model pembelajaran discovery learning digunakan pada kelompok perlakuan, dan model pembelajaran langsung digunakan pada kelompok pembanding. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika dan skala minat belajar dan digunakan ANAVA dua jalan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) model pembelajaran dan minat belajar mempunyai pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa, dan (2) model pembelajaran discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran langsung. Kata kunci: model discovery learning, model langsung, minat belajar, hasil belajar matematika siswa. ABSTRACT The major objective of this research was to investigate the effects of applying discovery learning on mathematics achievement in terms of student's learning interest. The research methodology was a quasi-experimental and the design of the research was a 2x2 factorial. The research was conducted in SMP Negeri in Rantepao City in academic year 2014/2015. The population of research was made up of all seventh grade students of SMP Negeri Rantepao from where a sample of 78 students was obtained by using cluster random sampling technique. Learning model as the independent variable, student's learning interest as intervening variable, and mathematics achievement of student as response variable. The treatment class group taught by using Discovery learning model. While the comparison group was taught by Direct Instruction. The data were collected using the mathematics learning test instrument and learning interest scale. The data collected were analyzed with two way ANOVA. The findings showed that: (1) learning model and interest in learning have an effect on student learning outcomes, and (2) Discovery learning model is better than Direct Instruction. Keywords: discovery learning model, direct instruction, student interest, matemathics acievement.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi daripada kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan pragmatis. (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi 180 orang, dengan cluster random sampling berjumlah 80 orang yang terdiri dari 40 orang kelas A dan B. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen, desain faktorial 2 x 2. Uji statistik dengan statistik deskriptif, dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Sebelumnya dilakukan uji persyaratan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Hipotesis ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tepat dari pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa, dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis akan memperoleh hasil yang lebih baik dari pada mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis pembelajaran yang tepat digunakan adalah strategi pembelajaran Direct Instructional.            Kata Kunci: pengantar bisnis, kooperatif tipe TST, NHT, gaya belajar Abstract: The purpose of this study is to find out: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than that of the NHT cooperative type. (2) introductory student learning outcomes that have theoretical and pragmatic learning styles. (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. The research was conducted at Methodist University in Indonesia. A population of 180 people, with a cluster random sampling of 80 people consisting of 40 people class A and B. Quasi-experimental research methods, factorial design 2 x 2. Statistical tests with descriptive statistics, followed by inferential statistics two-way ANOVA with a significant level α = 0.05 continued with the Scheffe test. Previously performed requirements testing. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type were higher than that of the NHT type of cooperative; (2) the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have higher theoretical learning styles than pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. This hypothesis shows that the TSTS type of cooperative learning model is more appropriate than the NHT type of cooperative learning model in improving student business introductory learning outcomes, and students who have a theoretical learning style will get better results than students who have appropriate pragmatic learning styles of learning used is the Direct Instructional learning strategy. Keywords: business introduction, cooperative TST type, NHT, learning style

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING MODELS AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TOWARD MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT BY CONTROLLING STUDENTS’ NUMERIC APTITUDE

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-86
Author(s):  
NI Nyoman Kawiwati
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Learning Achievement

This research is to determine the effect of learning model and critical thinking skills toward mathematics learning achievement of class XI IPA students in senior high school in Gianyar by controlling students’ numeric aptitude. This research used treatment by level 2x2 design and analysis of covariance. The sample was 80 people using multistage random sampling. The results by controlling numeric aptitude are: students learning achievement taught using PAIKEM model is higher than those taught in conventional model. There is an interaction effect between learning model and critical thinking skills toward students’ mathematics achievement. Given high critical thinking skills, students taught using PAIKEM models displayed higher results compared to those in conventional learning who were best in a lower critical thinking skills. Finally, based on the results, it can be recommended to SMA Mathematics teachers to increase students’ Mathematics achievement by using PAIKEM model accurately and to see of students critical thinking skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document