scholarly journals A Nurse-Led Self-Management Support Intervention (ZENN) for Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Intervention Mapping: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Beck ◽  
Janet Been-Dahmen ◽  
Mariëlle Peeters ◽  
Jan Willem Grijpma ◽  
Heleen van der Stege ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Intervention Mapping ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Support Intervention ◽  
Intervention Mapping Protocol

BACKGROUND Optimal self-management in kidney transplant recipients is essential for patient and graft survival, reducing comorbidity and health care costs while improving the quality of life. However, there are few effective interventions aimed at providing self-management support after kidney transplantation. OBJECTIVE This study aims to systematically develop a nurse-led, self-management (support) intervention for kidney transplant recipients. METHODS The Intervention Mapping protocol was used to develop an intervention that incorporates kidney transplant recipients’ and nurses’ needs, and theories as well as evidence-based methods. The needs of recipients and nurses were assessed by reviewing the literature, conducting focus groups, individual interviews, and observations (step 1). Based on the needs assessment, Self-Regulation Theory, and the “5A’s” model, change objectives were formulated (step 2). Evidence-based methods to achieve these objectives were selected and subsequently translated into practical implementation strategies (step 3). Then, program materials and protocols were developed accordingly (step 4). The implementation to test the feasibility and acceptability was scheduled for 2015-2017 (step 5). The last step of Intervention Mapping, evaluation of the intervention, falls outside the scope of this paper (step 6). RESULTS The intervention was developed to optimize self-management (support) after kidney transplantation and targeted both kidney transplant recipients and nurse practitioners who delivered the intervention. The intervention was clustered into four 15-minute sessions that were combined with regular appointments at the outpatient clinic. Nurses received a training syllabus and were trained in communication techniques based on the principles of Solution-Focused Brief Therapy and Motivational Interviewing; this entailed guiding the patients to generate their own goals and solutions and focus on strengths and successes. Kidney transplant recipients were encouraged to assess self-management challenges using the Self-Management Web and subsequently develop specific goals, action plans, and pursuit skills to solve these challenges. CONCLUSIONS The Intervention Mapping protocol provided a rigorous framework to systematically develop a self-management intervention in which nurses and kidney transplant recipients’ needs, evidence-based methods, and theories were integrated. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR DERR1-10.2196/11856

scholarly journals Evaluating the feasibility of a nurse-led self-management support intervention for kidney transplant recipients: a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet M. J. Been-Dahmen ◽  
Denise K. Beck ◽  
Mariëlle A. C. Peeters ◽  
Heleen van der Stege ◽  
Mirjam Tielen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Support Intervention

scholarly journals Development of Self-Management Scale for Kidney Transplant Recipients, Including Management of Post-Transplantation Chronic Kidney Disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiho Kosaka ◽  
Makoto Tanaka ◽  
Tomoko Sakai ◽  
Shinji Tomikawa ◽  
Kazunari Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplantation

An evaluation scale is indispensable for the promotion of continuing, effective postkidney transplantation self-management behaviors. We aimed to develop and validate a new self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients to improve their long-term outcomes and prevent the recurrence of CKD complications. Two hundred and thirty-nine Japanese patients who had undergone kidney transplantation were recruited from three hospitals. The scale’s validity and reliability were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients. Scale items were selected by considering the findings of a clinical importance survey of 17 experts. Four subscales were identified by the factor analysis: “Self-monitoring” (six items), “Self-care behavior in daily living” (seven items), “Early detecting and coping with abnormalities after kidney transplantation” (four items), and “Stress management” (three items). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.61 to 0.87. A further four items with high clinical importance were added to the scale. The final scale comprised 24 items within four subscales and four single items. The intraclass correlation ranged from 0.88 to 0.95 in each subscale and the weighted kappa coefficient for the single items ranged from 0.33 to 0.72. The validity and reliability of our new self-management scale were confirmed by a patient-based field survey.

scholarly journals Current Pharmacological Intervention and Medical Management for Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 413
Author(s):  
Theerawut Klangjareonchai ◽  
Natsuki Eguchi ◽  
Ekamol Tantisattamo ◽  
Antoney J. Ferrey ◽  
Uttam Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Allograft ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Glucose Management

Hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation is common in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Both pretransplant and post-transplant diabetes mellitus are associated with increased kidney allograft failure and mortality. Glucose management may be challenging for kidney transplant recipients. The pathophysiology and pattern of hyperglycemia in patients following kidney transplantation is different from those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with pre-existing and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, there is limited data on the management of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation. The following article discusses the nomenclature and diagnosis of pre- and post-transplant diabetes mellitus, the impact of transplant-related hyperglycemia on patient and kidney allograft outcomes, risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hyperglycemia after kidney transplantation, glucose management before and after transplantation, and modalities for prevention of post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Fabry Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Diseases ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Maria L. Gonzalez Suarez ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Panupong Hansrivijit ◽  
Juan Medaura ◽  
Pradeep Vaitla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Fabry Disease ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Allograft Rejection ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Lysosomal Storage ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Enzyme Replacement

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder with progressive systemic deposition of globotriaosylceramide, leading to life-threatening cardiac, central nervous system, and kidney disease. Current therapy involves symptomatic medical management, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), dialysis, kidney transplantation, and, more recently, gene therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess outcomes of kidney transplantation among patients with FD. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database, from inception through to 28 February 2020, to identify studies that evaluate outcomes of kidney transplantation including patient and allograft survival among kidney transplant patients with FD. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined using the random-effects generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results: In total, 11 studies, including 424 kidney transplant recipients with FD, were enrolled. The post-transplant median follow-up time ranged from 3 to 11.5 years. Overall, the pooled estimated rates of all-cause graft failure, graft failure before death, and allograft rejection were 32.5% (95%CI: 23.9%–42.5%), 14.5% (95%CI: 8.4%–23.7%), and 20.2% (95%CI: 15.4%–25.9%), respectively. In the sensitivity analysis, limited only to the recent studies (year 2001 or newer when ERT became available), the pooled estimated rates of all-cause graft failure, graft failure before death, and allograft rejection were 28.1% (95%CI: 20.5%–37.3%), 11.7% (95%CI: 8.4%–16.0%), and 20.2% (95%CI: 15.5%–26.0%), respectively. The pooled estimated rate of biopsy proven FD recurrence was 11.1% (95%CI: 3.6%–29.4%), respectively. There are no significant differences in the risks of all-cause graft failure (p = 0.10) or mortality (0.48) among recipients with vs. without FD. Conclusions: Despite possible FD recurrence after transplantation of 11.1%, allograft and patient survival are comparable among kidney transplant recipients with vs. without FD.

FC 124PATTERNS OF RENAL OSTEODYSTROPHY ONE YEAR AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Skou Jørgensen ◽  
Geert Behets ◽  
Patrick D'Haese ◽  
Pieter Evenepoel
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Bone Turnover ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Renal Osteodystrophy ◽  
Bone Disease ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Steroid Dose ◽  
Bone Biopsies

Abstract Background and Aims Bone disease after kidney transplantation is an issue of growing concern, as prolonged graft survival and older age of recipients necessitate focus on long-term health burdens such as osteoporosis and fractures. Pre-existing type of renal osteodystrophy, post-transplant immunosuppressive treatment, and de novo disturbances of mineral metabolism all contribute to bone disease in kidney transplant recipients. The current pattern of renal osteodystrophy after kidney transplantation is not well characterized. This study reports histomorphometric findings of protocolled bone biopsies in a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients 1 year post-transplant. Method Histomorphometric analysis of transiliac bone biopsies with prior tetracycline labelling was performed in 141 kidney transplant recipients. Biochemical measurements included bioactive parathyroid hormone (PTH), total calcium, phosphate, calcidiol, bicarbonate, and sclerostin. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to evaluate differences across categories and between groups, respectively. Stepwise multivariate linear regression was performed to identify key demographic and biochemical determinants of bone turnover (bone formation rate, BFR), mineralization (mineralization lag time, Mlt), and volume (Bone area, BAr). Results Mean age was 57±11 years, 71% were men, and all were Caucasian. Mean eGFR was 49±16 (range 19 to 106) ml/min/1.73 m². Hyperparathyroidism (PTH > 1.5xUNL) was seen in 48%, hypercalcemia (>10.3 mg/dL) in 18%, hypophosphatemia (<2.3 mg/dl) in 12%, and vitamin D deficiency (<15 ng/mL) in 4% of patients. Categorization of bone turnover, mineralization, and volume is shown in Figure 1. Bone turnover was normal in the vast majority (71%). Patients with low turnover (26%) had received a higher cumulative steroid dose (2.78 vs 2.34g in low vs non-low turnover; p=0.02). Patients with delayed mineralization (16%) were younger (52 vs 58 yrs, p=0.02) and had received a higher cumulative steroid dose (2.85 vs 2.36g, p=0.003). They had higher levels of PTH (124 vs 53 ng/L, p<0.001), and lower levels of phosphate (2.68 vs 3.18 mg/dL, p<0.001), calcidiol (29 vs 37ug/L, p=0.02), bicarbonate (21.3 vs 23.3 mmol/L, p=0.004), and sclerostin (493 vs 594 pg/mL, p=0.03) compared to patients with normal mineralization. Patients with low bone volume tended to be older (61 vs 56 years, p=0.07). Independent determinants of BFR were PTH (β=0.68, p<0.001) and cumulative steroid dose (β = -0.22, p=0.02). Determinants of Mlt were phosphate (β=-0.48, p=0.001) and cumulative steroid dose (β=0.18, p=0.004), and determinants of BAr were age (β=-0.15, p=0.002), and BMI (β=0.33, p=0.002). Conclusion Bone turnover is normal in the majority of kidney transplant recipients at 1 year post-transplant, despite a high prevalence of hyperparathyroidism. Low levels of bicarbonate, phosphate, and calcidiol may contribute to delayed bone mineralization in kidney transplant recipients.

An Exploratory Correlational Study in the Use of Mobile Technology Among Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara O’Brien ◽  
Cynthia L. Russell ◽  
Alai Tan ◽  
Mallory Washington ◽  
Donna Hathaway
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Mobile Technology ◽  
Mobile Apps ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adult Kidney ◽  
Access Patterns ◽  
Management Of Care

Introduction: Rapidly growing use of mobile technology provides a platform for self-management of care support for those with chronic conditions. Few studies have explored the characteristics or access patterns of kidney transplant recipients who use mHealth applications (apps) for self-management of care. Research Questions: The primary aim of this study was to describe demographics, use, barriers, and perceptions of mobile apps for self-management of care among adult kidney transplants recipients. The secondary aim was to compare blood urea nitrogen, glomerular filtration rate, and number of hospitalizations among mHealth app users, other app users, and non-app users. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to administer the Mobile Application Use among Kidney Transplant Recipients Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, χ2 statistics, and analysis of variance were used for the primary aim and linear regression was used for the secondary aim. Results: The sample included mostly African American males (n = 123, 75.5%) with a mean age of 50 (13.2) years. Knowledge was the greatest barrier reported by the non-app users (mHealth app users 9%, other app users 12%, non-app users, 49%, P < .001). Significantly fewer hospitalizations were found in the mHealth app users compared to other app users (regression coefficient b = −1.2, standard error [SE] = 0.5) and non-app users ( b = −0.9, SE = 0.6), adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Discussion: Findings suggest a relationship may exist between mHealth app use and a decrease in the number of hospitalizations following kidney transplantation.

scholarly journals 2658. Meningitis in Kidney Transplant Recipients: TransMéninges, a French Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S930-S930
Author(s):  
Yanis Tamzali ◽  
Anne Scemla ◽  
Pierre Taupin ◽  
Sunny Randhawa ◽  
Valérie Moal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Immunosuppressive Treatment ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Specific Population ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Background The management of meningitis requires the prompt introduction of high-dose probabilistic anti-infectious therapy. The literature reporting on meningitis in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is scarce and no recommendation exists for this specific population. Methods We retrospectively included all adult KTRs diagnosed with meningitis (cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) cell count >10/mm3 or positive fungal antigen or direct examination) between 2007 and 2018 in 16 French hospitals. Clinical, biological, and therapeutic data, and 1-year kidney and patient survival were collected. Results Meningitis occurred in 134 KTRs (mean age 57+/11.8 years, 56% male), after a median time of 27 months (IQR 8–65); 25% of patients received an immunosuppressive treatment before kidney transplantation, induction treatment included lymphocyte-depleting antibodies in 63%, and 53% presented diabetes (34% before and 19% after the transplantation). The etiologies included Cryptococcus neoformans (30%), Herpesviridae (22%, including Varicella-Zoster Virus 15%), idiopathic forms (11%), Gram-negative bacilli (8% of which 20% produced an extended spectrum β-lactamase), %), infusion of intravenous immunoglobulins (6%), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (5%), Aspergillus fumigatus (4%), Listeria monocytogenes (4%), Enterovirus (4%), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (3%). The most common symptoms were fever (82.5%), headaches (75%), encephalitis (55%), and convulsion (22.5%). CSF hypercellularity (found in 92% of the cases) was lymphocytic in 65% of the cases and neutrophilic in 35%. Initial anti-infectious therapy was inappropriate in 27% of the cases. One-year patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival rates were 84%, 76%, and 89%, respectively. Conclusion Meningitis after kidney transplantation encompasses a wide range of causes, with C. neoformans and VZV explaining more than 50% of the cases. Gram-negative bacilli are the most represented bacteria with a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. Treatment guidelines should be reconsidered in the specific population of KTRs as the etiology greatly differs from what is observed in the general population. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Source of Post-Transplant Care and Mortality among Kidney Transplant Recipients Dually Enrolled in VA and Medicare

2021 ◽  
pp. CJN.10020620
Author(s):  
Winn Cashion ◽  
Walid F. Gellad ◽  
Florentina E. Sileanu ◽  
Maria K. Mor ◽  
Michael J. Fine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Veterans Health Administration ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Administration Hospital

Background and objectivesMany kidney transplant recipients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration are also enrolled in Medicare and eligible to receive both Veterans Health Administration and private sector care. Where these patients receive transplant care and its association with mortality are unknown.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of veterans who underwent kidney transplantation between 2008 and 2016 and were dually enrolled in Veterans Health Administration and Medicare at the time of surgery. We categorized patients on the basis of the source of transplant-related care (i.e., outpatient transplant visits, immunosuppressive medication prescriptions, calcineurin inhibitor measurements) delivered during the first year after transplantation defined as Veterans Health Administration only, Medicare only (i.e., outside Veterans Health Administration using Medicare), or dual care (mixed use of Veterans Health Administration and Medicare). Using multivariable Cox regression, we examined the independent association of post-transplant care source with mortality at 5 years after kidney transplantation.ResultsAmong 6206 dually enrolled veterans, 975 (16%) underwent transplantation at a Veterans Health Administration hospital and 5231 (84%) at a non–Veterans Health Administration hospital using Medicare. Post-transplant care was received by 752 patients (12%) through Veterans Health Administration only, 2092 (34%) through Medicare only, and 3362 (54%) through dual care. Compared with patients who were Veterans Health Administration only, 5-year mortality was significantly higher among patients who were Medicare only (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.1) and patients who were dual care (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.1).ConclusionsMost dually enrolled veterans underwent transplantation at a non–Veterans Health Administration transplant center using Medicare, yet many relied on Veterans Health Administration for some or all of their post-transplant care. Veterans who received Veterans Health Administration–only post-transplant care had the lowest 5-year mortality.

scholarly journals Correlation of Prolonged Total Ischemic Time with Body Mass Index in Kidney Transplant: A Single Center Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 1009-1013
Author(s):  
Eriawan Agung Nugroho ◽  
Erwin Wibowo ◽  
Prathita Amanda Aryani
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
The Body ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a rising health concern worldwide, especially in Indonesia. The treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease is Kidney Transplantation.1 Numerous studies showed that prolonged total ischemic ischemic time may cause hypoxia of the graft tissue and increased risk of ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) and delayed graft function (DGF).2 Body mass index of kidney transplant recipients may cause prolonged duration of the procedure, as well as prolonged total ischemic time. This study aimed to determine the correlation between prolonged total ischemic time with body mass index. Method: This was an observational and cross-sectional analysis at Kariadi General Hospital Semarang involving patients who underwent kidney transplantation from January 2016 to December 2019. The total ischemic time was recorded intraoperatively. The Body Mass Index data were provided by medical records. The program used to statistically analyze the data was SPSS 23.0, and Spearman was used for hypothesis testing. Result: This study included 25 kidney transplant recipients. The mean total ischemic time was 43,27 ± 6,63 minutes. There was a significant positive correlation between prolonged ischemic time and body mass index (r= 0,506 ; p= 0,010). Conclusion: Prolonged total ischemic time was positively correlated with increased body mass index and these results are statistically significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document