scholarly journals ANALISIS SITIRAN JURNAL PSIKOLOGI UGM TAHUN 1997-2006 Citation Analysis of Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal dating from 1997 to 2006.

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pergola Irianti ◽  
Sri Rochyanti Zulaikha

The study aims: (1 )to discover the foreign journal referred by the Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal dating from 1997 to 2006, (2) to know the percentage of use of the subscribed foreign journal by the Faculty Library of Psychology, Gadjah Mada University founded in Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal from 1997 to 2006, (3) to know the relevancy and use of foreign journal by the scientific article in the Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal dating from 1997 to 2006, (4) to know the currency of the foreign journal referred by Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal dating from 1997 to 2006. The study is a descriptive research with the Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal by 1997-2006 as a subject, and the foreign journals referred in Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal by 1997-2006 as an object. Documentation, and interview are used as methods of collecting data, and citation analysis as an data analysis. The result of study: (1) There are 148 titles offoreign journal cited in Gadjah Mada University Journal of Psychology dating from 1997-2006, including 14 titles of the journal subscribed by Faculty Library of Gadjah Mada University, (2) The freguence of the citation of the 14 titles was that: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology by 68 times (39,76%), Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology by 23 (13,45%), Journal of Applied Psychology by 21 (12,28%), Psychological Bulletin by 11 (6,43%), Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Journal of Counseling Psychology by 9 respectively ( 5,26%), Journal of Educational Psychology by 8 (4,67%), Developmental Psychology by 7 (4,09%), Journal of Occupational Psychology by 5 (2,92%), Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology and Psychological Review by 3 respectively (1,75%), Journal of Experimental Psychology by 2 (1,16%), American Psychologist and Health Psychology by 1 each (0,58%). (3) There are also a relevancy between the scientific article and the foreign journal referred, in the Gadjah Mada University Psychology Journal dating from 1997 to 2006 (4) The foreign journal subscribed by the Faculty Library of Psychology Gadjah Mada University was included in a current category (52,77%), not current category (45,47%), and more than 30 years (1,76%). Key words: use of journal, citation analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Sri Junandi

The study aims: (1) to discover the scientific paper librarians referred by the Visi Pustaka Journal in 2008-2013, (2) to know the percentage of use of the subscribed the scientific paper librarians, (3) to know the relevancy and use of scientific paper librarians by the Visi Pustaka in 2008-2013, (4) to know the currency of the scientific paper librarians referred by the Visi Pustaka Journal in 2008-2013.This study is a descriptive research, with Visi Pustaka Journal in 2008-2013 as a subject, and the scientific paper librarians referred in the Visi Pustaka Journal as an object. Documentation and interview are used as methods of collecting data, and citation analysis as an data analysis.The results of study: (1) There are 204 titles of scientific paper librarians are utilized in Vision Library consisting of 78 titles in the form of textbooks and 126 in the form of articles, The results also obtained from 204 scientific paper librarians title is the result of the work of some 109 librarians which consists of 31 forms of textbooks and 78 form the article. (2) Frequency of utilization of the scientific work of the highest librarians kind of text books which Sulistyo-Basuki by 11 times (5.39%) ; Lasa Hs by 10 (4.90%); Pendit, Putu Laxman by 8 (3.92%); Saleh, Abdul Rahman and Sutarno NS by 7 (3.43%); Qalyubi, Sihabbudin by 4 (1.96%); Soeatminah and Supriyanto, Wahyu by 3 (1.47%); Towa P. Hamakonda and Joseph M. Pawit by 2 (0.98%) and 21 other librarians by 1 (0.49%). While the use of scientific work of the highest librarians from the types of articles that Sulistyo-Basuki by 14 times (6.86%); Purnomowati, Sri by 8 (3.92%); Pendit, Putu Laxman by 5 (2.45%); 6 librarians namely Arif Surachman, Sri Hartinah, Hernandono, Neneng Komariah, Ida Fajar Priyanto, and Yaniasih respectively by 3 (1,47%); 12 librarians, each for 2 (0.98%) and 57 other librarians by 1 (0.49%). (3) There are also a relevancy between the scientific articles and the scientific paper librarians in the Visi Pustaka Journal in 208-2013, (4) The scientific paper librarians is used reference in Visi Pustaka Journal 2008-2013 in a current category 81.37%or equal to 166 citation, as is not currentcategory 18,63% or equal to 38 citation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge Nicolas ◽  
Zachary Levine

Though Alfred Binet was a prolific writer, many of his 1893–1903 works are not well known. This is partly due to a lack of English translations of the many important papers and books that he and his collaborators created during this period. Binet’s insights into intelligence testing are widely celebrated, but the centennial of his death provides an occasion to reexamine his other psychological examinations. His studies included many diverse aspects of mental life, including memory research and the science of testimony. Indeed, Binet was a pioneer of psychology and produced important research on cognitive and experimental psychology, developmental psychology, social psychology, and applied psychology. This paper seeks to elucidate these aspects of his work.


2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles T. Lockett

Charles Lockett is an Assistant Professor in the School of Psychology at James Madison University, where he teaches developmental psychology as well as advanced topic courses in cultural psychology and the psychology of race and racism. A graduate of Howard University, Lockett credits Howard's Preparing Future Faculty Fellowship Program for his grasp of classroom dynamics. Lockett's research focus is examining cultural and personal identity factors that lead to achievement among minority populations. Robert Serpell, Professor of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, is currently a visiting professor at the University of Malawi where he conducts applied developmental psychology research. He was the Director of the Doctoral Studies Program in Applied Developmental Psychology (1989 to 2001). Born and raised in England, with a BA (Oxford, 1965), and a PhD (Sussex, 1969), he is a citizen of Zambia and worked at the University of Zambia (1965 to 1989) as Head, Psychology Department, and Director, Institute for African Studies. His theoretical and applied research in Africa, Britain, and the United States has centered on the sociocultural context of children's cognitive development.


Author(s):  
Nandita Chaudhary ◽  
Sujata Sriram ◽  
Jaan Valsiner

Cultural psychology is a theoretical approach that treats human beings as intimately intertwined with the surrounding social world, which is filled with meanings conveyed through signs. It is based on the axiom that cultural contexts and psychological phenomena are assumed to be mutual, inseparable, and co-constructive. This focus fits the general scientific status of all open systems, which exist only due to the continuous exchange of materials with the environment. Cultural psychology is an integrated approach to psychology rather than a separate branch, as is sometimes believed, since psychology and culture “make each other up.” This involves constructive internalization (intra-mental construction of personal meanings) and equally constructive externalization (changing the environment in the direction specified by the internal meanings). As a collaborative, multidisciplinary perspective, cultural psychology is closely linked with disciplines like anthropology, sociology, linguistics, literature, and others. Cultural psychology focuses on the study of cultural—sign-mediating—processes within the mind. A common misconception relates to the fact that the term “cultural” refers to the study of similarities and differences between various communities. Rather than focusing on static comparisons, meaning-making and dynamic organization of personal and collective reality are studied. Differences between societies are important only as illustrations of the possible patterns of human psychological variation as they emerge in a particular time-space coordinate. Thus, another important axiom is that there can be no psychology without culture. Culture is constructed by goal-oriented human actions and involves continuous thought, action, and emotion in the face of uncertainty. Thus, the centrally important feature of cultural psychology is the inclusion of personal, interpersonal, and collective processes as they make up the different layers of meaning in irreversible time. Culture is both inside a person’s mind, as a personal manifestation, and also a shared system or collective set of customs. Cultural psychologists tend to treat the person as a whole rather than as separate different domains of activity because a comprehensive and multidimensional approach to a person within context is believed to be the key to meaning. Cultural psychology attempts to bring the notion of context into the central focus in psychology and the notion of person back into ethnography, as these are believed to be constructive. Context is viewed in two ways—as inevitably and inseparably linked with the phenomenon and as external social setting (e.g., home, school) in which human activities take place. Another important feature is that “cultural psychology is inherently a developmental discipline and developmental psychology is inherently cultural” (Shwartz, et al. 2020, p. 2). All levels of culturally organized human ways of living—persons, communities, societies—are constantly developing systems.


1975 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willy Canziani

A survey of the scientific work of the psychologist, Prof. Dr. Franziska Baumgarten, takes into consideration her research and her methods in the fields of occupational psychology, developmental psychology, professional ethics, and political and social psychology.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris HJ Hartgerink ◽  
Robbie CM van Aert ◽  
Michèle B Nuijten ◽  
Jelte M. Wicherts ◽  
Marcel ALM van Assen

Previous studies provided mixed findings on pecularities in p-value distributions in psychology. This paper examined 258,050 test results across 30,710 articles from eight high impact journals to investigate the existence of a peculiar prevalence of p-values just below .05 in the psychological literature, and a potential increase thereof over time. We indeed found evidence for a bump just below .05 in the distribution of exactly reported p-values in the journals Developmental Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, but the bump did not increase over the years and disappeared when using recalculated p-values. We found clear and direct evidence for the QRP ”incorrect rounding of p-value” (John et al., 2012) in all psychology journals. Finally, we also investigated monotonic excess of p-values, an effect of certain QRPs that has been neglected in previous research, and developed two measures to detect this by modeling the distributions of statistically significant p-values. Using simulations and applying the two measures to the retrieved test results, we argue that, although one of the measures suggests the use of QRPs in psychology, it is difficult to draw general conclusions concerning QRPs based on modeling of p-value distributions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin L Griffin

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to establish a core serials list for “Single doctoral”, Carnegie classification universities offering Doctor of Education (EdD) programs in educational leadership based on a sample of six institutions over a six-year period. Design/methodology/approach – A citation analysis was used using a descriptive research design. The population was all dissertations accepted for the award of the EdD degree in Educational Leadership from 2005 to 2010 at six peer institutions. From this population, 20 dissertations from each institution were randomly selected during the period under study. Data were extracted from the title pages and reference lists. Extracted data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Serial titles were ranked according to a frequency-weighted index formula, which recorded the serial titles cited by the greatest percentage of students. Findings – It was found that the serials with the highest frequency weight depended, in part, on the period studied. The findings also showed that 84.2 per cent of the serial citations were represented by four Library of Congress classification areas: education (L); social sciences (H); medicine (R) and philosophy, psychology and religion (B). In addition, it was found that EdD students cited serials aged 10 years or less more than other sources of information materials. Originality/value – While other citation analyses of dissertations have been done, including some that compare dissertations at more than one institution, the author could find no other study of EdD dissertations, specifically, across a nationwide group of peer institutions. Further, the author could find no other citation analysis covering as many as six continuous years, which made a difference in the most frequently cited serial titles.


1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-69
Author(s):  
Omar H. Khaleefa

General psychology includes many areas of investigation: biologicalbases of behavior, sensation and perception, consciousness andattention, motivation and emotion, conditioning, learning, cognition,language, thinking, remembering and forgetting, intelligence, and personality.During the first half of the twentieth century, psychologistsclassified themselves as structuralists, functionalists, behaviorists,gestaltists, psychoanalysts, existentialists, humanists, or cognitivists.Today, such classifications are little used in the West. If one looks at thepublications of the American Psychological Association and the BritishPsychological Society, psychologists classify themselves according totheir fields or specific topic of hterest, such as social psychology,developmental psychology, abnormal psychology, psychotherapy,counseling, occupational psychology, psychometrics, media, women,and so on. Several tools are used in psychology to study behavior,among them surveys, questionnaires, interviews, observations, experiments,and tests.Psychology is defined as the scientific study of human behavior, andits theories and methods are considered scientific and universal.According to this understanding, there are four important terms that need ...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document