scholarly journals HOW DOES CONGESTION MATTER FOR JAKARTA’S CITIZENS?

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonny Harry Budiutomo Harmadi
Keyword(s):  
Public Transportation ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Stated Preference ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Transportation Policy ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Conditional Logit ◽  
Operational Costs ◽  
Stated Preference Method ◽  
The Government

Jakarta, as the biggest city in Indonesia, faces many problems, one of which is congestion, that produces a high cost economy. It is predicted that if the government does not take immediate action to solve this problem, there will be a potential loss of IDR65 trillion by 2020 (Bappenas, 2007). This consists of IDR28.1 trillion in operational costs and IDR36.9 trillion in opportunity costs from time lost. This study is aimed at estimating how much Jakarta citizens’ are willing to pay to overcome the congestion problem. By using the stated preference method, the estimation result shows that the annual cost of congestion in Jakarta is estimated at IDR50.2 trillion a year. Furthermore, this result can be used as a baseline for a cost-benefit analysis by the government to generate a better public transportation policy in Jakarta.Keywords: willingness to pay, congestion, stated preference method, conditional logit

scholarly journals Prioritized list of health services in the Islamic Republic of Iran

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 367-371
Author(s):  
B. Larijani ◽  
O. Ameli ◽  
K. Alizadeh ◽  
S. R. Mirsharifi
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Islamic Republic ◽  
Therapeutic Procedures ◽  
Islamic Republic Of Iran ◽  
The Government

We aimed to provide a prioritized list of preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and their appropriate classification based on a cost-benefit analysis. Functional benchmarking was used to select a rationing model. Teams of qualified specialists working in community hospitals scored procedures from CPTTM according to their cost and benefit elements. The prioritized list of services model of Oregon, United States of America was selected as the functional benchmark. In contrast to its benchmark, our country’s prioritized list of services is primarily designed to help the government in policy-making with the rationing of health care resources, especially for hospitals

Cost–benefit analysis for applied public health economic evaluation

2019 ◽  
pp. 204-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma McIntosh ◽  
Camilla Baba ◽  
Willings Botha
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Stated Preference ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation ◽  
Public Health Intervention ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Process Outcomes

Chapter 9 introduces the reader to the stages of cost–benefit analysis (CBA) as specifically applied to public health intervention economic evaluation. The specific focus of this chapter follows on from the messages of Chapter 6 on the relevance of, and methods for, quantifying the ‘outcomes’ of public health interventions in monetary form for CBA. Two case studies focus on the use of stated preference discrete choice experiment (SPDCE) methodology for valuation of multi-attribute benefits comprising health, non-health, and process outcomes of the type likely to occur in PHIs.

scholarly journals L’industrie de l’amiante

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-284
Author(s):  
Roma Dauphin
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Asbestos Fiber ◽  
The Political ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Fiber Production ◽  
Asbestos Fibers ◽  
Political Forces ◽  
The Government

This study is comprised of two parts. The first is essentially descriptive and seeks to define with greater precision the nature of the Western world's asbestos fiber needs, account being made currently-known technology and the existence of substitutes. Asbestos ore reserves are then examined with a view to evaluating the constraints conditioning current asbestos fiber production. With the exception of that carried out in the U.S.S.R., this production is highly concentrated in Quebec whose surplus output is exported to every continent at prices that have experienced a staggering increase since 1973 even though international trade in asbestos fibers is conducted via multinational firms. The second part of the study contains a cost-benefit analysis of Quebec's new policy as well as a brief consideration of the political forces that have induced the Government of Quebec to adopt it.

scholarly journals Mortality-risk valuation, age and cause of death: out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-40
Author(s):  
Björn Sund
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Stated Preference ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Transport Sector ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Economic evaluation of policies regarding out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is important. The value of a statistical life (VSL) for OHCA victims is the most important component in a cost-benefit analysis of interventions that have the possibility to reduce mortality from this cause. This value is not known. We use responses to a national Swedish mail survey, based on the stated-preference technique to directly elicit individuals’ hypothetical willingness to pay for a reduced risk of dying from OHCA. A lower-bound estimate of VSL for OHCA would be in range of SEK 30 to 50 million. The value is found to be higher than for comparable VSL estimates from the transport sector, even though individuals who suffer OHCAs are generally older and less healthy than people who die in road traffic accidents. The results indicate that it is not an overestimation to use the ‘baseline’ VSL value from the transport sector (SEK 24 million) in cost-benefit analysis of OHCA policy decisions and that the cause of death is important when examining willingness to pay for death risk reductions. We do not support a general declining VSL due to the age of the victims, i.e. a ‘senior death discount’, for this cause of death.Published: Online January 2017. In print December 2017.

scholarly journals Cost-Benefit Analysis for a Quinquennial Census: The 2016 Population Census of South Africa

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce D. Spencer ◽  
Julian May ◽  
Steven Kenyon ◽  
Zachary Seeskin
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Population Estimates ◽  
Population Census ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Important Benefit ◽  
The Government ◽  
And Migration ◽  
The Cost

Abstract The question of whether to carry out a quinquennial Census is faced by national statistical offices in increasingly many countries, including Canada, Nigeria, Ireland, Australia, and South Africa. We describe uses and limitations of cost-benefit analysis in this decision problem in the case of the 2016 Census of South Africa. The government of South Africa needed to decide whether to conduct a 2016 Census or to rely on increasingly inaccurate postcensal estimates accounting for births, deaths, and migration since the previous (2011) Census. The cost-benefit analysis compared predicted costs of the 2016 Census to the benefits of improved allocation of intergovernmental revenue, which was considered by the government to be a critical use of the 2016 Census, although not the only important benefit. Without the 2016 Census, allocations would be based on population estimates. Accuracy of the postcensal estimates was estimated from the performance of past estimates, and the hypothetical expected reduction in errors in allocation due to the 2016 Census was estimated. A loss function was introduced to quantify the improvement in allocation. With this evidence, the government was able to decide not to conduct the 2016 Census, but instead to improve data and capacity for producing post-censal estimates.

scholarly journals Quality attributes in the non-market stated-preference based valuation of cultural goods

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (53) ◽  
pp. 132-150
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Wiśniewska
Keyword(s):  
Performing Arts ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Stated Preference ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Market Valuation ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cultural Goods ◽  
Arts And Culture ◽  
Art And Culture ◽  
Non Market Valuation

AbstractEvidence-based policies require well-established research and reliable data. One of the major difficulties in delivering such data for cultural policies lies in measuring culture, expressing its ephemeral nature in numbers and indicators, as research used to do in other sectors. Stated-preference based non-market valuation is one of the few tools able to reveal the benefits that cultural goods deliver to the society for cost–benefit analysis. The prevalent problem in this kind of studies is poorly defined, ambiguous goods. When attempting to define them, we cannot forget that the essence of art and culture, which is in itself worth measuring, is quality. The goal of the article was to review previous uses of quality measurements of arts and culture in stated-preference based non-market valuation research, most of which are dedicated to performing arts and cultural heritage.

scholarly journals What cost decisiveness? A cost benefit analysis of the lockdown to contain COVID-19 in India

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mousumi Dutta ◽  
Zakir Husain
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
National Level ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Considerable Controversy ◽  
The Government ◽  
Alternative Scenarios ◽  
Ball Point

AbstractOn 24th March, 2020 the Government of India announced a national level lockdown to contain the spread of COVID. The lockdown policy has generated considerable controversy, with critics arguing that it was done without adequate notice or planning, exposed vulnerable section of the population to a humanitarian crisis, and failed to contain the spread of COVID. In response, the Government has claimed that lockdown slowed the transmission process of COVID, thereby reducing the number of cases and deaths substantially. The consequent pressure on the health infrastructure was also much less. To judge between competing claims, this study has undertaken the first cost-benefit analysis of the world’s biggest lockdown. Although the data for a proper cost-benefit analysis is currently not available, we have made a ball point estimate of the net benefit of the lockdown under alternative scenarios. Our estimates reveal the net benefits of lockdown to be negative; moreover, the results are robust under all scenarios.

Liberia's External Debts and their Servicing

1972 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-626
Author(s):  
Robert L. Curry
Keyword(s):  
Recent Article ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Open Door ◽  
Focus Attention ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Open Door Policy ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Government

A recent article in this Journal, X, I, May 1972, by Robert E. Miller and Peter R. Carter on ‘A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Liberia’, examined the general cost pattern inherent in concession agreements based upon her ‘Open-Door Policy’, and noted that ‘officials of the Government of Liberia who are responsible for negotiating foreign concessionaire agreements… now recognise this pattern and hopefully plan better bargains in the future’. I wish to focus attention on Liberia's external debts, a particular cost largely resulting from that policy.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Policy Claims of Migration in Nepal

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asmod Karki
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Migration Decision ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Rural Settlements ◽  
Policy Paper ◽  
The Government ◽  
Rural Nepal ◽  
The Relationship

The Government of Nepal published the landmark Compact Rural Settlements Policy (CRSP) in 2013. The policy paper argued for clustering settlements in rural Nepal in order to improve quality of life for people. One of the main arguments of this paper is that rural out-migration happens due to lack of services. This paper analyzes the relationship between migration and availability of services in Nepal. The results demonstrate that the relationship among migration decision, availability of health and education services is statistically insignificant. In other words, the claims of the CRSP paper needs to be reevaluated and a comprehensive cost–benefit analysis of resettlements should be conducted before government led clustered settlements are built in the country.

scholarly journals Putting the Environment Into the NPV Calculation: Quantifying Pipeline Environmental Costs

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn R. Dott ◽  
S. C. Wirasinghe ◽  
Amit Chakma
Keyword(s):  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Stated Preference ◽  
Contingent Valuation Method ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Environmental Costs ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Monetary Value ◽  
Valuation Method ◽  
Risk Of Rupture ◽  
Evaluation Stage

Pipeline projects impact the environment through soil and habitat disturbance, noise during construction and compressor operation, river crossing disturbance and the risk of rupture. Assigning monetary value to these negative project consequences enables the environment to be represented in the project cost-benefit analysis. This paper presents the mechanics and implications of two environmental valuation techniques: (1) the contingent valuation method and (2) the stated preference method. The use of environmental value at the project economic-evaluation stage is explained. A summary of research done on relevant environmental attribute valuation is presented and discussed. Recommendations for further research in the field are made.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document