scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN ASAS KEADILAN BERIMBANG DALAM HUKUM KEWARISAN ISLAM DIKAITKAN DENGAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG R.I. NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEDOMAN MENGADILI PERKARA PEREMPUAN BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Haniah Ilhami
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
The Supreme Court

AbstractIdentifying the interrelation between the Principle of Equality of Justice in Islamic Inheritance Law and the Principle of Non-discrimination in Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 years 2017 concerning Guidance on Presecuting Legal Cases Involving Women, this normative research conducts legal comparisons using a conceptual approach. This research finds the independence the Principle of Equality of Justice, due to the application of the principle which is not determined by the Supreme Court Regulation No.3 / 2017. Furthermore, the principle does not substantially contradict with the Principle of Non-discrimination.IntisariPenelitian ini didasarkan pada adanya persinggungan antara Asas Keadilan Berimbang dengan konsep non diskriminasi yang diusung oleh PERMA No. 3/2017. Asas Keadilan Berimbang membedakan bagian antara ahli waris perempuan dan ahli waris laki-laki, sementara PERMA No.3/2017 melarang hakim untuk melakukan pembedaan ataupun pembatasan yang dibuat atas dasar jenis kelamin yang mempunyai dampak mengurangi hak-hak tertentu bagi para pihak yang berperkara di pengadilan. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengkaji kedudukan asas Keadilan Berimbang dalam penyelesaian perkara waris Islam pasca ditetapkannya PERMA No. 3/2017. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dalam bentuk perbandingan hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Asas Keadilan Berimbang merupakan asas yang independen karena penerapan dan penegakannya tidak bergantung serta tidak bertentangan dengan prinsip Non Diskriminasi yang diatur dalam PERMA No.3/2017.

scholarly journals Czy przebaczenie niweczy skutki uprzedniego wydziedziczenia?

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 143-153
Author(s):  
Anna Moskal
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Dominant Position ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Lower Courts ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Made In

Does forgiveness nullify the effects of previous disinheritance? The legal nature of forgiveness is the subject of passionate debates among the representatives of civil law doctrine. According to the dominant position in the literature, forgiveness is an act of affection or its manifested expression of forgiveness of the perpetrator of experienced injustice and related to this grudge. This institution has been applied three times in the Civil Code — once with the donation agreement, twice in regulations of inheritance law. Article 1010 § 1 provides that a testator cannot disinherit eligible for legal portion if he forgave him. The wording of the above article indicates that accomplishment of disinheritance in case if testator eligible for legal portion has previously forgiven. The legislator did not, however, determine the effects of forgiveness in relation to previous disinheritance. In the act of 1971, the Supreme Court accepted that such forgiveness would automatically nullify the effects of disinheritance, and could be made in any form. In recent years, lower courts have begun to question the Supreme Court's position, and judges increasingly refer to the critical statements of numerous doctrines. As it was rightly stated, admitting the possibility of invoking the forgiveness made after disinheritance poses a serious threat to the realization of the testator’s will, who, by forgiving, does not necessarily want to revoke the effects of his previous disinheritance. The postulate of de lege ferenda is, according to the author of the article, giving of freedom of judging the effects of forgiveness to the courts and each examination of the forgiving testator’s will on the possible abatement of the consequences of previous disinheritance.]]>

DISSENTING OPINION PUTUSAN SENGKETA MEREK PIERRE CARDIN INDONESIA MELAWAN PIERRE CARDIN PERANCIS DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM ISLAM: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Masrifatun Mahmudah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Bad Faith ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
The Supreme Court

<p>This article intents to examine the dissenting opinion in the judges consideration on the Supreme Court Decision No. 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015. This article is normative research with statute approach dan conceptual approach. The legal material on this research consist of primery legal materials namely Law No. 15 of 2001 on Trademark and Supreme Court Decision No. 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015, while the secondary legal materials are books, journals, research related to trademarks. The judge decide to reject the application of Pierre Cardin because the petition of Pierre Cardin has passed a period of five years from the registration of Pierre Cardin Indonesia. However, the conclusion of this study revealed that Pierre Cardin entitled to be protected because it is a well-known mark. Finally, Pierre Cardin Indonesia has violeted the terms of article 4 jo article 6 paragraph (1) letter b of Trademark Law because he has a bad faith and had imitated the well-known mark.</p>

scholarly journals The Problematics of Simple Lawsuit Implementation To Reduce Civil Cases In Supreme Court

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-194
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng ◽  
Zahry Vandawati Ch.
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Simple System ◽  
State Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Process

This research has purpose to analyze the implementation of a simple lawsuit settlement to reduce the accumulation of civil cases in the Supreme Court. Also to analyze the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases and investigate the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases. This research is normative legal research that used the approach of statute approach and conceptual approach. The result of this research indicated that the implementation of simple lawsuit mechanismin court process could be quite helpful for citizen to settle the civil cases on state court with a quick process, simple system and low cost. In the context of implementing a simple lawsuit mechanism in court proceedings, there are several obstacles and have not maximally utilized in society, such as the minimum limit for the value of material claims is at most Rp. 200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiahs).

scholarly journals Jurisdiction Analysis of The Distribution of Integrity Children Out of Marriage as Substitute Heritages (Study of The Supreme Court Decision Number: 784 K/Pdt/2014)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (01) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Gagah Hotma Parulian Siregar ◽  
Widhi Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Main Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Research Problems

 Many problems regarding inheritance law occur due to distribution that is not in accordance with applicable regulations. In the Supreme Court Decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014, the main research problems are: (1) How is the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs based on the Civil Code study of the Supreme Court's decision number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 . (2) Is the content of the Supreme Court's order Number: 784/Pdt/2014 concerning the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs appropriate or not according to the Civil Code. This type of research is normative juridical. The data used are secondary data, library study data collection and qualitative data analysis and deductive method conclusions. The conclusion of this decision study states that (1) the heirs to the inheritance of the Supreme Court decision study number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 are Dewina Tjandra, Trisnani Tjandra, Patty Tjandra, Sarina Tjandra, Arifin Tjandra, Ony Tjandra, and Fitri Tjandra . (2) The Supreme Court's decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014 regarding the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as substitute heirs is not in accordance with Article 842 of the Civil Code.   

scholarly journals COVID-19 PANDEMIC AS A FORCE MAJEURE FOR MASSIVE LAYOFFS

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mustakim ◽  
Syafrida Syafrida
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
The Supreme Court

The fact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemics was often made as a reason by a lot of companies to conduct massive layoffs (PHK) in Indonesia. The regulation about force majeure to do massive layoffs (PHK) could only be found in Article 164 Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment and it is not that specific about what kind of condition which could be categorized as force majeure that enables companies to conduct massive layoffs PHK. The statement of problem of this research is the spread of Covid-19 a condition categorized as force majeure that could become the reason to do a massive layoffs and how is the legal protection of worker toward the layoffs during the Covid-19 pandemics? This is normative research with constitutional and conceptual approach. The result from the observation and analysis indicated that the Covid-19 pandemics could be qualified as a force majeure but to conduct massive layoffs the companies need to experience loss or disadvantage and already closed permanently or massive layoffs is conducted for efficiency as what has been regulated by Article 164 point (1) and (3) Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment by doing some steps in advance as stated in Minister Hand-outs  No. SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, 28th October 2004 and the decision of the Supreme Court No. 19/PUU-IX/2011, 20th June 2012. 

scholarly journals Pandemi Covid-19 Sebagai Alasan Force Majeure Dalam Melakukan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 695-706
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mustakim ◽  
Syafrida Syafrida
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Work Relationship

AbstractThe fact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemics was often made as a reason by a lot of companies to conduct massive layoffs (PHK) in Indonesia. The regulation about force majeure to do massive layoffs (PHK) could only be found in Article 164 Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment and it is not that specific about what kind of condition which could be categorized as force majeure that enables companies to conduct massive layoffs PHK. The statement of problem of this research is the spread of Covid-19 a condition categorized as force majeure that could become the reason to do a massive layoffs and how is the legal protection of worker toward the layoffs during the Covid-19 pandemics? This is normative research with constitutional and conceptual approach. The result from the observation and analysis indicated that the Covid-19 pandemics could be qualified as a force majeure but to conduct massive layoffs the companies need to experience loss or disadvantage and already closed permanently or massive layoffs is conducted for efficiency as what has been regulated by Article 164 point (1) and (3) Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment by doing some steps in advance as stated in Minister Hand-outs  No. SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, 28th October 2004 and the decision of the Supreme Court No. 19/PUU-IX/2011, 20th June 2012.  Keywords: Work relationship, massive layoffs, Covid-19 ABSTRAKFakta penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) banyak dijadikan alasan bagi perusahaan-perusahaan untuk melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) d Indonesia. Pengaturan mengenai alasan force majeure dalam melakukan PHK hanya terdapat dalam Pasal 164 Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan tidak terlalu rinci bagaimana kondisi yang dapat dikualifikasi sebagai force majeure sehingga perusahaan dapat melakukan PHK. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah apakah penyebaran Covid-19 merupakan kondisi yang dikualifikasi force majeure sehingga dapat dijadikan alasan untuk melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum pekerja atas pemutusan hubungan kerja yang terjadi pada masa penyebaran Covid-19 ? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konsep. Dari hasil penelusuran dan analisis dapat ditegaskan penyebaran Covid-19 dapat dikualifikasi sebagai keadaan memaksa namun untuk melakukan PHK perusahaan harus mengalami kerugian dan telah tutup secara permanen  atau PHK dilakukan dengan alasan efisiensi sebagaimana diatur Pasal 164 ayat (1) dan (3) Undang-Undang No. 13 Taun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan  dengan terlebih dahulu  melakukan langkah-langkah dalam Surat Edaran Menteri Nomor SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, tertanggal 28 Oktober 2004 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 19/PUU-IX/2011, tertanggal 20 Juni 2012. Kata kunci : Hubungan Kerja, Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja, Covid-19

ANALYSIS OF ELEMENT ‘UNLAWFUL’ OF CORRUPTION IN THE BANKING SECTOR (STUDY OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 1812 K / PID.SUS / 2014)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Angga Wijaya Holman Fasa ◽  
Ferianto Ferianto ◽  
Tommy Hendrix
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Banking Service ◽  
The Supreme Court

The banking sector as one of the drivers of the national economy plays an important role in funding a business through bank credit distributing activities. In practice, this banking service raises legal problems, not only banking crimes but also corruption. Supreme Court Decision No. 1812 K / PID.SUS / 2014 on behalf of the Defendant Dian Siswanto, S.E. MM., in the case of a corruption shows this. This paper examines the element of unlawful and abuse of authority in cases of corruption in the banking sector. The research method used is normative law which is prescriptive with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The results show 2 (two) things, first, that the defendant's actions met the unlawful element in the act of corruption as charged in the primary indictment. Second, the judge had wrongly in the application of law based on the subsidiary indictment concerning abuse of authority which was not fulfilled. The judge in this case, was not punctilious in digging up legal facts and was not correct in applying the law. Therefore, in the case of deciding a case, if the charges are of subsidiarity, the judge should prove the primary indictment carefully before deciding based on the subsidiary indictment to create justice, benefit and legal certainty in law enforcement in general, and especially for the accused.

scholarly journals Standard Issuance of Circular Letters in The Implementation Of Judicial Power

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 03021
Author(s):  
Rahadi Wasi Bintoro ◽  
Abdul Shomad ◽  
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court

Circular issued by state institutions in the framework of the freies ermessen principle. Circular in administrative law is known as policy regulation/ belleidsregel. The Supreme Court as a state institution also has the authority to issue circular letters. This paper focused on the standard circular issued by the Supreme Court. This paper was legal research that was carried out with the statute approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis, circulars issued by the supreme court contained restrictions, namely that they should not influence the judge in examining the case.

scholarly journals URGENSI PEMBANGUNAN YURISPRUDENSI PEMIDANAAN KORPORASI PELAKU KORUPSI UNTUK EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA / URGENCY OF JURISPRUDENCY DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATION PUNISHMENT OF CORRUPTION ACTORS FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 459
Author(s):  
Budi Suhariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Supreme Court

Realitas pemberantasan tindak pidana korporasi di Indonesia banyak mengalami kendala, termasuk dalam perkara korupsi. Ketiadaan yurisprudensi yang bisa dijadikan pedoman bagi penegak hukum dan hakim menjadi persoalan yang mendasar dalam mengatasi kegalauan yang selama ini ada.Menarik dipermasalahkan yaitu bagaimanakah urgensi pembangunan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasi Pelaku korupsi untuk efektivitas penegakan hukum di Indonesia? Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendorong Mahkamah Agung menginisiasi pembentukan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasiPelaku korupsi. Jika telah ditetapkan sebagai yurisprudensi dapat berguna sebagai inspirasi dan dipedomani oleh penegak hukum dan hakim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatankasus. Hasil pembahasan mengemukakan bahwa beberapa putusan pemidanaan terhadap korporasi Pelaku korupsi memiliki kaidah hukum baru yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian penegak hukum dan hakim Pengadilan Tipikor. Kaidah hukum baru tersebut perlu dipertimbangkan untuk dijadikan yurisprudensi sehingga bisa menjadi solusi atas kendala efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi korporasi yang selama ini ada. Mengingat persyaratan yurisprudensi pemidanaan korporasi Pelaku korupsi telah terpenuhi maka sesegera mungkin dapat dimulai proses dan tahapannya oleh Mahkamah Agung.The reality of the eradication of corporate crime in Indonesia has many obstacles, including in corruption cases. The absence of jurisprudence that can be used as a guide for law enforcers and judges to be a fundamental problem in overcoming the turmoil that has been there. Interest in question is how urgency of jurisprudence development corporations corruption Actors of corruption for the effectiveness of law enforcement in Indonesia? The purpose of this study is to encourage the Supreme Court to initiate the formation of corporate criminal prosecution jurisprudence. If it has been established as jurisprudence can be useful as an inspiration and guided by law enforcement and judges. This research uses normative research method with the approach of legislation, conceptual approach and approach of case. The results of the argument suggest that some criminal verdicts against corporations Perpetrators of corruption have new legal rules that need to get the attention of law enforcers and judges of the Corruption Court. The new law rules need to be considered for jurisprudence so that it can be a solution to the obstacles to the effectiveness of corruption eradication of corporations that have been there. In view of the requirements of corporations punishment lawsuit The perpetrators of corruption have been fulfilled as soon as possible can begin the process and its stages by the Supreme Court.

scholarly journals THE SHIFT OF KARO ADAT INHERITANCE LAW ON DAUGHTER AND WIDOW’S PORTION

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
. Rosnidar ◽  
. Afrita ◽  
. Zulkifli
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Status ◽  
Equal Right

Supreme Court Verdict No. 179 K/Sip/ 1961 states that son and daughter have equal portion of inheritance. Then, the Supreme Court Verdict No. 100 K/Sip/1967 stated that  a widow is the recipient of her deceased husband’s legacy. The research formulates the following questions; What is the status of a daughter and widow in relation to the inheritance of her parent/ husband legacy in Karo communities after the Supreme Court Verdict No. 179 K/Sip/ 1961 and Supreme Court Verdict No. 100 K/Sip/ 1967 that have been implemented? How does the inheritance law develop recently? These questions will be addressed empirically by a descriptive analytical method. The shift of adat inheritance law occurs post Supreme Court Verdict No. 179 K/Sip/ 1961 which puts the equal right for both son and daughter. Besides, the post Supreme Court Verdict No. 100 K/Sip/ 1967 states the widow is the recipient of her deceased husband’s legacy.Keywords  : Karo adat inheritance law, daughter/widow, Supreme Court Verdict

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document