scholarly journals COVID-19 PANDEMIC AS A FORCE MAJEURE FOR MASSIVE LAYOFFS

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mustakim ◽  
Syafrida Syafrida
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
The Supreme Court

The fact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemics was often made as a reason by a lot of companies to conduct massive layoffs (PHK) in Indonesia. The regulation about force majeure to do massive layoffs (PHK) could only be found in Article 164 Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment and it is not that specific about what kind of condition which could be categorized as force majeure that enables companies to conduct massive layoffs PHK. The statement of problem of this research is the spread of Covid-19 a condition categorized as force majeure that could become the reason to do a massive layoffs and how is the legal protection of worker toward the layoffs during the Covid-19 pandemics? This is normative research with constitutional and conceptual approach. The result from the observation and analysis indicated that the Covid-19 pandemics could be qualified as a force majeure but to conduct massive layoffs the companies need to experience loss or disadvantage and already closed permanently or massive layoffs is conducted for efficiency as what has been regulated by Article 164 point (1) and (3) Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment by doing some steps in advance as stated in Minister Hand-outs  No. SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, 28th October 2004 and the decision of the Supreme Court No. 19/PUU-IX/2011, 20th June 2012. 

scholarly journals Pandemi Covid-19 Sebagai Alasan Force Majeure Dalam Melakukan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 695-706
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mustakim ◽  
Syafrida Syafrida
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Work Relationship

AbstractThe fact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemics was often made as a reason by a lot of companies to conduct massive layoffs (PHK) in Indonesia. The regulation about force majeure to do massive layoffs (PHK) could only be found in Article 164 Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment and it is not that specific about what kind of condition which could be categorized as force majeure that enables companies to conduct massive layoffs PHK. The statement of problem of this research is the spread of Covid-19 a condition categorized as force majeure that could become the reason to do a massive layoffs and how is the legal protection of worker toward the layoffs during the Covid-19 pandemics? This is normative research with constitutional and conceptual approach. The result from the observation and analysis indicated that the Covid-19 pandemics could be qualified as a force majeure but to conduct massive layoffs the companies need to experience loss or disadvantage and already closed permanently or massive layoffs is conducted for efficiency as what has been regulated by Article 164 point (1) and (3) Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment by doing some steps in advance as stated in Minister Hand-outs  No. SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, 28th October 2004 and the decision of the Supreme Court No. 19/PUU-IX/2011, 20th June 2012.  Keywords: Work relationship, massive layoffs, Covid-19 ABSTRAKFakta penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) banyak dijadikan alasan bagi perusahaan-perusahaan untuk melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) d Indonesia. Pengaturan mengenai alasan force majeure dalam melakukan PHK hanya terdapat dalam Pasal 164 Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan tidak terlalu rinci bagaimana kondisi yang dapat dikualifikasi sebagai force majeure sehingga perusahaan dapat melakukan PHK. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah apakah penyebaran Covid-19 merupakan kondisi yang dikualifikasi force majeure sehingga dapat dijadikan alasan untuk melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum pekerja atas pemutusan hubungan kerja yang terjadi pada masa penyebaran Covid-19 ? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konsep. Dari hasil penelusuran dan analisis dapat ditegaskan penyebaran Covid-19 dapat dikualifikasi sebagai keadaan memaksa namun untuk melakukan PHK perusahaan harus mengalami kerugian dan telah tutup secara permanen  atau PHK dilakukan dengan alasan efisiensi sebagaimana diatur Pasal 164 ayat (1) dan (3) Undang-Undang No. 13 Taun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan  dengan terlebih dahulu  melakukan langkah-langkah dalam Surat Edaran Menteri Nomor SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, tertanggal 28 Oktober 2004 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 19/PUU-IX/2011, tertanggal 20 Juni 2012. Kata kunci : Hubungan Kerja, Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja, Covid-19

scholarly journals Eksistensi Perjanjian Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Kunarso Kunarso ◽  
A Djoko Sumaryanto
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Large Population ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
The World

Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has a significant impact on all aspects of human life in the world, especially in Indonesia which is very large in area and has a large population (around 267 million people) with different kinds of professions. The purpose of this study is to focus on civil matters, with more emphasis on the problem of agreements that are influenced by Covid-19. The normative legal research method uses a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach to force majeure and describes an analysis (analytical descriptive). The results showed that the agreement in the state of the Covid-19 outbreak greatly influenced the implementation of the agreement set and agreed upon by the parties, because the agreement binds the parties, so the parties are subject to the contents of the agreement.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMENANG LELANG OBYEK HAK TANGGUNGAN DARI GUGATAN PERDATA PIHAK KETIGA

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-49
Author(s):  
Firman Angga
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
District Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Winning Bidder

In practice, the auction, although carried out in accordance with applicable regulations, is sometimes still sued in the District Court, the High Court even to the Supreme Court. The results of the supreme court's decision were canceled. Regarding this matter, of course the auction winner is very disadvantaged. The problem to be known in this scientific work is a form of legal protection against the winning bidder for the execution of Mortgage, and how to settle if there are obstacles in the implementation of the auction. This scientific work uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The results obtained from this study are that the form of legal protection for auction winners who have good intentions is: 1) Submitting resistance (Derden Verzet) to the execution of the verdict. This resistance is submitted to the Chairperson of the District Court whose confiscation occurs in his jurisdiction, both verbally and in writing, 2) Submitting a request for legal protection for the decision to cancel the auction and re-execute. The method of settlement if there is an obstacle in the implementation of the auction for the Mortgage by means of the debtor paying the amount of debt and other costs as stated in the contents of the decision if the obstacles arise during the auction. Whereas the method of settlement after the auction, is the creditor as the buyer and the winner of the auction of the Mortgage resistance (derden verset) by suing the debtor to court with a claim for compensation for all costs of conducting the auction that has been carried out and canceled by the court. Furthermore, Bank Rakyat Indonesia as the creditor holds the default debtor accountable to immediately fulfill the defaulted debt by re-executing

DISSENTING OPINION PUTUSAN SENGKETA MEREK PIERRE CARDIN INDONESIA MELAWAN PIERRE CARDIN PERANCIS DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM ISLAM: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Masrifatun Mahmudah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Bad Faith ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
The Supreme Court

<p>This article intents to examine the dissenting opinion in the judges consideration on the Supreme Court Decision No. 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015. This article is normative research with statute approach dan conceptual approach. The legal material on this research consist of primery legal materials namely Law No. 15 of 2001 on Trademark and Supreme Court Decision No. 557 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015, while the secondary legal materials are books, journals, research related to trademarks. The judge decide to reject the application of Pierre Cardin because the petition of Pierre Cardin has passed a period of five years from the registration of Pierre Cardin Indonesia. However, the conclusion of this study revealed that Pierre Cardin entitled to be protected because it is a well-known mark. Finally, Pierre Cardin Indonesia has violeted the terms of article 4 jo article 6 paragraph (1) letter b of Trademark Law because he has a bad faith and had imitated the well-known mark.</p>

scholarly journals Perlindungan Pekerja/Buruh yang Bekerja di Masa Darurat COVID-19 dalam Prespektif Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1111
Author(s):  
Risma Fitri Amalina
Keyword(s):  
Work Environment ◽  
Occupational Safety ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Occupational Illness ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIn Indonesia, currently the number of victims infected with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is increasing, causing death. The impact of Covid-19 on the labor sector, namely company closures, delays in mobilization and decreased productivity. The research was conducted using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that the Covid-19 virus was a disease caused by biological exposure factors. What employers can give workers / laborers in the work environment during the Covid-19 pandemic is the right to Occupational Safety and Health (K3). K3 is a protection that must be received by workers in order to prevent accidents in the work environment. In accordance with the mandate of the Work Safety Law and the Labor Law, workers infected with the Covid-19 virus can recover to their original state if they are given adequate health insurance by the state. However, until now there has been no latest legal regulation regarding the protection of workers who work amid Covid-19. Keywords: Occupational Health and Safety; COVID-19; Occupational Illness; Health insurance.AbstrakDi Indonesia saat ini jumlah korban yang terinfeksi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) semakin meningkat sehingga menyebabkan kematian. Dampak Covid-19 pada sektor ketenagakerjaan yakni penutupan perusahaan, keterlambatan mobilisasi dan menurunnya produktivitas. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa virus Covid-19 termasuk ke dalam penyakit akibat faktor pajanan biologi. Hal yang dapat diberikan pengusaha kepada pekerja/buruh di lingkungan kerja selama pandemi Covid-19 adalah hak atas Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3). K3 merupakan perlindungan yang wajib diterima oleh pekerja guna mencegah terjadinya kecelakaan di lingkungan kerja. Sesuai dengan amanat UU Keselamatan Kerja dan UU Ketenagakerjaan, pekerja yang terinfeksi virus Covid-19, dapat pulih seperti keadaan semula apabila diberikan jaminan kesehatan yang memadai oleh negara. Namun, sampai saat ini belum ada peraturan hukum terbaru terkait perlindungan pekerja yang bekerja ditengah Covid-19. Kata Kunci: Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja; COVID-19; Penyakit Akibat Kerja; Jaminan Kesehatan.

scholarly journals IMPACT ON EMPLOYEES DURING PANDEMIC BASE ON LABOR SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-186
Author(s):  
Suci Flambonita ◽  
Wahyu Ernaningsih ◽  
Vera Novianti
Keyword(s):  
Logical Consequence ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Basic Rights ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Labor System

The fourth paragraph at the opening of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the Government of the Republic of Indonesia is obliged to protect the entire Indonesian nation, promote the general welfare, and educate the nation's life which is a manifestation of the responsibility of the state which is obliged to create welfare for its people fairly and equitably equally. This constitutional mandate is spelled out in the form of regulations aimed at preventing injustice from the stronger party against the weaker party so that a just and peaceful society can be created. The method used to analyze this problem is through normative and empirical mix and match. The approach used in this study is a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Legal protection for workers is an obligation for the fulfillment of basic rights inherent and protected by the constitution as regulated in Article 27 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The logical consequence of this mandate is the birth of the State's obligation to accommodate facilities and the widest possible opportunity for the community so that they can get a job as well as make it something worthy of humanity. Thus, the violation of basic rights guaranteed by the constitution is a violation of human rights. Protection of workers is regulated in Articles 67 to 101 of the Manpower Law, including those concerning wages and welfare. However, when faced with the COVID-19 pandemic situation, the company immediately provided a force majeure reason to avoid paying severance pay for workers/laborers affected by layoffs. The problem that occurs, in this case, is the termination of employment carried out by companies using force majeure reasons by companies in Indonesia unilaterally. Keywords: Impact, Employees, Pandemic

scholarly journals The Problematics of Simple Lawsuit Implementation To Reduce Civil Cases In Supreme Court

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-194
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng ◽  
Zahry Vandawati Ch.
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Simple System ◽  
State Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Process

This research has purpose to analyze the implementation of a simple lawsuit settlement to reduce the accumulation of civil cases in the Supreme Court. Also to analyze the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases and investigate the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases. This research is normative legal research that used the approach of statute approach and conceptual approach. The result of this research indicated that the implementation of simple lawsuit mechanismin court process could be quite helpful for citizen to settle the civil cases on state court with a quick process, simple system and low cost. In the context of implementing a simple lawsuit mechanism in court proceedings, there are several obstacles and have not maximally utilized in society, such as the minimum limit for the value of material claims is at most Rp. 200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiahs).

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH MENGENAI PENANGANAN PANDEMI VIRUS CORONA DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-58
Author(s):  
Anwar Hidayat ◽  
Budiman
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact

Perkembangan pandemi Covid-19 saat ini sangat mengkhawatirkan dimana terjadinya suatupeningkatan kasus corona khusus di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahuidan menganalisis kebijakan yang diambil pemerintah dalam penanganan pandemi Covid-19serta langkah-langkah yang diambil pemerintah untuk menganggulangi dampak-dampak, terutama dampak dari segi ekonomi dan sosial akibat pandemi Covid-19. Metode penelitianhukum yang digunakan yakni metode penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan yangdigunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatankonseptual. Penelitian ini berlandaskan pengaturan perundang-undangan yang mengaturmengenai penanganan dan penganggulangan pandemi Covid-19 serta analisis atas konseppenetapan peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalamrangka penanganan Covid-19, berawal dari pemerintah tmengeluarkan kebijakan tentangPembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang merujuk pada Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Peraturan pelaksanaannya yaitu PeraturanPemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar, sertaKeputusan Presiden tentang Kedaruratan Kesehatan sampai dengan saat ini pemerintah telahmengeluarkan kebijakan PPKM yang dimana dilakukan secara berkala. Untukmenganggulangi dampak Covid-19 dari segi ekonomi dan sosial pemerintah mengambilbeberapa kebijakan-kebijakan, yang diantaranya adalah: Peraturan Menteri KeuanganRepublik Indonesia Nomor 23/Pmk.03/2020 tentang Insentif Pajak Untuk WajibPajakTerdampak Wabah Virus Corona; Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Kata Kunci : Kebijakan, Penanganan, Covid-19 The current development of the Covid-19 pandemic is very worrying where there is anincrease in special corona cases in Indonesia. This study aims to identify and analyze thepolicies taken by the government in handling the Covid-19 pandemic and the steps taken bythe government to mitigate the impacts, especially the economic and social impacts of theCovid-19 pandemic. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Thisresearch is based on the legislation governing the handling and handling of the Covid-19pandemic as well as an analysis of the concept of establishing these laws and regulations. The results of this study are in the context of handling Covid-19, starting with thegovernment issuing a policy on Large-Scale Social Restrictions which refers to Law Number6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine. The implementing regulations are GovernmentRegulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions, as well as thePresidential Decree on Health Emergencies. Until now, the government has issued a PPKMpolicy which is carried out regularly. To address the economic and social impact of Covid- 19, the government has taken several policies, including: Regulation of the Minister ofFinance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23/Pmk.03/2020 concerning Tax Incentives forTaxpayers Af ected by the Corona Virus Outbreak; Regulation of the Financial ServicesAuthority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 /Pojk.03/2020 concerning NationalEconomic Stimulus as a Countercyclical Policy for the Impact of the Spread of Corona VirusDisease2019; and Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of2020 concerning Refocussing of Activities, Reallocation of Budgets, and Procurement ofGoods and Services in the Context of Accelerating Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019(Covid-19). Keyword : Policy, Handling, Covid-19

scholarly journals PENGAWASAN OMBUDSMAN TERHADAP PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA MASA PANDEMI CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Inggit Akim
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Work From Home ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
Social Restriction ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

ABSTRACTSupervise the government as the provider of public services to carry out their duties and authorities under applicable regulations. Large-Scale Social Restrictions are restrictions on certain activities in an area suspected of being infected with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which causes the quality of public services to be disrupted. The Ombudsman has the task of supervising the implementation of shared services organized by state or government officials and private or individual bodies assigned the task of providing services according to minimum service standards as a benchmark for service delivery and assessing the quality of services to the community. The research method used is normative juridical research with a conceptual approach (Statute Approach).The results of this study are large-scale social restriction policies through the Mayor of Tarakan Regulation Number 17 of 2020, restrictions on activities outside the house such as the implementation of learning at schools and/or other educational institutions, Work From Home (WFH), religious movements in houses of worship, activities in public places, social and cultural activities and Mandatory rapid tests for those using Sea and Air transportation modes, and providing social assistance to communities affected by COVID-19. Ombudsman's supervision of public services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tarakan City, namely by conducting coordination and control and cooperation with state and private officials as well as community or individual organizations, opening an Online Complaint Post for COVID-19 Affected Persons. Also, conduct unannounced checks to improve public services in the City of Tarakan. Based on the supervision, the receipt of reports on suspicion of maladministration and the Ombudsman's investigation results are subject to examination. Suppose it is proven that it has committed maladministration in public services, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia can take corrective action and provide recommendations/suggestions to state administrators to improve the quality of public services. Keywords: Surveillance; Ombudsman; Public Service; COVID-19 Pandemic

scholarly journals Legal Aid by the State as a Constitutional Right of the Poor: Problems and Challenges in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-196
Author(s):  
Ari Wibowo ◽  
Michael Hagana Bangun
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The provision of legal aid is one way to realize access to law and justice for the poor people provided by the state on the mandate of the constitution. Several regulations regarding legal aid have been issued by the state through the Act and its implementing regulations as well as from the Supreme Court or the Constitutional Court through the Supreme Court Regulations and the Constitutional Court's decisions. Legal aid is the constitutional right of every citizen to guarantee legal protection and guarantee equality before the law stipulated in Law Number 16 of 2011, the State is responsible for recognizing and protecting the human rights of every individual without differing backgrounds so that everyone has the right to be treated equally before the law is contained in Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. For the poor who experience legal problems in the form of injustice, they can request legal assistance from legal aid institutions that are regulated in legislation. The purpose of providing legal aid is to guarantee and fulfill the right for Legal Aid Recipients to gain access to justice, to realize the constitutional rights of all citizens in accordance with the principle of equality in law, to ensure the certainty that the implementation of Legal Aid is carried out equally across the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. , and to create an effective, efficient and accountable court.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document