Nomograms for predicting the survival rate for cervical cancer patients who undergo radiation therapy: a SEER analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (26) ◽  
pp. 3033-3045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Yang ◽  
Guoxiang Tian ◽  
Zhenyu Pan ◽  
Fanfan Zhao ◽  
Xiaojie Feng ◽  
...  

Aim: To integrate multiple independent risk factors to establish prognostic nomograms for better predicting overall survival and disease-specific survival in patients with cervical cancer receiving radiation therapy. Materials & methods: Cox analysis used to construct nomograms. The C-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic and calibration plots were used to evaluate the performance. The discrimination abilities were compared using the decision curve analysis, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement. Results: After randomization, 2869 and 1230 cervical cancer patients were included in the training and validation sets, respectively. Nomograms that incorporated all of the significant independent factors for predicting the 3- and 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival in the training cohort were established. Conclusion: Compared with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system, the proposed nomograms exhibit superior prognostic discrimination and survival prediction.

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 2740-2746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Valicenti ◽  
Jiandong Lu ◽  
Miljenko Pilepich ◽  
Sucha Asbell ◽  
David Grignon

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of external-beam radiation therapy on disease-specific survival (death from causes related to prostate cancer) and overall survival in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: From 1975 to 1992, 1,465 men with clinically localized prostate cancer received radiation therapy on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase III randomized trials and were pooled for this analysis. No one received androgen-deprivation therapy with his initial treatment. All original histology had central pathologic review for grading using the Gleason classification system. Total delivered radiation dose ranged from 60 to 78 Gy (median, 68.4 Gy). The median follow-up time was 8 years. RESULTS: A Cox regression model revealed that Gleason score was an independent predictor of disease-specific survival and overall survival. The 10-year disease-specific survival rates by Gleason score were as follows: score of 2 through 5, 85%; score of 6, 79%; score of 7, 62%; and score of 8 through 10, 43%. Stratifying outcome by this important prognostic factor revealed that higher radiation dose was a significant predictor for improved disease-specific survival and overall survival only for those patients whose cancers had Gleason scores of 8 through 10 (P < .05). After adjusting for clinical T stage, nodal status, and age, treating with a higher radiation dose was associated with a 29% lower relative risk of death from prostate cancer and 27% reduced mortality rate (P < .05). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that higher-dose radiation therapy can significantly reduce the risk of dying from prostate cancer in men with clinically localized disease. This survival benefit is restricted to men with poorly differentiated cancers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 884-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chel Hun Choi ◽  
Joon-Yong Chung ◽  
Ho-Seop Park ◽  
Minsik Jun ◽  
Yoo-Young Lee ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
pp. 1520-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Schrevel ◽  
R Karim ◽  
N T ter Haar ◽  
S H van der Burg ◽  
J B M Z Trimbos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
P. Anandhi

Cervical cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers among females, being the fourth most common after breast, colorectal, and lung cancer[1]. The FIGO 2018 staging system has brought in various pathological and radiological parameters for stage classification to guide treatment related decision making and for better prognostication. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to analyse the results of stage redistribution by applying 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer patients in a tertiary care cancer centre, who were previously staged according to FIGO 2009. METHODS: Data of all cervical cancer patients who underwent various forms of treatment at our institute including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy from Jan 2013 to Dec 2016 were collected from the Medical Records Department For this study, we re-staged all patients by the FIGO 2018 staging system RESULTS: The data of patients with carcinoma cervix diagnosed in the 4 years between 2013 & 2016 was tabulated according to both 2009 FIGO staging as well as 2018 FIGO staging. Significant up-staging to Stage IIIC1 & IIIC2 was noted. (Table 1& 2) CONCLUSION: The current FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer appears to be useful for predicting survival in patients considering radiological and pathological variables. As per our study, majority of the cancer cervix patients fall into a single subgroup – III C1; this, in a country were already most patients present with advanced disease, will skew the data further. Stage III C1 cervical cancer is not homogenous; sub classification within stage IIIC1 may result in better prognostication.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16520-e16520
Author(s):  
P. H. Thaker ◽  
F. Gao ◽  
I. Zighelboim ◽  
M. A. Powell ◽  
J. S. Rader ◽  
...  

e16520 Background: Recently, the rates of obese and overweight patients have increased dramatically. However, the effect of body mass index (BMI) have not been evaluated in treatment outcomes for patients with advanced stage cervical cancer receiving definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and is the purpose of this study. Methods: After obtaining approval from the Washington University Human Studies Protection Office, a retrospective cohort study (n = 321) was performed on all cervical cancer patients with stage IB1 with positive lymph nodes or ≥ stage IB2 from January 1998 to January 2008. The median duration of follow up was 60 months. BMI was calculated using the National Institute of Health online BMI calculator. Main outcomes were overall survival, disease free survival, and radiation complications such as radiation enteritis/cystitis, bowel obstruction, and fistula formation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. Results: Underweight patients (BMI<18.5 kg/m2) compared to normal weight (BMI = 18.5–25 kg/m2) and overweight/obese (>25 kg/m2) have a higher actuarial complication rate (p = 0.0137). Regardless of weight there is no difference in disease free survival. However, underweight patients have a significantly poorer overall survival than those patients with a higher BMI (>18.5 kg/m2) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Underweight patients have a diminished overall survival compared to normal or obese cervical cancer patients. This is of clinical relevance when counseling underweight cervical cancer patients who will be cured of the disease with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but have a significant risk of suffering potentially fatal complications from treatment. Further study needs to be done to elucidate this relationship further. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-001333
Author(s):  
Feng Lin ◽  
Ruru Zheng ◽  
Chen Yu ◽  
Ying Su ◽  
Xiaojian Yan ◽  
...  

ObjectiveLipids have been evaluated for their possible role in cancer survival prediction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prognostic value of lipids on overall survival for stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer patients.MethodsA retrospective study including cervical cancer patients with early-stage (FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IIA2) disease was conducted from January 2012 to February 2017. Patients with any history of liver disease or other cancers, and patients who took any medications known to influence lipid metabolism, were excluded. We measured various factors in patients' lipid profiles including total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein, and assessed these four parameters together with clinicopathological features to identify the significant prognostic factors for overall survival.ResultsA total of 583 patients with median age 53 (range 25–82) years were included. Among them, 283 (48.5%) patients were in FIGO stage IB1, 44 patients (7.6%) in stage IB2, 189 (32.4%) patients in stage IIA1, and the remaining 67 (11.5%) patients were in stage IIA2. Using univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis and subsequent multivariable analysis, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and pelvic lymph node status were shown to be independent prognostic factors for overall survival (p<0.05 for all). Furthermore, the results of the Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that both the high total cholesterol group and the high triglycerides group were associated with worse overall survival (p=0.002 and p=0.001, respectively)ConclusionsOur study showed that total triglycerides and total cholesterol may serve as potential predictors for overall survival in patients with cervical cancer. Cervical cancer patients may benefit from treatments after adjusting their triglycerides and total cholesterol levels.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wancheng Zhao ◽  
Yunyun Xiao ◽  
Wei Zhao ◽  
Qing Yang ◽  
Fangfang Bi

ObjectiveTo compare the survival and recurrence outcomes between open and laparoscopic radically hysterectomy (RH) for stage IA2-IIA2 cervical cancer based on Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018.MethodsData of 1,373 early cervical cancer patients undergoing open or laparoscopic radically hysterectomy at ShengJing Hospital of China Medical University between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW) was used to balance the covariates between the two groups.ResultsA total of 705 cervical cancer patients of FIGO 2009 stage IA2-IIA2 were finally enrolled in this study. After IPTW adjustment, the OS (HR = 2.095, 95% CI: 1.233-3.562, P = 0.006) and PFS (HR = 1.950, 95%CI: 1.194-3.184, P = 0.008) rates were significantly higher in the open RH (ORH) group compared with the laparoscopic RH (LRH) group. Then after re-staging according to the FIGO 2018 staging system, 561 patients still belonged to stage IA2-IIA2, 144 patients were upgraded to stage IIIC1p-IIIC2p. The ORH group had a significantly superior OS (HR = 1.977, 95%CI: 1.077-3.626, P = 0.028) and PFS (HR = 1.811, 95%CI: 1.046-3.134, P = 0.034) compared with the LRH group after PS-IPTW analysis. Furthermore, in patients with no high and intermediate risks, difference of the OS (HR = 1.386, 95%CI: 0.287-6.69, P = 0.684) and PFS (HR = 1.524, 95%CI: 0.363-6.396, P = 0.565) rates between the two groups were with no statistical meaning.ConclusionsOutcomes of this retrospective cohort study were in compliance with indications for ORH recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines Version 1, 2021. However, LRH showed non-inferiority for patients with no prognostic risk factors compared with ORH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document