Zykov A.P., Kosintsev P.A., Trepavlov V.V. The Town of Sibir — Isker Fortress (Historical and Archaeological Research) / Institute of History and Archeology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Russian History of the RAS; Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Nauka — Vostochnaya Nauka, 2017. — 456 p.: ill.

Author(s):  
Дмитрий Редин ◽  
Dmitry Redin
Author(s):  
Roman Stoyanov

The Bosporus expedition of the Institute for the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences conducted a small archaeological research in the northwestern sector of Porthmion in 2002–2003. Two exploration trenches were laid on the excavation area. Archaeological assemblages of the trenches contain information on historical chronology of the settlement. The fire-destruction layer recorded in trench 1 marks the period of destabilization of Greek-barbarian relations in the region, probably connected with the activity of nomadic tribes during the early 5th c. BC. The foundations of the residential building identified in trench 2 refer to the 4th c. BC. This period was associated with the relatively calm reign of the Spartokids dynasty in the Bosporus. Traces of active building dating back to the early 2nd c. BC are associated with the period of the so-called Bosporus “cultural revival”, which took place against a background of stabilization in the region after the Sarmatian invasion.


2021 ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Alexander Diukov

Kiev and Nur-Sultan are looking for rapprochement in the historical sphere. According to Kazakhstan's ambassador to Ukraine, Darkhan Kaletaev, the sides plan to launch a joint research project. As examples of topics of such cooperation the diplomat named the deportations of 1920-1930-ies and the fate of the 106th Akmola division, whose soldiers were defeated and later became a part of the Turkestan legion of the Wehrmacht. What will Kiev's historical initiatives bring to Kazakhstan was assessed by Alexander Dyukov, director of the Foundation for Assistance to Current Historical Studies "Historical Memory", researcher of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-184
Author(s):  
Mikhail Dmitrievich Bukharin (Михаил Дмитриевич Бухарин ◽  
Irina Fedorovna Popova (Ирина Федоровна Попова)

This article presents twenty-five unpublished letters between the outstanding Russian scholar Vasilii Vladimirovich Bartol’d and the diplomat Nikolai Fedorovich Petrovsky, who was a key organizer of Russian archaeological research in Eastern Turkestan. The letters illustrate certain peculiarities in the development of Oriental studies in Russia during the late nineteenth/early twentieth century, and they enlarge our knowledge of Bartol’d’s and Petrovskii’s roles in that developmental process. В публикации представлена переписка (25 писем) выдающегося востоковеда В.В. Бартольда и дипломата, организатора археологического изучения Восточного Туркестана Н.Ф. Петровского. Переписка характеризует особенности развития востоковедения в России в конце xix – начале xx вв. и расширяют наши знания об участии в этом процессе Бартольда и Петровского.


Author(s):  
Viktor Zaharov

In this paper we draw conclusions of the International Scientific Conference devoted to the 400th Anniversary of Archpries Avvakum. The Conference took place on 26–27 October, 2020 at the Institute for Russian History of Russian Academy of Sciences. A lot of attention was paid to the personality and activity of Avvakum, it was pointed out that his works and activity were as a response to the crisis in the medieval religious perception but his ideas were unlike Nikon’s and his followers’ reaction. At the special board devoted to Avvakum’s literary works, it was noted that the language and the style of his texts need deeper research. The Anniversary was the matter and the ground for considering a great deal of issues connected to Old Believers’ history over the period of its existence that is why the majority of papers concerned this issue.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 295-297
Author(s):  
Sergej A. Borisov

For more than twenty years, the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences celebrates the Day of Slavic Writing and Culture with a traditional scholarly conference.”. Since 2014, it has been held in the young scholars’ format. In 2019, participants from Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kazan, Togliatti, Tyumen, Yekaterinburg, and Rostov-on-Don, as well as Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Romania continued this tradition. A wide range of problems related to the history of the Slavic peoples from the Middle Ages to the present time in the national, regional and international context were discussed again. Participants talked about the typology of Slavic languages and dialects, linguo-geography, socio- and ethnolinguistics, analyzed formation, development, current state, and prospects of Slavic literatures, etc.


2020 ◽  

The book was compiled on the materials of the scientific conference “Anthropomorphic and zoomorphic representations of nations and states in the Slavic cultural discourse” (2019), held at the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow) and devoted to the history of the nations’ personifications and generalized ethnic images in period of “imagined communities” formation. This process is reconstructing on verbal and visual sources and by methods of various disciplines. The historical evolution of such zoomorphic incarnations of nations as an Eagle (in the Polish patriotic poetry of the first third of the 19th cent), a Falcon (in the South Slavic and Czech cultures in the 19th cent), a Griffin (during the formation of the Cassubian ethnocultural identity) is considered. The animalistic national representations in the Estonian caricature of the interwar twenty years of the 20th cent., so as the functioning of the Bear’s allegory as a symbol of Russia in modern Russian souvenir products are analyzed. The originality of zoomorphic symbolism in Polish and Soviet cultures is shown оn the examples of para- and metaheraldic images in XXth cent. The transformation of the verbal and visual images of “Mother Russia” personifications in Russian Empire was reconstructed. The evolution of various allegories of ethnic “Self” and “Others” is presented by caricatures of 19th – 20th cent. in Slovenian periodic and in Russian “Satyricon” journal (1914–1918).


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
A. D. Gvishiani ◽  
E. O. Kedrov ◽  
Y. S. Lyubovtseva ◽  
J. Bonnin

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
A. D. Gvishiani ◽  
Y. S. Lyubovtseva ◽  
E. O. Kedrov ◽  
Y. V. Barykina

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document