scholarly journals ANALISIS KEPATUHAN TERHADAP PRINSIP KERJA SAMA GRICE DALAM KOMIK SUNDA SI MAMIH AN ANALYSIS OF GRICE’S COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE IN SUNDANESE’S COMIC “SI MAMIH”

Jurnal KATA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Hera Meganova Lyra ◽  
Gugun Gunardi ◽  
Teddi Muhtadin

<p><em>Si Mamih is a Sundanese comic character created by the cartoonist Edyana Latief. This obese female cartoon character, identical with black spotted shirt and crested hair, may deliver a comical communication that brings smiles and laughs as the Sundanese people character’s assertion that are fond of humor. Evidently, in delivering her humor, Si Mamih does not always disobey the cooperative principle. There is obedience toward Grice’s theory performed by Si Mamih. This obedience can be observed in maxims of quality, quantity, relevance and manner. The obedience of Si Mamih toward the cooperative principle is intentionally performed by its cartoonist creator as a uniqueness of delivering creativity and imagination which bring smiles and laughs.</em></p>

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaimie Krems ◽  
Steven L. Neuberg

Heavier bodies—particularly female bodies—are stigmatized. Such fat stigma is pervasive, painful to experience, and may even facilitate weight gain, thereby perpetuating the obesity-stigma cycle. Leveraging research on functionally distinct forms of fat (deposited on different parts of the body), we propose that body shape plays an important but largely underappreciated role in fat stigma, above and beyond fat amount. Across three samples varying in participant ethnicity (White and Black Americans) and nation (U.S., India), patterns of fat stigma reveal that, as hypothesized, participants differently stigmatized equally-overweight or -obese female targets as a function of target shape, sometimes even more strongly stigmatizing targets with less rather than more body mass. Such findings suggest value in updating our understanding of fat stigma to include body shape and in querying a predominating, but often implicit, theoretical assumption that people simply view all fat as bad (and more fat as worse).


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman Jihad Mansoor ◽  
Yaseen Khashman Hussein ◽  
Abdulhadi Mohamed Jumaa ◽  
Mossa M. Marbut

Author(s):  
Roger W. Shuy

Much is written about how criminal suspects, defendants, and undercover targets use ambiguous language in their interactions with police, prosecutors, and undercover agents. This book examines the other side of the coin, describing fifteen criminal investigations demonstrating how police, prosecutors, undercover agents, and complainants use deceptive ambiguity with their subjects, which leads to misrepresentations of the speech events, schemas, agendas, speech acts, lexicon, and grammar. These misrepresentations affect the perceptions of judges and juries about the subjects’ motives, predispositions, intentions, and voluntariness. Deception is commonly considered intentional while ambiguity is often excused as unintentional performance errors. Although perhaps overreliance on Grice’s maxim of sincerity leads some to believe this, interactions of suspects, defendants, and targets with representatives of law are adversarial, non-cooperative events that enable participants to ignore or violate the cooperative principle. One effective way the government does this is to use ambiguity deceptively. Later listeners to the recordings of such conversations may not recognize this ambiguity and react in ways that the subjects may not have intended. Deceptive ambiguity is clearly intentional in undercover operations and the case examples illustrate that the practice also is alive and well in police interviews and prosecutorial questioning. The book concludes with a summary of how the deceptive ambiguity used by representatives of the government affected the perception of the subjects’ predisposition, intentionality and voluntariness, followed by a comparison of the relative frequency of deceptive ambiguity used by the government in its representations of speech events, schemas, agendas, speech acts, lexicon, and grammar.


Author(s):  
Christine Velazquez ◽  
Robert C. Siska ◽  
Ivo A. Pestana

Abstract Background Breast mound and nipple creation are the goals of the reconstructive process. Unlike in normal body mass index (BMI) women, breast reconstruction in the obese is associated with increased risk of perioperative complications. Our aim was to determine if reconstruction technique and the incidence of perioperative complications affect the achievement of reconstruction completion in the obese female. Methods Consecutive obese women (BMI ≥30) who underwent mastectomy and implant or autologous reconstruction were evaluated for the completion of breast reconstruction. Results Two hundred twenty-five women with 352 reconstructions were included. Seventy-four women underwent 111 autologous reconstructions and 151 women underwent 241 implant-based reconstructions. Chemotherapy, radiation, and delayed reconstruction timing was more common in the autologous patients. Major perioperative complications (requiring hospital readmission or unplanned surgery) occurred more frequently in the implant group (p ≤ 0.0001). Breast mounds were completed in >98% of autologous cases compared with 76% of implant cases (p ≤ 0.001). Nipple areolar complex (NAC) creation was completed in 57% of autologous patients and 33% of implant patients (p = 0.0009). The rate of successfully completing the breast mound and the NAC was higher in the autologous patient group (Mound odds ratio or OR 3.32, 95% confidence interval or CI 1.36–5.28 and NAC OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.50–4.69). Conclusion Occurrence of a major complication in the implant group decreased the rate of reconstruction completion. Obese women who undergo autologous breast reconstruction are more likely to achieve breast reconstruction completion when compared with obese women who undergo implant-based breast reconstruction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1853 (1) ◽  
pp. 012037
Author(s):  
Y M Taay ◽  
M T Mohammed ◽  
R Abbas ◽  
A Ayad ◽  
M A Mahdi

2021 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 101919
Author(s):  
Dolores Adriana Bravo Durán ◽  
Selina Jocelyn Barreda Guzmán ◽  
Angélica Trujillo Hernández ◽  
Adriana Berenice Silva Gómez

1980 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1612-1615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Autissier ◽  
Paul Dumas ◽  
Annie Loireau ◽  
Raymond Michel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document