scholarly journals Government Innovation in Social Sciences: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-184
Author(s):  
Syahnaz Oriza Keumala ◽  
Ulung Pribadi

many countries for influencing public sector reform. Government policy has also attracted attention from academia as a modern concept of governance. This study aims to understand issue innovation in government perspective. This study reviewed the literature of an article published in the social sciences through the NVivo analysis tool. This study indicates that the main issues in government innovation are public, actors, politics, policies, and institutions. This study also finds that government innovation can be used for decision making and increasing organizational capacity. In addition, it can also be used to improve democratic institutions and increase organizational. This article contributions is provide new topic concerning government innovation in the future.

1973 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Vaison

Normally in political studies the term public policy is construed to encompass the societally binding directives issued by a society's legitimate government. We usually consider government, and only government, as being able to “authoritatively allocate values.” This common conception pervades the literature on government policy-making, so much so that it is hardly questioned by students and practitioners of political science. As this note attempts to demonstrate, some re-thinking seems to be in order. For purposes of analysis in the social sciences, this conceptualization of public policy tends to obscure important realities of modern corporate society and to restrict unnecessarily the study of policy-making. Public policy is held to be public simply and solely because it originates from a duly legitimated government, which in turn is held to have the authority (within specified limits) of formulating and implementing such policy. Public policy is public then, our usual thinking goes, because it is made by a body defined somewhat arbitrarily as “public”: a government or some branch of government. All other policy-making is seen as private; it is not public (and hence to lie essentially beyond the scope of the disciplines of poliitcal science and public administration) because it is duly arrived at by non-governmental bodies. Thus policy analysts lead us to believe that public policy is made only when a government body acts to consider some subject of concern, and that other organizations are not relevant to the study of public policy.


Africa ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin Magid

Opening ParagraphThe notion that rural political life is essentially traditional tribal in Africa and therefore scarcely relevant to modern decision-making at higher echelons of government has had a commanding influence in African studies. Associated with this viewpoint has been a tacit division of labour in the social sciences which emphasizes the pre-eminence of anthropology in the tribal domain and the pre-occupation of political science with macropolitics especially in the urban sphere. Happily, a younger generation of political scientists has emerged in recent years to challenge an essentially artificial arrangement.


PERSPEKTIF ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 728-738
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ainul Usama ◽  
Ulung Pribadi ◽  
Al Fauzi Rahmat

Public participation is the right and obligation of citizens to contribute to development by contributing to initiative and creativity. Public participation has also attracted a lot of attention from academia as a concept of public policy. The authors conducted a systematic literature review of published articles in the social sciences to enhance our understanding of public participation. Some of the main issues are explained in this area through the NVIVO 12 plus software that qualitative analysis tool. The main issues are community, development, government, information, and interests. This article raises several propositions on the matter. This article suggests some new topics for further research.


Author(s):  
Marsha Rosengarten

Although the body is fundamental to observation and feeling, its experience of infection is regarded by the biomedical sciences and, for the most part, the social sciences as relatively obtuse. The body is situated as a mere object of inquiry, as if its intricate and highly complex dynamics indicate that it is no more than an imperfect animated machine and, concomitantly, infection simply a change to its normative mechanisms. In this Position Piece, I ask: what might be afforded to the problematic diagnosis of communicable infection and to global health strategies of containment if the body were appreciated as an active participant in diagnoses? To do so, I take up the ‘pluralist panpsychist’ proposition that bodies think. Counter to the view that thinking is the preserve of the human mind and that value is an ‘after’ ascribed to a given fact or situation, I experiment with the idea that the body’s sensory awareness can be thought as a creative source of immanent values. Drawing on a series of empirical examples primarily focused on the perceived novelty of COVID-19, I offer a preliminary sketch of how revaluing the body as involved in decision-making and novelty might enrich the scope of biomedical and social diagnoses.


Epigram ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megido Andreas ◽  
Maswir Maswir ◽  
Mawarta Onida

AbstractThis research aimed to analyze and determine the performance of employees in the Secretariat Division of PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Jakarta and Tangerang using motivational variables are analyzed based on the theory of intrinsic motivation, according to Herzberg two-factor theory. This research was conducted to measure employee performance using several indicators, including the number (quantity) of work, quality of work, precision time, attendance, and cooperation ability. The method used in this research is the quantitative method with survey research and data collection through a questionnaire to the respondent. Processing data using a data analysis tool named SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 21. The samples used in this study as many as 23 people. Based on the calculation simple linear regression analysis obtained regression equation Y = 5.113 + 0,894X. From the calculation of the coefficient of determination the influence of work motivation (Variable X) on the performance (Variable Y) is equal to 0.413 or 41.3%, while the remaining 0.587 or 58.7% is influenced by independent variables studied were: job satisfaction, stress, trust, justice, ethics, training and decision-making. From the calculation of significance test (partial test) can be obtained values (t count > t table), i.e. 3.844 > 1.721 that means Ha accepted and Ho rejected, so the hypothesis are "There is a positive and significant influence between Work Motivation and Employees Performance at Secretariat Division of PT PLN (Persero) Distribution of Jakarta and Tangerang" which means that the hypothesis can be accepted.Key words: Performance, Work Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui kinerja pegawai pada Divisi Kesekretariatan PT PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya dan Tangerang dengan menggunakan variabel motivasi yang dianalisis berdasarkan teori motivasi intrinsik, menurut teori dua faktor Herzberg. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan mengukur kinerja pegawai dengan menggunakan beberapa indikator, diantaranya jumlah (kuantitas) pekerjaan, kualitas pekerjaan, ketepatan waktu, kehadiran, dan kemampuan kerja sama. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode kuantitatif dengan penelitian survei serta pengumpulan data melalui kusioner ke responden. Pengolahan data dengan menggunakan alat bantu analisis data yaitu SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) versi 21. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 23 orang. Berdasarkan pada perhitungan analisis regresi linear sederhana didapat persamaan regresi Y = 5,113 + 0,894X. Dari hasil perhitungan koefisien determinasi besarnya pengaruh motivasi kerja (Variabel X) terhadap kinerja (Variabel Y) adalah sebesar 0,413 atau 41,3%, sedangkan sisanya sebesar 0,587 atau 58,7% dipengaruhi oleh variabel bebas yang diteliti yaitu: kepuasan kerja, stress, kepercayaan, keadilan, etika, pelatihan dan pengambilan keputusan. Dari hasil perhitungan uji signifikansi (uji parsial) dapat diperoleh nilai (t hitung > t tabel) yaitu 3,844 > 1,721 berarti Ha diterima dan Ho ditolak, sehingga hipotesis yang didapat adalah “Terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan antara Motivasi Kerja dan Kinerja Pegawai pada Divisi Kesekretariatan PT. PLN (Persero) Distribusi Jakarta Raya dan Tangerang.” yang berarti hipotesis tersebut dapat diterima.Kata kunci: Kinerja, Motivasi Kerja, Motivasi Intrinsik


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Jan-Erik Lane

Climate and earth scientists now predicting abrupt climate change never ask the social sciences whether large scale policy-making and international coordination, like the COP21 project, is all feasible. The message from policy analysis is that rational decision-making is a myth, as there is bound to be mistakes, confusion and opportunism in policy implementation. Is it better for each state to develop its own climate policy – the resilience option? However, when looking at energy planning by core states, one finds little of decarbonisation. Only Uruguay has good preparation for global warming. Abrupt climate change threatens numerous tipping points towards Hawking irreversibility. But the social sciences are skeptical about large scale policy implementation based upon comprehensively rational decision-making.


Author(s):  
Mihai Deju ◽  
Petrică Stoica

Framing accounting as a science has been carried out in close connection with the development of knowledge in this field and with the meaning given to this concept of “science”. Recognizing accounting as scientific field by specialists is due to the fact that it features a combination of accounting theory and methods for the development and application of these theories. Accounting is a scientific discipline in the social sciences because: it is a creation of the human being in response to practical needs; it reflects phenomena, activities and social facts; it addresses various groups of users (managers, bankers, shareholders, employees, tax bodies, etc.) which are an integral part of society; it offers information necessary to decision-making, most of the times with impact on the behaviour of individuals; it is influenced by the economic, social, legal and political environment, that is by social phenomena.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document