Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Otentik yang Dibuatnya Terkait Jangka Waktu Pensiun

An authentic deed is a letter whose form has been determined by law that can be used as perfect evidence made before a notary public. The notary concerned must take full responsibility in case of problems related to the deed he made, whether in Civil, Criminal, UUJN and Code of Ethics. The notary will be released from all of these responsibilities if he has retired from his position. This study aims to determine the responsibility of the notary for authentic deeds that are canceled in court and made after the retirement period. The research method used is normative law using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the analysis show that the notary's responsibility for the authentic deed he makes when declared canceled in court can be divided into 4, namely a) civil liability, b) criminal responsibility, c) responsibility based on UUJN d) Responsibility based on the Code of Ethics. Then, the notary is still responsible even though the notary's term of office has ended or has retired. This can be carried out by the authorities as long as the authentic deed is null and void in existence at a grace period of 30 years from the date the deed is drawn up by the Notary. Through this research, it is hoped that the provisions regarding the responsibility of the notary public after retirement will be more defined regarding the maximum limit so as not to cause problems for both the notary and the party concerned

Download Full-text

Sanksi Bagi Notaris Yang Mempromosikan Jabatannya Pada Sosial Media

Jurnal Panorama Hukum ◽

10.21067/jph.v4i1.3885 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 31-41

Author(s):

Meishell Njoto

Keyword(s):

Social Media ◽

Research Method ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Public ◽

Ethics Code ◽

Notary Public ◽

Legal Consequences

Notary plays an important role in making authentic deed in Indonesia. Notaries are often referred to occupying honorary positions as general or state officials. As the holder of an honorary position trusted by the public to make an authentic deed, the Notary must comply with the applicable laws and the Code of Ethics. Obligations and prohibitions of Notaries have clearly been regulated in UUJN and Notary Ethics Code, but that does not mean there are no Notaries who violate these rules. In order to find out what the legal consequences of a notary who violated social media promotion, the authors conducted this research. The research method used in this study is normative legal research. Normative legal research is legal research conducted by examining materials derived from various laws and regulations and other materials from various literatures. Which means this research examines secondary data material or does a literature review. The approach used in this study is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The result of this research is the prohibition on promotion through social media which actually has been regulated in various rules regarding notaries along with the legal consequences if the Notary Public violates these rules.

Download Full-text

Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan dengan Minuta Akta

Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum ◽

10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2962 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 147

Author(s):

Yoefanca Halim ◽

Fricky Sudewo ◽

Tyas Fidelia

Keyword(s):

Code Of Ethics ◽

Civil Liability ◽

The Public ◽

The Law ◽

Notary Public

<h1>Notary as a general official has authorization in making an authentic deed and have other powers as referred to in this law or under other laws, as described in the Department of Law Notary. In carrying out his position, a notary is obliged to act as a trustee, honest, equitable, independent, immutated, and keep the interests of the parties and to make the deed Minuta. In addition, a notary is obliged to issue the Grosse deed, copy of the deed, or Deed citation based on Minuta deed, such matters are governed by Law No.2 of 2014 as has been amended by Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Department of notary. It means that a notary is supposed to carry out obligations. But in fact, the notary can still be found that does not carry out obligations as stipulated in the notary law. By looking at this raises an issue about, "What is Notary's responsibility for the inconsistency of the Copy act with the Minuta deed?". In general, the responsibilities of notary public can be examined in the public, criminal, notary LAW, and responsibility for performing the duties of the department under the notary Code of Ethics. Civil liability regarding material truth in the deed made and can be categorized as making false documents in criminal terms. While the responsibilities according to the LAW and the Code of Ethics Department notary, notary may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral warning, letters, temporary stops, and stops with respect or disrespect.</h1><p class="KataKunciInggris"> </p>

Download Full-text

Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti setelah Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Jabatan Berakhir

Lentera Hukum ◽

10.19184/ejlh.v5i2.7339 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 305

Author(s):

Tengku Erwinsyahbana ◽

Melinda Melinda

Keyword(s):

Criminal Responsibility ◽

Code Of Conduct ◽

Civil Liability ◽

Legal Liability ◽

Notary Public ◽

Laws And Regulations

Abstract As an honorable position and profession, the notary replacement also has obligations that must be implemented, either based on laws and regulations that specifically regulate notary public (UUJN), or other laws and regulations. The authority of a notary substitute shall be the same as that of a notary public, comprising of general authority, special powers, and powers that shall be determined later in accordance with the laws and regulations. The replacement notary's legal liability includes civil liability, criminal responsibility, UUJN-based responsibilities, and responsibility for performing his / her duties under the Notary's Code of Conduct. However, the limitation of the length of time the substitute notary's responsibility to the deeds he made, has not been explicitly regulated in the UUJN. Keywords: Deed, Authority, Notary Substitute, Responsibility

Download Full-text

PEMBATASAN JUMLAH PEMBUATAN AKTA NOTARIS OLEH DEWAN KEHORMATAN PUSAT IKATAN NOTARIS INDONESIA

Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY ◽

10.22219/jihl.v25i2.5999 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 25 (2) ◽

pp. 158

Author(s):

Heni Kartikosari ◽

Rusdianto Sesung

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Board Of Trustees ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The People ◽

Notary Public ◽

Central Board

To protect the Notary Public Offices and the people who use Notary services related to the legal certainty of the deed made by the Notary, the Central Board of Trustees of the Indonesian Notaries Association issued the Regulation of the Central Board of Honor No. 1 of 2017 on the Fairness Limit of Number of Permanent Deeds. The regulation is determined by the Central Board of Trustees that the limit of fairness in the deed per day is 20 (twenty) deeds. In the fact, there are so many notaries that broke the regulation. So, it must be cleared by a juridical research against that phenomenon. The research method used is normative legal research, that is legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary law material while in searching and collecting data is done by two approaches, that is law approach and conceptual approach.

Download Full-text

Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Berkenaan Dengan Kebenaran Substansi Akta Otentik

Rechtidee ◽

10.21107/ri.v12i2.2872 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 267

Author(s):

Wayan Paramarta Jaya

Keyword(s):

Rule Of Law ◽

Criminal Responsibility ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Criminal Liability ◽

Criminal Code ◽

General Purpose ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Rule Of Law ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

Legal Consequences

<p>Notary as a position has its own authority which is regulated with the rule of law to make an authAentic deed. This authority is described in Article 15 of Law Number 2 Year 2014 as amendments from UUJN. However, this authority is unperfect due to not arranged authority to Notary's for investigation, so the notary is unable to investigate the thruth of material document data fom confrontist is true or not. Condition like that often drag the Notary into legal issues in both criminal and civil problems. The purpose of this thesis research is divided into two, that is general purpose of an academic and special purpose is to examine and analyze how the notary accountability in making authentic deeds and to know and understand the legal consequences of authentic deeds made by the notary when the parties provide false data. This study is a normative juridical research using statute approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis of legal material obtained, basically a notary has responsibility for the formalities of an authentic deed and has no responsibility for the material of the contents the authentic deed except in the<em> relass </em>deed. Notaries can be requested of accountability if the Notary is proven to have committed administrative, civil and criminal violations. Notary must be responsible in terms of Administrative Law, Civil Law, that is in accordance with the provisions of sanctions contained in Article 84 and 85 on Amendment of UUJN and code of ethics, but in UUJN and UUJN Change Law does not regulate the existence of criminal sanctions. Notary cant be sought for criminal liability if there is a loss to one of the parties as a result of false documents from another party, since the notary only records what the parties have submitted to the deed. Such false statements shall be the responsibility of the parties, not the responsibility of the notary, unless such fraud or deceit originates from the Notary itself, a notary may be sought for criminal responsibility in accordance with article 263, 264, 266 of the Criminal Code.</p>

Download Full-text

PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMALSUAN AKTA OTENTIK YANG DILAKUKAN NOTARIS

Borneo Law Review ◽

10.35334/bolrev.v5i1.1977 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 36-48

Author(s):

Wahyudin, Wahyudin, ◽

Jarot Widya Muliawan

Keyword(s):

Rule Of Law ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Requirements ◽

The Rule Of Law ◽

Approach Method ◽

The Law ◽

Notary Public ◽

Collection Methods ◽

Secondary Materials

AbstractThis research uses the Conceptual Approach Method and the Law Approach Method, on Normative Juridical Analysis by combining two data collection methods, namely Studying the Law and Examining library materials or secondary materials which are then analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Method.The research results show that the notary can only (legally / in accordance with the rule of law) be a suspect if the notary intentionally keeps making a fake deed as requested by the tapper, even though he knows that the parties do not meet the legal requirements of the engagement. This shows that the notary does not strictly adhere to the Law on Notary Position (UUJN) and the Notary Professional Code of Ethics. Where it can lead to a notary public criminal act of forgery of authentic letters / deeds.The position of a Notary is held or its presence is desired by the laws and regulations with the intention of helping and serving people who need authentic written evidence regarding circumstances of events or legal actions of direct involvement by the parties facing them. However, in carrying out his profession, the police law apparatus is often summoned as a suspect in connection with the forgery of authentic deeds he has made. Thus, it is deemed necessary to know the Normative Juridical Analysis of Authentic Deed Falsification Conducted by Notaries. Keywords: Notary, Authentic Deed Falsification, Suspect. AbstrakPenelitian ini menggunakan Metode Pendekatan Konseptual dan Metode Pendekatan Undang-Undang, tentang Analisis Yuridis Normatif dengan cara menggabungkan dua metode pengumpulan data yaitu Menelaah Undang-Undang dan Meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan sekunder yang Kemudian dianalisa dengan Metode Analisis Kualitatif.Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa notaris hanya dapat (legal/sesuai dengan aturan hukum) dijadikan sebagai tersangka apabila notaris tersebut dengan sengaja tetap membuat akta palsu sesuai yang diminta oleh penghadap, padahal ia mengetahui bahwa para pihak penghadap tersebut tidak memenuhi syarat-syarat sahnya perikatan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa notaris tersebut tidak berpegang teguh pada Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) dan Kode Etik Profesi Notaris. Dimana dapat menjerumuskan notaris mengarah pada tindak pidana pemalsuan surat/akta otentik.Jabatan Notaris diadakan atau kehadirannya dikehendaki oleh Peraturan Perundang- undangan dengan maksud untuk membantu dan melayani masyarakat yang membutuhkan alat bukti tertulis yang bersifat otentik, mengenai keadaan peristiwa atau perbuatan hukum atas keterlibatan langsung oleh para pihak yang menghadap. Namun demikian Notaris dalam menjalankan profesinya tidak jarang dipanggil oleh pihak aparat hukum kepolisian sebagai tersangka Sehubungan dengan pemalsuan akta otentik yang dibuatnya. Sehingga, dipandang perlu untuk mengetahui Analisis Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris. Kata kunci: Notaris, Pemalsuan Akta Otentik, Tersangka.

Download Full-text

Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik

Acta Comitas ◽

10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p18 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 6 (02) ◽

pp. 450

Author(s):

I Gusti Agung Ika Laksmi Mahadewi ◽

I Wayan Novy Purwanto

Keyword(s):

Qualitative Analysis ◽

Research Methods ◽

Analytical Approach ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Time Limit ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Notary Public ◽

Study Techniques ◽

Research Show

Abstract The writing of this article aims to determine the authority of a substitute notary in carrying out the duties and positions of a notary and to find out the responsibilities of a substitute notary when committing an unlawful act in making an authentic deed. This research examines empty norms using normative research methods, with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and an analytical approach. The search for legal materials uses document study techniques, as well as analysis studies using qualitative analysis. The results of this research show that the responsibilities of a Notary Substitute are the same as that of a Notary Public, although they have different competencies, which can be seen through the requirement that a substitute Notary be appointed only with a Bachelor of Law graduates and have worked in a Notary Office. This cannot guarantee that the Substitute Notary will work properly and will not discriminate against the position of the Notary who has responsibility for the deed he made without a time limit and is not associated with the responsibility of the Notary being replaced. The principle of responsibility based on error is the basis for imposing sanctions on a Substitute Notary who is proven to have committed an unlawful act and is responsible for his actions in Civil, Criminal, code of ethics as well as administratively and is not associated with the responsibility of the Notary being replaced. Abstrak Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kewenangan notaris pengganti dalam menjalankan tugas serta jabatan notaris dan untuk mengetahui tanggung jawab Notaris Pengganti apabila melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam pembuatan akta autentik. Riset ini mengkaji norma kosong menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan analisis. Penelusuran bahan hukum menggunakan teknik studi dokumen, serta analisis kajian menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Hasil riset ini menunjukkan bahwa tanggung jawab Notaris Pengganti sama dengan Pejabat Notaris meski memiliki kompetensi yang berbeda yang dapat dilihat melalui syarat diangkatnya notaris pengganti hanya dengan lulusan Sarjana Hukum dan pernah bekerja pada Kantor Notaris. Hal tersebut tidak dapat menjamin bahwa Notaris Pengganti akan bekerja dengan baik dan tidak mendiskriminasi jabatan Notaris yang memiliki tanggung jawab terhadap akta yang dibuatnya tanpa adanya Batasan waktu dan tidak dikaitkan dengan tanggungjawab Notaris yang digantikan. Prinsip pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan kesalahan merupakan dasar pengenaan sanksi kepada Notaris Pengganti yang terbukti melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dan mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya secara Perdata, Pidana, kode etik serta pula secara administrasi dan tidak dikaitkan dengan tanggung jawab Notaris yang digantikan.

Download Full-text

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGEMBALIAN KEWENANGAN ISTIMEWA MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT MELALUI PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945

Jurnal Yuridis ◽

10.35586/.v5i1.320 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. 142

Author(s):

Putu Ayu Anastasia Wierdarini

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

State Institution ◽

Vice President ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Administration System ◽

Material Content ◽

The People ◽

State Administration ◽

Strategic Position

The amendment of the Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 positioned the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat no longer as the highest state institution and the highest sovereign of the people. This has implications for the authority of the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat to have a strategic position, namely to UUD 1945, to stipulate GBHN, to elect the president and vice president through amendment of its authority to be very limited and weak. This paper examines jurisdictionally how to restore the privileges possessed by the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat through the amendment of the UUD 1945. A normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach is used to analyze this problem.The results of the study indicate that the MPR's repatriation in the main and vital position in the Indonesian state administration system is very important, namely through amendments to the material content of the UUD 1945 which must be implemented on an ongoing basis.

Download Full-text

Kajian Yuridis Pengesampingan Pasal 1266 dan Pasal 1267 Kitab Undang -Undang Hukum Perdata sebagai Syarat Batal dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan

Perspektif Hukum ◽

10.30649/ph.v17i1.59 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 65-89

Author(s):

Rocky Marciano Ambar ◽

Budi Santoso ◽

Hanif Nur Widhiyanti

Keyword(s):

Research Method ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Civil Law ◽

Banking System ◽

Civil Code ◽

Bank Credit ◽

Dominant Position ◽

Legal Implications ◽

Credit Agreement ◽

The Right

Banks in credit agreements use more standard agreements, standard contracts in 2 (two) things, (1) There is an unbalanced position between banks and debtors, banks that have a more dominant position and debtors. (2) There is an understanding of the principle of freedom of contracting and without limits. The Bank has the freedom to seek the form and content of the agreement. Code of Ethics in agreement. The provisions of the Civil Code provide types of compensation for parties. Based on the background, then for problems the problem is written (1). Does the inclusion of Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code on the banking system have collected the principles of balance and justice. (2) What are the legal implications of the exclusion clause. The research method is normative juridical research. The result of this research is the neglect of civil law and the principle of compensation is the principle of balance. The basic principle according to Rawls is that it is unfair or more people. in the sense of "freedom of results", in other words. is the nature of the debtor in a bank credit agreement. For the legal implications of the clause that excludes Article 1266 and Article 1267 of the Civil Code concerning the right of the debtor to the debtor. Legal efforts in finding and resolving problems that cannot be made by a decision due to the imbalance of the parties in the agreement. For people who make changes, no party will be harmed.

Download Full-text

Perjanjian Baku dalam Perjanjian Sewa Beli Kendaraan Bermotor pada Perusahaan Pembiayaan di Kota Banda Aceh

Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.24815/kanun.v20i2.10684 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 20 (2) ◽

pp. 219-236

Author(s):

Muhammad Marafwansyah ◽

Sanusi Bintang ◽

Darmawan Darmawan

Keyword(s):

Consumer Protection ◽

Research Method ◽

Civil Code ◽

Main Issue ◽

Motor Vehicles ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Finance Company ◽

Banda Aceh

Adanya ketidakseimbangan dalam penggunaan perjanjian baku dalam perjanjian sewa beli kendaraan bermotor pada perusahaan pembiayaan di Kota Banda Aceh memberi perlindungan hak kepada penjual daripada pembeli, sehingga lebih banyak risiko kerugian yang harus dipikul oleh pembeli. Pokok permasalahan dalam artikel ini adalah apakah klausula baku dalam perjanjian sewa beli kendaraan bermotor pada perusahaan pembiayaan melanggar ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan tentang perlindungan konsumen. Jenis metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah jenis metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan penelitian hukum yang digunakan dalam artikel ini terdiri dari, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian baku pada perusahaan pembiayaan PT ADMF bertentangan dengan ketentuan KUH Perdata, khususnya dalam Pasal 1266, Pasal 1267, Pasal 1337, Pasal 1338 ayat (1), ayat (2), dan ayat (3), Pasal 1339 KUH Perdata, dan juga bertentangan dengan ketentuan UUPK, khususnya dalam Pasal 4, Pasal 7, Pasal 18 ayat (1), dan ayat (2) UUPK. Oleh karena itu, penggunaan perjanjian baku dalam perjanjian sewa beli kendaraan bermotor pada perusahaan pembiayaan harus ditinjau dan disesuaikan agar tidak bertentangan dengan ketentuan undang-undang. Standard Agreement in The Hir-Purchase Agreement for the Motor Vehicles in a Finance Company in Banda Aceh The existence of an imbalance in the use of standard agreement in the hire-purchase agreement for motor vehicles in a finance company in Banda Aceh gives protection to the seller rather than the buyer, thus more risk of loss to be borne by the buyer. The main issue in this article is whether the standard clause in the hire purchase agreement of motor vehicles in the finance company violates the provisions of legislation on consumer protection. The research method used in this article was the normative legal research method. The legal research approaches used in this article consist of, statutory approach, case approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that the standard agreements used by PT ADMF was contradictory to the provisions of the Civil Code, particularly in Article 1266, Article 1267, Article 1337, Article 1338 Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), and Paragraph (3), Article 1339 Civil Code, and also contrary to the provisions of UUPK, particularly in Article 4, Article 7, and Article 18 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) UUPK. Therefore, the standard agreements in the hire-purchase agreement of motor vehicles in the finance company should be reviewed and adjusted so as not violates the provisions of legislation.

Download Full-text