Accountability of a Notary in Court for Underhand Deed Legalized by a Notary

This research aims to provide an explanation of the responsibility of notary public in the Court of deed under the hands of a notary public, facts in the field show that a Notary is often called to the court to give testimony on the evidence of the trial, namely a letter under the hand legalized by the notary, therefore there needs to be an explanation of the notary's liability for the deed made or legalized. Notary responsibility for deed under legalized hands is heavier than waarmerking, because the parties sign before notary public where notary does not ascertain the content of a deed whether it is wrong or true. Although only legalization but the deed under the hand has the value of being a valid and strong evidence in court so that sometimes dragging a notary witness in the trial. Notary can be subject to criminal sanctions if they are proven to have harmed one of the parties and the Notary can also be subject to civil sanctions in the form of compensation according to what was suffered by the parties.

Analysis of Inheritance Division Based on Deeds Made Before Notary Perspective Sadd Adz-Dzari'ah (Study at Notary Office of Bengkulu City)

This research aims to explain: 1) How is the distribution of inheritance made by the heirs based on the deed made before the notary perspective of Sadd Adz-Dzari'ah?, 2) What is the position of the inheritance distribution deed made before the notary perspective of Sadd Adz-Dzari’ah?. This type of research is library research. Data collection techniques using the Document Method. The conclusion states that, 1) The heirs in dividing the inheritance do not use the Islamic inheritance system but are divided in a family manner using each party discussing each other looking for a way out of the inheritance problem being faced. 2) The implementation of the inheritance distribution in a family is not intended to avoid furudhul muqaddarah (the part set out in the text), but is nothing but for the benefit of all heirs and avoid kemudharatan. To prevent this kemudharatan, then made the Deed of Inheritance before the notary public. So in the perspective of sadd adz dzari'ah, the position of making the deed of distribution of legal inheritance is sunnah.

Legal Liability For Losses Of Third Parties In The Agreement To Transfer Property Rights With An Absolute Power Of Attorney

An agreement to transfer title to land based on absolute power is prohibited by law. The prohibition of absolute power is regulated in Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs number 14 of 1982 concerning the Prohibition of Using Absolute Power for Transfer of Rights to Land, and Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Article 39 paragraph (1) letter d concerning land registration. However, the reality is that there is still a land sale and purchase agreement using an absolute power of attorney, causing losses to other parties. The problem is how is the legal responsibility of the seller and the notary against the loss of a third party due to the use of absolute power of attorney in the agreement to transfer title to land. This study aims to determine the legal liability of the seller and the notary against the losses of third parties due to the use of absolute power of attorney in the agreement to transfer ownership of land rights. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method using a statuate approach and case approach. The Study found that the seller's responsibility was based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code, namely by providing compensation for the value of the sale value of the land minus the owner's debt without involving a third party with good faith. And the accountability of the notary is contained in Law Number 30 of 2014 Article 84 concerning the Position of Notary Public and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 Article 62 concerning Land Registration which explains the sanctions for notaries. In this case it relates to the loss of a third party in good faith.Keywords: Absolute Power, CompensationAbstrak: Perjanjian pengalihan hak milik atas tanah yang didasarkan pada kuasa mutlak merupakan sesuatu yang dilarang oleh hukum. Pelarangan kuasa mutlak diatur dalam Instruksi Menteri Dalam Negeri nomor 14 Tahun 1982 tentang Larangan Penggunaan Kuasa Mutlak Sebagai Pemindahan Hak Atas Tanah, dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997 Pasal 39 ayat (1) huruf d tentang pendaftaran tanah. Namun realitas yang terjadi masih terdapatnya suatu perjanjian jual beli tanah menggunakan surat kuasa mutlak sehingga menyebabkan kerugian bagi pihak lain. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimanakah pertanggungjawaban hukum pihak penjual dan notaris terhadap kerugian pihak ketiga akibat penggunaan surat kuasa mutlak dalam perjanjian pengalihan hak milik atas tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban hukum pihak penjual dan notaris terhadap kerugian pihak ketiga akibat penggunaan surat kuasa mutlak dalam perjanjian pengalihan hak milik atas tanah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pihak penjual yakni berdasarkan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata yaitu dengan memberikan ganti kerugian seharga nilai penjualan tanah dikurangi hutang pemilik tanpa melibatkan pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. dan pertanggungjawaban pihak notaris yaitu terdapat dalam UU Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Pasal 84 tentang Jabatan Notaris dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Pasal 62 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah yang menjelaskan sanksi bagi notaris. Dalam hal ini berhubungan dengan kerugian pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik.Kata Kunci: Kuasa Mutlak, Ganti Kerugian

Implementation Of the Notary's Duties and Positions Regarding the Presence of the Appeaser Refers to Decree Number 65/33-III/ PP-INI/2020 Dated March 17, 2020

Concerns about Covid 19 by notaries in doing the Deed. This study aims to examine the Implementation of the Notary Position in Doing Deeds Before and during the Covid-19 Pandemic Period, and to Assess Obstacles in the Duties of Notary Positions in Doing Deeds during the Covid-19 Pandemic Period). The type of research used by the author is descriptive type research. Descriptive research is a problem-solving procedure investigated by describing or describing the current state of the subject and object of research based on existing facts. The results of the research in the Assignment of Notary Positions in Doing Deeds Before and during the Covid 19 Pandemic Period differed from the difference in the health protocol and the presence of the appeasers based on SK Number 65/33-III/ PP-INI/2020 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the matter referred to In the main point of the letter, the Central Management of the Indonesian Notary Association (PP-INI) and all of its staff expressed concern over the massive development of the spread of Covid-19 which directly affected the implementation of the duties of a Notary public in providing services to the public and in this regard, this PP urges all members to follow the health protocols set by the government to overcome the spread of Covid-19.Keywords: CoronaViruses, Notary, Decree.

Position of Deed Made by a Retired Notary in Court Proceedings in Banda Aceh

Article 65 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Notarial Department states "Notary, Substitute Notary and Notary Acting Officer are responsible for any deed made even though the Notary Protocol has been submitted or transferred to the notary protocol depository." In practice, it often occurs when the Protocol Deed is transferred to the Notary protocol holder of the party harmed by the existence of the deed to a lawsuit involving a retired notary public. This is as happened in the case in the Banda Aceh District Court. This relates to the summoning of witnesses who must obtain approval from the Notary Honorary Assembly in accordance with Article 66 paragraph 1 of the UUJN. This research aims to explain the position of the Deed made by a retired Notary who is sued to the Court and the liability of the Notary Protocol Holder if the Deed of Protocol held in question in the Court and to know the need for approval from the Notary Honorary Assembly if the retired notary is called as a witness in a court case. The research method used is normative research method. The data used is primary data. The results showed that: A retired notary (werda) the position of the deed that he made as a deed of protocol submitted to the Notary protocol holder. If the deed of protocol is questioned to the court, then the retired notary is responsible for the deed he made. The notary of the Protocol holder cannot be held liable for the Deed of Protocol he holds if it is in question in the Court. If there is a problem with the deed then the responsible person remains the notary concerned and not the notary protocol holder. The summons of a retired Notary does not require permission from the Notary Honorary Assembly (MKN).

The ambiguity of dismissal of notary over bankruptcy in Indonesia

A notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and other authorities regulated in-laws and regulations. Notaries are also private legal subjects (natuurlijk persons), which have free will to carry out legal actions. According to the Law on Notarial Positions, a Notary is dishonorably dismissed when (s)he is declared bankrupt. On the other hand, the UUK and PKPU recognize the rehabilitation of bankrupt debtors if they have fulfilled their obligations. This is where there is ambiguity or a fuzzy norm (vegen norm). Legal research aims to find out how bankruptcy is regulated in the notary position, and what are the legal consequences for the position of a notary both as a person and in relation to his/her position as a notary public? This legal research is normative juridical using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials obtained are analyzed using content analysis. The results of the discussion: 1). Notary bankruptcy has been regulated in UUK and PKPU as well as in the Law on Notary Position. 2). The legal consequences for a Notary who is declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court have an impact on the notary's personality, as well as on his position. According to the Law on the Position of Notary Public, if violating Article 84 which results in losses to the parties, the notary is obliged to pay compensation. According to the UUK and PKPU, this could result in the debtor losing the right to act freely on his assets, but not losing the right to perform his/her tasks and hold a position. As a recommendation, in the Law on the Position of Notary Public, it is necessary to clearly define the separation of Notary as a person from her/his position as his profession.

PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMALSUAN AKTA OTENTIK YANG DILAKUKAN NOTARIS

This research uses the Conceptual Approach Method and the Law Approach Method, on Normative Juridical Analysis by combining two data collection methods, namely Studying the Law and Examining library materials or secondary materials which are then analyzed using the Qualitative Analysis Method.The research results show that the notary can only (legally / in accordance with the rule of law) be a suspect if the notary intentionally keeps making a fake deed as requested by the tapper, even though he knows that the parties do not meet the legal requirements of the engagement. This shows that the notary does not strictly adhere to the Law on Notary Position (UUJN) and the Notary Professional Code of Ethics. Where it can lead to a notary public criminal act of forgery of authentic letters / deeds.The position of a Notary is held or its presence is desired by the laws and regulations with the intention of helping and serving people who need authentic written evidence regarding circumstances of events or legal actions of direct involvement by the parties facing them. However, in carrying out his profession, the police law apparatus is often summoned as a suspect in connection with the forgery of authentic deeds he has made. Thus, it is deemed necessary to know the Normative Juridical Analysis of Authentic Deed Falsification Conducted by Notaries. Keywords: Notary, Authentic Deed Falsification, Suspect. AbstrakPenelitian ini menggunakan Metode Pendekatan Konseptual dan Metode Pendekatan Undang-Undang, tentang Analisis Yuridis Normatif dengan cara menggabungkan dua metode pengumpulan data yaitu Menelaah Undang-Undang dan Meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan sekunder yang Kemudian dianalisa dengan Metode Analisis Kualitatif.Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa notaris hanya dapat (legal/sesuai dengan aturan hukum) dijadikan sebagai tersangka apabila notaris tersebut dengan sengaja tetap membuat akta palsu sesuai yang diminta oleh penghadap, padahal ia mengetahui bahwa para pihak penghadap tersebut tidak memenuhi syarat-syarat sahnya perikatan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa notaris tersebut tidak berpegang teguh pada Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) dan Kode Etik Profesi Notaris. Dimana dapat menjerumuskan notaris mengarah pada tindak pidana pemalsuan surat/akta otentik.Jabatan Notaris diadakan atau kehadirannya dikehendaki oleh Peraturan Perundang- undangan dengan maksud untuk membantu dan melayani masyarakat yang membutuhkan alat bukti tertulis yang bersifat otentik, mengenai keadaan peristiwa atau perbuatan hukum atas keterlibatan langsung oleh para pihak yang menghadap. Namun demikian Notaris dalam menjalankan profesinya tidak jarang dipanggil oleh pihak aparat hukum kepolisian sebagai tersangka Sehubungan dengan pemalsuan akta otentik yang dibuatnya. Sehingga, dipandang perlu untuk mengetahui Analisis Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris. Kata kunci: Notaris, Pemalsuan Akta Otentik, Tersangka.

Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik

The writing of this article aims to determine the authority of a substitute notary in carrying out the duties and positions of a notary and to find out the responsibilities of a substitute notary when committing an unlawful act in making an authentic deed. This research examines empty norms using normative research methods, with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and an analytical approach. The search for legal materials uses document study techniques, as well as analysis studies using qualitative analysis. The results of this research show that the responsibilities of a Notary Substitute are the same as that of a Notary Public, although they have different competencies, which can be seen through the requirement that a substitute Notary be appointed only with a Bachelor of Law graduates and have worked in a Notary Office. This cannot guarantee that the Substitute Notary will work properly and will not discriminate against the position of the Notary who has responsibility for the deed he made without a time limit and is not associated with the responsibility of the Notary being replaced. The principle of responsibility based on error is the basis for imposing sanctions on a Substitute Notary who is proven to have committed an unlawful act and is responsible for his actions in Civil, Criminal, code of ethics as well as administratively and is not associated with the responsibility of the Notary being replaced. Abstrak Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kewenangan notaris pengganti dalam menjalankan tugas serta jabatan notaris dan untuk mengetahui tanggung jawab Notaris Pengganti apabila melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam pembuatan akta autentik. Riset ini mengkaji norma kosong menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan analisis. Penelusuran bahan hukum menggunakan teknik studi dokumen, serta analisis kajian menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Hasil riset ini menunjukkan bahwa tanggung jawab Notaris Pengganti sama dengan Pejabat Notaris meski memiliki kompetensi yang berbeda yang dapat dilihat melalui syarat diangkatnya notaris pengganti hanya dengan lulusan Sarjana Hukum dan pernah bekerja pada Kantor Notaris. Hal tersebut tidak dapat menjamin bahwa Notaris Pengganti akan bekerja dengan baik dan tidak mendiskriminasi jabatan Notaris yang memiliki tanggung jawab terhadap akta yang dibuatnya tanpa adanya Batasan waktu dan tidak dikaitkan dengan tanggungjawab Notaris yang digantikan. Prinsip pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan kesalahan merupakan dasar pengenaan sanksi kepada Notaris Pengganti yang terbukti melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dan mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya secara Perdata, Pidana, kode etik serta pula secara administrasi dan tidak dikaitkan dengan tanggung jawab Notaris yang digantikan.

Keabsahan Akta Perjanjian Kredit Secara Daring yang Dibuat oleh Notaris Dalam Kondisi Pandemi Covid 19

The validity of the credit agreement deed read out online is still subject to the provisions in Article 1320 BW. The validity of the Credit Agreement Deed that is read out online is still valid and valid and has perfect legal force. The perfect legal power in the credit agreement deed remains subject to and in accordance with the provisions of civil law BW and Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of a Notary. The validity of the Credit Agreement Deed that is read out online remains valid and valid and has perfect legal force, which is very important during the Covid 19 pandemic which has an impact on limiting access to face-to-face meetings. The legal basis for reading credit agreement deeds online is not required to read or does not need to meet, namely Article 16 paragraph (7) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public is an exclusion of the requirement for a notary to read the deed. credit agreement before the parties with the condition that the tappers have read it themselves, know it, and understand the contents of the deed to be made. The Credit Agreement Deed that is read out online carries legal risks for the parties and witnesses who appear, therefore the notary must authenticate the parties present online, if there is negligence in authenticating the parties and harming the party in the credit agreement deed, the notary is responsible civil liability, criminal responsibility and administrative responsibility. The research approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach.Keywords: Notary; Validity of the Credit Agreement Deed; Online.Keabsahaan akta perjanjian kredit yang dibacakan secara daring tetap tunduk pada ketentuan dalam Pasal 1320 BW. Keabsahan Akta Perjanjian Kredit Yang di Bacakan Secara Daring tetap sah dan berlaku serta mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sempurna. Kekuataan hukum yang sempurna dalam akta perjanjian kredit tetap tunduk dan sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum perdata BW dan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Keabsahan Akta Perjanjian Kredit Yang di Bacakan Secara Daring tetap sah dan berlaku serta mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sempurna sangat penting disaat pandemic covid 19 yang berdampak kepada dibatasinya akses untuk tatap muka secara langsung. Adapun dasar hukum pembacaan akta perjanjian kredit secara daring tidak diwajibkan dibacakan atau tidak perlu bertemu yaitu Pasal 16 ayat (7) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris merupakan Pasal pengecualiaan akan keharusan notaris membacakan akta perjanjian kredit dihadapan para pihak dengan syarat penghadap telah membacanya sendiri, mengetahuinya, serta memahami isi dari akta yang akan dibuat. Akta Perjanjian Kredit Yang di Bacakan Secara Daring membawa risiko hukum akan para pihak dan saksi yang menghadap oleh karena itu notaris harus melakukan autentifikasi para pihak yang hadir dalam daring, jika terjadi kelalaian dalam autentiikasi para pihak serta merugikan pihak dalam akta perjanjian kredit maka notaris bertanggung jawab perdata, tanggung jawab pidana dan tanggung jawab administratif. Pendekatan penelitian yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual.Kata Kunci: Notaris; Keabsahaan Akta Perjanjian Kredit; Daring.