scholarly journals Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti setelah Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Jabatan Berakhir

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 305
Author(s):  
Tengku Erwinsyahbana ◽  
Melinda Melinda
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Abstract As an honorable position and profession, the notary replacement also has obligations that must be implemented, either based on laws and regulations that specifically regulate notary public (UUJN), or other laws and regulations. The authority of a notary substitute shall be the same as that of a notary public, comprising of general authority, special powers, and powers that shall be determined later in accordance with the laws and regulations. The replacement notary's legal liability includes civil liability, criminal responsibility, UUJN-based responsibilities, and responsibility for performing his / her duties under the Notary's Code of Conduct. However, the limitation of the length of time the substitute notary's responsibility to the deeds he made, has not been explicitly regulated in the UUJN. Keywords: Deed, Authority, Notary Substitute, Responsibility

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Otentik yang Dibuatnya Terkait Jangka Waktu Pensiun

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-333
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ayu Ria Rahmawati ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Grace Period ◽  
Full Responsibility ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Maximum Limit

An authentic deed is a letter whose form has been determined by law that can be used as perfect evidence made before a notary public. The notary concerned must take full responsibility in case of problems related to the deed he made, whether in Civil, Criminal, UUJN and Code of Ethics. The notary will be released from all of these responsibilities if he has retired from his position. This study aims to determine the responsibility of the notary for authentic deeds that are canceled in court and made after the retirement period. The research method used is normative law using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the analysis show that the notary's responsibility for the authentic deed he makes when declared canceled in court can be divided into 4, namely a) civil liability, b) criminal responsibility, c) responsibility based on UUJN d) Responsibility based on the Code of Ethics. Then, the notary is still responsible even though the notary's term of office has ended or has retired. This can be carried out by the authorities as long as the authentic deed is null and void in existence at a grace period of 30 years from the date the deed is drawn up by the Notary. Through this research, it is hoped that the provisions regarding the responsibility of the notary public after retirement will be more defined regarding the maximum limit so as not to cause problems for both the notary and the party concerned

SOME MEASURES OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CORRUPTION OFFENSES IN THE LAW OF THE MOSCOW STATE OF THE XV-XVI CENTURIES

2020 ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Любовь Евгеньевна Логунова
Keyword(s):  
Corporal Punishment ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Present Stage ◽  
Legal Documents ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Russian Law

В статье автором проводится анализ законодательных памятников права Московского государства XV-XVI вв. и публично-правовых грамот. Выявляется проблема отсутствия законодательного закрепления таких понятий, как «коррупция», «коррупционное правонарушение». Предпринимается попытка определения данных понятий. Сравнивается понимание указанных явлений в XV-XVI вв. с современной правовой интерпретацией. Анализируются и раскрываются основные аспекты и особенности коррупционных правонарушений, характерные для периода Московского государства. Перечисляются меры противодействия коррупции на современном этапе и в рассматриваемом временном периоде. Изучаются не только такие известные памятники российского права, как судебники, но также и иные источники права периода XV-XVI вв. Перечисляются и раскрываются меры юридической ответственности за совершение коррупционных правонарушений. Дается краткая характеристика видам юридической ответственности, применяемым за совершение коррупционных правонарушений. Подчеркивается тяжесть уголовной ответственности, которую несли низшие судебные чиновники за совершение коррупционных правонарушений. Автор обращает внимание на то, что законодатель рассматриваемого периода придавал большое значение борьбе с чиновничьим произволом на местах. В ходе исследования автор приходит к выводу о том, что расширение видов мер юридической ответственности за коррупционные правонарушения, назначение тяжких телесных наказаний за совершение такого рода деяний не привело к искоренению коррупции в рассматриваемом историческом периоде. In the article, the author analyzes the legal monuments of the Moscow state of the XV-XVI centuries and public legal documents. The problem of the lack of legislative consolidation of such concepts as «corruption», «corruption offense» is revealed. An attempt is made to define these concepts. The understanding of these phenomena in the XV-XVI centuries is compared with the modern legal interpretation. The main aspects and features of corruption offenses typical for the period of the Moscow state are analyzed and disclosed. Measures to counteract corruption at the present stage and in the considered time period are listed. We study not only such well-known monuments of Russian law as sudebniki, but also other sources of law from the XV-XVI centuries the measures of legal responsibility for committing corruption offenses are Listed and disclosed. A brief description of the types of legal liability applied for corruption offenses is given. The author emphasizes the severity of the criminal responsibility that was borne by lower judicial officials for committing corruption offenses. The author draws attention to the importance that the legislator of the period under review attached to the fight against official arbitrariness on the ground. In the course of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that the expansion of the types of measures of legal responsibility for corruption offenses, the appointment of heavy corporal punishment for committing such acts did not lead to the eradication of corruption in the considered historical period.

scholarly journals The Position And Function Of Notary In The Using Of State Symbol

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Arief Rahman Siregar ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Letter Position ◽  
Problem Formulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
And Function

This study tried to answer the problem formulation is What position and Function of Notary in using the State symbol? What if Notaries do malpractices in the using of State Symbol and how sanctions against malpractice Notary Public who use the State Symbol? The purpose of this study to determine the position and Function of Notary in using the State Symbol, and determine sanctions against notaries who do mal practice in the using of State Symbol.This research was conducted using the normative method, means testing and reviewing secondary data, using literature data in the form of positive law relating to Legislation relating to the issues discussed.The results of this study concluded that a Notary Public in the office using the Symbol State under Article 16 paragraph (1) letter k of Notary law) and use of the State symbol of Notary's Stamp or Head Letter Position as stipulated in Article 54 paragraph (1) letter j Act No. 24 of 2009 and as Stamp of Department Office as stipulated in Article 54 paragraph (2) letter j Act No. 24 of 2009, while the Notary malpractice in the using of State symbol is not necessarily directly given to criminal sanctions as a form of application of the law ultimum remidium. because there are several steps that must be passed given the Notary has its own rules in the Law on Notary. Notary of the behavior is also governed by a special organization that Indonesian Notary Association (INI), but still asked the criminal responsibility under Act No. 24 of 2009 and Article 154 of the Criminal Code letter if indeed Notary proven legally and convincingly to have malpractice against the using of State Symbol.Keywords: Notary Authority; Notary Position; Sanctions Against Notary.

scholarly journals Legal Liability of the Deputies to NPC for Selling Ballots

2020 ◽  
pp. 86-90
Author(s):  
Zhou Heng
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Standing Committee ◽  
The Status ◽  
Right To Vote ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
People's Congress

Deputies to people’s congresses enjoy the right to elect the personnel of a state organ, members of the Standing Committee of the People’s Congress at the same level and deputies to the People’s Congress at a higher level in accordance with the provisions of the law. Based on the official nature of the right to vote, deputies to NPC can not transfer their right to vote and sell votes. As selling ballots is an illegal exercise of their official duty, they should assume for corresponding criminal responsibility for the crime of undermining election and bribery provided in the Criminal Law of China. Moreover, delegates to NPC who have the status of public officials shall be included in the supervision , and strengthen the responsibility inquiry.

scholarly journals Aspek Hukum Pidana Penyiaran Film Tanpa Sensor oleh Netflix Sebagai Penyedia Layanan Subscription Video On Demand

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2203
Author(s):  
Aushofi Zuhrotul Ulya
Keyword(s):  
Video On Demand ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Broadcast Media ◽  
Sensor Film ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Demand Service ◽  
Laws And Regulations

AbstractThe new broadcast media is broadcast digitization in the form of a platform accessed via the internet network. Netflix as a provider of the Subscription Video on Demand service broadcasts uncensored films which result in the films being against the culture and laws and regulations in Indonesia because they contain pornography to violence even though there is an obligation to be censored by a film before the film will be shown. This research is a legal research that analyzes the uncensored film broadcasting activities carried out by Netflix according to the laws and regulations in Indonesia and Netflix's legal liability for uncensored film broadcasting by using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. From this research it was found that Netflix broadcasts uncensored films in Indonesia in violation of the statutory provisions concerning Broadcasting, Film, Pornography, and ITE. However, Netflix does not automatically account for all provisions of the laws and regulations because the locus of broadcasting activities carried out by Netflix cannot be reached by all the provisions of the laws and regulations.Keywords: Film Broadcasting; Netflix; Film Censorship; Internet.AbstrakMedia penyiaran baru merupakan digitalisasi penyiaran dalam bentuk platform yang diakses melalui jaringan internet. Netflix sebagai penyedia layanan Subscription Video on Demand menyiarkan film tanpa sensor yang mengakibatkan filmnya bertentangan dengan budaya dan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia karena bermuatan pornografi hingga kekerasan padahal terdapat kewajiban untuk dilakukan sensor film dikeluarkan oleh lembaga sensor film sebelum film akan dipertunjukkan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang menganalisis kegiatan penyiaran film tanpa sensor yang dilakukan oleh Netflix menurut peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia dan pertanggungjawaban hukum Netflix terhadap penyiaran film tanpa sensor dengan mengggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Dari penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa Netflix melakukan penyiaran film tanpa sensor di Indonesia melanggar ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan tentang Penyiaran, Perfilman, Pornografi, dan ITE. Namun, tidak serta merta semua ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang dilanggar dapat dipertanggungjawabkan pada Netflix karena locus kegiatan penyiaran yang dilakukan oleh Netflix tidak dapat dijangkau semua ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Kata Kunci: Penyiaran Film; Netflix; Sensor Film; Internet.

scholarly journals DEGRADASI AKTA OTENTIK YANG TIDAK DILAKUKAN PENANDATANGANAN PARA PIHAK SECARA BERSAMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Dian Dharmayanti ◽  
Rr Asfarina Izazi Razan ◽  
Nahdlotul Fadilah
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Will ◽  
High Integrity ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Take All ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<em>Notary is a general officer authorized to create an authentic deed of all actions, agreements, and statutes required by the laws and/or regulations required by the interested to be expressed in the deed Authentically, guaranteeing the certainty of the date of the deed, storing the deed, giving Grosee, copies and quotations of the deed, all of them throughout the making of the deed were not also assigned or excluded to the other officers stipulated by the law. Thus, it is described in article 1 number 1 of Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the amendment to law Number 30 year 2004 concerning the Notary Regulation (Hereinafter called UUJN). A notary public is a noble, independent and high integrity position, so it is only natural to take all actions in their position seriously referring to the laws and regulations and the code of ethics. The law actions of the parties as described in the notarial deed is purely wishes of the parties and the notary is limited to providing law counseling related to the contents of the deed and the law actions of the parties, without imposing the will of the parties. party or in favor of one party. After the deed is made and then read out in front of the parties and witnesses, it must be signed when it is signed by all parties present and witnesses as well, it becomes one of the notary obligations stipulated in UUJN.</em>

scholarly journals CIVIL LIABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE: AN ANALYSIS OF CYBERBULLYING POLICIES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIAN SCHOOLS

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peta Spyrou
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
School Community ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Duty Of Care ◽  
Australian School ◽  
Multifaceted Approach ◽  
Whole School ◽  
Legal Duty

Cyberbullying is a form of covert bullying that affects the lives of young people and adults alike. Empirical evidence suggesting that the effects of cyberbullying may lead to protracted mental harm highlights the need for schools to take a proactive stance against this form of bullying. This article looks specifically at the effectiveness of the anti-bullying policies implemented by South Australian school authorities in order to comply with their legal duty of care in negligence. Part I introduces the topic of cyberbullying, while Part II explains a school’s legal liability for instances of cyberbullying and identifies the requisite need for anti-bullying polices. In addition, Part III highlights the need for a multifaceted approach to reduce the occurrence of cyberbullying that recognises the important roles played by parents and student bystanders. This section concludes by providing specific recommendations on how anti-bullying policies should be implemented. The article argues that while school authorities may bear legal liability for instances of cyberbullying, schools cannot effectively implement anti-bullying policies without forming a partnership with the whole school community.

scholarly journals Civil liability in the rental agreement

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Extra-B) ◽  
pp. 180-184
Author(s):  
Guzel Firdinatovna Nagumanova
Keyword(s):  
Main Part ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Historical Aspects ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Lease Agreement ◽  
Russian Model

In this article, the author attempts to analyze the institution of civil liability arising from the movable property lease agreement, using the example of Russian legislation and the legislation of a number of European states. Within the framework of this study, the author also raises more general doctrinal issues related to the place of liability under a rent agreement in the system of civil liability, as well as in the system of legal liability in general. In order to determine the place and role of the institutions under consideration, the author considered various views and interpretations of the terms under study, as well as studied the individual historical aspects of the formation and development of the civil liability institution. Among other things, the main part of the study is devoted to the consideration of individual measures and cases of contractors' liability under the rent agreement. At the end of work, the researcher assessed the effectiveness and efficiency of the Russian model of legal regulation of civil liability arising from the rent agreement.    

scholarly journals Sanksi Terhadap Penerima Fidusia Yang Tidak Menghapuskan Jaminan Fidusia Elektronik

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
I Putu Budi Arta Yama ◽  
I Made Udiana
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of carrying out the elimination of related fiduciary guarantees so that objects that are used as fiduciary collateral objects with the debt fiduciary debt paid off, then the object can be re-registered the same fiduciary guarantee. In the regulations regarding Fiduciary Guarantees namely Law Number 42 of 1999 does not regulate sanctions against parties who are given the mandate by statutory regulations to abolish fiduciary guarantees. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the sanctions against those appointed by the laws and regulations that do not abolish electronic fiduciary guarantees and who can eliminate electronic fiduciary guarantees. This study applies a method which is normative legal research and the approach is the statutory approach. The result of this research is that the sanction given is civil sanction, in the form of a claim for compensation which refers to the provisions of Article 1365 of the Civil Code and the party that can carry out the removal of fiduciary guarantees ie is a fiduciary recipient either through his power of attorney or representative, the attorney referred to is a Notary Public.

To the issue of legal liability for informational and mental iatrogenesis and their correlation

2019 ◽  
pp. 165-174
Author(s):  
Nikolai Alekseyevich Ognerubov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Medical Worker ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

We consider various approaches to understanding and classifying such phenomenon as “iatrogenesis”. Taking into account the specifics of the stated theme, we highlight informational and mental manifestations of iatrogenesis, we identify approaches where these types differ, as well as approaches where they are identical. Due to this, we analyze informational and mental iatrogenesis from the juridical science point of view. We define the reasons for the criminal liability of a medical worker for “classical” mental iatrogenesis as highly controversial. At the same time there is a civil liability, namely, the issue of causing moral harm. In the context of the consideration of informational iatrogenesis, we propose to pay attention to the provisions of Article 137 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Article 732 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the provisions of criminal legislation on offenses to which medical workers may be subject, and the provisions of civil legislation on redress for the non-pecuniary damage as a civil liability. The conducted research led to the conclusion that it is impossible to identify informational and mental iatrogenesis from a legal point of view. We substantiate the necessity of conducting work at the legislative level on a clear classification of iatrogenesis as a basis for further research on its individual differentiations, which have legal significance both in doctrinal and practical terms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document