scholarly journals THE ROLE OF LAND DEED OFFICIALS (PPAT) IN THE IMPOSITION OF ACQUISITION DUTY OF RIGHT ON LAND AND BUILDING IN THE EXCHANGE PROCESS OF LAND AND BUILDING IN DENPASAR CITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105
Author(s):  
Dita Paramitha ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Nyoman Sukandia

In the process of exchanging land rights, the facts show that the use of market value as the basis for calculating the acquisition duty of right on land and building often creates problems in the field. This study aims to examine the basis for imposing acquisition duty of right on land and building in the process of exchanging land and buildings in Denpasar city and to examine the role of land deed officials and the obstacles faced in the imposition of acquisition duty of right on land and building in the process of exchanging land and buildings in Denpasar city. The method used in this study is an empirical juridical research method. The results of this study showed that (1) the imposition of acquisition duty of right on land and building in the exchange process in Denpasar City is applied with the provisions of Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Regional Levies calculated based on market value. (2) The Land Deed Official has a role in making the deed of exchange and in collecting acquisition duty of right on land and building in the process of exchanging the duties and authorities of the land deed official, namely assisting taxpayers in legal acts of exchange in the process of transferring rights to land and/or buildings from the exchange provider to exchange recipients in accordance with Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning Position Regulations for Land Deed Maker Officials.

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Mochamad Elmo Sidiq ◽  
Amin Purnawan

ABSTRAKProblematik penelitian ini adalah : Apa dasar hukum  Peran Notaris dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau? apa peran Notaris  Dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau? dan apa akibat hambatan hukum atas Peran Notaris dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau?Penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis-empiris yang bersumber dari pengumpulan data yang diperoleh dari data primer dan data sekunder, kemudian dianalisis dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah teknik wawancara. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis data kualitatif.Hasil temuan peneliti menunjukkan bahwa Dasar hukum Notaris dan/atau PPAT dalam pertanahan, didasarkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris dan Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor : 1 Tahun 2006 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor : 37 Tahun 1998 tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuatan Akta Tanah. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 55 Tahun 1993 maupun Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006, peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut dapat dilakukan melalui/dihadapan Notaris dan/atau PPAT. Peran nyata keterlibatan notaris dalam pembangunan komplek kantor Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau adalah pembuatan Akta Notaris Nomor 9 tanggal 06 Juli 2005 tentang Surat Perjanjian Pelepasan Hak atas Tanah di antara PT Sinar Bintang Sakti dan Pemda Kabupaten Sekadau dan Pembuatan Akta Notaris No. 10 tanggal 06 Juli 2005 tentang surat Pengakuan hutang yang pada pokoknya Pemkab Sekadau mengakui mempunyai hutang kepada CHAN INDRA, dengan jaminan tanah yang telah diterima pelepasan hak atas tanah dari CHAN INDRA selaku Direktur PT. Sinar Bintang Sakti. Perdebatan Notaris berwenang untuk membuat akta yang berkaitan dengan akta-akta pertanahan mengakibatkan keraguan mengenai keabsahan terhadap akta notaris yang terdapat dalam proyek pembangunan perkantoran di Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau.Kata Kunci : Notaris, Pengadaan Tanah, Kabupaten Sekadau. ABSTRACTIn relation to the authority of Notary, as mentioned in UUJN Number 30 Year2004 jo Law Number 2 Year 2014, Article 15 paragraph (2) letter (f), that Notary has authority to make deed related to land.The problematic of this research is: What is the legal basis of Notary's Role in Transaction of Land Procurement For Development Site of Sekadau Regency Government Complex  what is the role of Notary In Transaction of Land Procurement For Development Site of Sekadau Regency Government Complex ?; and what are the consequences of the legal barrier to the Notary's Role in the Land Acquisition Transaction for the Location of the Sekadau Regency Government Complex ?This research is with juridical-empirical approach that comes from collecting data obtained from primary data and secondary data, then analyzed by qualitative analysis method. Data collection techniques used are interview techniques. Data analysis techniques used qualitative data analysis.The findings of the researcher indicate that the legal basis of Notary and / or PPAT in the land is based on Law Number 30 Year 2004 regarding Notary Position and Regulation of the Head of National Land Agency Number 1 Year 2006 regarding Provisions on Implementation of Government Regulation Number 37 Year 1998 on the Regulation of Officials of the Establishment of Deed of Land. Presidential Decree No. 55/1993 and Presidential Regulation No. 65/2006, the transfer of land rights can be done through / in the presence of a Notary and / or PPAT. The real role of notary involvement in the construction of the Sekadau District Government office complex is the making of Notarial Deed No. 9 dated July 6, 2005 concerning Letter of Agreement on the Release of Land Rights between PT Sinar Bintang Sakti and the Regional Government of Sekadau Regency and the Notarial Deed. 10 dated July 6, 2005, concerning letters of recognition of debt principally Pemkab Sekadau acknowledged to have a debt to CHAN INDRA, with guaranteed land that has been received the release of land rights from CHAN INDRA as Director of PT. Sinar Bintang Sakti. The debate of a Notary is authorized to make deeds relating to land deeds lead to doubts about the validity of the notarial deed contained in office building projects in the Sekadau District Government.Suggestions to lawmakers to anticipate differences in legal interpretation in the future, it is recommended that both Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law Number 2 Year 2014 on UUJN and the Notary Profession Code of Ethics, to strengthen the explanation of legislation has been compiled.Keywords : Notary Public, Land Procurement, Sekadau District.


Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.


Author(s):  
Adri Aulia Rahman ◽  
Shalim HS ◽  
Muhaimin

The problem of inheritance is still a complex matter in Indonesia. In general, the transfer of inheritance is carried out in several ways, namely inheritance, grant and will. Provisions regarding inheritance are regulated in the Civil Code, KHI and various jurisprudences which can be used as a foundation. In carrying out the distribution of inheritance is also inseparable from the role of Notary and PPAT which by Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position and Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning PPAT Position Regulations, the regulation is given the authority to make deeds. The method used in the study is the empirical research method. In order to find out the position of non-Muslim heirs in Islamic inheritance, and to find out how the role of Notary and PPAT and the form of deed made in the distribution of the inheritance.


Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24
Author(s):  
Hadi Pranoto

Related to this research, the object of philosophical thinking is the role of the land office when facing multiple SHM disputes in the perspective of the legal objective theory. This problem originated from Allan Tjipta Rahardja who owned a plot of land covering an area of 33,170 M2 based on SHM No. 12/Kelurahan Gunung Anyar Tambak, Rungkut District, Surabaya City. Physical control over the parcels of land since it was bought by Allan Tjipta Rahardja is in his possession, and as long as his possession has never been disputed by anyone. Then in early 2008 the land belonging to Allan Tjipta Rahardja was seized and physically controlled by Haji Musofaini, resulting in a dispute over ownership of the land rights between Allan Tjipta Rahardja and Haji Musofaini. SHM No. 12/Kelurahan Gunung Anyar Tambak owned by Allan Tjipta Rahardja is listed in the land book No. 9722 / 84.85 Date 18-February-1985. All this time, an inspection has been carried out and is in accordance with the Land Book in Surabaya City Land Office II, recorded in a clean condition of all burdens, so that it can be used as collateral goods. No. 12/Kelurahan Gunung Anyar Tambak. The research method use  normative legal research method, namely a library research approach that is focused by conducting an applied study of a rule or a norm on positive law in relation to the substance of this paper. The results showed that in a case of multiple SHM disputes, the Land Office was passive, so the disputing parties had to "fight" themselves to defend the truth of their exhausting ownership, consuming energy, thoughts, time and costs that were not small, as a result the legal certainty of ownership was not achieved land rights.Terkait penelitian ini, yang menjadi objek berpikir filosofis ialah peran kantor pertanahan ketika menghadapi perselisihan SHM ganda dalam perspektif teori tujuan hukum. Masalah ini berawal dari Allan Tjipta Rahardja yang memiliki sebidang tanah seluas 33.170 M2 berdasarkan SHM No. 12/ Kelurahan Gunung Anyar Tambak, Kecamatan Rungkut, Kota Surabaya. Penguasaan fisik atas bidang tanah tersebut sejak dibeli oleh Allan Tjipta Rahardja berada dalam penguasaannya, dan selama dalam penguasaannya tidak pernah dipermasalahkan oleh siapapun juga. Kemudian pada awal tahun 2008 tanah milik Allan Tjipta Rahardja tersebut diserobot dan dikuasai secara fisik oleh Haji Musofaini, sehingga timbul perselisihan kepemilikan hak atas tanah tersebut antara Allan Tjipta Rahardja dan Haji Musofaini. SHM No. 12/Kelurahan Gunung Anyar Tambak milik Allan Tjipta Rahardja itu terdaftar dalam buku tanah No. 9722/84.85 Tanggal 18-Pebruari-1985.  Selama ini telah dilakukan pemeriksaan dan telah sesuai dengan Buku Tanah yang ada di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Surabaya II,  tercatat dalam keadaan bersih dari segala beban, sehingga dapat dijadikan barang agunan Kredit bank dan dibebani Hak Tanggungan, sampai dengan terdapat Roya yang semuanya terbaca pada lembar SHM No. 12/Kelurahan Gunung Anyar Tambak. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum bersifat normatif dengan kajian terapan suatu kaidah atau suatu norma pada hukum positif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada sebuah kasus sengketa SHM ganda, Kantor Pertanahan bersikap pasif, sehingga para pihak yang berselisih harus “bertempur” sendiri mempertahankan kebenaran kepe-milikannya yang meletihkan, menyita tenaga, pikiran, waktu dan biaya yang tidak kecil, akibatnya tidak tercapai kepastian hukum kepemilikan hak atas tanah. 


Author(s):  
Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba ◽  

Correctional Bureau (BAPAS) plays a very important and strategic role in child criminal case settlement. One form of the settlement is made through diversion, for child to avoid the bad impact of formal child criminal judicature. The research employed a juridical normative research method and statute approach and conceptual approach. The role of Bapas in child criminal case settlement through diversion is quite important and strategic as set forth in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning Child Criminal Judiciary System, Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning the Guidelines on the Implementation of Diversion and Dealing with Under 12 (Twelve) Years Old Child, Regulation of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2014 concerning the Guidelines on Diversion Implementation in Child Criminal Judiciary System. The constraints found in the diversion implementation are related to remedy for victim and non-optimal post-diversion supervision by the Correctional Advisor of Correctional Bureau (PK Bapas).


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57
Author(s):  
Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas ◽  
Rico Zubaidi

Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) as an accelerated land registration program in Indonesia led directly by the President needs to provide assurance and legal protection of ownership of land rights. PTSL in this case is assigned to the Adjudication Committee which functions as the executor of PTSL according to the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian/Head of the National Land Agency. PPAT as a public official mandated by Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration in fact could not be found its role in the implementation of PTSL both outside and within the Adjudication Committee. This study aims to examine the role of PPAT that exists and should be present in the implementation of PTSL. The research methodology used is normative legal research with literature study in primary and secondary data collection. The results of the study found no role for PPAT in PTSL legislation. If referring to Government Regulation No. 24/1997, all transitions after the birth of this regulation require a PPAT deed as written evidence of ownership or transfer of land rights. The Adjudication Committee as the executor of PTSL should coordinate with PPAT to ensure that PTSL meets the legal data research stage so that an orderly, complete registration of land is achieved and provides legal certainty of ownership of land rights.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Widyawati Widyawati ◽  
Widhi Handoko

The purpose of this study: 1) to analyze the Notary role / PPAT in raising legal awareness in the registration of land rights in Pati Regency, according to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration. 2) to analyze the obstacles and solutions role of the Notary / PPAT in increasing of public awareness for the registration of land rights in Pati regency. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analytical method.Based on the results of data analysis concluded that: the role of the Notary / PPAT in increasing of public awareness for the registration of land rights in Pati Regency, according to Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration can be said to have not been successful, due to the lack of socialization of Notary / PPAT up to the suburbs Pati city where people still common law. Barriers Notary / PPAT in increasing of public awareness for the registration of land rights in Pati regency namely external and internal factors. The solution Notaries should cooperate with other parties for the success of socialization, such as cooperation with the press.Keywords: Notary Role; Socialization; Legal Understanding.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seftia Azrianti

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis peran badan pertanahan dalam pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah menurut Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. Metode pada penelitian ini adalah metode pendekatan yuridis empiris. Pendektan yuridis, digunakan untuk menganalisis berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan terkait dengan peranan Kantor Pertanahan Kota Tebing Tinggi dalam upaya meningkatkan pendaftaran hak atas tanah. Sedangkan pendekatan empiris, digunakan untuk menganalisa hukum yang dilihat sebagai prilaku masyarakat yang berpola dalam kehidupan masyarakat yang selalu berinteraksi dan berhubungan dalam aspek kemasyarakatan. Berdasarkan Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan Peran Badan Pertanahan Nasional dalam mengoptimalisasikan pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia dilakukan sesuai dengan tugas dan wewenang Peraturan Perundang undangan yang berlaku khususnya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah,  dalam upaya untuk meningkatkan pendaftaran hak atas tanah,  Badan Pertanahan nasional adalah sebagai garda depan dalam melayani masyarakat dalam melakukan pendaftaran tanah pertama kali maupun dalam rangka pemeliharaan daftar umum pendaftaran tanah. Upaya-upaya yang dilakukan oleh Kantor Pertanahan di Kota Tebing Tinggi untuk mengoptimalkan pendaftaran tanah di Tebing Tinggi adalah menggunakan Program Larasita dan Prona Sebagai cara ampuh mempercepat program pendaftaran tanah di Kota Tebing Tinggi.  Kata Kunci:  Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Optimalisasi, Pendaftaran TanahThe aim of this study was to identify and analyze the role of land agency in the implementation of land registration in accordance with Government Regulation (PP) No. 24 of 1997 about Land Registration. The method in this study was empirical juridical approach. Juridical approach used to analyze the various laws and regulations relating to the role of Tebing Tinggi land agency in an effort to improve the registration of land rights. While the empirical approach, used to analyze the law based on society attitudes in daily interaction and relating in the social aspects. Based on The results of this study, it can be concluded that the role of the National Land Agency in optimizing land registration in Indonesia carried out in accordance with the duties and authority of Laws and regulations, particularly the Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration, in effort to improve the registration of land, national rights Land Agency was as main officerin serving the community in conducting the first land registration and maintenance . The efforts undertaken by the Land Office at Tebing Tinggi to optimize land registration in Tebing Tinggi was using Larasita and Prona Program as a useful effort to accelerate land registration program in Tebing Tinggi. Key words:  National Land Agency, Optimalization, Land Registration


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-181
Author(s):  
Putu Arya Bagus Utama ◽  
I Nyoman Sumardika ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti

For human life, land has an important role because there is a direct relationship between humans and land. Land is the main and largest capital of Indonesia. The problems of this study are 1) Is the basis for the agreement on the sale and purchase of land rights by the parties? 2) Is PPAT authorized to make deed of sale and purchase of rights to land based on the sale and purchase agreement made by the parties? The research method used is a normative legal research method, with a literature study of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study can be concluded that: 1) The Agreement on the Sale and Purchase is made by the parties because the agreement that binds the seller to the buyer so as not to offer objects that are traded to other buyers, and the price of the object being traded is definitely price and there is no price increase. 2) The Land Deed Maker Officer has the authority to make the sale and purchase deed of land rights based on the sale and purchase agreement by the parties stated in article 4 paragraph 1 of Government Regulation Number 37 of 1998 concerning the Position Regulations of the Land Deed Making Officer. In this case, it is expected that the Land Deed Maker Officer in making a deed of sale and purchase in accordance with the applicable Law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document