scholarly journals Putusan Sela Perkara Perdata Bila Penggugat Asal Meninggal Dunia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-593
Author(s):  
I Kadek Agus Widiastika Adiputra ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Arguments ◽  
The Republic

The decision of the Panel of Judges on Civil Case No. 414/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps, which continued the trial and set an interim decision even though one of the plaintiffs had died, contradicted the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 431K/Sip/1973, dated May 9, 1974. This study aimed to examine the setting of interlocutory decisions on the civil procedural law and examine the judge's considerations in determining the continuation of the trial process in the case of decision Number: 414/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps when the original plaintiff died. This research was designed by using normative legal research and legislation approaches. The data used were primary and secondary legal data collected through documentation techniques by processing and analyzing legal literature that had been collected using legal arguments. The results of the study indicated that the provision of interlocutory decisions was regulated in Article 185 HIR/196 RBg. Interlocutory decisions could be divided into 4 groups, namely preparatory, interlocutor, incidental, and provisional. The judges' considerations in civil cases Number: 414/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps The Intervenient asked the Panel of Judges to be given the position of a Plaintiff-Intervenor based on the legal basis of disputes over property rights, over the land and buildings on it with the Intervenient's position as a buyer in good faith.

scholarly journals Kedudukan dan Efektivitas Justice Collaborator di dalam Hukum Acara Pidana

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-256
Author(s):  
Adi Syahputra Sirait
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Analysis Instrument ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Illicit Trafficking

This article aims to analyze and explain the position of justice collaborator in criminal procedural law and the effectiveness of justice collaborator in proof, as an analysis instrument this research uses a case study of a narcotics-specific criminal decision in the Supreme Court where narcotics is an extraordinary crime committed in an organized manner by a drug syndicate narcotics, this research uses a social legal research approach using juridical type, the research data is obtained from an analysis of the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 920K / Pid.Sus / 2013 which is then analyzed using the effectiveness theory. The Supreme Court Judge determines the defendant as a justice collaborator based on the Supreme Court circular number 4 of 2011 regarding the treatment of whistleblowers and witnesses of collaborating actors (justice collaborator). The results of this study are that the supreme court judge considered the defendant's petition as a justice collaborator who could reveal the illicit trafficking network of international channels and also reveal the main perpetrators of the narcotics distribution.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS KONSENSUALISME DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI ONLINE

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Bunga Sasmita ◽  
I Wayan Novy Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Online Trading ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Penelitian ini bertujuan untukemahami bagaimanakah pengaturan jual beli online dalam hukum di Indonesia dan bagaimanakah aspek hukum jual beli secara online dalam perjanjian.  Penelitian ini, menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Sedangkan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah menggunakan pendekatan fakta dan statute approach. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pengaturan mengenai jual beli secara online diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 18 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, yang mana sebagai penerapan pasal 1313 KUHPerdata. Para pihak yang mengadakan perjanjian bisa menerapkan KUHPerdata yang jadi dasar diakui sahnya perjanjian dimana keabsahannya tercantum syarat 1320 KUHPerdata yakni:   kecakapan, kesepakatan, suatu sebab yang halal dan suatu hal tertentu.Sedangkan penerapan asas Konsensualisme dalam perjanjian online yang didasarkan oleh ketentuan dalam Pasal 1313 KUHPerdata yang menegaskan bahwa adanya suatu perjanjian berarti pihak satu dengan pihak lainnya setuju untuk mengikatkan dirinya.   This study aims to understand how the online arrangement in the sale and purchase agreement and how the legal aspects of buying and selling online in the agreement. This research uses normative legal research methods. While the approach used is to use the fact approach and statute approach. The results of this study indicate that the regulation regarding online trading is regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, which is the legal basis for applying article 1313 of the Civil Code. The parties who entered into the agreement can apply the KUHPer which is the basis for the validity of the agreement where the validity is stated in the terms of the 1320 KUHPer, namely: skill, agreement, a halal cause and a certain thing. While the application of the principle of consensualism in an online agreement based on the provisions in Article 1313 of the KUHPer which confirms that an agreement means that one party with another party agrees to bind themselves.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI MASA PANDEMI COVID 19. (STUDI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KAB. KEDIRI)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Emi Puasa Handayani ◽  
Zainal Arifin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Third Stage ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
The Republic

This article is the outcome of research aimed at took two problems. First, what is the procedure for the mediation process in accordance with the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016. Second, how is the implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016, during the Covid 19 pandemic at the Kediri District Religious Court. The method used in this research is juridical empirical. The research steps taken were: First, the researcher visited the Kediri District Religious Court offi ce. To fi nd initial data, and interviewed the data source, then processed and presented according to the theory used. The theory used is the legal system. In essence, there are three components in law, namely substance, structure and culture (society). The research found two things, namely: fi rst, that Mediation based on the regulations of the Supreme Court is carried out in three stages, fi rst is pre-mediation, the second stage is the application of mediation and the third stage is the implementation of mediation. The second fi nding is that the implementation of Perma RI Number: 1 of 2016 concerning mediation during the Covid 19 pandemic at the Kediri District Religious Court deviates from the established legal basis. The judge still gave a verdict or sentenced him, even though the Petitioner did not come at the time of mediation on the grounds of the Covid 19 Pandemic.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN HUKUM ISBAT NIKAH LUAR NEGERI

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramdani Wahyu Seruri
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Work Abroad ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper is motivated by the number of Indonesian Workers (TKI) who work abroad to get married in Sirri, some of them occurred in Malaysia. Based on this background, the authors interested in explaining the legal position validation of marriage in outside the country. That is the legal basis for the implementation of validation of marriage outside the country, referring to the legislation, ranging from generalist like regulations of Law Number 48 Of 2009 about The Judicial Authorities of clause 60B and Law about Religious Courts, as well as the rule of lex specialist like Circular Supreme Court Number 10 Of 2010, appendix B SK Supreme Court Nomor 084/KMA/ SK/V/2011 on Permit Session Establishment Marriage (isbat nikah/validation of marriage) in The embassies of the Republic of Indonesia. procedures of case examination about validation of marriage in outside the country followed the procedural law applicable in the Religious Court, whereas KUA which the authorities listed about validation of marriage in outside the country is PPN (The Registrar of Marriage) located in The embassies of the Republic of Indonesia in each country.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENANG LELANG SEBAGAI PEMBELI BERITIKAD BAIK YANG DIGUGAT KEMBALI

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Putu Eka Trisna Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
High Court ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Original Owner ◽  
Credit Agreement ◽  
Selling Effort

When the bank debtors did not make the payment, the bank as the holder of the mortgage is bound in the credit agreement by obtaining fulfillment of the debtor's credit through an auction process as mandated by law. Problems will arise if the auction winner cannot own or control what he has won because the debtor uses the auction process on the collateral. Then the winner of the auction is a buyer with ‘good faith’ who must be protected by law, and legal protection for the buyer with ‘good faith’ as stated in article 584 of the Civil Code of ‘good faith’ exists if the property rights are obtained through one of the means to obtain property rights, where from that article It is known that some of the transfer of existing property rights cannot be separated from the existence of the agreement law in the Civil Code. Legal remedies that can be taken by the injured parties during the auction execution by the court if there is a rebuttal due to the lawsuit made by the original owner which is later won by the court's decision of the original owner, then the auction holder can submit legal remedies to the high court to resolve the problem by way of an appeal to the Supreme Court. This is because selling through an auction is a civil selling effort and legal remedies that can be taken within the scope of civil law.

scholarly journals Criminal Accountability for Corruption Actors in the Form of Concursus Realist

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-332
Author(s):  
Redentor G A Obe ◽  
Indah Sri Utari
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
State University ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the criminal liability arrangements for the perpetrators of corruption in the form of concurrent acts, finding juridical reasons to the extent to which corruption in the form of concurrent acts can be justified. This research method uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical law design. Data collection techniques using library research Subjects library research law faculty of Semarang State University. Data analysis techniques: (1) presentation, (2) data reduction, and (3) collection and verification. The results of the study: (1) the form of criminal liability from the perpetrators of corruption in the form of a joint act is to follow the criminal procedure in the Criminal Code by dropping the absorption system which is made worse by the regulation contained in the Constitutional Court's decision in the results of the criminal chamber meeting of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Tangerang No 10 concerning the application of concursus teachings precisely in the parallel act of corruption. Conclusions of the study that the doctrine of concursus results of the criminal chamber meeting of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Tangerang has a legal basis that serves as a guideline or legal basis so that the action does not go outside the lines of statutory provisions in the implementation of decision making in imposing penalties for the perpetrators of acts corruption in the form of a parallel act.

scholarly journals REMODELLING AND REPOSITIONING OF COURT’S MEDIATION IN INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Benny Riyanto
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Ideal Model ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Court ◽  
Legal Factor ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Ideal

This article is intended to explain the failure of the use of mediation in Indonesia, particularly mediation which is integrated with the court (court connected mediation). The focus of the problem in this study is about the ideal model of court connected mediation as a strategy to achieve the hope of strengthening and to maximize the function of judiciary institutions in resolving dispute in Indonesia. A method of socio-legal research is used to reveal things that make mediation has not worked effectively in resolving civil case in court. This study resulted that the practice of mediation in civil court is very limited, especially dealing with a model applied by mediators, so it is not always appropriate to the situation faced by the parties in disputes. Moreover, although the Supreme Court Regulation allows co-mediation, in practice, it is never implemented. Even court connected mediation has become part of the dispute because it has been registered and published to public. So that it becomes a non-legal factor that influence the parties to reach agreement.  Keywords : mediation, mediator, civil case, model, court.

PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MENANGANI KASASI PERKARA KARTEL PUTUSAN KPPU YANG MENGGUNAKAN ALAT BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG (INDIRECT EVIDENCE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-101
Author(s):  
Fransiska Lestari Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Republic

Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an institution authorized to handle unfair business competition violation. In fact, in several KPPU decisions it was revealed that KPPU prioritizes indirect evidence in handling cartel cases in Indonesia. KPPU's decision is not final and binding. Business actors who do not accept the decision of KPPU may file an objection at the District Court. The parties who do not accept the decision of the district court, may file an appeal in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The type of research is used in this research is normative legal research, that is research done by reviewing the rules of law applicable or applied to a certain legal problem. The result of the research shows that in the Supreme Court appeal, KPPU's decision was upheld and canceled by Supreme Court to KPPU's decision uses indirect evidence in handling cartel case. The basis of consideration of the Supreme Court Justices ruling the KPPU's decision in the case of the tire cartel and the cement cartel is the Chief Justice accepting and acknowledging the indirect evidence as valid evidence, since the evidence is sufficient and logical evidence, and there is no evidence the more powerful that can weaken the indirect evidence. While the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge overturning the KPPU's decision in the case of cartel fuel surcharger is not accepting and acknowledging indirect evidence as valid evidence, because the evidence is insufficient and illogical, and there is stronger evidence that can weaken the tool indirect evidence

GENERAL LEGAL ESSENCE OF THE DOCTRINE OF POISONED TREE FRUIT AS A MAIN ASPECT IN THE INSTITUTE'S SYSTEM OF ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larysa Bayrachna ◽  
◽  
Yurii Burdai ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
National Courts ◽  
History Of Development ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Tree Fruit ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Law

The article presents a critical analysis of the doctrine of "poisoned tree" through the prism of its interpretation by the European Court of Human Rights, scientific and practical approach to its formation by the case law of Ukrainian national courts, in particular, but not limited to, the Supreme Court. Given the requirements of current procedural legislation of Ukraine. An overview of the basic standards and aspects of the standard established by the institute of admissibility of evidence in their entirety and individually. The institute of admissibility of evidence has a long history of development. To date, the inadmissibility of evidence obtained in violation of procedural law is enshrined at the European judicial level in such judgments of the European Court of Human Rights as Gefgen v. Germany, Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, and Sabelnik v. Ukraine. against Ukraine", "Nechyporuk and Yonkalo against Ukraine", "Yaremenko against Ukraine". This requirement for the admissibility of evidence is formulated in the above-mentioned Decisions quite succinctly and clearly, and is currently the subject of its implementation in both the law-making system and the law enforcement system. In the legal literature, there is still a discussion about the doctrine of "poisoned tree fruit", which is directly related to the recognition of derivatives of evidence obtained in violation of Ukrainian law - inadmissible. In the course of the study, uncertainty was found that the implementation of this doctrine is necessary only when the violation of the conditions of admissibility calls into question the reliability of the evidence. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether there is a dependence of the admissibility and reliability of the evidence or the "fruits of the poisoned tree" appear under other conditions, when the evidence is declared inadmissible, regardless of this impact on the reliability.

Civil legal method of protection of intellectual property rights

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Svitlychnyy Oleksandr ◽  
◽  
Korotun O.M. ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Subjective Rights

The article draws attention to the specifics of protection of intellectual property rights in Ukraine by civil and special legislation, the rules of which are designed to protect the subjective rights of right holders and other participants in legal relations in the field of intellectual property. Some aspects of the legal nature of jurisdictional remedies are studied. Attention is paid to the specifics of protection of intellectual property rights by civil law, which consists primarily in the methods of protection provided by procedural law. The legislation, the norms of which guarantee the protection of intellectual property and the ways of protection of civil rights are outlined. The existing in the legal literature different views on the classification of methods of protection of property rights are analyzed. The legal analysis of the application of the vindication claim as a means of protection of intellectual property rights is carried out and the author's proposals are formulated. Keywords: civil law, intellectual property, lawsuit, protection

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document