Research documents a decline in risk-taking during peak fertility, which has been taken to suggest that fertile women may have inherent rape-avoidance adaptive mechanisms, particularly during the ovulatory phase. However, it cannot be known from previous research whether the decline in risk taking is specific to situations of increased risk of rape, or whether women become risk-averse more generally during peak fertility. Moreover, the cognitive mechanisms underlying the documented reduce in risk taking are not known. Across two studies, we examine the cognitive mechanisms associated with fertility-related risk avoidance by examining attentional biases to angry versus neutral males and females (to assess rape specificity), and fear-relevant versus neutral animals (to assess for domain generality). Study 1 employed a dot-probe paradigm to assess attentional biases to threatening versus neutral faces and animals. Against expectations, women were faster to respond to neutral faces when fertile compared to nonfertile. There were no fertility-related differences in attention to animals, thus suggesting fertility-related differences may be specific to social, or reproductively relevant stimuli. Study 2 built on the limitations of Study 1 by employing eyetracking apparatus for more direct oculomotor evidence of attention to threat. Overall, women fixated more quickly when fertile compared to nonfertile. Regarding fertility, women were slower to make their first fixations on angry compared to neutral faces when fertile, but spent a higher proportion of time fixating on angry versus neutral faces. Emotion did not influence first fixation speed when nonfertile. Importantly, fertility did not influence attention according to fear-relevance in animals. Thus, altogether, the findings appear to suggest fertility-related differences in attention are specific to reproductively relevant stimuli.