CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL PROTECTION OF LOCAL SELF - GOVERNMENT IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 165-170
Author(s):  
A.R. Dashkevich ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Russian Federation

INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF THE SPHERE OF BLOCKCHAIN FUNCTIONING AGAINST CRIMINAL OFFENCES: LANDSCAPE, DYNAMICS AND PERSPECTIVES

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
SONA MKRTCHIAN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
International Protection ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Telecommunications Network ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The purpose of the research is to identify the most successful ideas and legal techniques used in international law regarding regulations of defense against criminal offences in the sphere of cybersecurity, as well as blockchain functioning and cryptocurrency turnover. Results. On the basis of the positive international experience in regulating the criminal legal protection of relations in the last-mentioned sphere, the following directions for improving Russian criminal legislation were formulated: 1) fixation of the fair limits of the criminal administrative liability for defendant in reliance on the level of public danger of his personality and his offences; 2) creation of the formally defined crimes against computer information; 3) criminalization of some actions that precede cybercrimes; 4) expansion in the number of the mentioning of the sign "by interfering in the functioning of the resources of the storing, processing or transmitting computer information or data telecommunications network" as an essential or aggravating elements of crimes, typically committed with the use of information technologies (for example, in the articles number 133, 134, 135, 137, 138, 139, 146, 147, 163, 165, 240, 240.1, 241 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, etc.); 5) expansion in the number of the elements of crimes combined in the chapter 28 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, in reliance on the modern criminal schemes and typical criminal situations in the world of information technology; 6) expansion of the effect of the article number 274.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on any criminal offense to the critical information infrastructure of the Russian Federation and inclusion of the additional aggravating elements in the text of this article.

scholarly journals PATENTING OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FIELD OF NEUROSURGERY: REALITY AND PROSPECTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
T. N. Erivantseva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
World Market ◽  
High Potential ◽  
Patent Activity ◽  
The World ◽  
Leading Position ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Patent Applications ◽  
Patent Documents

Implementation of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2018, No. 204 “On the national goals and strategic tasks of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024” assumes that Russia should move from 8th to 5th position in the world for the number of patent applications for inventions during 6 years. The paper analyzes the patent activity of inventors in the field of medicine on the example of spinal neurosurgery. Analysis of patent documents demonstrates that developments in the field of spinal neurosurgery have currently a high potential for commercialization throughout the world. However, domestic developers should pay due attention to the full scope of legal protection of their inventions to take a leading position in the world market.

scholarly journals Legal Peculiarities of Child Custody of Minor Parents with an Incomplete Parental Status

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
Ekaterina E. Lekanova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Minor Parent ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
A Minor ◽  
The Guardian ◽  
Family Code

Despite the existence of an article in modern Russian legislation on the legal status of minor parents, many legal issues related to the implementation and protection of the rights, duties, interests of a minor parent and his child remained outside family legal regulation, which exacerbates the already difficult problem of legal protection of early parenthood. Moreover, the provisions of Article 62 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation are very inharmoniously combined with the rules of guardianship of minors. The aim of the work is to analyze the legislation on the legal status of minor parents and guardians, to identify the legal characteristics of the care of a child of minor parents. The author concludes that the features of the care of a child of minor parents, in addition to the age of one or both parents, in the case of the appointment of a guardian include: a combination of parenthood and guardianship; unequal opportunities for the care of a child by a minor parent who is not able to independently provide care, and by the legal representative of the child of the minor parent; special (additional) grounds for terminating guardianship of a child of minor parents; the need for the guardian to live together not only with the child in care, but also with his parent. The norms of paragraph 2 of article 62 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation and paragraph 2 of article 29 of the Federal law «On Guardianship and Custodianship» should be adjusted. It is proposed to introduce special rules for the selection of the guardian of a child of a minor parent, which would properly ensure the right of the minor parent to live together with the child.

scholarly journals Authorities and Officials of the Prosecutor’s Office as Subjects of Protection and Subjects of Violation of the Constitutional Right of Citizens to Petition

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
I. V. Timoshenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Status ◽  
Effective Instrument ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
Administrative Code ◽  
The Right

The paper analyzes the status of bodies and officials of the prosecutor’s office as subjects of protection and subjects of violation of the constitutional right of citizens of Russia to petition as bodies exercising public power, whereas the very norm-principle of the basic Russian law on the right of citizens to petition is considered both as a constitutional right and as a constitutional safeguard. The author identifies the main practical problems, legal gaps and conflicts of law when citizens implement their constitutional right to petition and their reasons. The author proposes options for their elimination at the law-making and law-enforcement levels. It is noted that article 5.59 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences from 2011 providing administrative liability for violation of established procedure of consideration of citizens’ petitions, despite being a very effective instrument for the legal protection of the right under consideration, needs to be adjusted because its discretionary part contains only general language and does not reveal the objective side of this administrative offence. At the same time, prosecutor’s offices have long developed a certain practice concerning the application of Art. 5.59 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation as a means of public and legal protection of the violated right of citizens to petition. However, what should be done if the right of citizens to petition is violated by the prosecutors themselves with their special status as subjects of the offense, whereas it is the exclusive competence of prosecutors by operation of law to initiate cases under Art. 5.59 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation? The paper is devoted to the search for the answer to this question.

Administrative and legal protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens in the field of defense and security of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuliya Fedotova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
State Control ◽  
Functional Characteristics ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation

The monograph is devoted to the administrative and legal protection of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens in the field of defense and security of the Russian Federation. The mechanism of administrative and legal support of defense and security and the administrative and legal status of citizens as subjects of this activity are disclosed. The author's vision of the concept and content of administrative and legal protection is justified, the functional characteristics of the powers of state authorities are given, and the specifics of state control in this area are indicated. It is intended for students, cadets, postgraduates, teachers, practitioners, as well as a wide range of readers interested in the problems of ensuring defense and security.

scholarly journals THE OBSTRUCTION OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE AND PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION: PROBLEMS OF THE OBJECT AND THE OBJECTIVE SIDE

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-105
Author(s):  
Alexandra Vladimirovna Boyarskaya
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Complex Analysis ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Body ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject. The article is devoted to the investigation of the main direct object and the circle of victims are subjected of harm by criminal acts stipulated by pts. 1, 2 of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.The purpose of the paper is to identify does the art. 294 of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation meets the other provisions of criminal procedure legislation.The methodology of research includes methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-logical, comparative legal and formal-legal methods.Results and scope of application. The content of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not comply with the provisions of the criminal procedure law. The discrep-ancy lies in terms of the range of participants in criminal proceedings and the functions performed by them, as well as the actual content and correlation of such stages of criminal proceedings as the initiation of criminal proceedings and preliminary investigation. In addi-tion, the current state of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not take into account the ever-widening differentiation of criminal proceedings.The circle of victims listed in pt. 2 of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be supplemented by such participants in the criminal process as a criminal investi-gator, the head of the investigative body, the head of the inquiry department, the head of the body of inquiry. At the same time, the author supports the position that the criminal-legal protection of the said persons should cover not only their activities at the stage of preliminary investigation, but also of the entire pre-trial proceedings as a whole.The circle of criminal acts provided for in art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Fed-eration, should also be specified with an indication of encroachment in the form of kidnapping, destruction or damage to such a crime as materials of criminal, civil and other cases, as well as material evidence.Conclusions. The content of art. 294 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not comply with the provisions of the criminal procedure law. The author formulates the conclusion that the circle of victims listed in pt. 2 of art. 294 of the Criminal Code should be broadened and joins the position that the criminal-legal protection of these persons should cover not only their activities at the stage of preliminary investigation, but also of the entire pre-trial proceedings as a whole.

scholarly journals Legal regulation of measures for the use and protection of forests

2021 ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Radmir IKSANOV ◽  
◽  
Igor VLADIMIROV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Local Population ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Nature Management ◽  
Forest Protection ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Forest Users ◽  
Legal Mechanism

Forest violations are a special type of offenses that infringe on the order of rational nature management and environmental protection. The purpose of this study is to analyze legal measures for the use and protection of forests. The relevance of the work lies in the fact that the problem of legal protection of forests is manifested in the mechanism of exercising the powers of forest protection by the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, therefore, the solution to this problem should be developed and implemented by the efforts of state bodies, public associations and the local population. The paper lists the problems of the legal mechanism of forest protection, defines its subjects, discloses the problems in the field of control and supervision activities by forest users.

scholarly journals NON-JURISDICTIONAL FORMS OF PATENT RIGHTS PROTECTION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruslan B. Sitdikov ◽  
Ravil M. Sadykov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Patent Holder ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right

This article discusses the features of the implementation of non-jurisdictional forms of protection of civil rights (self-defense, claims, mediation) in relation to patent infringements in the Russian Federation. It is noted that the self-defense of patent rights by classical means in non-contractual legal relations is limited due to the peculiarities of the legal nature of the objects of patent rights, namely because of their intangible nature, the general availability of information about them, the presence of state registration, but it is possible to use special means of self-defense: software and hardware, introduction trade secrets, optimization of patenting and legal protection strategies as know-how. It is concluded that it is necessary to specify the provisions of Articles 1252 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Articles 14.1. - 14.3. Federal Law on the Protection of Competition regarding the assessment of good faith / unfairness of the distribution by the patent holder of warnings about the alleged violation of his rights and apply the approach according to which: the patent holder has the right to protect his exclusive right, and also in case of threat of negative consequences from third parties, to disseminate information about the alleged , in his opinion, a violation of his rights, including against the alleged offender, as well as other persons, including buyers / p purchasers of goods, works, services of the patent holder or the alleged infringer, which in itself is not an act of unfair competition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document