scholarly journals Editorial

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Áron Perényi ◽  
Paolo Tenuta

The recent issue of the journal “Corporate Ownership and Control” is devoted to the issues of market concentration, capital structure, MENA economies, corporate governance, family firms, socioemotional wealth, loan appraisal process, corporate social responsibility, financial performance, cash holdings, trade-off theory, auditing, internal and external control, ownership structure of enterprises, voting premium, corporate control, corporate reputation, government policy, social impact bond etc.

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Doriana Cucinelli

The recent volume of the journal “Corporate Ownership and Control” is devoted to very interesting issues related to the corporate governance such as accounting standards, efficacy of board governance, corporate social responsibility reporting, corporate governance disclosure, ownership and firms’ performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Marco Tutino ◽  
Áron Perényi ◽  
Alexander Kostyuk

The recent issue of the Corporate Ownership and Control journal (volume 19, issue 1) covers the following key themes: accounting standards, corporate governance and social responsibility, public sector governance, financial management and firm performance. The authors represent a range of developed and developing countries, making this issue of the journal truly international.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihwei Wu ◽  
Fengyi Lin ◽  
Chiaming Wu

This study develops several models to examine the relationship between the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the ownership structure of Taiwanese firms. Our results suggest that firms which are controlled by professional managers, government-owned, or collectively-owned would like to undertake serious efforts to integrate the CSR into various aspects of their companies. Due to Asia firm’s culture, family firms might be more reluctant to put efforts on CSR activities. We also report that there is a positive relationship between (a) the CSR and financial performance and (b) the CSR and earnings quality. This study suggests that the ownership structures are found to have effects on the CSR and the CSR could also decrease the information asymmetry between managers and investors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3, special issue) ◽  
pp. 220-222
Author(s):  
Andrea Rey

To date, future research trends will certainly concern sustainability and entrepreneurship due to the post-COVID-19 crisis. Studies will focus on the determinants related to corporate governance, such as corporate ownership, or the role of institutional investors, or a company that aims to get public by an IPO as a possible answer to the crisis. A future research trend will surely concern environmental and economic sustainability. Another line of research will concern the protection of biodiversity and gender equality. With the regard to the content of this issue of the Corporate Ownership and Control journal, ownership structure is the most popular issue considered by the authors of the papers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Fortuna ◽  
Mirella Ciaburri ◽  
Silvia Testarmata ◽  
Riccardo Tiscini

The paper empirically explores how firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure varies according to their ownership structure. Three different kinds of ownership structures are considered: family firms (FFs), state-owned firms (SOFs) and firms with dispersed ownership (DOFs). It is the first study examining the relationship between CSR disclosure and ownership structure, which includes in the analysis also FFs and SOFs. The analysis is provided on a sample of 192 listed firms with reference to Italy, a suitable setting for the purpose of the study due to the considerable presence of both FFs and SOFs. Firstly, a content analysis on the CSR documents disclosed by the 192 firms is provided and then data are empirically analysed to test whether the ownership structure influences a firm’s CSR disclosure. Results show that FFs and SOFs disclose less CSR information and the explanation can be found in the lower level of agency problems they have to face. The paper contributes to the stream of literature about CSR disclosure, because it argues that the contents of CSR disclosure vary according to firm’s ownership structure and also to those about FFs and SOFs because it shows that the presence of a concentrated ownership lowers the level of CSR information disclosed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Ioraver Nyenger Tsegba ◽  
John Iorpenda Sar

The main purpose of this study is to ascertain whether alternative corporate ownership and control structures give rise to significant differential firm performance in light of Nigeria’s conflicting polices regarding the ownership structure of the state owned enterprises. The data obtained from a sample of 73 companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange is analyzed through the Wilcoxon ranks tests for two independent samples. The evidence obtained suggests that firms with foreign ownership and control outperform their indigenous counterparts. However, firms controlled by single shareholders do not perform better than those controlled by multiple shareholders. The study recommends that foreign ownership and control of Nigerian firms be encouraged due to their affirmative features, while single shareholder control of firms, embedded in the core investor mode of ownership, is reconsidered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kostyuk Alexander ◽  
Tutino Marco

The recent volume of the journal “Corporate Ownership and Control” is devoted to the i compensation, reporting quality, ownership structure, disposition effect, behavioral finance, leadership, top management diversity, glass-ceiling, asset pricing models, en propensity, corporate foundation, earnings management, accrual anomaly etc.


2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin-Hua Yeh

Recent empirical literature on corporate governance has demonstrated that companies’ shares are generally concentrated in the hands of particular families or wealthy investors. Claessens et al. (2002) analyzed the ownership structure in East Asian eight countries, but misestimated the Taiwanese condition that made them not find the positive incentive or negative entrenchment effects in Taiwan. This study tries to clear the ultimate control in Taiwan, use the detailed data to better understand the ownership structure in Taiwan and investigates the determinants for deviation of control from cash flow rights. Based on the findings, the companies’ shares are common concentrated in the hands of the largest shareholder. We find that the deviation of control from cash flow rights is greater in the family-controlled companies than other type companies. Also the controlling shareholders use more pyramids and cross shareholding to increase their control rights that accompanies with deeply management participation. On the average, the controlling shareholders hold more than half board seats and usually occupy the chairman and general manger to enhance their control power in family-controlled companies. No matter in all sample or family-controlled companies, the controlling shareholders owns significantly less cash flow rights, occupy more board seats in deviation group companies than those without deviation. Corporate valuation is significantly lower in the companies with the divergence of control from cash flow rights than non-deviation companies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-150
Author(s):  
Rahmawaty Rahmawaty ◽  
Putra Maswan

Objective – The ownership structure dispersed into state ownership, foreign ownership, institutional ownership, and corporate ownership. This study aims to examine the influence of ownership structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure which is measured by 40 Corporate Social Responsibility indicators developed by Dias in 2017.  Design/methodology – This study utilizes the samples from companies listed on SRI-KEHATI Index for the year 2013-2017. Purposive sampling technique was applied resulting in 9 companies were chosen for a total 45 observation data. Multiple linear regression analysis is utilized for the hypotheses testing. Results – The result of this study revealed that all independent variables simultaneously influenced the dependent variable. Partially, foreign ownership and institutional ownership determined the Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, but there is no influence for state ownership and corporate ownership on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Alexander Kostyuk

The recent issue of Corporate Ownership and Control journal contains both empirical and review papers describing the wide variety of corporate governance issues from the board of directors and executive compensation to mergers and acquisitions, stock market and institutional investors. The geographical representation of the papers provides an excellent opportunity for international comparison.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document