scholarly journals The effect of the period of weed interference on the growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-237
Author(s):  
Olumide Daramola ◽  
Olusegun Adeyemi ◽  
Joseph Adigun ◽  
Christopher Adejuyigbe ◽  
Patience Olorunmaiye
Keyword(s):  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Yield Component ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Yield Reduction ◽  
Weed Interference ◽  
Weed Growth ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Glycine Max L ◽  
Cropping Seasons

Field trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of different periods of weed interference on weed infestation, growth and yield of soybean in 2016-2017 cropping seasons. In both years, soybean grain yields ranged from 888- 1148 kg ha -1 in plots where weeds were allowed to grow until harvest to 2103- 2389 kg ha -1 in plots where weeds were controlled until harvest, indicating a 52- 58% yield loss with uncontrolled weed growth. Weed interference until 3 weeks after sowing (WAS) had no detrimental effect on soybean growth and yield provided the weeds were subsequently removed. However, further delay in weed removal until 6 WAS or longer depressed soybean growth and resulted in irrevocable yield reduction, with the number of pods per plant being the most affected yield component. For optimum growth and yield, it was only necessary to keep the crop weed-free between 3 and 6 WAS.

INFLUENCE OF INTER-ROW SPACING AND WEED CONTROL METHODS IN GROUNDNUT (Arachis hypogeal (L.)

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95
Author(s):  
J. A. ADIGUN ◽  
O. R. ADEYEMI ◽  
S. T. O., LAGOKE ◽  
P. M. OLORUNMAIYE ◽  
O. S. DARAMOLA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Crop Production ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Control Methods ◽  
Weed Growth ◽  
Need To Evaluate ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Main Plot

Weed competition has been identified as one of the major obstacles in crop production. The produc-tion of groundnut is limited by high weed infestation resulting in yield losses ranging from 50 - 80% in Nigeria. Hence, the need to evaluate integrated weed control in its production. Field trials were there-fore conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (7o 20’ N, 30 23’ E) to evaluate the influence of inter-row spacing and weed control methods on growth and yield of groundnut during the wet seasons in 2009 and 2010. The experiment was a Randomised Complete Design (RCBD) laid out in a split plot with three replications. The main plot treatment con-sisted of three inter-row spacings of 60 cm, 75 cm and 90 cm while the subplots included five weed control treatments of commercial formulation of metolachlor plus promethyne mixture (codal) at 1.0 kg a.i/ha, codal at 1.0 kg a.i./ha followed by supplementary hoe weeding at 6 weeks after sowing (WAS), codal at 2 kg a.i./ha, hoe weeding at 3, 6 and 9 WAS and a weedy check. Inter-row spacings of 60 cm and 75 cm reduced weed growth with consequent higher yields compared to the inter-row spacings of 90 cm in the early season of 2009. Application of codal at 1.0 kg a.i./ha followed by supplementary hoe weeding at 6 WAS combined with 60cm inter-row spacing gave effective weed control and higher groundnut pod yield than hoe-weeded control in both years of experimentation.

scholarly journals Weed biomass and productivity of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L)Moench) as influenced by spacing and pendimethalin-based weed management

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-398
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Imoloame ◽  
Muinat Usman
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Control Methods ◽  
Plant Spacing ◽  
Economic Returns ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Cropping Seasons

Field trials were conducted at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Kwara State University, Malete, Nigeria, to determine the effect of plant spacing and weed control methods on weed infestation, growth and yield of okra during the 2016 and 2017 cropping seasons. The experiment consisted of twelve treatments comprising six weed control methods and two plant spacings. The method of weed control consisted of pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1, pendimethalin at 2.0 kg a.i. ha-1, pendimathalin at 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 + one supplementary hoe weeding (SHW) at 6 weeks after sowing (WAS), two hoe weedings at 3 and 6 weeks after sowing (WAS), weeding at 4 and 8 weeks after sowing (WAS) and a weedy check. The plant spacings were 60cm x 30cm and 60cm x 50cm. These treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with split plot arrangements and three replications. Weed control and plant spacing treatments were allocated to the subplots and the main plot respectively. Results showed that a plant spacing of 60cm x 30cm minimized weed infestation and resulted in a higher total number of pods/plot and okra fresh weight, while pendimethalin at 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 + one supplementary hoe weeding at 6 WAS minimized weed infestation in the plots, and led to the highest total number of pods and yield of okra. This combination also promoted higher economic returns.

scholarly journals Growth and Yield Performance of Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata (L.) Walp) as influenced by Row-Spacing and Period of Weed interference in South-West Nigeria

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Adigun ◽  
A. O. Osipitan ◽  
Segun Toyosi Lagoke ◽  
Raphael Olusegun Adeyemi ◽  
Stephen Olaoluwa Afolami
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Vigna Unguiculata ◽  
Growth Parameter ◽  
Crop Growth ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Weed Interference ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Weed Removal

Weed problem appears to be the most deleterious factor causing between 25 and 60% reduction in potential yield of cowpea. Field trials were therefore conducted to study the effect of inter-row spacing and period of weed interference on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (07° 15'; 03° 25' E) in South Western Nigeria during the early and late wet seasons of 2009. The experiment consisted of eight main plots of weed interference which included initial weed removal for 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks after sowing (WAS) and subsequently weed –infested until harvest as well as initial weed infestation for corresponding periods and thereafter kept weed free until harvest. There were also sub-plot treatments of three inter-row spacing of 60, 75, and 90 cm. All treatments in different combinations were laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. In both trials, the use of inter-row spacing of 60 cm resulted in significant reduction in weed growth as evident in lower weed dry matter production and subsequent higher cowpea pod and grain yields than those of 75 and 90 cm inter-row spacing. Initial weed infestation of up to 3 WAS did not have any adverse effect on crop growth and cowpea grain yields provided the weeds were subsequently removed. On the other hand, cowpea grain yield loss was not significantly averted by keeping the crop weed free for only 3 WAS without subsequent weed removal. In this study, initial weed-infestation for 6 WAS and beyond significantly depressed various crop growth parameter and cowpea grain yield compared with the crop kept weed free throughout its life cycle. In order to obtain optimum yields similar to that of the weed free cowpea field, it was required to keep the crop weed free for 6 WAS and beyond. However, frequent weeding beyond 9 weeks after sowing did not improve cowpea yield significantly and as a matter of fact it may even result in reduction of cowpea grain yield due to mechanical damage of hoe weeding. The practical implication of this finding is that early weeding starting from 3 WAS is very crucial for cowpea production while the critical period of weed removal for optimum yield in cowpea is between 3 and 9 WAS in the forest-savannah transitional zone of south Western Nigeria.

Time of Removal of Crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides) on Peanut Yield

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney L. Farris ◽  
Cody J. Gray ◽  
Don S. Murray ◽  
Laval M. Verhalen
Keyword(s):  
Natural Population ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Yield Reduction ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Weed Interference ◽  
Weed Growth ◽  
Poor Predictor ◽  
Verbesina Encelioides ◽  
Shell Peanut ◽  
Weed Removal

Field experiments were conducted in southwestern Oklahoma near Colony in 2000 and near Ft. Cobb in 2001 to quantify the effect of time of removal of a natural population of crownbeard on peanut yield. Weed densities and dry weed weights were measured at eight weed-removal times, and in-shell peanut yields were determined at harvest. Crownbeard was removed at 0 (the weed-free check), 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 wk (full season) after crop emergence (WAE). Weed density was a poor predictor for dry weed weight and peanut yield; however, dry weed weight and time of removal were good predictors for peanut yield. Weed growth was minimal up to 4 WAE and increased linearly after that time. For each week of weed growth, a 0.52 kg/plot increase in dry weed weight was measured. Peanut yield decreased linearly because of crownbeard competition. For each kilogram per plot increase in dry weed weight, a 129 kg/ha or 5.1% peanut yield reduction took place. For each week of weed interference, a 75 kg/ha or 2.8% peanut yield reduction occurred. Crownbeard removal by or before 4 WAE will minimize losses in peanut yield because of interference.

scholarly journals Weed infestation and productivity of maize/soybean intercrop as influenced by cropping patterns in the southern Guinea savanna of Nigeria

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-26
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Imoloame ◽  
Kafayat Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiments ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
State University ◽  
Economic Returns ◽  
Cropping Patterns ◽  
Guinea Savanna ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Cropping Seasons

Field experiments were conducted during the 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons at the Teaching and Research (T & R) Farm of the College of Agriculture, Kwara State University, Malete, to determine the effect of cropping patterns on weed infestation, growth and yield of a maize/soybean intercrop in the southern Guinea savanna of Nigeria. The experiments consisted of six treatments as follows: one row of maize alternated with one row of soybean (1:1), one row of maize alternated with two rows of soybean (1:2), two rows of maize alternated with one row of soybean (2:1), two rows of maize alternated with two rows of soybean (2:2), sole maize (1:0) and sole soybean (0:1). The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance and means were separated by the least significant difference (LSD) at the 5% level of probability. Results showed that sole soybean consistently suppressed weeds and resulted in a higher yield. Similarly, the 2:1 ratio of maize to soybean did not only reduce weed density, it produced significantly higher yields of maize and lower yield of soybean, and had the higher land equivalent ratio and economic returns followed by sole maize.

scholarly journals Agronomic and economic performance of maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by seed bed configuration and weed control treatments

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 445-455
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Oyamedan Imoloame
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Economic Performance ◽  
Zea Mays L ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Economic Returns ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Maize Grain Yield ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Maize Grain ◽  
Cropping Seasons

Abstract Poor method of weed control and indiscriminate use of herbicides led to low yields, economic returns, and increasing environmental pollution in the southern Guinea savanna of Nigeria. These prompted the conduct of field trials in the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons to determine the effects of seed bed configuration and weed control treatments on the agronomic and economic performance of maize. The treatments consisted of flat and ridge seed beds and six weed control treatments. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with split plot arrangement and replicated thrice. Results showed that seed bed configuration had significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on weed density, but not on maize grain yield. All the weed control treatments significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced weed infestation and increased maize grain yields compared to the weedy check. Furthermore, Primextra at 1.5 kg active ingredient per hectare (kg a.i. ha−1) + One supplementary hoe weeding (SHW) at 6 weeks after sowing (WAS), Primextra + Paraforce at 1.5 + 0.7 kg a.i. ha−1, and Primextra + Guard force at 1.5 + 0.03 kg a.i. ha−1 applied on flat seed beds and two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WAS + ridge produced higher yields, profit, and economic returns. Therefore, the above reduced herbicide rates applied on flat seed beds are recommended to farmers as alternatives to two hoe weeding at 3 and 6 WAS for profitable production of maize.

scholarly journals Efficacy and selectivity of pendimethalin for weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), Gezirastate, Sudan

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68
Author(s):  
Suhaip Zain ◽  
Awadallah Dafaallah ◽  
Mohamed Zaroug
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Research Station ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Yield Attributes ◽  
Broad Leaf ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Glycine Max L

Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effi cacy and selectivity of the herbicide pendimethalin on weed control in soybean at Gezira State, Sudan. Methods. A fi eld experiment was carried out at Gezira Research Station Farm, Wad Medani, Sudan during summer season 2018/2019. The pendimethalin (Pendimight 500 EC®) was applied at three doses as pre-emergence treatment. The doses were 1.339, 1.785 and 2.232 Kg a.i./ha. Weeded and un-wedded treatments were included for comparison. The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block designed with four replicates. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis and analysis of variance procedure (P ≤ 0.05). Signifi cant means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range test. Results. The results showed that all herbicide treatments were effective in weed control. They signifi cantly reduced weed infestation compared to un-weeded control and signifi cantly promoted the yield and various growth characters of soybean over un-weeded control treatment, except pendimethalin at the dose of 2.232 Kg a.i./ha which only reduced the plant population by 7% due to a phytotoxicity effect on soybean as compared to un-weeded control treatment. Application of pendimethalin at the dose 1.339 kg a.i./ha signifi cantly controlled grasses and broad leaf weeds in soybean. It was also found superior in respect of various growth and yield attributes. Highest seed yield (1562.5 kg /ha) was recorded under pendimethalin treatment at a dose of 1.339 kg a.i./ha. Chemical analysis of soybean seeds showed that no residues of the tested herbicide were detected. Conclusions. It is concluded that the tested pre-emergence herbicide pendimethalin at the dose of 1.339 kg a.i./ha could be used effectively and safely in controlling weeds in soybean crop.

Effects of missing-row sowing supplemented with row spacing and nitrogen on weed competition and growth and yield of wheat

2011 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Das ◽  
N. T. Yaduraju
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Weed Suppression ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Weed Competition ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Weed Growth ◽  
Spatial Uniformity ◽  
Weed Infestation ◽  
Ecological Weed Management

Crop husbandry practices, i.e. sowing method, row spacing, and nitrogen (N) fertilisation, influence weed competition in a crop and play a role in ecological weed management. Missing-row sowing is a novel method of sowing wheat, with one row left unsown after several rows of continuous sowing. It affects density and spatial uniformity of wheat, which may influence the wheat plants’ competitiveness and weed suppression. It may have interactions with row spacing and N, which may further improve crop–weed balance, but is rarely studied in India or elsewhere. We undertook this study to optimise the method of missing-row sowing of wheat in combination with row spacing and N application. The results revealed that leaving 20% of rows unsown significantly reduced weed populations and dry weights, and increased the competitiveness of wheat plants through greater leaf area, numbers of ear-bearing tillers, and uptake of N. Leaving 20% of rows unsown increased wheat yield by 10.9%, 17.3%, and 8.2%, respectively, during the first, second, and third year compared with conventional sowing (no missing rows). An 18.5-cm row spacing resulted in a more weed suppression than 22.5-cm row spacing, but the latter gave higher yield. Application of N at 120 kg/ha resulted in higher yield than N at 60 kg/ha, due to a significant reduction in weed growth. A practice that combines 20% of rows unsown, 22.5-cm row spacing, and 120 kg N/ha will yield more through better suppression of a moderate weed infestation.

scholarly journals Growth and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max L.) as Influenced by Phosphorus

1970 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-368
Author(s):  
RM Morshed ◽  
MM Rahman ◽  
MA Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Glycine Max ◽  
Maximum Growth ◽  
Yield Component ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Silty Clay ◽  
Clay Loam Soil ◽  
Silty Clay Loam ◽  
Glycine Max L ◽  
Loam Soil ◽  
P Application

The experiment was conducted to find out the influence of phosphorus (P) on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L., variety: G-2). The treatments were: control (P1) and with the application of 50% (P2), 75 % (P3), 100 % (P4), 125 % (P5) and 150 % (P6) of the BARC recommended dose of P. Nitrogen, K and S were applied as blanket as per BARC recommendation. Seeds were inoculated with Bradyrhizobium inoculum before sowing. All the treatments of P application showed higher growth than that of the control. P5 treatment (11.25 kg P ha-1) showed maximum growth and yield, which was 84.73% higher than that of control. The yield changed as a parabola curve with the increase of P application. The yield component, namely number of pods plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 and number of seed plant-1 increased with the increase of P levels up to 11.25 kg P ha-1. The application of P at 11.25 kg ha-1 (25% higher over BARC recommendation) produced the highest seed yield of soybean (7.50 g plant-1). So, for better yield of soybean in silty clay loam soil of Jahangirnagar University farm, application of P should be increased 25 % higher over BARC recommendation.Key words: Soybean, Phosphorus, Growth, YieldDOI = 10.3329/bjsir.v43i3.1151Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res. 43(3), 359-368, 2008

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document