The topic of this paper is a model of two-predicate sentence in which with
the matrix predication, which makes the so-called sentential-transitive verb,
there appears accusative with the preposition ZA (for) and the complement
clause with the conjunction DA (that). On the basis of such formal structure,
it represents a sentence with two objects - one non-propositional object in
the form of the prepositional accusative - indirect type and the other
propositional object, sententially formalized. Conducted analysis showed that
this is a specific sentential model which could be viewed at several relevant
levels: at the syntactic, syntactic-semantic, semantic and pragmatic level,
because only that way one can view all its features. It turned out that the
status of complement clause was not problematic - it is a
propositional-sentential object, obligatorily postponed both to the basic
predication and to the prepositional accusative, but the prepositional
accusative, though placed in the matrix sentence, is not in the direct
correlation with its predication, so it is not its object, but has the
function of PROLEPTIC SUBJECT of the complement clause (in the periphrasis
test, the prepositional accusative is turned into nominative and is placed
inside the complement clause), and semantically it is a pseudoagent: the
bearer of the feature expressed in the predicate of the complement clause
whose referent most frequently has the feature ?alive? ?human?, but can also
be abstract. Therefore, the verbs which appear in the matrix predication are
the verbs of simple, obligatorily propositional-sentential transitivity which
in addition also belong to specific semantic classes: it is the case with the
verbs of cognition: primarily the basic verb of having knowledge znati (know)
and the verbs of acquiring knowledge saznati, doznati (get to know); the
verbs of a different degree of certainty about the factual situation: the
verb garantovati (guarantee) and the copulative-adjectival structure biti
siguran (be certain), biti ubedjen (be assured) and the verbs verovati
(believe), misliti (think); then the verb of fictitious cognition uobrazavati
(imagine); the verbs of speaking pricati (talk) and, used in that meaning,
the verbs cuti (hear), citati (read), then kazati (say), suskati ?speak
quietly? (whisper), sumnjati (doubt), nagadjati (suspect); and at the end the
verbs of fear: brinuti se ?fear? (worry), bojati se (fear), pribojavati se
(have fears), plasiti se (fear), strepeti (fear for), strahovati (be
apprehensive). Since with these verbs the complement proposition acquires
various features when it comes to factivity, this sentential model is
analyzed from that perspective, too. Finally, the paper also discusses the
frequency of negative / positive characterization of the referent of the
proleptic subject.