scholarly journals Cognitive and metacognitive strategies as predictors of language learning outcomes

Psihologija ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-505
Author(s):  
Katrin Saks ◽  
Äli Leijen
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Language Proficiency ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
Upper Secondary ◽  
Reported Data

Inconsistent findings in earlier research on language learning strategies and their relations with language proficiency motivated this deeper exploration of the effects language learning strategies have on learning outcomes. The aim of the study was to explore the potential effects of cognitive and metacognitive language learning strategies on learning outcomes. The investigation involved self-reported data from a sample of 269 final-year students of upper-secondary schools (aged 18.4) analysed with the results of the standardized English as a foreign language exam. The analysis revealed a linear relationship between language learning strategies and learning outcomes based on learners? perceptions. Structural equation modelling indicated that cognitive strategies have a direct effect on learning outcomes, whereas metacognitive strategies affect outcomes indirectly.

scholarly journals Language Learning Strategies: Classification and Pedagogical Implication

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Ag. Bambang Setiyadi
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Deep Level ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
Surface Level ◽  
Gain Scores ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
Learning English

Many studies have been conducted to explore language learning strategies (Rubin, 1975, Naiman et.al., 1978; Fillmore, 1979; O'Malley et.al.,1985 and 1990; Politzer and Groarty, 1985; Prokop, 1989; Oxford, 1990; and Wenden, 1991). In the current study a total of 79 university students participating in a 3- month English course participated. This study attempted to explore what language learning strategies successful learners used and to what extent the strategies contributed to success in learning English in Indonesia. Factor analyses, accounting for 62.1%, 56.0%, 41.1% and 43.5% of the varianceof speaking, listening, reading and writing measures in the language learningstrategy questionnaire, suggested that the questionnaire constituted threeconstructs. The three constructs were named metacognitive strategies, deep level cognitive and surface level cognitive strategies. Regression analyses, performed using scales based on these factors revealed significant main effects for the use of the language learning strategies in learning English, constituting 43% of the variance in the posttest English achievement scores. An analysis of variance of the gain scores of the highest, middle, and the lowest groups of performers suggested a greater use of metacognitive strategies among successful learners and a greater use of surface level cognitive strategies among unsuccessful learners. Implications for the classroom and future re-search are also discussed.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Personality Traits of Dayakese Students and Their Strategies in Learning Arabic as a Foreign Language

DINAMIKA ILMU ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-258
Author(s):  
Nurul Wahdah ◽  
Moh. Ainin ◽  
M. Abdul Hamid
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Arabic Language ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Openness To Experience ◽  
Social Strategies ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims at finding out the relationship between personality traits and Arabic Language Learning Strategies (LLS) for the Dayakese learners of Islamic Senior High School Tumbang Samba, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.  Eighty one students   were asked to participate in this study. The instruments used were the Big Five Personality Inventory (BFI) proposed by John (1990) and   the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) proposed by Oxford (1990). In analysing data, arithmetic mean, standard deviation and correlation coefficient of Pearson were used. The findings can be explained as follows. 1) The agreeableness and conscientiousness traits of Dayakese learners were at moderate levels, and the extroversion, neuroticism and   openness to experience traits of them were at high levels. The most preferred personality trait was openness to experience. 2) The language learning strategies used by students on the six strategies were at different levels. The cognitive, compensation, affective and social strategies were at low levels. The memory and metacognitive strategies were at moderate levels. The most popularly strategy used was metacognitive strategies and the least strategy used was cognitive strategies. 3)  Although there is not a statistically significant correlation between Dayakese learners ‘personality and Arabic language learning strategies generally, the significant correlations were found between neuroticism trait and memory, metacognitive, and social strategies; and between openness to experience trait and cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective and social strategies specifically.

scholarly journals Revisiting the Use of Language Learning Strategies by University Freshmen in Taiwan

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jia-Ying Lee
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Social Strategies ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
First Year College ◽  
The Past ◽  
First Year College Students

This article reports a large-scale survey on the use of language learning strategies by first-year college students in Taiwan, with the aim of describing what language learning strategies they reported using and what strategic patterns were formed. A total of 199 non-English majors responded to a survey designed by Oxford (1990), namely, the Strategies Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) (Version 7.0). The results show that today’s language learners self-reported using the following SILL strategies in the following order of frequency: compensation strategies, metacognitive strategies, social strategies, memory strategies, cognitive strategies, and affective strategies. In addition, the results also demonstrate that three SILL categories used today were used differently in the past: affective strategies, metacognitive strategies, and compensation strategies. Moreover, it was also found that males and females these days had slightly different strategic patterns from one another in learning English and also used slightly different ones in the past.

scholarly journals A SURVEY OF STUDENTS� LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND THEIR ENGLISH LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT IN SMA NEGERI 1 PALOPO

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iksan Muhammad ◽  
Duriani Duriani
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Statistical Correlation ◽  
Metacognitive Strategies ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
English Achievement ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

The objectives of this research were: (1) To investigate the dominant language learning strategies (LLSs) used by the students in SMA Negeri 1 Palopo; (2) To investigate the dominant LLSs used by the high and low achiever students in SMA Negeri 1 Palopo; and (3) To investigate the correlation between the students dominant LLSs and their English achievement. This research involved 63 students that were chosen using cluster random sampling technique. The data that was obtained through SILL questionnaire and English achievement test were analyzed using descriptive statistics through SPSS software version 21.0.The findings revealed that the students use all of the six categories of LLSs given by Oxford (1990), and the most dominant used LLSs category by the students are metacognitive strategies (39.76%), followed by affective strategies (16.95%), while the least dominant used strategies by the students are social strategies (7.60%), followed by memory strategies (8.77%). The high achiever students dominantly use cognitive strategies (40%), followed by metacognitive strategies (30%), while the low achiever students dominantly use metacognitive strategies (42.22%), followed by affective strategies (16.67%). The Chi-square analysis reveals that accumulatively, there is no statistical correlation between the dominant categories of LLSs that the students use with their English achievement.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and Lexical Complexity Measures

2021 ◽  
pp. 37-52
Author(s):  
Ervin Kovacevic
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
English For Academic Purposes ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
Complexity Measures ◽  
Lexical Complexity ◽  
The Relationship

This study examines the hypothesis that language learning strategies (LLS) partly account for the level of L2 proficiency (i.e. the level of L2 lexical complexity produced in the written output of English language learners). To test the hypothesis, 152 English-proficient freshman students of Bosnian L1 linguistic background were surveyed utilizing the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) designed by Rebecca Oxford (1990). Their lexical output was collected through short essays that were written during formal exams held in English for Academic Purposes undergraduate courses at the International University of Sarajevo. The written samples were converted to an electronic format and analyzed with the Web-based Lexical Complexity Analyzer (Lu, 2012; Ai & Lu, 2010). Relationships between six SILL subscales and twenty-five lexical complexity (LC) measures were assessed through applying the principles of correlational design. The results confirmed the hypothesis. Statistically significant correlations were found between memory strategies and three LC measures, cognitive strategies and twenty LC measures, compensation strategies and nine LC measures, and affective strategies and three LC measures. It is concluded that the relationship between LLS and LC levels is mostly conditioned by LLS types.

scholarly journals Language Learning Strategy Use and English Proficiency of Iraqi Upper Secondary School Students

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Qusay Mahdi Mutar
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Language Proficiency ◽  
English Language ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
School Students ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Learning Strategy Use

To learn English language, there are some language-learning strategies, which learners need to be familiar with. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the language learning strategies used among Iraqi sixth-grade preparatory students, and how could gender and proficiency level effect on using language-learning strategies. To analyze the collected data, SPSS software version 20 included Independent sample T-Test Besides, one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD have been used. A total of 210 sixth-grade preparatory students were chosen randomly from four-different secondary schools for the academic year 2016-2017 at al-Karkh side of Baghdad city. The study sample consisted of (105 females and 105 males). The findings revealed that EFL learners have shown medium use of language learning strategies, besides, no statistically significant differences between male and female students in the frequency of using LLSs. the findings also showed Cognitive and memory strategies were the most frequent used categories comparing to the compensation strategies that scored the least frequent category. As for language proficiency, the result showed that students with high proficiency used all six categories of learning strategies more than medium and low-proficiency students.

scholarly journals The Influence of the Economic Students’ Motivations and Language Learning Strategies towards Their English Achievement in STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Iksan ◽  
Dirham Dirham
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
First Year ◽  
Social Strategies ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
First Year Students ◽  
Study Programs ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
English Competence

The aims of this research were: (1) to investigate the students’ motivations, (2) to investigate the language learning strategies (LLSs) that are used by the students, (3) to investigate the level of students’ LLSs usage, and (4) to investigate the influence of the students’ motivations and the level of students’ LLSs usage towards their English competence. This research gave descriptions about the students’ motivations, LLSs that are used by the students, and the level of students’ LLSs usage. The sample of this research was 111 students that were taken from three classes of the first year students from three study programs, i.e. Ilmu Ekonomi, Manajemen, and Akuntansi. This research revealed that the students were categorized into high motivated to learn English where 70 students (63%) had high motivation, 25 students (23%) had very high motivation, 13 students (12%) had medium motivation, and 3 students (3%) had low motivation. This research also found that the students were dominantly used metacognitive strategies (44%), followed by compensation strategies (18%), affective strategies (14%), social strategies (10%), cognitive strategies (8%), and the least used strategies were memory strategies (6%). For the level of the students’ language learning strategies usage, the researcher found that the students level were categorized into medium, where 78 students (70%) mediumly used the LLSs, 30 students (27%) highly used the LLSs, 2 students (2%) lowly used the LLSs, and 1 student (1%) very highly used the LLSs.

Assessment of Language Learning Strategies in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment

2020 ◽  
pp. 83-99
Author(s):  
Wagdi Rashad Ali Bin-Hady ◽  
Abdu Al-kadi ◽  
Ali Abbas Falah Alzubi ◽  
Hassan Saleh Mahdi
Keyword(s):  
Language Learning ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
English Language ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Technology Enhanced Learning ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Gender

This chapter reports on the Yemeni and Saudi EFL learners' use of language learning strategies (LLSs) in technology-mediated language learning contexts. The study examines whether nationality and gender play a significant role in using LLSs on electronic platforms. The study adopted a correlative design in which 100 Yemeni and Saudi university students were recruited to respond to an online close-ended questionnaire. Drawing on Oxford's classification of learning strategies, the findings of this study showed that metacognitive and cognitive strategies were used more frequently compared to the other LLSs. Moreover, the findings of t-test showed a significant difference in the use of LLSs attributed to nationality in favor of the Saudi learners and no significant difference in the choice of LLSs attributed to gender. The study provided some suggestions for EFL learners to benefit from technology in their English language learning.

A Case Study of English Language Learning Strategies for University Students of Engineering Design Specialty

2013 ◽  
Vol 477-478 ◽  
pp. 1541-1544
Author(s):  
Yong Hong Sun ◽  
Xiao Wei Jiang ◽  
Ling Zheng ◽  
Xiang Dong Xu
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
English Language ◽  
Cognitive Strategies ◽  
Social Strategies ◽  
Language Learning Strategies ◽  
Quantitative Research Methods

This research aims at investigating language learning strategies of students of English as a foreign language in China. Using the questionnaire SILL as an instrument, qualitative and quantitative research methods are used. 33 valid questionnaires of university students of Engineering Design Specialty have been collected. The data have been analyzed using SPSS Version 20. The results show that the university students of Engineering Design Specialty sometimes use the English learning strategies at medium level. They sometimes use Compensation strategies, Cognitive strategies, Metacognitive strategies, Affective strategies and Social strategies, and they generally do not use Memory strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document