Attitudes toward Public Policy Alternatives to Reduce Air Pollution

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Aaker ◽  
Richard P. Bagozzi
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 377
Author(s):  
Gudono Gudono

According to the UN, air pollution kills more than 3 millionpeople each year (UN-Habitat 2007). Despite the magnitude ofthe impact, delays in making decisions about the environmentare quite common among governments worldwide. The purposesof this study are twofold. First, the study is to investigate therelative strength of attributes of environmental policy such asmethods of vehicle restriction, percentage of reduction in lead (and CO2) content, and percentage of subsidy reduction. Second, the study is to test government choice when it facesconservative, “scientific,” and popular policy alternatives. Toachieve both objectives this research uses an experimentalmethod. The orthogonal design is adopted for stimuli presenta-tion and conjoint analysis is used for data analysis. The re-search participants are students of an accounting graduateprogram of a state university in Java (Indonesia).The results suggest CO2/lead reduction has the strongesteffect on policy maker preference. In addition, those policymakers tend to prefer the  status quo condition which indicatesconservative views. This is demonstrated by the tendency of theirchoice on an alternative policy package which requires minimum changes compared with the existing policies (a maximumutility of 64.3 percent vs. 28.6 percent and 7.1 percent of otheralternatives). In addition, bureaucrats tend to play “safe”(namely the reduction of lead content in gasoline) when thepossibility of resistance is imminence. Some consequences of theresearch findings are also discussed. Keywords: conjoint analysis; mixed environmental; public policy; utility function


1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Aaker ◽  
Richard P. Bagozzi

A structural equation model is used to explore the relationships among a set of constructs including concern about air pollution, miles driven, political orientation, and attitudes toward specific public policy alternatives such as rationing gasoline.


1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 503-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaheen Borna ◽  
Joseph Chapman ◽  
Dennis Menezes

2021 ◽  
pp. 106591292110703
Author(s):  
Devin J. Christensen

Mill’s harm principle and the financial externalities of risky behavior are routinely invoked to justify health and safety regulation. However, this approach fares poorly when subjected to theoretical scrutiny. First, it is false: individuals engaging in risky behavior do not harm others. Second, even if risky behavior were harmful to others, the argument from harmful externalities does not imply safety-enhancing policy interventions, at least not without additional appeals to paternalism. Third, focusing on the economic impacts of accidents invites perverse victim-blaming attitudes toward accident victims that undermine democratic values and justice. To improve our moral understanding of health and safety regulation, I sketch a theory of public policy justification grounded in the controversies which attract our attention to paternalistic polices in the first place. On this account, justificatory arguments are plausible if they identify goods that individuals genuinely affirm on their own terms, are sensitive to causal responsibility and imbalances between restraint and protection, and comparatively engage with possible policy alternatives. Illustrating the shortcomings of one dominant approach to public policy justification and reorienting us toward the controversies that policy justifications need to confront reflect two ways that political theory can help enhance justice in public policy design and articulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document