186-OR: Plasma Glycated CD59 (pGCD59) Predicts Early Gestational Diabetes (GDM) and Abnormal Neonatal Outcomes: DALI Study Secondary Analysis

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 186-OR
Author(s):  
JOSE HALPERIN ◽  
DONGDONG MA ◽  
MIGUEL A. LUQUE-FERNANDEZ ◽  
DELIA BOGDANET ◽  
GERNOT DESOYE ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 319-327
Author(s):  
María Augusta Guillén-Sacoto ◽  
Beatriz Barquiel ◽  
Natalia Hillman ◽  
María Ángeles Burgos ◽  
Lucrecia Herranz

2014 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. S189
Author(s):  
Veronica Alaniz ◽  
Emily Schneider ◽  
Sara Mazzoni ◽  
Norma Stiglich ◽  
M. Camille Hoffman

2021 ◽  
pp. 089033442110186
Author(s):  
Laurie Beth Griffin ◽  
Jia Jennifer Ding ◽  
Phinnara Has ◽  
Nina Ayala ◽  
Martha B. Kole-White

Background In patients with gestational diabetes, breastfeeding decreases the lifetime risk of Type 2 diabetes by half. Lactation consultation has been shown to increase breastfeeding rates in the general population but has not been assessed in a gestational diabetes population. Research Aims To determine if (1) a postpartum International Board Certified Lactation Consultant (IBCLC) consultation during delivery hospitalization improved inclusive (any) or exclusive breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge and 3 months postpartum in participants with GDM; and if (2) obstetrical providers’ acknowledgement of maternal feeding preference affected the rates of IBCLC consultation for patients. Methods This was a retrospective, comparative, secondary analysis of a prospective cohort ( N = 517) study of women gestational diabetes. Participants who received a IBCLC consultation ( n = 386; 74.5%) were compared to those who did not ( n = 131; 25.5%). Baseline demographics, antepartum characteristics, neonatal information, mode of infant feeding at hospital discharge and 3 months postpartum, and IBCLC consultation during postpartum hospitalization were measured. Results After adjusting for baseline differences, participants who received an IBCLC consultation were more likely to report any breastfeeding at postpartum discharge (aOR 4.87; 95% CI [2.67, 8.86]) and at 3 months postpartum (aOR 5.39; 95% CI [2.61, 11.16]) compared to participants who did not. However, there was no difference in exclusive breastfeeding rates between those who did and did not receive IBCLC consultation. Conclusion Inpatient IBCLC consultation during the immediate postpartum period was associated with improved rates of any breastfeeding in participants with GDM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 01-08
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mansour

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major global public health issue, with prevalence increasing in recent years due to the epidemic of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Aim of the Work: to compare different neonatal outcomes according to the different treatment modalities used in the management of GDM. Our hypothesis was that Metformin is as effective and safe as insulin in patients with gestational diabetes. Patients and Methods: The current non inferiority-Randomized controlled trial was conducted at Ain Shams Maternity hospital between June 2020 to February 2021. The study included 140 outpatient cases or admitted patients for antenatal care: Group A: women were given Metformin (Total 70) and Group B: Women were given insulin. (Total 70). Results: there was no significant difference between Metformin and Insulin groups regarding age, enrollment BMI, parity and family history of DM. There was no significant difference between Metformin and Insulin groups regarding gestational age at enrollment and delivery as well as pregnancy duration after intervention. BMI at delivery, BMI increase as well as BMI increase rate were significantly lower in Metformin group. There were no significant differences between Metformin and Insulin groups regarding fasting, two-hour postprandial and HbA1c blood glucose at enrollment and throughout treatment as well as their reduction after intervention. Maternal complications as hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia and preeclampsia were non-significantly less frequent among Metformin group than among Insulin group. Compliance to treatment was significantly more frequent among Metformin group than among Insulin group. Cesarean delivery was non­significantly less frequent among Metformin group than among Insulin group. There was no significant difference between Metformin and Insulin regarding birth weight APGAR-1, but APGAR-5 was significantly higher in Metformin group. Neonatal complications as IUFD, IUGR, macrosomia, congenital anomalies, neonatal hypoglycemia, respiratory distress and NICU admission were non-significantly less frequent among Metformin group. Conclusions: From the results of current study we can conclude that: Oral metformin was effective as insulin injection in control and management of GDM. BMI was controlled with oral metformin better than insulin injection. Maternal and neonatal complications specially birth weight were the same with both types of treatment. Women had better compliance to metformin treatment. Type of delivery wasn’t affected by type of treatment.


2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 411-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Tundidor ◽  
Apolonia García-Patterson ◽  
Miguel A. María ◽  
Justa Ubeda ◽  
Gemma Ginovart ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1131-1137
Author(s):  
Annalisa Post ◽  
Geeta Swamy ◽  
Chad Grotegut ◽  
Amber Wood

Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of noncephalic presentation on neonatal outcomes in preterm delivery. Study Design In this study a secondary analysis of the BEAM trial was performed. It included women with singleton, liveborn, and nonanomalous fetuses. Neonatal outcomes were compared in noncephalic versus cephalic presentation. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each outcome with logistic regression while controlling for possible confounders. A stratified analysis by mode of delivery was also performed in this study. Results A total of 458 noncephalic deliveries were compared with 1,485 cephalic deliveries. In multivariate analysis, noncephalic presentation was associated with increased risk of death in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or death at <15 months corrected gestational age (cGA), and a decreased risk of IVH. The risk of death persisted in stratified analysis, with increased risk of death at <15 months cGA in noncephalic neonates born via cesarean delivery. In the vaginal delivery group, there was an increased risk of death at <15 months cGA and NICU death. Conclusion After controlling for possible confounders, neonates who are noncephalic at delivery have higher risk for death <15 months cGA and death in the NICU while their risk of IVH is reduced. The risk of death persisted in stratified analyses by mode of delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document