scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Circulating free DNA by Conventional vs. Real Time PCR in Gallbladder Cancer

Author(s):  
Swati Kumari PhD ◽  
Sridhar Mishra PhD ◽  
Akash Agarwal MD ◽  
Anshuman Pandey MD ◽  
Abhinav Sonkar MD ◽  
...  

Background: Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) in serum/plasma has been studied as a promising biomarker in various pathologies, including cancer. However, there is no standardized method for the isolation and quantification of serum cfDNA. An effective and reliable method for isolation and quantification is of utmost importance before any clinical decision. The current study compares the conventional and real-time PCR methods to find any differences and concordance in cfDNA levels between the two methods and the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA by each method. Methods: Serum sample was collected from 67 subjects, including 17 normal healthy individuals (control, n=17), 19 disease controls (cholecystitis, n=19), and 31 Gallbladder cancer patients (cancer, n=31) before any treatment for cfDNA quantification. Results: The cfDNA level did not differ significantly between two methods in both control and cholecystitis groups. In cancer group, cfDNA level was significantly (P < 0.001) different and higher in real time PCR as compared to conventional PCR. There was no significant correlation between two methods in control (r=0.02, P = 0.937), cholecystitis (r=0.10, P = 0.697), cancer (r=-0.08, P = 0.657) and total cases (control + cholecystitis + cancer) (r=0.06, P = 0.622). The diagnostic accuracy of two methods was found similar (P > 0.05) when assessed between control vs. cholecystitis (Z=0.85, P = 0.397), and control vs. total cases (Z=1.35, P = 0.177). However, the diagnostic accuracy of real time PCR was found significantly different and higher as compared to conventional PCR when assessed between control vs. cancer (Z=2.98, P = 0.003), and cholecystitis vs. cancer (Z=4.41, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Quantitative real-time PCR method is of high accuracy, reproducibility, and time-effectiveness. The diagnostic accuracy of real-time PCR was higher compared to conventional PCR.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Luisa Silva ◽  
Paulina Klaudyna Powalowska ◽  
Magdalena Stolarek ◽  
Eleanor Ruth Gray ◽  
Rebecca Natalie Palmer ◽  
...  

AbstractAccurate detection of somatic variants, against a background of wild-type molecules, is essential for clinical decision making in oncology. Existing approaches, such as allele-specific real-time PCR, are typically limited to a single target gene and lack sensitivity. Alternatively, next-generation sequencing methods suffer from slow turnaround time, high costs, and are complex to implement, typically limiting them to single-site use. Here, we report a method, which we term Allele-Specific PYrophosphorolysis Reaction (ASPYRE), for high sensitivity detection of panels of somatic variants. ASPYRE has a simple workflow and is compatible with standard molecular biology reagents and real-time PCR instruments. We show that ASPYRE has single molecule sensitivity and is tolerant of DNA extracted from plasma and formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples. We also demonstrate two multiplex panels, including one for detection of 47 EGFR variants. ASPYRE presents an effective and accessible method that simplifies highly sensitive and multiplexed detection of somatic variants.


Food Control ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 380-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofu Wang ◽  
Ting Tang ◽  
Qingmei Miao ◽  
Shilong Xie ◽  
Xiaoyun Chen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
zhenhua Guo ◽  
Kunpeng Li ◽  
Songlin Qiao ◽  
Xinxin Chen ◽  
Ruiguang Deng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: African swine fever (ASF) is the most important disease to the pigs and cause serious economic losses to the countries with large-scale swine production. Vaccines are recognized as the most useful tool to prevent and control ASF virus (ASFV) infection. Currently, the MGF505 and MGF360 gene-deleted ASFVs or combined with CD2v deletion were confirmed to be the most promising vaccine candidates. Thus, it is essential to develop a diagnosis method to discriminate wide-type strain from the vaccines used.Results: In this study, we established a duplex TaqMan real-time PCR based on the B646L gene and MGF505-2R gene. The sequence alignment showed that the targeted regions of primers and probes are highly conserved in the genotype II ASFVs. The duplex real-time assay can specifically detect B646L and MGF505-2R gene single or simultaneously without cross-reaction with other porcine viruses tested. The limit of detection was 5.8 copies and 3.0 copies for the standard plasmids containing B646L and MGF505-2R genes, respectively. Clinical samples were tested in parallel by duplex real-time PCR and a commercial ASFV detection kit. The detection results of these two assays against B646L gene were well consistent.Conclusion: We successfully developed and evaluated a duplex TaqMan real-time PCR method which can effectively distinguish the wide type and MGF505 gene-deleted ASFVs. It would be a useful tool for the clinical diagnosis and control of ASF.


Plant Disease ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosra Ahmed ◽  
Jacqueline Hubert ◽  
Céline Fourrier-Jeandel ◽  
Megan M. Dewdney ◽  
Jaime Aguayo ◽  
...  

Elsinoë fawcettii, E. australis, and Pseudocercospora angolensis are causal agents of citrus scab and spot diseases. The three pathogens are listed as quarantine pests in many countries and are subject to phytosanitary measures to prevent their entry. Diagnosis of these diseases based on visual symptoms is problematic, as they could be confused with other citrus diseases. Isolation of E. fawcettii, E. australis, and P. angolensis from infected tissues is challenging because they grow slowly on culture media. This study developed rapid and specific detection tools for the in planta detection of these pathogens, using either conventional PCR or one-tube multiplex real-time PCR. Primers and hybridization probes were designed to target the single-copy protein-coding gene MS204 for E. fawcettii and E. australis and the translation elongation factor (Tef-1α) gene for P. angolensis. The specificity of the assays was evaluated by testing against DNA extracted from a large number of isolates (102) collected from different citrus-growing areas in the world and from other hosts. The newly described species E. citricola was not included in the specificity test due to its unavailability from the CBS collection. The detection limits of conventional PCR for the three pathogens were 100, 100, and 10 pg μl−1 gDNA per reaction for E. fawcettii, E. australis, and P. angolensis, respectively. The quadruplex qPCR was fully validated assessing the following performance criteria: sensitivity, specificity, repeatability, reproducibility, and robustness. The quadruplex real-time PCR proved to be highly sensitive, detecting as low as 243, 241, and 242 plasmidic copies (pc) μl−1 of E. fawcettii, E. australis, and P. angolensis, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of this quadruplex assay were further confirmed using 176 naturally infected citrus samples collected from Ethiopia, Cameroon, the United States, and Australia. The quadruplex assay developed in this study is robust, cost-effective, and capable of high-throughput detection of the three targets directly from citrus samples. This new detection tool will substantially reduce the turnaround time for reliable species identification and allow rapid response and appropriate action.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiyu Zhang ◽  
Ming Yao ◽  
Zhihui Tang ◽  
Daning Xu ◽  
Yan Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pathogens including duck-origin avian influenza virus (AIV), duck-origin Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and duck Tembusu virus (DTMUV) posed great harm to ducks and caused great economic losses to the duck industry. In this study, we aim to develop a triplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to detect these three viruses as early as possible in the suspicious duck flocks. Results The detection limit of the triplex real-time PCR for AIV, NDV, and DTMUV was 1 × 101 copies/μL, which was at least 10 times higher than the conventional PCR. In addition, the triplex assay was highly specific, and won’t cross-react with other duck pathogens. Besides, the intra-day relative standard deviation and inter-day relative standard deviation were lower than 4.44% for these viruses at three different concentrations. Finally, a total of 120 clinical samples were evaluated by the triplex real-time PCR, the conventional PCR and virus isolation, and the positive rates for these three methods were 20.83, 21.67, 19.17%, respectively. Taking virus isolation as the gold standard, the diagnostic specificity and positive predictive value of the three viruses were all above 85%, while the diagnostic sensitivity and negative predictive value of the three viruses were all 100%. Conclusion The developed triplex real-time PCR is fast, specific and sensitive, and is feasible and effective for the simultaneous detection of AIV, NDV, and DTMUV in ducks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 112400
Author(s):  
Wook Jin Kim ◽  
Sungyu Yang ◽  
Goya Choi ◽  
Inkyu Park ◽  
Pureum Noh ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. W. Lam ◽  
H. B. Zhang ◽  
L. Yu ◽  
C. H. Woo ◽  
K. N. Tiew ◽  
...  

In this study, a quantitative species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to rapidly detect E. histolytica in water is developed. First, the specificity of E. histolytica PCR detection was verified by using species-specific primers of 16S-like rRNA genes to clearly differentiate it from the closely related amoebae species E. dispar and E. moshkovskii. The sensitivity of this method was subsequently determined using purified E. histolytica genomic DNA and culture cells as PCR reaction templates. Results indicated that conventional PCR visualized on 1% agarose gel was able to detect as low as 0.02 pg genomic DNA and 5 cells, while real-time PCR could detect 0.01 pg genomic DNA and 2 cells of E. histolytica. The protocols for E. histolytica PCR detection in real water samples were then optimized by spiking E. histolytica cells into tap water and reservoir raw water samples. A two-round centrifugation treatment to concentrate amoeba cells directly as a PCR template was the most effective way to detect E. histolytica in spiked tap water samples, while DNA extraction after concentrating amoeba cells was required for spiked reservoir raw water samples. The detection limit of 50 E. histolytica cells in 100 ml tap water was achieved in 2 h from sample collection to real-time PCR data readout. With these established protocols, 78 tap water samples, 11 reservoir raw water samples and 4 feed water samples from Singapore water supply systems were analyzed by both conventional PCR and real-time PCR methods. No E. histolytica cell was detected in tested samples.


2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-175
Author(s):  
Dane Brooks ◽  
Benjamin Bastin ◽  
Erin Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
Mike Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The iQ-Check Real-Time PCR kits use PCR technology based on gene amplification and detection by a real-time PCR thermalcycler for the detection of target analytes in select food matrices. The iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 [Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) 020801] and STEC VirX and STEC SerO (combined PTM 121203) methods were previously validated for different matrices under different enrichment schemes. Objective: To modify the current iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 Kit for the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from 25 to 375 g for raw ground beef (17% fat), raw beef trim, and fresh spinach. In addition, a matrix extension was validated for iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 for raw chicken breast without skin (25 g), raw chicken thigh with skin (25 g), mechanically separated chicken (25 g), and raw ground pork (25 g). The study also included the modification of the iQ-Check STEC VirX and SerO Kits for the detection of non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing E. coli (STEC) for raw ground beef (375 g), raw beef trim (375 g), and fresh spinach (375 g) from STEC Enrichment Broth to buffered peptone water (BPW). All tests were carried out at 8–22 h (10–22 h for fresh spinach). Methods: Ground beef, beef trim, and spinach were co-inoculated with E. coli O157:H7, non-O157 STECs, and Salmonella spp. and analyzed for E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 STECs after an 8-22 h enrichment in BPW for the beef matrices and after a 10–22 h enrichment in BPW for spinach. The chicken matrices were inoculated with E. coli O157:H7 only and analyzed after an 8–22 h enrichment in BPW. The iQ-Check Free DNA Removal Solution workflow was utilized for all matrices. Confirmations at the 22 h time point and method comparisons were conducted with the appropriate reference method as outlined in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual Chapter 4A or the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook Chapters 5.09 and 5B.05. For the iQ-Check STEC VirX and STEC SerO Kits, inclusivity and exclusivity were also performed. Results: The two inclusivity and exclusivity evaluations indicated that the test methods can accurately detect the target analytes and correctly excluded nontarget organisms after 8 h of enrichment. In the method comparison study, the iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 and STEC VirX and STEC SerO test kits demonstrated no statistically significant differences between candidate and reference method results or between presumptive and confirmed results for all food matrices analyzed and the two time points (8 or 10 and 22 h). Both time points produced the same results, with no discrepancies. Conclusions: The iQ-Check real-time PCR kits are effective methods for the detection of E. coli O157 and non-O157 STECs (both the virulence factors and the O groups) from raw ground beef, raw beef trim, and fresh spinach in 375 g samples enriched in BPW for 8–22 h (10–22 h for fresh spinach). In addition, the iQ-Check E. coli O157 Kit is effective in detecting E. coli O157 in 25 g samples of raw chicken breast without skin, raw chicken thigh with skin, mechanically separated chicken, and raw ground pork. The iQ-Check test kits allow the end user to pair enrichments for multiple target analytes, allowing the user to prepare a single enrichment and perform a single DNA extraction. The Free DNA Removal Solution removes free DNA from samples prior to PCR analysis, protecting DNA from intact and living cells. Highlights: The method modifications were granted based on the data collected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document