scholarly journals DAMPAK IMPLEMENTASI RGEC TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN YANG GO PUBLIC DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

KINERJA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Wardoyo , ◽  
Rizki Muti Agustini
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
The Other ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Public Company ◽  
Enterprise Size

This research aims to find and analyze influence risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings, and capital on the banking sector companies in Indonesia public company. Based on the completeness of data, there are only 14 banks to the period observation in 2009-2011 that able to be analyzed. The analysis used is multiple regression. The research results show that risk market and risks reputation impact on value of enterprise, while credit risk, risk liquidity, operational risk, risk law, and risks compliance have not been affecting the value of enterprise. Size of the board of commissioners, independence of the board of commissioners, size of the board of directors, and the number of audit committee have not been affecting the value of enterprise. While, ROE impacts on value of enterprise. In the other hands, ROA, BOPO, and CAR values have not been affecting the value of enterprise.Keywords: corporate value, tobin’s Q, risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings.

scholarly journals ANALISIS KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN METODE RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNING DAN CAPITAL PADA BANK MILIK NEGARA TAHUN 2013-2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 356
Author(s):  
Skalis Winda Munte ◽  
Selmi Dedi ◽  
Ted Matheus Suruan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Comparative Research ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Market Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Public Company ◽  
Composite Rating

This research was aimed to analysis risk base bank rating using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, and Capital ) method in Bank of Public Company 2013-2017. This research was a comparative research. The analyzer was used in this research is RGEC method. Risk Profile was assessed by, credit risk, market risk, and liquidity  risk. Good Corporate Governance was assessed by self assessment of bank report. Earning was assessed by, i.e ROA, ROE, NIM, and BOPO. And for capital was assessed by CAR. The results of the study that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk obtains the highest average weighted Composite Rating, which is 94.67%., PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk came in second place at 87.11%. and PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk obtains the lowest weighted Composite Rating weight of 85.78%. However, overall the three State-Owned Banks are still rated very healthy. However, it is hoped that further researchers will be able to take on more banks to provide a broader picture.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TOWARDS CORPORATE VALUE WITH ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT AS MODERATING VARIABLE (EMPIRICAL STUDY OF FINANCIAL COMPANIES LISTED IN IDX FOR THE PERIOD 2017-2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-98
Author(s):  
Lydia Sibarani ◽  
Herlina Lusmeida
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Multiple Regression Method ◽  
The Impact

Abstract- This research aims to observe and analyze the impact of Good Corporate Governance towards Corporate Value as well as analyzing whether Enterprise Risk Management is able to moderate its impact. Good Corporate Governance is proxied by the presence of Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee, as well as Managerial Ownership. The population of this research includes all financial companies that publish their annual report in Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) over the period of 2017-2019. Data were analyzed using the multiple regression method and the moderated regression analysis. The result of this research found that Independent Commissioners and Audit Committee gives positive and significant impact towards Corporate Value while Managerial Ownership gives negative and insignificant impact towards Corporate Value. Enterprise Risk Management is not able to moderate the impact of Independent Commissioner and Managerial Ownership towards Corporate Value but is able to moderate the impact of the Audit Committee towards Corporate Value. Keywords: Audit Committee; Corporate Value; Corporate Governance; Independent Commissioner; Managerial Ownership

scholarly journals PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI TAHUN 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Della Ayu Rizki ◽  
Eni Wuryani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
External Audit ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of implementing good corporate governance on financial performance in banking companies. Proxies for good corporate governance are the board of directors, the independent board of commissioners, the audit committee, external audit quality, and institutional ownership. Measurement of banking financial performance uses Return on Assets (ROA). The sample used is 26 samples of banking sector companies listed on the IDX during 2014-2018. The analysis technique uses multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the board of directors and institutional ownership have an influence on financial performance, while the independent board of commissioners, audit committee, and external audit quality have no influence on financial performance. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance;Financial Performance;Banking Sector.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, Capital terhadap Value of Firm di Bursa Efek Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Rhevinalda Bima Prakarsa ◽  
Winwin Yadiati ◽  
N. R. Handiani Suciati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Estimation Model ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Asset Quality

<em>The purpose of the company is to increase the firm value. But in the last six years, firm value of the banking sector has fluctuated and even tends to decrease. The level of banking health can be expected to increase the firm value. The level of banking health can be measured using Risk Profile (RP), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earning, Capital (RGEC) method which is the latest formula after Capital, Asset Quality, Management, Earning, Liquidity (CAMEL). The purpose of this study was to determine effect of the banking health on the firm value. The research method uses partial panel data regression through the determination of estimation model and classical assumption test in advance using 33 banks listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The results showed that there was significant and positive effect between Return on Asset (ROA) and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) on firm value. Beside, there was positive but not significant effect between GCG and risk profile on firm value. The results showed that capital is a factor of business developer and company earnings can show as a signal of quality prospects. The application of GCG is not a significant influence because the results of self-assessment are not in accordance with fraud that occurs. Banks must be able to manage their risk, so that the risk can be an encouragement for them to produce high values.</em>

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN BANK DENGAN METODE RGEC (RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNING, CAPITAL) PADA PT. BANK MANDIRI (PERSERO) PERIODE 2015 - 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Pingkan Aprilia Maramis
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

ABSTRAK Dunia perbankan begitu penting dalam masyarakat maupun dalam memajukan perekonomian suatu Negara. Bank dijadikan sebagai tempat untuk melakukan berbagai transaksi yang berhubungan dengan keuangan seperti, tempat mengamnkan uang, melakukan investasi, pengiriman uang, melakukan pembayaran atau melakukan penagihan, Kasmir (2014:2). Menyadari pentingnya peranan bank, maka kesehatan bank harus terjaga karena bank mengelola dana masyarakat yang dipercayakan kepada bank. Berdasarkan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 13/1/PBI/2011 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesahatan Bank Umum dengan Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, dan Capital yang selanjutnya disebut dengan metode RGEC. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penilaian tingkat kesehatan Bank Mandiri Periode 2015-2018 dilihat dari factor Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, dan Capital. Dalam penelitian ini penilaian pada factor Risk-Profile dilihat dari risiko kredit diukur dengan rasio NPL dan risiko likuiditas diukur dengan rasio LDR, factor Good Corporate Governance (GCG) diukur dengan penilaian self assessment bank, factor Earning diukur dengan rasio ROA, dan factor Capital diukur dengan rasio CAR. Hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan menunjukan Bank Mandiri selama periode 2015-2018 pada factor Risk Profile dengan rasio NPL mendapatkan predikat Sehat, dengan rasio LDR mendapatkan predikat Cukup Sehat, pada factor GCG mendapatkan predikat Sangat Baik, pada factor Earnings mendapatkan predikat Sangat  Sehat, dan factor Capital mendapatkan predikat Sangat Sehat. Kata Kunci: profil risiko, GCG, Rentabilitas, Permodalan, Kesehatan Bank             ABSTRACT Banking is very important in society as well as in advancing the economy of a country. Banks are used as a place to carry out various financial-related transactions such as, a place to deposit money, make investments, send money, make payments or make collections, Kasmir (2014: 2).Recognizing the important role of banks, bank health must be maintained because banks manage public funds entrusted to banks. Based on Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 13/1 / PBI / 2011 concerning Evaluation of Commercial Bank Health Levels with Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital , hereinafter referred to as the RGEC method. This study aims to determine the level of soundness of Bank Mandiri for the period of 2015-2018 seen from thefactors Risk-Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Earnings, and Capital. In this study the assessment on factors Risk-Profile views of credit risk is measured by the ratio of NPL and liquidity risk is measured by the LDR, factor Good Corporate Governance (GCG) was measured with the assessment of self-assessment of banks, the factor Earning measured by ROA, and factors Capital is measured with a CAR ratio. The results of research that have been done show that Bank Mandiri during the 2015-2018 period on thefactor Risk Profile with the NPL ratio received the title of Healthy, with the LDR ratio getting the Pretty Healthy predicate, the GCG factor received the Very Good predicate, thefactor Earnings earned the Very Healthy predicate, and the factor Capital gets the title of Very Healthy. Keywords: risk profile, GCG, Profitability, Capital, Bank Health

scholarly journals PENGARUH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN (STUDI PADA SEKTOR PERTAMBANGAN DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA)

KEBERLANJUTAN ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 498
Author(s):  
Budi - Setyawan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social

Abstract This study aims to analyze the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance (independent commissioner, number of directors and number of audit committees) on the value of the company in the mining issuer in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Research samples of 20 companies and years of research that is 2011 - 2015. The data collected is processed by simple and multiple regression. The result of research shows that there is no influence of Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Value. The effect of independent commissioners on corporate value is insignificant. The effect of the number of directors on firm value is significant. The influence of audit committees on corporate value is not significant. Simultaneously CSR, independent commissioner, number of directors and number of audit committee have an effect on signifikan to Company Value. The magnitude of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance (Independent Commissioner, Number of Directors and Audit Committee) to the dependent variable of Corporate Value has a coefficient of determination of 0.049 indicating that the contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance of Independent Commissioners, Number of Directors, and Audit Committee) together against Corporate Value is 4.9%, the rest is caused by other factors. Keywords :  Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Value

scholarly journals Respond OJK Regulation Number 55: Can Good Corporate Governance Affect Banks Credit Risk in Indonesia?

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-114
Author(s):  
Siswantoro
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Risk Monitoring ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Descriptive Statistical Analysis

Efforts to reduce the number of non-performing loans continue to be carried out, one of which is by enforcing the rules regarding good corporate governance as enshrined in POJK Number 55/POJK.03/2016. The purpose of this study is to respond to these regulations by testing whether the attributes of good corporate governance can influence bank credit risk. The total population is 44 established banking companies with three years from 2017 to 2019. The data analysis technique uses descriptive statistical analysis and partial hypothesis testing. The results showed that the size of the Board of Directors and the size of the Risk Monitoring Committee harmed credit risk. Meanwhile, the size of the Board of Commissioners, the proportion of Independent Commissioners, the meeting of the Board of Commissioners, and the size of the Audit Committee does not significantly influence bank credit risk.

scholarly journals Penilaian Kesehatan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah (BPRS) ABC

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Arfan Anugrah Asyhari ◽  
Rangga Putra Ananto ◽  
Eka Rosalina
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Bank Soundness

This study aims to determine the Bank Soundness Level with the object of Islamic Rural Banks registered with the Financial Services Authority in 2015-2019. The type of the research that used in this research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Assessment using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method consists of four factors, namely the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital of each bank. The Risk Profile consists of credit risk and liquidity risk. Credit risk is measured using NPF and liquidity risk is measured using FDR. Earnings factor is measured by ROA and NIM ratio, Capital factor is calculated by CAR ratio. The results showed that the results obtained the predicate of being unhealthy and even quite healthy on the NPF, FDR, ROA, and NIM ratios, while the CAR ratios for the last 3 years received the predicate Very Healthy appropriate to Bank Indonesia regulations, which exceeded 12%  ABSTRAK  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan objek Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah yang terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan pada tahun 2015-2019. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian desktiptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Penilaian dengan metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) terdiri dari empat faktor yaitu Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings dan Capital dari setiap bank. Risk Profile terdiri dari risiko kredit dan risiko likuiditas. Risiko kredit diukur dengan menggunakan NPF dan risiko likuiditas diukur dengan menggunakan FDR. Faktor Earnings diukur dengan rasio ROA, ROE dan NIM, faktor Capital dihitung dengan rasio CAR. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hasil yang memperoleh predikat kurang sehat bahkan cukup sehat atas rasio NPF, FDR, ROA, ROE dan NIM, sedangkan pada rasio CAR pada 3 tahun terakhir memperoleh predikat Sangat Sehat sesuai ketentuan Bank Indonesia yaitu melebihi 12%.

scholarly journals Corporate governance and the financial performance of commercial banks in Ghana

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 33-47
Author(s):  
Samuel Gyamerah ◽  
Hannah Fosuaa Amo ◽  
Sandra Adomako
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Ceo Duality ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Income Ratio ◽  
Corporate Governance Practice

This study aims to provide further evidence on the effect of corporate governance on the performance of Ghanaian banks. Two performance measures were used in this study, namely: Return on Asset (ROA) and Cost-Income Ratio (CIR). Data for the analysis were sourced from 21 commercial banks from 2005 to 2015. Regression estimation techniques were employed for analysis purposes. The result revealed that large board size reduces banks’ performance. Furthermore, CEO duality and foreign ownership negatively affect the performance of banks. However, while the effect of CEO duality was significant on CIR, it was not significant in the case of ROA. On the contrary, the effect of foreign ownership was only significant on ROA.  Moreover, board independence has a significant positive effect on both CIR and ROA, while audit committee independence has no significant effect on CIR and ROA. The paper argues that for a good corporate governance practice, banks should institute a small board with more than half of the members being independent directors. Furthermore, the role of the board chair should be separated from that of the managing director/CEO. The study provides insight and further evidence to stakeholders and regulators to deal with the crisis in the Ghanaian banking sector.

The Effects of Good Corporate Governance for Corporate Value in Plantation Companies at Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX)

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
Yefni Yefni ◽  
Atika Zarefar ◽  
Arumega Zarefar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Book Value ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

Objective - This research aims to identify the effect of good corporate governance ('GCG') factors such as the size of the board, the presence of independent commissioners and audit committees, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership on corporate value (price to book value). This study also uses profitability measured by Return on Assets ('ROA') as moderating variables. Methodology/Technique - The object of this study is plantation companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2011 to 2015. The samples are selected by using purposive sampling method. The hypothesis in this study is tested by using multiple linear regression. Findings - There are three variables that significantly influence corporate value. These are independent commissioners, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. Moreover, profitability does not moderate the relationship between GCG and company value. Novelty - The research is intended to find a relationship between good corporate governance and firm performance among plantation companies. Type of Paper - Empirical Keywords: Audit Committee; Corporate Values; Good Corporate Governance; Independent Commissioner; Institutional Ownership; Managerial Ownership; Price to Book Value; Return on Assets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document