PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI 054938 ALUR DUA KECAMATAN SEI LEPAN PANGKALAN BRANDAN KABUPATEN LANGKAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Uthman Uthman
Keyword(s):  
Primary School ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Education Of Students

The objectives of this research were to discover: (1) the difference in learning<br />achievement of Islam Religion Education of students taught by cooperative<br />instructional strategy STAD type and student taught by expository instructional<br />strategy, (2) the a difference of learning style Islam Religion education with visual,<br />auditory and kinesthetic, learning style, and (3) the interaction between instructional<br />strategy and learning style in affecting learning achievement of learning style Islam<br />religion education. The population was Grade V students of Primary School Inti<br />Number SD Negeri 054938 Alur Dua Sei Lepan Pangkalan Brandan Langkat regency<br />consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for instructional class using STAD was<br />class Vc with 40 students, while those taught by expository was class Vb with 40<br />students. The results of the findings were: (1) the average of Islam Religion Education<br />of students taught by STAD instructional strategy ( X = 29,95) was higher than the<br />average of students taught by expositoyi instructional strategy ( X = 28,62) with Fcount<br />= 12,46 &gt; Ftable = 3, 972), the avarage learning achievement of Islam religion education<br />with kinesthetic learning style ( X = 29,77) and visual learning style ( X = 25.35) with<br />Fcount = 5,92 &gt; Ftable = 3,972, and (3) there was an interaction between instructional<br />strategy and learning style toward students learning achievement Islam Religion<br />education with Fcount = 23.84 &gt; Ftable = 3,972.

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran JUCAMA Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Berbicara di Prodi PBSI IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Darmuki ◽  
Ahmad Hariyadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Level I ◽  
Better Than

Focus this is research to determine which are the achievements of better speaking learning: (1), learning model JUCAMA or Conventional, (2) Visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) On models learning JUCAMA,  which are the achievements of better speaking learning, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.This type of research is quasi-experimental with 2 × 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program, which consists of nine classes with a total of 288 students. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling, selected three classes, namely the level of I-A, IB, and IC. The sample consisted of 93 students, with details of 31 IA students as an experiment, 31 IB level students as a control, and 31 IC level students as a trial. Data collection instruments using learning style questionnaires, and learning achievement tests that have been validated by the validators. The test instrument was tested in PBSI level I study program after being tested and then analyzed its reliability, distinguishing features and difficulty levels. The prerequisite tests include the normality test using the Lilliefors method and the variance homogeneity test using the Bartlett method. With α = 0.05, it can be concluded that the sample comes from populations that are normally distributed and have a homogeneous variance.In this study it can be concluded that: (1) students with learning JUCAMA had speaking learning achievement better than the students with conventional learning, (2) achievement of learning speaking students who have a visual learning style is better than the speaking learning achievement of students who have auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. While the speaking achievement students who have learning styles of auditory as well as students who have a kinesthetic learning style, (3) On learning JUCAMA, there is no difference between speaking achievement in each learning style. Keyword: jucama, learning style, learning achievement, speaking

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran STAD Berbantuan Geogebra pada Materi Similaritas Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2017 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Wawan Wawan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of Learning model of STAD geogebra viewed from learning style. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 × 3. The population was entirely the students 4thof Mathematics Education Program Ma’arif Institute of Metro Lampung in Academic Year 2015/2016. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 50 students consisted of 26 students in the first experimental class and 24 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and student learning styles questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusionsof thisresearchwere as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of STAD Geogebra type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style have the same achievement with students with auditory learning styles. Students with auditory learning style have the same achievement with students with kinesthetic learning styles. Students with visual learning styles have a better academic achievement than students with kinesthetic learning styles. (3) Difference in achievement of each learning method was not consistent with their respective learning styles and differences between individual learning style also was not consistent in each learning method Keywords: geogebra, power point, STAD

scholarly journals Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika (IAIM NU) Metro

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-114
Author(s):  
Santi Widyawati
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Islamic Studies ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Program ◽  
Student Grades

Learning style is one of the factors that allegedly affect the learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. The purpose of this research is to know "whether there is influence of learning style type (Visual, Auditorial, and kinestetik) to student learning achievement of Mathematics Education Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Islamic Institute of Mathematics”. The type of this research is comparative causal research with 3 × 1 research design. The population in this research is all students of semester IV of Mathematics Education program of Maarif Islamic Institute Nahdatul Ulama Metro academic year 2015/2016. The sample in this study was obtained by using class random technique. The sample in this study consists of 22 students with details of 10 students who have visual learning style, 4 students who have auditorial learning style, and 8 students who have kinesthetic learning style. Instruments used to collect data are questionnaire learning style and transcript of student grades semester IV of Mathematics Education Mathematics course Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Hypothesis testing in this study used a one way variance analysis with unequal cells.The result of this research is the influence of learning style to learning achievement (GPA) of Mathematics Education Mathematics Program of Maarif Nahdatul Ulama Institute of Islamic Studies. Furthermore, after further test using Scheefe 'method, it was found that students with visual learning styles had the same learning achievement with students with auditorial learning style, while both types of learning styles had better learning achievement compared with students with kinesthetic learning style.

STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GEOGRAFI

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyusri . ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Acheivement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori (SPE), (2) perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar Geografi siswa. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI Ilmu Sosial SMA Negeri 1 Pinangsori. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan Cluster Random Sampling. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x3. Teknik analisa data yang digunakan teknik ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi ekspositori (SPE); (2) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar mempengaruhi hasil belajar  Geografi siswa.   Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan ekspositori, gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik, hasil belajar geografi   Abstract: This research was aimed to: (1) the student acheivement of Geography who were tought by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that taugh by exspository instruction strategy, (2) the differences of the students acheivements of Geography who have Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic learning style, (3) the interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. The population  in this research is all of student grade XI social sciences at Senior High School 1 Pinangsori of Tapanuli Tengah. The sampling technique use in this research is cluster random sampling technique. The research method used was quasi exsperiment with 2x3 factorial designs. Tecnique analyses data was two way ANOVA testing at significance 0,05. The result showed that: (1) student acheivement of Geography who were taught by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that student acheivement who were taught by exspository instruction strategy; (2) there are differences of students acheivements which is as has Visual, Auditory, dan Kinesthetic learning style; (3) there are interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. Keywords: problem-based learning strategies and expository, visual learning styles, auditory, and kinesthetic learning outcomes geography

scholarly journals A Study of Educational Achievement of Standard XI Students in Context of their Learning Style in Reference to Area

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay B. Raval
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Individual Difference ◽  
Educational Achievement ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Style Inventory ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Selection Of

In the Era of Change, teacher should consider the individual differences while teaching in the classroom. In fact teacher must keep in mind the individual differences for teaching. Students have so many talent, we as a teacher must have that angel of view of identifying it. This individual difference can be divided in dimension of Learning Style, too. Researcher was giving service in High School as a teacher, he observe such an Individual difference in context to learning style in class room. Is there any relationship between Educational Achievement and Learning Style? Is there any effect of Learning Style on Educational Achievement in reference to Area? To find the answer of this question present study was conducted. Population & Sample: Population for present study was students studying in Standard-XI of Gujarati Medium School of Gandhinagar District. The selection of schools was by Stratified Randomization Technique and selection of students was selected by Cluster Method. In last, the Sample size was 607. Method: Survey Method was used for Data Collection. Tool: Self constructed Learning Style Inventory (L.S.I.) was used for Data Collection. Learning Style Inventory (L.S.I.) was three Point Likert type Scale. Findings: 1) There was no significance different in educational achievement among students having Visual Learning Style, Auditorial Learning Style and Kinesthetic Learning Style. 2) In matter of educational achievement, students of Rural are superior to students of Urban among students having Visual Learning Style. 3) In matter of educational achievement, students of Rural are superior to students of Urban among students having Auditorial Learning Style. 4) In matter of educational achievement, students of Urban are superior to students of Rural among students having Kinesthetic Learning Style.

scholarly journals Komparasi model pembelajaran earth science community dan grup investigasi pada scientific approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-125
Author(s):  
Jailani Husain Saleh ◽  
Muhsinatun Siasah Masruri
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Earth Science ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Cognitive Aspect ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Science Community ◽  
The Difference

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk (1) menguji perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan group investigation (GI); (2) menguji perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar visual; (3) menguji perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar auditorial;  dan (4) menguji interaksi pengaruh antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar geografi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x2. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa SMA Negeri di Kota Kupang yang tersebar pada 12 sekolah. Teknik sampling yang digunakan adalah Simple Random Sampling dan terpilih 2 sekolah sebagai subjek penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) tidak terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada aspek kognitif  dengan p = 0,374 > 0,05; pada aspek afektif dengan p = 0,645 > 0,05, dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan p = 0,969 > 0,05; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar visual, pada aspek kognitif dengan p = 0,009 < 0,05; pada aspek afektif dengan p = 0,014 < 0,05 dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan p = 0,024 < 0,05;  (3) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar model earth science community dan GI pada siswa dengan gaya belajar auditorial, pada aspek kognitif dengan p = 0,042 < 0,05; pada aspek afektif dengan p = 0,026 < 0,05 dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan  p = 0,017 < 0,05; (4) terdapat interaksi pengaruh model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar geografi, pada aspek kognitif dengan p = 0,008 < 0,05, pada aspek afektif  dengan p = 0,004 < 0,05 dan pada aspek psikomotor dengan p = 0,006 < 0,05. AbstractThis study aims to test: (1) the difference in the learning outcomes through the earth science community and group investigation (GI) models, (2) the difference in the learning outcomes through the earth science community and GI models among students with the visual learning style, (3) the difference in the learning outcomes through the earth science community and GI models among students with the auditory learning style, and (4) the interaction of the effects of the learning models and the students’ learning styles on the geography learning outcomes. The study employed the quasi-experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design. The research population comprised all students of state senior high schools (SHSs) in Kupang city in 12 schools. The sampling technique was the simple random sampling technique and 2 schools were selected as the research subjects. The results of the study are as follows. (1) There is no difference in the learning outcomes between the students learning through the earth science community and GI models in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.374 > 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.645 > 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.969 > 0.05.(2) There is difference in the learning outcome through the earth science community and GI models among the students with the visual learning style in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.009  < 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.014 < 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.024 < 0.05. (3) There is difference in the learning outcome through the earth science community and GI models among the students with the visual learning style in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.042 < 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.026 < 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.017 < 0.05.(4) There is  interaction of the effects of the learning models and the students’ learning styles on the geography learning outcomes in the cognitive aspect with p = 0.008 < 0.05, in the affective aspect with p = 0.004  < 0.05, and in the psychomotor aspect with p = 0.006 < 0.05.

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Islam Riau

GERAM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhlis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Lecture Material ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Good Learning

Learning styles are the ways, attitudes, and habits undertaken by students to gain comfort in learning. In this case, the researcher analyzed the foreign students’ learning style from Thailand who are studying at the Islamic University of Riau. The result of study showed that foreign students’ learning style from Thailand tended to use Kinesthetic learning style. This was based on research findings, learning style that has the highest value of kinestetik with an average of 84.6%, followed by an auditory learning style with an average of 76.9% and then visual learning style with an average of 61.5 %. As the findings in research are: First, for visual learning style students prefered to use the media in the lecture process. They were more able to concentrate when the lecturer explains the lecture material when looking at the face. Students could not memorize the material while listening to music. Students understood the material written on the board rather than read more quickly. Second, for auditory learning style, students prefered their lecturers by using lecture method. Students more easily remembered well the lecture material during the discussion. Students will lose concentration, when they heard a noise. Students prefered to discuss with friends if they find problems learning. Third, for students' kinesthetic learning styles along with. Students were more interested in lectures that are in practice. Students memorized the material while walking more dominant. when studying students could not read quickly. The findings could certainly be an input for educators in order to absorb, organize, and suit the learning strategies with learning styles, so as to show good learning outcomes and will be in accordance with lecture objectives

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF USE MODEL MAKE A MATCH & PICTURE AND PICTURE AND STUDY LEARNING STYLE ON LEARNING RESULTS OF SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE CLASS II CLUSTER XI CIBINONG-BOGOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Ajat Sudrajat ◽  
Marfuah Darojat
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Social Knowledge ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Knowledge Learning

This research is a quantitative research that aims to know the difference of learning result of Social Knowledge learners using learning model make a match and picture and picture; Differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles; And the influence of interaction between cooperative learning model and student learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. The research was conducted in Cibinong District XI Cluster with sample of students of class II of SDN Ciriung 02 ( Public School Ciriung 2) which amounted to 78 students. Instrument used in this research is questionnaire and test result of learning. Data analysis techniques in this study using Saphiro Wilk Test to test the normality of data and Bartlett Test to test the homogeneity of data. After that, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Test was done to test the difference of mean value between groups followed by Tukey HSD test to see group interaction with reference to significant level α = 0,05. The results showed that there was a difference between learning outcomes of IPS learners using cooperative learning model make a match and picture and picture with significance of 0,000; There are differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles with significance of 0,001; And there is no direct interaction effect between the use of cooperative learning model and the learner's learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. This is indicated by a significance of 0,535.Keywords : Make a Match, Picture and Picture, learning style, Social Science learning result.

scholarly journals Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya belajar

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-240
Author(s):  
Muhammad Syawahid ◽  
Susilahudin Putrawangsa
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Wrong Answer ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematics Literacy ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Math Literacy

[Bahasa]: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 1 Mataram kelas VII. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 3 siswa dari 82 siswa kelas VIIIA dan VIIIB yang masing-masing memiliki gaya belajar auditori, visual dan kinestetis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu angket gaya belajar dan tes kemampuan literasi matematika. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk menggambarkan hasil tes literasi matematika siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Siswa dengan gaya belajar auditori memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4, yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2) meskipun mereka kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika dengan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). 2) Siswa dengan gaya belajar visual memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 3 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4) dan tidak mampu menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1 dan 2). 3) Siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis memiliki kemampuan literasi matematika level 4 yang ditunjukkan dengan kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika level 4 (soal nomor 1) dan level 3 (soal nomor 3 dan 4). Pada soal nomor 2 (level 4) siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetis kurang teliti sehingga jawaban yang dihasilkan salah.  Kata kunci: Literasi Matematika; Gaya Belajar; Auditori; Visual; Kinestetis [English]: This research aims to describe and analyze student’s mathematic literacy referring to learning style. This research was conducted at SMPN 1 Mataram for VIII class. The subjects are 3 students from 82 students of class VIIIA dan VIIIB who respectively have auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning style. The method used in this research is qualitative. Instruments used in this research are a questionnaire of learning style and tests of mathematical literacy. Data analysis was conducted descriptively to portray students’ mathematics literacy referring to learning styles. This research shows that: 1) The students with auditory learning style are in the 4th level of mathematical literacy, it is indicated by their ability in solving 4th level math literacy problem (question 1 and 2) although they have difficulties in solving 3th level math literacy problem (questions 3 and 4). 2) The students with visual learning styles are in 3rd level of mathematical literacy indicated by their ability to solve 3rd level math literacy problems (questions 3 and 4) and can’t solve the 4th level math literacy problem (questions 1 and 2). 3) The students with kinesthetic learning styles have 4th level of mathematical literacy shown by their ability to solve 4th level of math literacy problems (question 1) and 3rd  level (question 3 and 4). They are less accurate in solving question 2 (4th level) so as they have wrong answer.  Keywords: Mathematics Literacy; Learning Style; Auditory; Visual; Kinesthetic

scholarly journals Learning Styles, Does it Cause the Differences of Students Achievement?

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Sarah Mustika Barokah ◽  
Loviniantika Cahyaning Suseno ◽  
Yosepha Kurniawati Deze Say ◽  
Ali Mustadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Random Cluster ◽  
Achievement Data ◽  
Research Population ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Quantitative Statistics ◽  
Thematic Learning

This research aims to examine the difference between the learning achievement of students with learning styles visual, auditory, and kinesthetic in Sub-district Sukun Malang. The type of this research was comparative quantitative. This research population was all 4th-grade students in Sub-district Sukun, which amount to 3250 students, while the technique of sample retrieval used random cluster sampling. Sample of this research amount to 338 of the 4th-grade students from 5 elementary schools in Sub-district Sukun. Data were collected by using learning style questionnaires and documents of students learning achievement. Data analysis of this research used quantitative statistics descriptive and analysis statistics nonparametric using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. The result of this research showed that the amount of significant value is 0.688, higher than 0.05, so it can be concluded that there is no difference in thematic learning achievement between a student who has visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document