scholarly journals Russian Scholarly Journals in Emerging Sources Citation Index

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga V. Moskaleva ◽  
◽  
Vladimir V. Pislyakov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Citation Index ◽  
Scholarly Journals

scholarly journals Scholarly Journals’ Publication Frequency and Number of Articles in 2018–2019: A Study of SCI, SSCI, CSCD, and CSSCI Journals

Publications ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotian Chen
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Science Citation ◽  
Scholarly Journals ◽  
Journal Publication ◽  
Systematic Random Sampling ◽  
Chinese Science ◽  
The Past ◽  
Social Sciences Citation Index

This study used all-journal data and systematic random sampling data to primarily determine the average number of issues per year and the average number of articles per issue among the Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) (China), and Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) (China) journals. The random sampling data were based on 5% SCI and SSCI samples and 10% CSCD and CSSCI samples. The objectives were to have a 2018–2019 record of the journal publication frequency detailing the number of articles per issue and the number of issues per year for the journals on the lists, as well as to compare Chinese journals’ data with those of international journals, in the perspective of scholarly publishing transformations in the world as well as in China during the past two decades. The study found that the average number of issues per year for SCI, SSCI, CSCD, and CSSCI journals was 10.95, 5.18, 9.17, and 7.87, respectively, and that CSCD/CSSCI journals publish more articles than SCI/SSCI, with CSSCI journals publishing significantly more articles per year than SSCI journals. The author fees for non-OA journals in China could play a role in the higher number of articles. The “mega journal” phenomenon does not seem to be a common practice among all the journal lists studied.

scholarly journals Was the number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea affected by the COVID-19 pandemic?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
Sun Huh
Keyword(s):  
Citation Index ◽  
Board Members ◽  
Expected Number ◽  
Scholarly Journals ◽  
Medical Journals ◽  
Specific Subset ◽  
The World ◽  
Proportional Change ◽  
Science Citation Index Expanded

This study investigated whether there was an increase in submissions to scholarly journals in Korea according to journals’ field and indexation status in Scopus or Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) in 2020, the year when the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic first spread throughout the world. The analysis included 60 journals with esubmission systems operated by M2PI. Yearly and monthly submissions were counted from 2016 to 2020. The yearly proportional change was also calculated. In 2020, submissions soared for medical journals indexed in Scopus/SCIE (49.5%), corresponding to an increase of 36.9% relative to the expected number of submissions. There was also a surge of submissions to these journals from March to July 2020. However, non-medical journals and medical journals not indexed in Scopus/SCIE did not show an increase in submissions. The number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in a specific subset of journals. The background of the spike in submissions is required to be re-investigated. Editors’ burden also should be mitigated through editorial board members’ help and publishers’ support.

scholarly journals A cross sectional study of retraction notices of scholarly journals of science

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manorama Tripathi ◽  
Sharad Kumar Sonkar ◽  
Sunil Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Scholarly Journals ◽  
Data Manipulation ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Trend Pattern ◽  
Open Access Journals

Retraction is the withdrawal of published article after it is found that the authors did not ensure integrity in conducting and reporting their research activities. The bibliometric information of 4716 document categorised as retractions in Science Citation Index, Web of Science was downloaded and analysed to understand trend, pattern and reasons of retraction. The results showed that retractions had increased during the ten-year period, 2008-2017. The main reasons for retractions were plagiarism, falsified data, manipulation of images and figures. It was also found that just 40 out of 4716 retraction notices had explicitly stated reasons for retracting the published articles. The open access journals had more number of retractions as compared to subscription based journals. The study will guide library professionals and research scholars towards a better comprehension of the reasons behind retractions in science discipline in the ten-year period. They would be better equipped to steer clear of inauthentic publications in their citations and references.

Citation Index for Volume 22

1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-758
Author(s):  
Kristin Arndt
Keyword(s):  
Citation Index

Citation index and scientific production on the neuroscience of music: A bibliometric study.

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-422
Author(s):  
Miriam Albusac-Jorge ◽  
Francisco J. Giménez-Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Citation Index ◽  
Scientific Production ◽  
Bibliometric Study

On Scientific Value of russian Journals in Economics and related fields

2013 ◽  
pp. 130-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Muravyev
Keyword(s):  
Reference Lists ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Detailed Data ◽  
Academic Quality ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Russian Science Citation Index ◽  
Scientific Significance ◽  
Scientific Value

In this paper we attempt to classify Russian journals in economics and related disciplines for their scientific significance. We show that currently used criteria, such as a journal’s presence in the Higher Attestation Committee’s list of journals and the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) impact factor, are not very useful for assessing the academic quality of journals. Based on detailed data, including complete reference lists for 2010—2011, we find significant differentiation of Russian journals, including among those located at the top of the RSCI list. We identify two groups of Russian journals, tentatively called category A and B journals, that can be regarded as the most important from the viewpoint of their contribution to the economic science.

Scientometric Parameters of Russian Economic Science:General State and the Evaluation of Thesis boards

2013 ◽  
pp. 129-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kurakova ◽  
L. Tsvetkova ◽  
O. Eremchenko
Keyword(s):  
Science Citation Index ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Science Citation ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Russian Science Citation Index

The paper analyses the publications of Russian authors in various fields of economics indexed in Web of Science and Russian Science Citation Index. The authors claim that the scientometric parameters are only in a limited way applicable in evaluating the performance of expert and thesis boards in economics in Russia. The authors also put forward the approaches in order to improve Russia’s positions in the international citations indexes in economics.

The experience of ranking russian economic journals

2015 ◽  
pp. 99-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Balatsky ◽  
N. Ekimova
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Statistical Information ◽  
Expert Evaluation ◽  
Expert Interviews ◽  
Bibliometric Data ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Ranking Systems ◽  
Economic Journals ◽  
Russian Science Citation Index

The article presents the results of the rating of Russian economic journals, the methodology of which is based on a combination of bibliometric data and expert interviews. Processing of the statistical information system of Russian science citation index (RINC) allows us to form a “primary” list of the best journals in the country. Expert evaluation of the list makes it possible to reorganize it with regard to the scientific level of periodicals and get the “secondary” list. The merger of two ranking systems forms the basis of obtaining the final ranking of economic journals. It is shown that the leading part of the constructed rating forms a kind of the Diamond List of journals, which on the whole agrees with similar lists obtained in earlier studies by other authors.

Journals’ hidden self-citation as the problem of publication ethics

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolay Mazov ◽  
◽  
Vadim Gureyev ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Science Citation Index ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Editorial Staff ◽  
Publication Activity ◽  
Publication Ethics ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Russian Science Citation Index ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
First Time

Twenty two science Russian periodicals in informatics and library studies are selected for the bibliometrical analysis of key journal indicators, including publication activity of the same journals’ editorial staff. For the first time for domestic journals, the study reveals hidden self-citation when editorial members include links to their journal from other publications. The available instruments of scientometrical databases, including Web of Science and Scopus, and the national system Russian Science Citation Index do not enable to identify this form of self-citation. The mentioned manipulations are aimed at boosting journal rating. In several cases, intensive and unjustified citation by journals’ editorial staff in other periodicals which we consider the violation of publication ethical principles, is revealed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document