scholarly journals Diagnosis and treatment of acute surgical diseases in patients with COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
VI Vechorko ◽  
VD Anosov ◽  
BV Silaev
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Surgical Pathology ◽  
Extensive Experience ◽  
Urgent Surgery ◽  
Important Challenge

Emergency surgery in the infectious diseases hospital is an urgent problem during the COVID-19 pandemic. Municipal Clinical Hospital No.15 named after O. M. Filatov has been providing emergency surgical care after conversion, from March 27, 2020 until now. The hospital’s medical staff has built up extensive experience: 194 surgical procedures were carried out in April, and 289 surgical procedures were carried out in May 2020. The paper reports the experience of emergency surgery at the stage of conversion to an infectious diseases hospital. Among all hospitalized patients, 482 (5.29%) people had acute surgical pathology requiring emergency surgery. Among patients who underwent urgent surgery, 472 (98%) people had the caused by COVID-19 community-acquired pneumonia of various degrees of severity. The paper discusses some features of acute surgical pathology and complications identified in patients with COVID-19. The surgical care features in the hospital after conversion are proper epidemiological regime implementation, minimization of the number of staff in the operating room, possible minimization of the number and reduction of the duration of surgical procedures. The most important challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic is medical staff safety.

scholarly journals New approaches in providing care to surgical patients under conditions of COVID-19 pandemic on the basis of Military medical clinical center of Central region

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-137
Author(s):  
V. O. Shaprynskyi ◽  
A. V. Verba ◽  
Y. V. Shaprynskyi ◽  
I. P. Martsynkovskyi ◽  
S. M. Shalyhin
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Surgical Pathology ◽  
Infectious Disease Unit ◽  
Disease Unit

Annotation. Nowadays, in coronavirus disease pandemic, the conditions for emergency surgery have changed. The aim of the work was to improve the provision of emergency surgical care under conditions of COVID-19 pandemic by developing and implementing clinical pathway of patients, using the remodeled infectious disease unit with a specially equipped operating room. To improve emergency surgical care under conditions of coronavirus pandemic, clinical pathways have been developed and implemented for management of patients with acute surgical pathology: the pathway of the patient requiring emergency surgery with suspected COVID-19 during self-presentation, the patient delivered by ambulance, in mass admission of patients, in admission of servicemen. Part of the hospital stock was restructured into isolated off-line infectious disease unit for treatment of patients with COVID-19 in a separate two-story building. Specially equipped operating room of the off-line infectious disease unit has separate entrances for patients and medical staff, which ensures the distribution of patient flows in the operating room. Clinical pathways for providing emergency care to patients with acute surgical pathology, developed by the authors, made it possible to divide them into flows and minimize possible risks of coronavirus infection in medical staff and other groups of patients. Under pandemic conditions, restructuring of hospital stock along with creation of off-line units with the use of existing staff seems to be warranted. Appropriate training of medical personnel in the restructured units working with COVID-19 infection as well as the development of rotational system mechanism for medical personnel are urgently required. Clinical results of treatment of patients with acute surgical pathology in the off-line infectious disease unit for patients with COVID-19 will be the object of future studies.

scholarly journals The negative effects of COVID-19 and national lockdown on emergency surgery morbidity due to delayed access

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco A. Ciarleglio ◽  
Marta Rigoni ◽  
Liliana Mereu ◽  
Cai Tommaso ◽  
Alessandro Carrara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Close Correlation ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 and delayed emergency department access on emergency surgery outcomes, by comparing the main clinical outcomes in the period March–May 2019 (group 1) with the same period during the national COVID-19 lockdown in Italy (March–May 2020, group 2). Methods A comparison (groups 1 versus 2) and subgroup analysis were performed between patients’ demographic, medical history, surgical, clinical and management characteristics. Results Two-hundred forty-six patients were included, 137 in group 1 and 109 in group 2 (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the peri-operative characteristics of the two groups. A declared delay in access to hospital and preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were 15.5% and 5.8%, respectively in group 2. The overall morbidity (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.08–4.55, p = 0.03) and 30-day mortality (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.33–5.50, =0.68) were significantly higher in group 2. The delayed access cohort showed a close correlation with increased morbidity (OR = 3.19, 95% CI 0.89–11.44, p = 0.07), blood transfusion (OR = 5.13, 95% CI 1.05–25.15, p = 0.04) and 30-day mortality risk (OR = 8.00, 95% CI 1.01–63.23, p = 0.05). SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had higher risk of blood transfusion (20% vs 7.8%, p = 0.37) and ICU admissions (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.17) and a longer median LOS (9 days vs 4 days, p = 0.11). Conclusions This article provides enhanced understanding of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient access to emergency surgical care. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 changed the quality of surgical care with poorer prognosis and higher morbidity rates. Delayed emergency department access and a “filter effect” induced by a fear of COVID-19 infection in the population resulted in only the most severe cases reaching the emergency department in time.

scholarly journals Surgical Interventions in Patients Hospitalised with COVID-19. A Review of Seven Months of Experience Working in a COVID-19 Dedicated Centre

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 395
Author(s):  
Justyna Rymarowicz ◽  
Michał Pędziwiatr ◽  
Piotr Major ◽  
Bryan Donohue ◽  
Karol Ciszek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Overall Mortality

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made changes to the traditional way of performing surgical consultations. The aim of the present study was to assess the need for surgical care performed by various surgical specialties among patients infected with COVID-19 hospitalized in a COVID-19 dedicated hospital. All surgical consultations performed for patients infected with COVID-19 in a COVID dedicated hospital in a seven month period were evaluated. Data on demographics, surgical specialty, consult reason, procedure performed, and whether it was a standard face to face or teleconsultation were gathered. Out of 2359 COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital in the seven month period, 229 (9.7%) required surgical care. Out of those 108 consultations that did not lead to surgery, 71% were managed by telemedicine. A total of 36 patients were operated on while suffering from COVID-19. Out of them, only three patients admitted primarily for COVID-19 pneumonia underwent emergency surgery. The overall mortality among those operated on was 16.7%. Conclusions: Patients hospitalised with COVID-19 may require surgical care from various surgical specialties, especially during peaks of the pandemic. However, they rarely require a surgical procedure and only occasionally require major surgery. A significant portion of potentially surgical problems could be managed by teleconsultations.

scholarly journals Ethical considerations and patient safety concerns for cancelling non-urgent surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nolan J. Brown ◽  
Bayard Wilson ◽  
Stephen Szabadi ◽  
Cameron Quon ◽  
Vera Ong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Ethics ◽  
Health Care Access ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Surgical Safety ◽  
Care Access ◽  
Urgent Surgery ◽  
Starting Point

AbstractAt the time of writing of this article, there have been over 110 million cases and 2.4 million deaths worldwide since the start of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, postponing millions of non-urgent surgeries. Existing literature explores the complexities of rationing medical care. However, implications of non-urgent surgery postponement during the COVID-19 pandemic have not yet been analyzed within the context of the four pillars of medical ethics. The objective of this review is to discuss the ethics of elective surgery cancellation during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and autonomy. This review hypothesizes that a more equitable decision-making algorithm can be formulated by analyzing the ethical dilemmas of elective surgical care during the pandemic through the lens of these four pillars. This paper’s analysis shows that non-urgent surgeries treat conditions that can become urgent if left untreated. Postponement of these surgeries can cause cumulative harm downstream. An improved algorithm can address these issues of beneficence by weighing local pandemic stressors within predictive algorithms to appropriately increase surgeries. Additionally, the potential harms of performing non-urgent surgeries extend beyond the patient. Non-maleficence is maintained through using enhanced screening protocols and modifying surgical techniques to reduce risks to patients and clinicians. This model proposes a system to transfer patients from areas of high to low burden, addressing the challenge of justice by considering facility burden rather than value judgments concerning the nature of a particular surgery, such as cosmetic surgeries. Autonomy can be respected by giving patients the option to cancel or postpone non-urgent surgeries. However, in the context of limited resources in a global pandemic, autonomy is not absolute. Non-urgent surgeries can ethically be postponed in opposition to the patient’s preference. The proposed algorithm attempts to uphold the four principles of medical ethics in rationing non-urgent surgical care by building upon existing decision models, using additional measures of resource burden and surgical safety to increase health care access and decrease long-term harm as much as possible. The next global health crisis will undoubtedly present its own unique challenges. This model may serve as a comprehensive starting point in determining future guidelines for non-urgent surgical care.

Consensus ‘Interferon therapy for patients with influenza, SARS and COVID19’

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
N. D. Yushchuk ◽  
I. V. Maev ◽  
A. L. Vertkin
Keyword(s):  
General Practitioner ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Interferon Therapy ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Primary Contact ◽  
Respiratory Viral Infections

According to the who, the share of acute respiratory viral infections (амма? and influenza) accounts for about 90–95% of all infectious diseases; in russia, influenza and arvi take up to 40% of the total duration of official disability, which determines the significance of this pathology. At the same time, the primary contact of the overwhelming majority of patients with suspected arvi and influenza occurs with a therapist or general practitioner of polyclinics. The proposed consensus of experts is intended to systematize the known approaches to the diagnosis, treatment and secondary prevention of influenza, acute respiratory viral infections and community-acquired pneumonia for their use at outpatient clinics. The schemes of using interferon therapy for arvi and influenza are considered in detail.

scholarly journals Gambaran Pasien yang Menjalani Prosedur Bedah Emergensi di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado Periode Januari - September 2019

e-CliniC ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Utrecht Suleman ◽  
Angelica M. J. Wagiu ◽  
Stephanus J. Ch. Tangel
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Adult Age ◽  
Epidural Hemorrhage

Abstract: Emergency surgery is performed to avoid further complications of the disease or to save the patient's life. Albeit, there are lack of data in various health centers in Indonesia regarding the evaluation of emergency surgical patients, This study was aimed to obtain the profile of patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures in the Emergency Department of Surgery at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado from January to September 2019. This was a retrospective and descriptive study using patients’ medical records. The results showed that there were 540 patients in this study. Most of the patients were adult age group (18-59 years) as many as 343 patients (63.5%), males 366 patients (67.8%), and non-traumatic cases 436 patients (80.4%). The most common cases of trauma was epidural hemorrhage as many as 23 patients (4.3%) meanwhile the most common non-traumatic cases was chronic kidney disease as many as 122 patients (22.6%). According to the type of surgery, CDL insertion and laparotomy were performed on 131 patients each (24.3%). In conclusion, most patients undergoing emergency surgical procedures were 18-59 years old, males, and non-traumatic cases.Keywords: emergency surgery, traumatic cases, non-traumatic cases Abstrak: Bedah emergensi dilakukan dalam keadaan sangat darurat untuk menghindari komplikasi lanjut dari proses penyakit atau untuk menyelamatkan jiwa pasien. Data mengenai pasien bedah emergensi di berbagai pusat kesehatan di Indonesia masih sangat kurang. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan gambaran pasien yang menjalani prosedur bedah emergensi di IGD Bedah RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado periode Januari sampai September 2019. Jenis penelitian ialah deskriptif retrospektif, menggunakan data rekam medik pasien. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dari 540 pasien, didapatkan pasien terbanyak dari golongan usia dewasa (18-59 tahun) yaitu 343 pasien (63,5%), jenis kelamin laki-laki 366 pasien (67,8%), dan kasus non-trauma 436 pasien (80,4%). Kasus trauma terbanyak yaitu epidural hemorrhage pada 23 pasien (4,3%) sedangkan kasus non trauma terbanyak chronic kidney disease pada 122 pasien (22,6%). Menurut jenis tindakan operasi yang terbanyak ialah insersi CDL dan laparotomy, masing-masing 131 pasien (24,3%). Simpulan penelitian ini ialah pasien yang menjalani prosedur bedah emergensi terbanyak ialah usia 18-59 tahun, jenis kelamin laki-laki, dan jenis kasus non-trauma.Kata kunci: bedah emergensi, kasus trauma, kasus non-trauma

scholarly journals 42. A Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Decrease Anaerobic Coverage for Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S44-S45
Author(s):  
Maxx O Enzmann ◽  
Courtney M Pagels ◽  
Emily J Perry ◽  
Justin Jones ◽  
Paul Carson
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Lung Abscess ◽  
American Thoracic Society ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Guidance Document ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Antibiotic Regimen ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Abstract Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is frequently mis-categorized as aspiration pneumonia, prompting the addition of anaerobic coverage to the antibiotic regimen. In our institution, this usually takes the form of adding metronidazole to ceftriaxone. The 2019 American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America CAP guidelines recommend anaerobic coverage only for hospitalized patients with a suspected lung abscess or empyema. The objective of this study was to determine if a pharmacist-led workflow could increase adherence to the 2019 CAP guideline recommendations by limiting anaerobic coverage to those rare occasions. Methods The hospital antimicrobial stewardship committee approved a pharmacist workflow and guidance document which outlines criteria to evaluate appropriateness of anaerobic coverage for hospitalized patients with CAP and no other indications for antibiotics. If anaerobic coverage is not indicated, the pharmacist submits a standardized message to the treating provider via the electronic medical record, recommending discontinuation of metronidazole. This workflow was implemented on October 3, 2019. Metronidazole days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days in quarters 1 through 4 of 2019 and quarter 1 of 2020 were collected as well as percent acceptance of documented pharmacist interventions from October 3, 2019 until March 31, 2020. Results Between October 3, 2019 and March 31, 2020, a total of 221 interventions were made by pharmacists to discontinue metronidazole in hospitalized CAP patients where anaerobic coverage was not indicated. Out of those 221 interventions, 164 (74%) were accepted by providers and only 57 (26%) were rejected. The DOT per 1000 patient days of metronidazole was assessed for the three quarters prior to our intervention and the two quarters after the intervention. Compared to the three quarters prior, metronidazole DOT per 1000 patient days decreased by 26.6% for the two quarters following implementation of the pharmacist-led intervention (Figure 1). Figure 1: Metronidazole DOT per 1000 patient days from January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020. Vertical line indicates when pharmacist workflow was implemented. Conclusion A pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship intervention at our institution increased adherence to CAP guidelines and decreased unnecessary antibiotic exposure in hospitalized CAP patients when anaerobic coverage was not indicated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Association of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act with access to elective spine surgical care

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jacob K. Greenberg ◽  
Derek S. Brown ◽  
Margaret A. Olsen ◽  
Wilson Z. Ray
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Medicaid Expansion ◽  
Percentage Points ◽  
The Affordable Care Act ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVE The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid eligibility in many states, improving access to some forms of elective healthcare in the United States. Whether this effort increased access to elective spine surgical care is unknown. This study’s objective was to evaluate the impact of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act on the volume and payer mix of elective spine surgery in the United States. METHODS This study evaluated elective spine surgical procedures performed from 2011 to 2016 and included in the all-payer State Inpatient Databases of 10 states that expanded Medicaid access in 2014, as well as 4 states that did not expand Medicaid access. Adult patients aged 18–64 years who underwent elective spine surgery were included. The authors used a quasi-experimental difference-in-difference design to evaluate the impact of Medicaid expansion on hospital procedure volume and payer mix, independent of time-dependent trends. Subgroup analysis was conducted that stratified results according to cervical fusion, thoracolumbar fusion, and noninstrumented surgery. RESULTS The authors identified 218,648 surgical procedures performed in 10 Medicaid expansion states and 118,693 procedures performed in 4 nonexpansion states. Medicaid expansion was associated with a 17% (95% CI 2%–35%, p = 0.03) increase in mean hospital spine surgical volume and a 23% (95% CI −0.3% to 52%, p = 0.054) increase in Medicaid volume. Privately insured surgical volumes did not change significantly (incidence rate ratio 1.13, 95% CI −5% to 34%, p = 0.18). The increase in Medicaid volume led to a shift in payer mix, with the proportion of Medicaid patients increasing by 6.0 percentage points (95% CI 4.1–7.0, p < 0.001) and the proportion of private payers decreasing by 6.7 percentage points (95% CI 4.5–8.8, p < 0.001). Although the magnitude of effects varied, these trends were similar across procedure subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act was associated with an economically and statistically significant increase in spine surgery volume and the proportion of surgical patients with Medicaid insurance, indicating improved access to care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document