scholarly journals problems of fulfilling the culture formation potential of modern russian theater

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (Extra-D) ◽  
pp. 252-259
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Vladlenovich Kamenets ◽  
Irina Aleksandrovna Urmina ◽  
Elena Olegovna Kuznetsova ◽  
Lyubov Vladimirovna Molina ◽  
Galina Ivanovna Gribkova

The article focuses on the essential components of the contemporary theatrical process. The problems of drama and its recessionary trends are identified. Special attention is paid to the issue of values and ideals in dramaturgical work and significance for the further activity conducted by theaters. One of the pivotal aspects in the improvement of theaters’ work identified in the article is the task of optimization of the interaction between these institutions with the audience. The authors also examine the problems of modern theater directing that matter in terms of fulfilling the cultural and creative potential of modern Russian theaters. The authors associate the prospects of further improvement of the system of establishing theaters as cultural institutions with taking advantage of the opportunities for creating a more effective interaction between theater professionals and specialists working in the sphere of education.

2019 ◽  
pp. 234-244
Author(s):  
Madinabonu AHMEDOVA

The article is devoted to the problem of the evolution of the literary hero and the types of heroes in modern Russian literature of the XXI century. The admiration of the person of the person being described and the desire to redirect this feeling to the reader make the style of the work of Zakhar Prilepin realistic through the prism of modernity (neorealism). The writer sets himself the task of telling about the fate of a modern person who faces many difficulties to squeeze in the modern world where human values have already changed, transformed beyond recognition than they were in the literature of the 19th and 20th centuries. Zakhar Prilepin is gradually moving to comprehending a more global problem: is it possible in the conditions where absolutely everyone is wearing a bit of hell in himself. The writer seeks to get an answer to this question on a truly epochal, historical scale.This article also discusses the role of Zakhar Prilepin in the context of modern Russian literature. He writes willingly and openly on topics of concern to the general public. One of the essential components of such statements is his reflections on classical and modern Russian literature, showing love or, on the contrary, dislike for the work of this or that author.The aim of the work is to determine the transformation of modern Russian prose on the example of the works of contemporary Russian writer Zakhar Prilepin. His views on the formation and development of the literary process in the twenty-first century, explores the peculiarities of the hero and the specifics of the writer's artistic world based on the work and literary analyzes. Types of heroes’ characteristic of the prose of this neorealist writer: the hero-provincial, the rebellious hero, the intellectual hero and others. The article attempts to analyze the main features of the imaginative system in the works of Z. Prilepin in the context of the traditions of the new realism (neorealism). Мақола адабий қаҳрамон эволюцияси муаммоси ва ХХI аср замонавий рус адабиётидаги қаҳрамонлар турларини ўрганишга бағишланган. Захар Прилепиндаги таърифлаётган шахснинг ҳайрати ва ички дунёсини ёритиб бериш истаги ва уни китобхонга етказиш учун қўллаган услуби асарларини замон (неореализм) призмаси орқали реализмга олиб ўтади. Ёзувчи ўз олдига ХIХ ва ХХ аср адабиётларидаги инсоният қадриятлари ХХI асрга келиб мутлақоўзгариб, таниб бўлмас даражага етганини замонавий одамнинг тақдири орқалий ёритиб бериш вазифасини қўяди. Захар Прилепин аста-секин янада глобал муаммони англашга интилмоқда: мутлақо ҳамма ўзини дўзах азобига солаётган шароитда бу мумкинми? Ёзувчи ушбу саволгзамон ва тарих миқёсида жавоб олишга интилади.Ушбу мақолада замонавий рус ёзувчиси Захар Прилепиннинг замонавий рус адабиётида тутган ўрни муҳокама қилинади. У кенг жамоатчиликни қизиқтирган мавзуларда очиқ ёзади. Бундай баёнотларнинг муҳим таркибий қисмлариданбири, бу –унинг классик ва замонавий рус адабиётига бўлган муҳаббатини акс эттириши ёки аксинча у ёки бу муаллифнинг ишини ёқтирмаслигидир.Ушбу мақоланинг мақсади замонавий рус ёзувчиси Захар Прилепиннинг ижоди мисолида замонавий рус насрнинг ўзгаришини аниқлашдир. Унинг ХХI аср адабий жараёнининг шаклланиши ва ривожланиши ҳақидаги фикрлари, қаҳрамонининг ўзига хос хусусиятлари ва ёзувчининг ижодий дунёсининг ўзига хос хусусиятларини кўрсатишдир. Бу неореализм оқимига мансуб ёзувчининг насрига хос қаҳрамонлар турлари: провинциал қаҳрамон (қишлоқ аҳолиси), исёнкор қаҳрамон, интеллектуал қаҳрамон ва бошқалар. Муаллиф З. Прилепин асарларидаги образлар тизимига хос хусусиятларни янги реализм (неореализм) анъаналари контекстида таҳлил қилган. Статья посвящена проблеме эволюции литературного героя и типов героев в современной русской литературе XXI века. Восхищение личностью описываемогочеловека и желание переадресовать это чувство читателю делают стилистику произведении Захара Прилепина реалистическими через призму современности (неореализма). Писатель ставит перед собой задачу рассказать о судьбе современной личности сталкивающегося с множеством затруднений чтобы выжать в современном мире где уже человеческие ценности изменились, трансформировались до неузнаваемости чем были в литературе XIXи ХХ веке. Захар Прилепин постепенно переходит к постижению более глобальной проблемы: возможно ли то же самое условиях, где частичку ада в себе носит абсолютно каждый. Ответ на этот вопрос писатель стремится получить в поистине эпохальном, историческом масштабе.А такжев данной статье рассматривается роль Захара Прилепина в контексте современной русской литературы. Он пишет охотно и открыто на темы, волнующие широкую общественность. Одной из существенных составляющих такого рода высказываний становятся его размышления о классической и современной русской литературе, проявляющие любовь или наоборот, неприязнь, к творчеству того или иного автора.Целью работы является определить трансформацию современной русской прозы на примере творчества современного писателя России – Захара Прилепина. Его взгляды на формирование и развитие литературного процесса вХХIвеке; исследуются особенности героя и специфика художественного мира писателяна основе произведении и литературных анализов. Типы героев; характерные для прозы этого писателя-нео реали зма : герой-провинциал; бунтующий герой; герой-интеллигент и другие.В статье осуществляется попытка анализа основных особенностей образной системы в творчестве З. Прилепинав контексте традиций нового реализма (неореализм).


Author(s):  
Margarita Beatriz Flores Miranda

This study investigated what it meant and continues to mean for the creativity scientific field, J. P. Guilford´s research on the need to eradicate genius theory in order to give rise to the idea of creativity as an adaptive and projective human quality. The field of creativity as it exists today, emerged largely as a result of Guilford´s theoretical model of the structure of intelligence, a pioneer contribution to the measurement and possible development of creative potential. To these days, Guilford´s and E. Paul Torrance´s (1962) factors related to creativity remain the most widely used in the design of creativity tests. This paper presents a complication of the creativity factors that have been added to Guilford's original list since 1950 until these days, by diverse and relevant authors in the field. A grouping process is performed to eliminate repetitions, similarities or redundancies, and to obtain a list of clearly differentiated attributes. Every attribute is defined in the creativity context in order to examine how they could be related under R. Estarda (2005) theory of creativity, that categorize creativity´s factors in the following triad: affection, cognition and volition. Same factors that J. Lamberth (1980) defined in social psychology, as the essential components in any measurement of behavior. The validity in the selection of Estrada's theory as a merging point comes from its commonality with the theories of Urban (1995), Saturnino de la Torre (2003), Kurtzberg & Amabile (2001) and Arieti (1976). This study supports the view of creativity as a systemic process that considers both the contextual and the individual contribution, and contemplates the potential interplay among the three behavioral components. Concluding that factors related to creativity play an essential role on the identification and the development of creative potential. Both attributes and their categorization remain as fields for a future research´s quantitative validation.


2017 ◽  
pp. 128-134
Author(s):  
Sergey Zagrebin ◽  
◽  
Ksenya Tukhvatulina ◽  

2018 ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Marina Snetkova

The purpose of this article is to analyze the linguistic means of expressing the retranca – the subtle humour which is considered to be typical of the Galicians – in the music parodies by the project “Páramo Pictures”, whose video clips have become rather famous in the region during the last five years.The study method we apply is based on the linguo-stylistic, cultural and semiotic analysis of the audiovisual text.The songs, which “Páramo Pictures” choose to parody, are usually recent hits that have well-known video clips: “Despacito” by Luis Fonsi, “Súbeme la radio” by Enrique Iglesias, “Wrecking Ball” by Miley Syrus, etc. They film new videos trying to reproduce the elements of the original plot, but adapting both the lyrics and the scenery to rural Galicia.The success of the project can be explained by the perfect use of all the elements of the audiovisual text, stereotypes about rural Galicia, and – in terms of linguistics – of the wordplay and the homophonic translation, all of which shows the effective interaction of the analogy and the contrast, two essential components of the genre of the parody.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (34) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L KALUGINA ◽  

The article describes the ways of representing Chekhov's Russia as an archetype that exists at the deepest levels of the cultural consciousness of the Russian person. It was revealed that Chekhov and the images he created are present in the works of modern Russian literature as plots and as precedent phenomena - texts, names, statements and situations. Turning to the plots of A.P. Chekhov, the images he created and the image of the writer himself, modern authors demonstrate a creative treatment with them, often transforming the form and content of artistic phenomena created by the writer. This indicates the strength of these phenomena in the cultural space of a modern Russian speaker and their acquisition of archetype properties. It is concluded that the modern writer acutely feels the need to turn to this archetype to express his creative potential, to establish contact with readers, for a more accurate description of characters, situations, and realities of Russian reality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document