scholarly journals The place of intellectual property in the system of legal values: theoretical and legal aspects

Author(s):  
M.V. Kotenko

The author highlights and investigates the theoretical and legal aspects of the place of intellectual property in the system of legal values. It is noted that legal values ​​are a special phenomenon in which a wide range of ideas, ideas, provisions that reflect the peculiarities of society's perception of socially useful factors, which find their expression and manifestation in the legal sphere of society. In this regard, intellectual property is a special product of human intellectual activity, which is recognized as socially useful and subsequently acquired legal characteristics, ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights, their inviolability, as well as regulating relations in the field of intellectual property. Intellectual property is a special socio-cultural phenomenon, belonging to the system of socio-cultural values ​​is primarily due to its usefulness to society, the ability to ensure the interests of its subjects. At the same time, the multifaceted and complex nature of intellectual property, represented in various spheres of society, provides an opportunity to study intellectual property, including as part of a system of legal values ​​endowed with legal properties, provided by law, allows legal entities to achieve legally significant results. related to intellectual property. Based on the analysis of doctrinal and legal ideas about the value of intellectual property, the author identified the place of intellectual property in the system of legal values. It is concluded that intellectual property as a legal phenomenon has a multifaceted and multifaceted nature, which does not allow to unambiguously determine its place in the system of legal values. Therefore, it is proposed to determine the criteria according to which to classify legal values, which should cover and take into account all possible aspects (characteristics) of legal values, including taking into account the values ​​of intellectual property established above. The place of intellectual property in the system of legal values ​​is determined by the author according to the following criteria: 1) the state of legal support of intellectual property in Ukraine; 2) the method of legal regulation of relations in the field of intellectual property; 3) its functional purpose.

Author(s):  
Evgen Kharytonov ◽  
Olena Kharytonova ◽  
Maxym Tkalych ◽  
Inna Bolokan ◽  
Hanna Samilo ◽  
...  

The article aims to explore the relationships that arise with respect to intellectual property rights in sports. The objectives of the article are to establish points of contact between intellectual property law and sports, as well as a detailed analysis of relevant public relations in terms of intellectual property law and sports law. To achieve the objectives of the article, the authors used a number of scientific methods, among which the main methods are analysis, synthesis and comparative-legal method. The authors of the study concluded that modern sport is developing in close intertwining with intellectual property rights, because only in this way can a sports spectacle be conveyed to a wide range of spectators and consumers in a broad sense. In addition, the range of points of contact between intellectual property and sports law is constantly growing and such can now be called not only patents and trademarks in sports, but also copyright, "image" rights, know-how in sports and the like.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 76-90
Author(s):  
B. A. Shakhnazarov

The paper is devoted to the issues associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in intellectual property objects, in particular vaccines, in the context of fight against a pandemic. It is emphasized that AI technologies allow us to overcome similar problems at the national and international levels and to prevent their recurrence in the future. The author highlights that the most important requirements for observance of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens consolidated in regulatory acts and impossibility of their restriction in AI technologies must be supplemented with clear rules regulating the legal framework of artificial intelligence, including intellectual activity, and responsibility of developers and AI users. At the same time, the AI legal personality also needs to be thoroughly elaborated with the focus on providing a reasonable balance of rights, responsibilities and eligibility among developers, AI users, and other addressees entering into legal relationships involving artificial intelligence. A key aspect in the context of the legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity created entirely or partially by artificial intelligence is represented by the balance between the interests of rights holders and the public interests. Possible restrictions of rights of copyright holders as established in international instruments (Para 31 of the 1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) should be accepted as a harmonizing basis and adopted in national legal systems. At the same time, rights holders must be provided with appropriate guarantees of respect for their rights (In particular, the non-exclusive nature of the use of intellectual rights in the context of such restrictions, payment of reasonable remuneration, etc.).


Author(s):  
T. I. Begovа

For the development of the national economy, an effective system of legal support of relations is formed, which is formed as a result of transformation of intellectual activity results into innovative products and innovations, introduction of intellectual property rights into economic turnover. Given the expansion and complexity of ways to commercialize intellectual property rights in connection with the acquisition of these rights of various qualities, it is important to study not only the statutory agreements on the disposal of intellectual property rights, but also to develop other legal forms that mediate acts of transfer objects of intellectual property in the field of management. The purpose of the article is to refine the scientific and theoretical provisions on the legal forms of transfer of intellectual property rights in the field of management. The ways of involving intellectual property rights in the economic turnover within the framework of corporate, contractual, mortgage legal relations are revealed. It is established that the specificity of these relations leaves its mark on the legal forms of transfer of intellectual property rights. It has been found that with the complication of economic relations, the spheres and ways of involving intellectual property rights in economic turnover are expanding. Thus specificity of mechanisms of realization of the specified ways of transfer of the rights causes necessity of working out of the legal form adequate to this specificity. It is proved that economic and legal regulation of transfer of intellectual property rights does not provide proper definition and differentiation of legal forms of transfer of intellectual property rights in the organization and implementation of economic activities, which should take into account the broad economic potential of these rights. The study substantiates the types of legal forms of transfer of intellectual property rights in the field of management in the case of these rights as: contribution to the formation of the authorized capital of the business organization, contribution to joint activities (simple partnership); use as a subject of pledge and subsequent alienation of the pledged property right as a result of foreclosure on it. On this basis, a conclusion was made about the expediency of improving the economic and legal regulation of relations in the field of transfer of intellectual property rights in terms of normative definition of types of legal forms of transfer of these rights.


2019 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 00011
Author(s):  
Ievgeniia Bulat

The innovative model of development of Ukraine requires implementation of measures aimed at stimulation and protection of intellectual property objects and development of such improved legislative basis in this sphere that would allow not only to preserve existing scientific potential but also to ensure proper protection of the rights of creators of such objects with possibility of their further commercialization. The necessity and expediency of introducing this legal protection improvement is shown on the example of such objects as scientific discoveries in mining engineering, business methods and innovative proposals. The article is devoted to the improvement of mechanism for legal protection of intellectual property rights to the intellectual activity results in context of integration processes that take place in Ukraine. A unified approach is proposed, which assumes revealing in practical part of each claimed object its protectable part, followed by procedure of patenting in accordance with the procedure stipulated by the current legislation.


Author(s):  
Ivanna Babetska

Purpose. The purpose of the scientific article is to establish the ratio of the meanings of the concepts "trademark", "brand" and "well-known" trademark and then to characterize their common and distinctive features. Indicate the gaps in current legislation and the need to refine certain rules in this aspect to determine the aspects of protection and protection of the brand. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of appropriate conclusions and recommendations. During the research, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, dialectical, logical-semantic, logical-normative, system-structural. Results: in the course of the conducted study, the main and optional components of the brand are determined, which make it possible to determine the features of its legal protection. It has been proved that despite a fairly wide range of domestic and international regulations, there are certain shortcomings of the brand protection mechanism. Originality. The study found that a trademark differs from a brand in that a trademark is a designation that is only the basis of the brand, as for the trademark are not essential such properties of the designation as a certain level of information among consumers and quality as a basis. gaining a reputation; the concept of "brand" is an evaluative, conditional concept, and therefore its consolidation at the regulatory level is impractical. It is sufficient to establish the factors on the basis of which the trademark can be considered "well known". A "well-known" trademark is a designation that is familiar to a wide range of consumers through its use to designate certain goods. Practical importance. The results of the study can be used in law-making activities for the purpose of legal regulation of public relations in the sphere of legal protection of the brand.


Author(s):  
Оксана Алексеевна Владимирова

Статья посвящена анализу организационно-правовых аспектов реализации прав интеллектуальной собственности лиц, осужденных к лишению свободы. Рассмотрен сложившийся опыт, особое внимание уделяется проблемным вопросам реализации осужденными личных неимущественных и исключительных интеллектуальных прав: связанным с приобретением права интеллектуальной собственности, затруднениям осуществления интеллектуальных прав, вызванным режимными требованиями. Творческая деятельность человека - одно из самых эффективных средств исправления, по мнению автора, поскольку именно она является высшей сознательной деятельностью. Поэтому необходимо поощрять и развивать в исправительных учреждениях данный вид деятельности, всемерно содействовать ее реализации. Предлагается создавать в исправительных учреждениях кроме уже имеющихся ресурсов специальные лаборатории, мастерские и т. п. центры для реализации творческой, в том числе научно-творческой потребности осужденных. При необходимости всячески содействовать осужденным при реализации процедуры получения патента. Кроме того, в рамках правового просвещения осужденных необходимо информировать о возможностях реализации авторского или патентного права в рамках имущественных отношений. This article is devoted to analysis of legal aspects of implementation of intellectual property rights of persons sentenced to deprivation of liberty. Abstract: the experience, a special attention is paid to the problematic issues of implementation of convicted persons of exceptional moral and intellectual rights: associated with the acquisition of intellectual property rights, difficulties in the implementation of intellectual property rights, caused by the regime requirements. Human creativity is one of the most effective means of correction, in the author's opinion, as it is the higher conscious activity. It is therefore necessary to promote and develop in correctional institutions this activity, to contribute fully to its implementation. It is proposed to establish in correctional institutions in addition to the existing resources of the special laboratories, workshops, etc. centers for the implementation of creative, including research and creative needs of prisoners. If necessary to fully support the convict in the implementation of the procedure of obtaining a patent. In addition, the legal education of prisoners should be informed about the possibilities of implementation of copyright or patent rights in the framework of property relations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-226
Author(s):  
D. P. Fedulkin ◽  
V. G. Zinov

The article presents an overview of public policy measures in the field of identification, consolidation and inventory of rights to the results of intellectual activity with a high potential of industrial use. Proposals for the development of mechanisms of legal protection of individual intellectual property objects are substantiated. The instructive and methodical regulation of works on registration of results of scientific and technical activity under the state contracts is analyzed. Attention is paid to the complexity of the procedure of passing and agreeing the final results of their implementation. Methodological approaches to the improvement of identification and inventory of protectable results of intellectual activity obtained in the course of execution of state contracts as part of the organization’s activities in the field of innovation and technological development in order to implement the business strategy in the domestic and global markets are proposed.


Arsitektura ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz Arrosyid ◽  
Samsudi Samsudi ◽  
Ummul Mustaqimah

<p><em>Traditional weaving as a nation</em><em>al</em><em> cultural heritage </em><em>is</em><em> being abandoned, including songket in Palembang</em><em> city</em><em>. </em><em>S</em><em>ongket weaving craft has been abandoned</em><em> due to the limited process of the making, expensive raw materials</em><em>, and competiti</em><em>veness</em><em>, </em><em>either </em><em>other crafters</em><em> or</em><em> modern weaving. There are hundreds of Palembang songket motifs that have not </em><em>been </em><em>documented and collected well. O</em><em>nly</em><em> 77 motifs </em><em>which</em><em> have </em><em>been </em><em>registered </em><em>as</em><em> intellectual property rights. </em><em>The lack attention of this matter would give </em><em>possibility </em><em>for</em><em> neighboring </em><em>countries</em><em> </em><em>to claim it such an accident ever exist.</em><em> Songket Museum </em><em>is needed as</em><em> conservation</em><em> center</em><em>, exhibit</em><em>ion</em><em>, research, and songket craft workshop.</em><em> </em><em>Neo-Vernacular Architecture approach </em><em>is </em><em>used to</em><em> make museum </em><em>architectural design </em><em>which is </em><em>in </em><em>line </em><em>the cultural values of Palembang in contemporary design</em><em>. The design </em><em>issue </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>how to </em><em>apply the principles of Neo-</em><em>V</em><em>ernacular</em><em> Architecture</em><em> into Palembang Songket Museum design. The method is designing the museum by taking both the physical a</em><em>n</em><em>d non-physical </em><em>e</em><em>lements</em><em> of local culture</em><em>. Beside, </em><em>re-interpretation the </em><em>shape </em><em>and philosophy</em><em>cal value</em><em> of </em><em>local </em><em>architecture</em><em> a</em><em>nd Palembang songket a</em><em>re apllied</em><em> in</em><em> a </em><em>new composition </em><em>of </em><em>Neo-Vernacular Architecture. The result is </em><em>a design of </em><em>Palembang Songket Museum </em><em>which</em><em> </em><em>applies</em><em> </em><em>Neo-Vernacular Architecture principles.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>: Architecture, Neo-Vernacular, Palembang Songket, Songket Museum.</em></p>


Author(s):  
A. N. Kirsanov ◽  
A. A. Popovich

Introduction. The use of technical means for copyright protection is regulated not only in Russian legislation, but also in foreign and international law. It means that the international concept of intellectual property protection could be perceived differently by foreign jurisdictions, which, in turn, is of special scientific interest. The foundations of legal regulation are laid down in international treaties, which in the intellectual property law are tools that contain substantive rules of law. The provisions of such treaties are implemented in the national (supranational) legislation, and, therefore, become part of them and subject to additions.. The article is devoted to the study of international legal regulation of the use of technical means for copyright protection.Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the research consists of the following general scientific and special methods of cognition of legal phenomena and processes: dialectical, formal-legal, comparative-legal, formal-logical, structural-functional.Results of the study. The authors found that attempts to protect copyright using technology available at every stage of history were undertaken by individual countries, beginning from the second half of the 19th century. However technical means of protection received legal regulation at the international level relatively recently, the prerequisite for that was the rapid development of digital information technologies. Analysis of international legal norms in the field of legal regulation of technical means of copyright protection has shown that at present international legal regulation is of a general nature, providing each of the states at the national level with ample opportunities for legal concretization of gen-eral norms. However, recently the Internet treaties of WIPO recognized for the first time not only the advisability of the use of technical means of protection, but also the obligation prohibiting circumvention of such protection technologies, and therefore national legislations should contain provisions regulating the circumvention of such protection technologies.Discussion and Conclusions. The introduction of international law with regard to the use of the protection technologies, despite their general and abstract nature, has given a serious impetus to the establishment of legal regulation of this institution at the national level. At the same time, the rules governing the use of the protection technologies in the near future will require greater unification and concretization due to the rapid development of digital information technologies, blurring the borders between states in terms of disseminating the results of intellectual activity, and also in order to avoid a multiplicity of interpretation of law and to ensure effective legal regulation and protection of copyright.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document