scholarly journals Positive legal responsibility: general theoretical characteristics

2021 ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
O.R. Dashkovskaya ◽  
V.O. Yavorsky ◽  
K.D. Bezsonova
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Illegal Behavior ◽  
State And Society ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Basic Approaches ◽  
The Relationship

The article analyzes the concept of "positive legal responsibility". Its relationship with the term "responsibility" is established, the ratio of social and legal responsibility is considered. The relationship between the philosophical and moral meaning of the concept of "responsibility" is defined. Emphasis is placed on the need to define legal liability through the main objectives and principles of law, the practice of application and interpretation of the legal content of liability. The existence of positive and negative aspects of legal responsibility in modern legal science is outlined. The positive aspect of legal responsibility as a type of legal responsibility, which is a reaction of the state and society to socially useful action, is considered. The main types of legal incentives are identified. The most common signs of positive legal responsibility are outlined.  The negative aspect of legal liability is considered. The basic approaches to its understanding are defined, the basic signs are outlined. It is noted that negative legal liability is considered a means of guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of citizens. It is determined that in the mechanism of legal regulation measures of positive legal responsibility act as means of social control over the behavior of participants in public relations, ensuring mutual coherence of their actions.  Positive legal liability is aimed at reducing the manifestations of illegal behavior by stimulating the subjects of legal relations to implement socially useful behavior through various incentives and is characterized by the following features: associated with the provision of additional rights to the person; occurs for the implementation of certain desired behavior; established in incentive legal norms; is a means of stimulating subjects to commit lawful acts; sold voluntarily.  It is established that positive legal responsibility is a voluntary form of realization of legal responsibility, it is a legal obligation of the subject of responsibility to act according to requirements of legal norms which is realized in its lawful behavior.

Legal responsibility of a private notary

2021 ◽  
pp. 145-150
Author(s):  
L. Ladina ◽  
M. Veselov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Structural Element ◽  
Coercive Measures ◽  
State And Society ◽  
Legitimate Interests

The legal responsibility of a notary is in its essence an important element of the legal regulation of public relations in the field of notarial activities, which is manifested in the purposeful influence of the state on the behavior of notaries through legal means. The purpose of this article is to formulate the concept and outline the characteristics of the main types of legal liability of a private notary. The legal liability of private notaries is proposed to be understood as a set of legal coercive restrictions provided by law and the suffering of subjects of private notarial activity of personal, organizational and property nature for the committed offense. At the same time, it is emphasized that the legal responsibility of a notary as a structural element of his legal status consists not only in the application of appropriate coercive measures against him for an offense (retrospective aspect), but also in his awareness of his responsibility for proper performance (prospective aspect). It is noted that the components of the system of legal liability of a private notary are its types, namely: civil (professional), criminal, administrative and disciplinary. It is emphasized that the institution of legal liability of private notaries should be considered not only as a guarantee of lawful and conscientious performance of their duties, a means of protecting the legitimate interests of the state and citizens related to the provision of notarial services, but also as a regime of private notaries. procedural relations arising from the application of coercive measures by the state to them. It is established that the legal responsibility of a private notary is complex, and provides for the imposition on him not only the actual legal responsibility, but also moral responsibility for actions before the state and society. The limits of legal liability of private notaries depend on the type of such liability. The administrative nature of the notary’s activity and his performance of actions on behalf of the state allows to draw a conclusion about the tortious nature of the notary’s liability for violation of the established procedure for performing notarial acts.

Zur Frage der doktrinellen Auslegung des Artikels 61 Pkt. 3 der Verfassung der Republik Kasachstan

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Ermek B. Abdrasulov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
National Business

This article examines the issues of differentiation of legislative and subordinate regulation of public relations. It is noted that in the process of law-making activities, including the legislative process, practical questions often arise about the competence of various state bodies to establish various legal norms and rules. These issues are related to the need to establish a clear legal meaning of the constitutional norms devoted to the definition of the subject of regulation of laws. In particular, there is a need to clarify the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of the concepts "the most important public relations", "all other relations", "subsidiary legislation", as well as to establish the relationship between these concepts. Interpretation is also required by the provisions of p. 4 of Article 61 of the Constitution in terms of clarifying the question of whether the conclusion follows from mentioned provisions that all possible social relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are subject to legal regulation, including those that are subject to other social and technical regulators (morality, national, business and professional traditions and customs, religion, standards, technical regulations, etc.). Answering the questions raised, the author emphasizes that the law and bylaws, as a rule, constitute a single system of legislation, performing the functions of primary and secondary acts. However, the secondary nature of subsidiary legislation does not mean that they regulate "unimportant" public relations. The law is essentially aimed at regulating all important social relations.

scholarly journals On certain aspects of public legal responsibility in the sphere of using artificial intelligence and autonomous robots

2021 ◽  
pp. 24-41
Author(s):  
Svetlana Sergeevna Gorokhova
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Autonomous Robots ◽  
Autonomous Systems ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Public Responsibility ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is certain theoretical aspects of public legal responsibility that may emerge in the spheres and situations of the use of artificial intelligence and robotic autonomous systems takes place. Special attention is given to interpretation of public legal responsibility as a legal category, and its role within the system of legal regulation of public relations in the country. The article explores the basic aspects of public responsibility in the sphere of potential use of the systems equipped with technological solutions based on artificial intelligence. The author describes the possible risks determined by the development and implementation of such technologies in accordance with trends of scientific and technological progress. The conclusion is made that currently in the Russian Federation does not have a liability system applicable particularly to damage or losses resulting from the use of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence. However, the existing liability regime at least ensures the basic protection for the victims suffered from the use of artificial intelligence technologies. However, the peculiar characteristics of these technologies and complexity of their application may hinder payment of compensations for inflicted harm in all cases when it seems justified, and not ensure fair and effective allocation of responsibility in a number of cases, including the violation of non-property rights of citizens.

scholarly journals INSURANCE FUNCTIONS AS AN OBJECT OF FINANCIAL AND LEGAL REGULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-168
Author(s):  
Viktoriia Bondarenko ◽  
◽  
Nataliia Pustova
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Financial System ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Insurance Business ◽  
Business Entities

The functions of insurance as an object of financial and legal regulation are considered. Based on the methodology of the system analysis, an analysis of the current legislation in the field of insurance concerning definition of the insurance concept is carried out. It is noted that today a new sub-branch such as financial and legal regulation of insurance business has appeared in the system of financial law as a branch of law. It combines legal norms that regulate (mainly by the method of authoritative provisions) public relations on the formation, distribution and use of insurance funds, exercise of control and supervisory measures. It also includes legal norms regulating involvement of insurance business entities and other participants in public relations in the field of insurance to financial and legal responsibility in order to protect the rights and legitimate interests of insured persons in insured accidents. Insurance functions occupy a special place in the financial legislation. The distributive, preventive, restorative, saving, risk, control, investment functions of insurance are examined. The factors influencing the investment function of insurance are determined; the role of the National Bank of Ukraine in the implementation of this function is demonstrated. It is stated that the function of forming a specialized insurance money fund to maintain the security and stability of the state financial system is one of the specific functions of insurance. Insurance is an integral part of the financial system of the state, which provides the regular functioning of social development; it is an integral function of the state, a necessary condition for the development and stability. Ukraine’s course towards European integration determines the factors of economic and legal transformations in the country, including the further development of insurance activities.

scholarly journals Concept of tortious legal relations and their main features

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 80-89
Author(s):  
Vladyslav Teremetskyi ◽  
◽  
Yaroslav Zhuravel ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Definition Of

The article is focused on studying the concept, content and essence of the definition of “tortuous legal relations”. The scientific works in the researched sphere have been analyzed. The author has indicated that there are gaps in the interpretation of the term of “tortuous legal relations” in its classical meaning and the place of this type of public relations in the legal system of Ukraine. It has been proved that most of scientific works do not reveal the meaning of this term, but its certain features were only indirectly analyzed in one way or another. The relevance and necessity of formulating the author’s definition of the term of “tortious legal relations” have been substantiated. The author has offered to understand this definition as relations regulated by legal norms arising in connection with the commission of an offense (tort), establishment of the tort’s fact, the use of state coercion during the process of bringing the subject of the committed illegal act to one of the types of legal liability, restoration of violated rights and freedoms and compensation for damage. Considerable attention has been paid to the novelties of national legislation on amendments to some codified acts of substantive and procedural law; the author has provided comments on the suggested amendments. It has been noted that the legislative enshrinement of the term of “criminal offense”, as well as the division of criminal offenses into crimes and misdemeanors and the selected criteria for such division is the most controversial. The components of the term of “tortious legal relations”, namely: the terms “tort” and “legal relations” have been revealed. It has been stated that tortious legal relations arise at the time of tort’s commission and are part of the legal relations. The issue of classification of legal relations and their features has been studied. Characteristic features of tortious legal relations have been revealed. It has been concluded that tortious legal relations, which are the component of legal relations and have all their features arise during the commission of a tort by a subject of legal liability.

scholarly journals Restrictions and boundaries in the Russian information law

2020 ◽  
pp. 11-30
Author(s):  
Gulfiia Gafiiatovna Kamalova
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Original Definition ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Information Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Theoretical Foundations

The subject of this research is the system of legal norms of the Russian Federation that regulates public relations within the process of restriction of the constitutionally recognized information rights and liberties of a human and citizen, as well as establishment of the boundaries of their realization in the current conditions of development of the information society and digitalization. The goal of this work is to develop theoretical foundations for information law through demarcation of boundaries and restrictions of the information rights and liberties, which would also contribute to improvement of information legislation and the practice of its application. The scientific novelty of research is reflected in the acquisition of scientific knowledge required for development of legal regulation of the information sphere in the conditions of digitalization, among which are the original definition of the concepts “boundaries of exercising rights in the information sphere” and “restrictions of information rights and liberties”, obtained based on the conducted analysis of the forming public relations within information sphere and their legal regulation. The following conclusions were made: 1) there is absence of research on the issues of boundaries of rights, including boundaries in information law; 2) there is a need for determination of boundaries of exercising right in the information sphere and restriction of information rights and liberties in implementation of legal regulation, as well as consideration of the legal nature of technical norms in their inclusion into a normative legal act.

Features of legal regulation of labor relations regarding the implementation of legal guarantees

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pyzhova
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Independent Form ◽  
Single Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Problem setting. The implementation of the norms of a particular branch of law can occur only in the relations that constitute its subject, thus transforming these relations into legal relations. Labor law is no exception. In this regard, the rules on guarantees must be considered in terms of implementation in relations that are part of the subject of labor law. Note that the relations that are the subject of labor law are governed by special methods that form a single method of this branch of law. This, in turn, gives rise to the assertion that an additional circumstance that allows to include the relations included in the subject of labor law to an independent form, is the possibility of applying to these relations methods of legal regulation characteristic of the method of this branch of law. This approach should be used in relation to the provision of guarantees and compensation, the inclusion of which in the subject of labor law as a separate type is not excluded. To do this, we highlight the main methods of legal regulation proposed by the science of labor law, which characterize the method of this branch of law. Analysis of recent research. The works of many labor scientists, in particular: N. Bobrova, M. Vitruk, D. Karpenko, T. Markina, P. Nedbayl, K. Urzhinsky, are devoted to the study of guarantees in labor law. V. Skobelkin, O. Smirnov, N. Stolyar, L. Surovskaya, O. Yaroshenko and others. Target of research is to consider the relationship between the methods of legal regulation of the method of legal law for the provision of guarantees and compensation. Article’s main body. The article covers the issues of legal regulation of labor relations for the implementation of legal guarantees. The peculiarities of the method of legal regulation are described. It is indicated how the methods of legal regulation of the method of labor law relate to the relationship of providing guarantees and compensations. It is concluded that the regulation of relations on the provision of guarantees and indemnities takes place using special methods that are not used in relations that are the subject of labor law. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Thus, the characteristics of the method of labor law, in terms of the possibility of applying its methods to the relationship of guarantees and compensation allows us to draw the following conclusions: the method of labor law is a special combination of ways to influence the rules of law on public relations. The regulation of relations for the provision of guarantees and compensation is using methods that determine the method of labor law. At the same time, the regulation of relations on the provision of guarantees and indemnities also takes place using special methods that are not used in relations that are the subject of labor law. This fact determines the specifics of their intended purpose and indicates the presence in the system of labor law of an independent legal institution – the institution of guarantees and compensations.

scholarly journals Subsidiary and analogous application of Law in general administrative procedure

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (91) ◽  
pp. 97-116
Author(s):  
Miloš Prica
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Application Of Law ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
General Law ◽  
Subject Specific ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Relationship

Considering that the expansion of legal regulation and multiplication of legal norms in the legal order of the Republic of Serbia have engendered over two hundred (substantive and procedural) legislative acts referring to the application of the General Administrative Procedure Act (GAPA), there is no general law in the Serbian legal order that could be compared to the GAPA in terms of correlation with other laws. Yet, in our judicature and legal science, there are no clear criteria for regulating the relationship between the GAPA and other (subject-specific) legislative acts referring to the application of the GAPA provisions. The relationship between the GAPA and subject-specific legislative acts may be based on the regime of legal subordination and the regime of legal referral. It further leads to the distinction between subsidiary and analoguous application of the general law, which is the author's original standpoint. Analogous application entails the application of the general law in accordance with the nature of the relationship between the legal procedure rules and the subject matter of legal regulation, whereas subsidiary application entails the application of the general law as a whole in all matters which are not regulated by a subject-specific law. In view of the obligation to harmonize subject-specific legislative acts with the GAPA, the author is of the opinion that such harmonization cannot be put into effect without amending the GAPA. Therefore, the GAPA provisions shall: (1) embody the distinction between subsidiary and analogous application of the GAPA, and (2) strengthen the direct application of the GAPA in administrative matters.

scholarly journals FORMALLY UNCERTAIN TERMS AS A MEANS OF LEGAL INFLUENCE

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Оleksandr Kurakin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Social Significance ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Response ◽  
Ability To Act ◽  
The Subject

The effectiveness of legal influence on relations in modern society is determined along with other factors and the perfection of legal terminology used in regulations. The need to improve the quality of legal activity in Ukraine necessitates the study of the regulatory possibilities of legal terms, among which a special place is occupied by formally indefinite terms that cause formal uncertainty of legal norms. The use of formally indefinite terms in legal norms and the issue of legal influence in the domestic literature are not specifically considered, respectively, need further study to formulate certain scientific generalizations and practical recommendations that can be used to improve the legal regulation of public relations in Ukraine. The author proposes to consider the valuation concepts as enshrined in the legal norm abstract characteristics of the social significance of real or potential facts. It must be specified during its application or implementation. This ensures the legal response of the state to all individualized facts, which are characterized by the significance fixed in the legal norm. In addition, the specific features of intermediate concepts that distinguish them from the evaluative and formally defined are highlighted. Analyzing them, the author concludes that the categories of "legal regulation" and "legal influence" are correlated as general and specific, and the boundary separating them is quite conditional. Noting the inseparability of legal influence and legal regulation, the author points out that at the same time does not deprive them of differences. The subject of legal regulation is somewhat narrower than the subject of legal influence. The latter includes such economic, political and social relations, which are not regulated by law, but to which they in one way or another extend their influence. If legal regulation, as a special legal influence, in any case is associated with the establishment of specific rights and obligations of subjects, with direct instructions about what is necessary and possible, the legal influence is not always. The relationship, unity and separation of legal influence and legal regulation suggest the need for a generalized approach to these legal phenomena. This position is confirmed by the author, focusing on formally vague norms, in particular those that contain intermediate concepts. Such concepts have a special ability to act as a means of legal influence, both related and unrelated to legal regulation. This ability stems from the properties of intermediate concepts, primarily from the ability to be a means and source (and this is the influence) of legal regulation. Summing up, the author notes that one of the means of legal influence, which accompanies legal regulation and is not directly related to it, are formally vague, in particular, intermediate (semi-valued) concepts. The study of this category of legal terms, their place and role in legal techniques, the ability to regulate public relations and influence them is one of the ways to determine ways to improve the legal regulation of social relations in the modern state.

scholarly journals Criteria for determining the effectiveness of the law

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir A. Rybakov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Complex Analysis ◽  
Common Knowledge ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Illegal Behavior ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Law

The subject of the article concerns the assessment of the effectiveness of law.       The purpose of the article is to identify indicators that reflect the effectiveness of the law.The methodology of the research includes complex analysis of scientific legal literature, synthesis of ideas as well as formal-legal method of interpretation of legal acts.The main results and scope of their application. More than 2500 existing normative legal acts of the Russian Federation contain various requirements for improving the efficiency of legal regulation. The complexity of the study is caused by the lack of a common understanding of the phenomenon. The effectiveness of the law is often understood by many authors as the ability to influence public relations in a certain direction useful for society; or as the ability to influence positively on social relations at the lowest cost; or as fundamental feasibility, predetermined by common knowledge, clarity and consistency of legal norms; the correspondence between the objectives of the legislator and development of social relations.           An indicator of the effectiveness of legislation is a criterion for determining the degree of achievement of the goals and objectives of legal regulation. The indicators that are offered by scientists for assessment the effectiveness of law, has logical defects. These indicators are^ frequency of application of laws that are estimated for the effectiveness (I. Samoshchenko, V. I. Nikitinsky, A. B. Vengerov); measure of conflict regulated by this norm of social relations (V. Lapaeva); proportional ratio of the number of facts of lawful behavior to the number of cases of illegal behavior (T. Geiger and E. Hirsch), etc.Conclusions. The following formula can be proposed to determine the effectiveness of the law: effectiveness = LR2–LR1, where: LR1 - initial legal relations, and LR2 – the state of legal relations on the current date. Effectiveness can be measured in this formula in a number of violations and satisfied claims and complaints. There is no direct connection with the goal of legal regulation in this formula but it is possible, to trace the dynamics of the effectiveness of law with this formula by using statistics data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document