scholarly journals Restrictions and boundaries in the Russian information law

Author(s):  
Gulfiia Gafiiatovna Kamalova

The subject of this research is the system of legal norms of the Russian Federation that regulates public relations within the process of restriction of the constitutionally recognized information rights and liberties of a human and citizen, as well as establishment of the boundaries of their realization in the current conditions of development of the information society and digitalization. The goal of this work is to develop theoretical foundations for information law through demarcation of boundaries and restrictions of the information rights and liberties, which would also contribute to improvement of information legislation and the practice of its application. The scientific novelty of research is reflected in the acquisition of scientific knowledge required for development of legal regulation of the information sphere in the conditions of digitalization, among which are the original definition of the concepts “boundaries of exercising rights in the information sphere” and “restrictions of information rights and liberties”, obtained based on the conducted analysis of the forming public relations within information sphere and their legal regulation. The following conclusions were made: 1) there is absence of research on the issues of boundaries of rights, including boundaries in information law; 2) there is a need for determination of boundaries of exercising right in the information sphere and restriction of information rights and liberties in implementation of legal regulation, as well as consideration of the legal nature of technical norms in their inclusion into a normative legal act.

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (37) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
L. Konduforova

The subject of the article is the determination of the essence of the administrative-legal mechanism for the implementation of private interests. The purpose of the article is to formulate the concept of this mechanism and to determine its elements. This goal led to the use of formal-dogmatic and system-structural methods with which the author determines the structure of the administrative-legal mechanism for the implementation of private interests. The author offers his own definition of administrative and legal mechanism for the implementation of private interests. The results of the study can be used in legislative work in the field of protecting the rights and freedoms of participants in public relations, as well as in law enforcement.Key words: administrative-legal mechanism, administrative-legal relations, administrative-legal norms, private interests, public administration, administrative-legal means.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Ermek B. Abdrasulov

This article examines the issues of differentiation of legislative and subordinate regulation of public relations. It is noted that in the process of law-making activities, including the legislative process, practical questions often arise about the competence of various state bodies to establish various legal norms and rules. These issues are related to the need to establish a clear legal meaning of the constitutional norms devoted to the definition of the subject of regulation of laws. In particular, there is a need to clarify the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of the concepts "the most important public relations", "all other relations", "subsidiary legislation", as well as to establish the relationship between these concepts. Interpretation is also required by the provisions of p. 4 of Article 61 of the Constitution in terms of clarifying the question of whether the conclusion follows from mentioned provisions that all possible social relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are subject to legal regulation, including those that are subject to other social and technical regulators (morality, national, business and professional traditions and customs, religion, standards, technical regulations, etc.). Answering the questions raised, the author emphasizes that the law and bylaws, as a rule, constitute a single system of legislation, performing the functions of primary and secondary acts. However, the secondary nature of subsidiary legislation does not mean that they regulate "unimportant" public relations. The law is essentially aimed at regulating all important social relations.


Author(s):  
Olena Shtefan

Keywords: civil procedural law, civil process, civil proceedings, subject of civil procedurallaw The process of reforming procedural legislation, its harmonization, harmonization with theprinciples and standards of international law, as well as other processes taking place insociety and the state are the factors that affect the need to revise the doctrinal definitions of civil procedural law. One of the most developed issues in the theory of civil procedurallaw is its definition. In turn, the development of science is impossible without reviewingeven established doctrinal approaches and provisions.An analysis of the special literature, mostly educational, led to the conclusion thatscholars use approaches to the definition of the term "civil procedural law", which weredeveloped and included in the theory of civil procedural law in the 50s-60s of the twentiethcentury. Modern definitions of civil procedural law are based on the provisions of theold invalid legislation, or on the provisions of the legislation of other countries (for example,the Russian Federation). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the existingdefinitions in the theory of civil procedural law and their harmonization with theprovisions of current legislation of Ukraine.In the process of researching doctrinal approaches to the definition of civil procedurallaw, it was found that researchers invest in the definition of the subject, purpose of thisbranch of law, as well as additional characteristics of civil procedural law (participants,sectoral affiliation, stage, etc.).The lack of a single doctrinal approach to the definition of the subject of civil procedurallaw, which is part of the definition of civil procedural law, prompted to study thesubject of civil procedural law and propose its author's definition.Based on the provisions of current legislation, the article presents the author's definitionof civil procedural law as a branch of law, set and system of legal norms, the subjectof which are public relations arising in civil proceedings on the basis of fair, impartialand timely consideration and resolution of civil cases in order to effectively protect violated,unrecognized or disputed rights, freedoms or interests of individuals, rights and interestsof legal entities, the interests of the state.


Author(s):  
Darina Viktorovna Kocheva

The subject of this research is the approaches existing in the theory and practice of prosecutorial activity towards determination of the concept of “prosecutor's authority” and its constituent definitions, their correlation with the scientific views of legal scholars upon the state-legal category of “authority”. Due to the fact that any science is based on the terminological framework, featuring units that differ in their semantic content, the research of the cognizable basic category that does not have a universal definition, neither in science nor effective legislation, as well as the contradicting legal phenomena of different legal nature (rights and obligations) at its part, substantiates the relevance of this research. The scientific novelty of lies in the author’s argumentation of similar, identical and opposite perspectives on the subject matter existing in the literature, effective legal regulation, personal experience of working in the prosecutor's office, justification of conclusion in the indicated category of “legal obligations”. The author comes to the conclusion there is no need for normative differentiation the rights and responsibilities of the prosecutor within the framework of his “general oversight” authority and optimality of the existing regulation, which authorizes the prosecutor to act at the own discretion (making decisions based on subjective opinion and assessment) in terms of the grounds  and means set by law, with consideration of private and public interests.


Author(s):  
Irina Eduardovna Ostrovskaya ◽  
Dina Valer'evna Mukhina ◽  
Ivan Ivanovich Dyakov

Currently the development of entrepreneurial potential of the youth becomes a priority of socioeconomic policy of the country, as well as a strategic vector in modern higher education. The subject of this research is the essence, content and specificity of entrepreneurial potential of university students. The goal consists in the development of theoretical approaches towards determination and clarification of the concept of entrepreneurial potential of students within the system of higher education. Research methodology is based on the systemic, competence, and subject-activity approach, as well as included the methods of theoretical analysis and summarization of the results of scientific research. The authors examine different approaches towards determination of the essence and content of the concepts “entrepreneurial potential” and “entrepreneurial potential of an individual”. A conclusion is made that under the current circumstances the concept of “entrepreneurial potential of a student”, which would reflect the peculiarities of student as a carrier of entrepreneurial potential, does not exist. Being a subject of educational activity, student is engaged in the process of formation of the own entrepreneurial potential. This defined the need to view student’s entrepreneurial potential inseparably from organizational-pedagogical conditions of the process of its formation as educational. The authors present an original definition of the concept of “entrepreneurial potential of a student” with consideration of the determined peculiarities, which can be used for the development of students’ entrepreneurial potential within the system of higher education.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4(106)) ◽  
pp. 269-275
Author(s):  
Ю. І. Соколова

The relevance of the article is that when forming a theoretical and legal position on the content of a phenomenon or object, the issue of its settlement by law is especially important. The study of various aspects of judges' pensions has shown the key role of the normative component in the content of this problem, through which the legal reality establishes its influence on the relations arising in the field of pensions of judges. It should be noted that the legal regulation is characterized by the following features: it is, first, the impact of law on public relations, which is carried out through a separate group of legal instruments - legal norms; secondly, normative-legal regulation is a part of complex legal influence, in other words, it shows only one of clusters of legal regulation of the corresponding object; thirdly, the intensity, efficiency, breadth and other mechanical factors of legal regulation directly depend on the quality and system of legal provisions and norms that build the content of the category. The article, based on the analysis of scientific views of scientists, proposes the author's definition of the concept of legal regulation of judges' pensions. The main normative-legal acts of the legislative and by-law level which fix the principles of regulation of public relations in the field of pension provision of judges are singled out. It is concluded that the main feature of the legal regulation of judges' pensions is the presence of two groups of legal documents, namely: general, which establish guarantees of social protection and pensions in Ukraine as a whole, led by the Constitution, and special - the Law of Ukraine "On Judiciary and the Status of Judges" dated 02.06.2016 №1402-VIII, documents of judicial self-government bodies - establish the peculiarities of judges receiving pensions and monthly lifetime allowance. At the same time, the disadvantage of the special legal framework is the lack of norms that clearly explain the procedure and features of both types of pensions for judges, by paying them pensions in the general order and a monthly lifetime allowance. In particular, the special normative-legal base does not explain the content of the monthly lifetime cash maintenance and the main points of its legal significance.


Author(s):  
Natalia Vasilyevna Markevich

The subject of this research is the concept, characteristics and interrelation of contracts in the area of air transportation. The article is dedication to understanding of legal nature and key elements of air contracts, specificity of their theoretical and practical application, classification; as well as aimed at creation of integral concept of regulatory system. Such understanding is acquired from a broad context of civil law literature and case law. Reference to the provisions of civil law doctrine allowed presenting an original view upon the subject matter, and propose recommendations on the improvement of aviation legislation. The main conclusion consists in the fact that civil law regulation of contracts in the area of air transportation is characterized by the existence of special contracts with peculiar features, which define the content of aviation legislation. With regards to each contractual construct, there emerge various question not only from the perspective of legal regulation and law enforcement (overbooking in the contract of air transportation of passengers), but also scientific approaches toward determination of the concept and nature of a particular contract (qualification of the shipping agreement as a bilateral or multilateral, legal nature of the shipping agreement for air cargo). The absence of universal understanding and interpretation of concept, contradiction of legislation, existence of legal gaps do not contribute to uniformity of aviation legislation, making it complicated for studying and application. The author also reviewed draft laws on regulation of air transportation and separate clauses thereof. Presented analysis reflects only few problematic aspects in the area of air transportation. The acquired results can be used in theoretical legal research, as well as legislative and practical activities.


Author(s):  
Кирилл Вячеславович Капустин

В статье проводится анализ теоретических положений правового регулирования оперативно-розыскной деятельности и современного состояния нормативного регулирования рассматриваемой деятельности в исправительных учреждениях. На основе сравнительного анализа современной научной литературы по рассматриваемому вопросу автором делается вывод, что исследователи, как правило, отождествляют понятия «правовое регулирование» и «правовая основа» и не уделяют должного внимания правовому регулированию оперативно-розыскной деятельности как процессу, а также формулируется авторское определение «правовое регулирование оперативно-розыскной деятельности». Автор предлагает разделить нормативное регулирование оперативно-розыскной деятельности в исправительных учреждениях на три уровня: конституционный, федеральный, ведомственный и межведомственный. В рамках проведенного исследования были выявлены недостатки ряда правовых норм и предложены пути по их решению. The article analyses both the theoretical provisions of the legal regulation of operational and search activities and the current state of the regulatory regulation of the activities in correctional institutions. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the current scientific literature on the subject, the author concludes that researchers generally identify the concepts of "legal regulation" and "legal basis" and do not pay due attention to the legal regulation of operational-search activities as a process, as well as the author 's definition of "legal regulation of operational-search activities." The author proposes to divide the normative regulation of operational-search activities in correctional institutions into three levels: constitutional; federal; departmental and interdepartmental. The study identified shortcomings in a number of legal norms and suggested ways to address them.


Author(s):  
IRINA VIKTOROVNA ERMAKOVA ◽  
◽  
◽  

The subject of the research is legal norms aimed at regulating by law relations in the field of concluding and executing smart contracts, including issues of protecting the rights of the parties to such contracts, including consumers. The object of the research is social relations arising in the process of creating, concluding and executing of smart contracts. Particular attention is paid to the theoretical and practical aspects of the definition of the concept of “smart contract” and its essence, as well as its legal status. In addition, the article considers approaches to defining the essence of institutions that are closely related to the category of “smart contract”, such as “cryptocurrency”, “digital ruble”, “mining”. The aspects of the protection of fundamental rights of the parties involved in the considered legal relationship, including consumers, are also analyzed. Examples of court decisions regarding the corresponding category of cases are given. The novelty of the research lies in determining the current approaches in relation to the essence, concept and legal status of smart contracts, including the current position of law enforcement practice in relation to this issue. In addition, the novelty of the study lies in considering the practical aspects of the conclusion and execution of smart contracts, including, indicating examples of blockchain platforms on the basis of which smart contracts can function. Ultimately, the study led to the development by the author of some proposals in order to improve the relevant legislation. In particular, the author proposed to consolidate at the legislative level the legal definition of the concept of “smart contract”, indicating the appropriate wording.


2018 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 01009
Author(s):  
Andrey Butyrin ◽  
Ekaterina Stativa

The paper defines the significance of judicial construction and technical expertise as a means of protecting the rights and interests of participants of building process when considering and resolving economic and industrial disputes, significant number of which is based on the imperfect legal regulation of public relations of this activity. Noting the insufficient knowledge of the judicial community about the informational potential of this kind of judicial expertise, the authors presented a wide range of types of studies conducted by the building expert in practice. The presented list includes the following types of studies of the object of judicial construction and technical expertise: establishment of its existence; location; technical condition; its properties; qualitative and quantitative characteristics; cost; an object's belonging to a particular class, sort, kind, type, group; establishment of the conformity of its characteristics to a certain standard, rule or regulation. Consideration is also made of studies that have been conducted in judicial and investigation expert practice aimed at establishing the presence and types of causal connection between events that have been the subject of criminal investigation and (or) judicial proceeding, as well as establishing the object’s existence by its representation, belonging of a part of the object to the whole, definition of a unified source of origin (manufacturer) of several objects of judicial construction and technical expertise.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document