scholarly journals National Data Sharing Policy in the Era of Open Science: A Systematic Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Cahyo Trianggoro ◽  
Tupan Tupan
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Policy Instruments ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Community Research ◽  
Research Institutions

Research data sharing activities provide many benefits to the research ecosystem. However, in the Indonesian context, there is a lack of policy in regulating research data sharing mechanisms which makes researchers reluctant to undertake the practice of data sharing. Research funders and research institutions play a critical role in developing data-sharing policies. Research related to the policy of research data sharing is important in order to design policies to encourage the practice of research data sharing. A systematic literature review was conducted to see how data-sharing policies were formulated and implemented in various research institutions. The data were taken from Scopus and Dimension indexers using controlled vocabulary. The roles of research institutions and funders as well as policy instruments were analyzed to see patterns that occur between the parties. We examine 23 articles containing data sharing policies. it was found that the funders have the greatest role in determining the design of the data sharing policy. Funders view that research data is an asset in research funded by public funding so that the benefits must be returned to the community. Research institutes play a role as a provider of research infrastructure that contributes to data creation. Meanwhile, researchers as research actors need to provide input in developing data sharing mechanisms and regulating data sensitivity aspects and legal aspects in research data sharing.

scholarly journals Efficiency measures of emergency departments: an Italian systematic literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e001058
Author(s):  
Danilo Di Laura ◽  
Lucia D'Angiolella ◽  
Lorenzo Mantovani ◽  
Ginevra Squassabia ◽  
Francesco Clemente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The World

Life expectancy globally increased in the last decades: the number of people aged 65 or older is consequently projected to grow, and healthcare demand will increase as well. In the recent years, the number of patients visiting the hospital emergency departments (EDs) rocked in almost all countries of the world. These departments are crucial in all healthcare systems and play a critical role in providing an efficient assistance to all patients. A systematic literature review covering PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library was performed from 2009 to 2019. Of the 718 references found in the literature research, more than 25 studies were included in the current review. Different predictors were associated with the quality of EDs care, which may help to define and implement preventive strategies in the near future. There is no harmonisation in efficiency measurements reflecting the performance in the ED setting. The identification of consistent measures of efficiency is crucial to build an evidence base for future initiatives. The aim of this study is to review the literature on the problems encountered in the efficiency of EDs around the world in order to identify an organisational model or guidelines that can be implemented in EDs to fill inefficiencies and ensure access optimal treatment both in terms of resources and timing. This review will support policy makers to improve the quality of health facilities, and, consequently of the entire healthcare systems.

scholarly journals A systematic literature review of researchers’ and healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards the secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hutchings ◽  
Max Loomes ◽  
Phyllis Butow ◽  
Frances M. Boyle
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Data Storage ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Secondary Use

Abstract A systematic literature review of researchers and healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards the secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data was conducted using electronic data searching. Eligible articles included those reporting qualitative or quantitative original research and published in English. No restrictions were placed on publication dates, study design, or disease setting. Two authors were involved in all stages of the review process; conflicts were resolved by consensus. Data was extracted independently using a pre-piloted data extraction template. Quality and bias were assessed using the QualSyst criteria for qualitative studies. Eighteen eligible articles were identified, and articles were categorised into four key themes: barriers, facilitators, access, and ownership; 14 subthemes were identified. While respondents were generally supportive of data sharing, concerns were expressed about access to data, data storage infrastructure, and consent. Perceptions of data ownership and acknowledgement, trust, and policy frameworks influenced sharing practice, as did age, discipline, professional focus, and world region. Young researchers were less willing to share data; they were willing to share in circumstances where they were acknowledged. While there is a general consensus that increased data sharing in health is beneficial to the wider scientific community, substantial barriers remain. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018110559

A systematic literature review on research data management practices and services

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murtaza Ashiq ◽  
Muhammad Haroon Usmani ◽  
Muhammad Naeem
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Academic Libraries ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Research Data Management

Purpose Research data management (RDM) has been called a “ground-breaking” area for research libraries and it is among the top future trends for academic libraries. Hence, this study aims to systematically review RDM practices and services primarily focusing on the challenges, services and skills along with motivational factors associated with it. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review method was used focusing on literature produced between 2016–2020 to understand the latest trends. An extensive research strategy was framed and 15,206 results appeared. Finally, 19 studies have fulfilled the criteria to be included in the study following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Findings RDM is gradually gaining importance among researchers and academic libraries; however, it is still poorly practiced by researchers and academic libraries. Albeit, it is better observed in developed countries over developing countries, however, there are lots of challenges associated with RDM practices by researchers and services by libraries. These challenges demand certain sets of skills to be developed for better practices and services. An active collaboration is required among stakeholders and university services departments to figure out the challenges and issues. Research limitations/implications The implications of policy and practical point-of-view present how research data can be better managed in the future by researchers and library professionals. The expected/desired role of key stockholders in this regard is also highlighted. Originality/value RDM is an important and emerging area. Researchers and Library and Information Science professionals are not comprehensively managing research data as it involves complex cooperation among various stakeholders. A combination of measures is required to better manage research data that would ultimately move forward for open access publishing.

A Systematic Literature Review of Ethical Challenges Related to Medical and Public Health Data Sharing in China

2021 ◽  
pp. 155626462110402
Author(s):  
Xiaojie Li ◽  
Yali Cong
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Public Health Data ◽  
Educational Implications ◽  
Full Text Screening ◽  
Final Synthesis

Although stakeholders in China have begun promoting medical and public health data sharing, a large portion of data cannot flow freely across research teams and borders and be converted into “big data.” To identify the ethical challenges that are considered to hinder medical and public health data sharing, we performed a systematic literature review pertaining to medical and health data sharing in China. A total of 2959 unique records were retrieved through the database search, 61 of which were included in the final synthesis after full-text screening. This review provides an overview of the current ethical challenges and barriers involved in data sharing for healthcare purposes in China. Through the systematic review of evidence from peer-reviewed literature and dissertations, we identified barriers and ethical challenges grouped in a taxonomy of capacity building needs, balancing different stakeholders’ interests, scientific and social value, and the data subjects’ rights, public trust and engagement. Best practices and educational implications were suggested based on our findings.

scholarly journals A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 663-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanibaa' A. Garrison ◽  
Nila A. Sathe ◽  
Armand H. Matheny Antommaria ◽  
Ingrid A. Holm ◽  
Saskia C. Sanderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
The United States ◽  
Broad Consent

scholarly journals COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do We Expect for the Future? A Systematic Literature Review of Social Science Publications in the First Year of the Pandemic (2020–2021)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 8259
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Pratici ◽  
Phillip McMinn Singer
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Social Science ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Economic Effects ◽  
First Year ◽  
Single Issue ◽  
The Future

The Covid-19 pandemic has had wide-reaching societal and economic effects and a return to “normal” will take years to accomplish. In light of this situation, the most important advancement since COVID-19′s emergence has been the development of multiple, life-saving, vaccines. Academic research on vaccine has been extensive. It is estimated that in only one year it has been produced more published and indexed papers on this single issue than in the last twenty years on any other single issue, thus, necessitating some organization. This research consists of a systematic literature review of the social science publication on COVID-19 published in the first year of the pandemic (February 2020 to March 2021). This review is important because it occurs at a time when vaccines have begun their global distribution and the best efforts to address the pandemic is through vaccination programs. In this research, 53 papers published in relevant journals are analyzed out of the almost 30,000 articles retrieved from Scopus database. The analysis conducted relies on two different types: descriptive analysis (evolution at the time of citations; evolution over time of keywords; bibliographical mapping of countries, the top 10 most influential papers), and bibliometric analysis for content evaluation. A cluster analysis was performed for the latter. Clustering the research papers, based on the actual content of papers, found there to be five research areas: (1) economic aspects; (2) ethics and legal aspects; (3) health communication; (4) policies and crisis management, and (5) political issues. Yet, this article’s results paint a picture of literature that has not yet considered the full scope of COVID-19’s effect on the economic, political, and population level health and well-being. Nor has it considered these effects across the global community, suggesting new potential areas of research and giving a perspective of what we should expect for the future.

scholarly journals Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Keberhasilan dan Kegagalan Kinerja Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDES)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-44
Author(s):  
Ade Rani Aprillia ◽  
Dwi Cahyono ◽  
Ari Sita Nastiti
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Organizational Performance ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Leadership Style ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Research Data ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Village

BUMDes has a role to realize the village economy. In improving the village economy, the government has the task of conducting socialization to the villagers through the provincial and district governments. The purpose of the systematic literature review is to determine the determinants of success and failure on the performance of BUMDes. Research data obtained from Google Scholar in 2016-2021 based on an initial search found as many as 484 articles and only 9 journals used as data sources and will be analyzed further. This study only uses research with a quantitative approach. The results of this study indicate that the failure factors that affect the performance of BUMDes are very diverse, namely motivation, education, age, and work experience. While the success factors that affect the performance of BUMDes are communication, AIS, HR, leadership style, motivation, work environment, salary, competence, organizational performance, commitment, organizational culture, training, the influence of job satisfaction, and GCG. Keywords: Systematic Literature Review; BUMDes; The Success Of BUMDes; BUMDes Failure

scholarly journals Assessment of Tobacco Control Policy Instruments, Status and Effectiveness in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 2913-2927
Author(s):  
George N Chidimbah Munthali ◽  
Xue-Lian Wu ◽  
Muhammad Rizwan ◽  
Gama Rivas Daru ◽  
Yu Shi
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Tobacco Control ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Policy Instruments ◽  
Control Policy ◽  
Tobacco Control Policy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document