scholarly journals Hormone Therapy Review for Perimenopausal Symptoms: Focused on Perimenopausal Women without Other Risk Factors

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-206
Author(s):  
Young Mee Lee ◽  
Hwi-yeol Yun
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Stevenson ◽  
Sophia Tsiligiannis ◽  
Nick Panay

Cardiovascular disease, and particularly coronary heart disease (CHD), has a low incidence in premenopausal women. Loss of ovarian hormones during the perimenopause and menopause leads to a sharp increase in incidence. Although most CHD risk factors are common to both men and women, the menopause is a unique additional risk factor for women. Sex steroids have profound effects on many CHD risk factors. Their loss leads to adverse changes in lipids and lipoproteins, with increases being seen in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides, and decreases in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. There is a reduction in insulin secretion and elimination, but increases in insulin resistance eventually result in increasing circulating insulin levels. There are changes in body fat distribution with accumulation in central and visceral fat which links to the other adverse metabolic changes. There is an increase in the incidence of hypertension and of type 2 diabetes mellitus, both major risk factors for CHD. Oestrogens have potent effects on blood vessels and their loss leads to dysfunction of the vascular endothelium. All of these changes result from loss of ovarian function contributing to the increased development of CHD. Risk factor assessment in perimenopausal women is recommended, thereby permitting the timely introduction of lifestyle, hormonal and therapeutic interventions to modify or reverse these adverse changes.


Climacteric ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Kim ◽  
S. H. Kim ◽  
J. R. Lee ◽  
B. C. Jee ◽  
S-Y. Ku ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryfran R. Sowers ◽  
M. Kathleen Clark ◽  
Bruce Hollis ◽  
Robert B. Wallace ◽  
Mary Jannausch

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L Molinsky ◽  
Kanokwan Kulprachakarn ◽  
Sakaewan Ounjaijean ◽  
Ryan Demmer ◽  
Kittipan Rerkasem

Background: Cross-sex hormone therapy (CSHT) is prescribed to transition secondary sexual characteristics among individuals undergoing male-to-female (MtF) transitions (age range 18-41, mean age=24). Limited data exist to inform the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor profile associated with CSHT. We investigated the relationship between CSHT and cardiovascular risk factors in MtF transgender persons and hypothesize that CSHT will be associated with adverse CVD risk factor profiles. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1 st , 2018 to November 30 th , 2018 in 100 MtF transgender people not receiving CSHT vs. 100 receiving CSHT. CSHT use was defined by self-report use of up to 23 medications. Serum testosterone and 17-beta estradiol were assessed to validate CSHT use. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured. Lipid profiles, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin I and pro b-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP) were assessed from fasting blood. Non-invasive arterial examinations included: carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), ankle-brachial index (ABI), cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Multivariable linear regression models, regressed CVD risk factors on CSHT status. Among the subgroup of CSHT users, we assessed the relationship between duration of use and CVD risk factors. Multivariable models included age, gender, education, income, drinking, smoking, exercise, and BMI. Results: Participant mean age was 24±0.38 years and did not differ by CSHT use. Mean±SE values of testosterone were in the CSHT vs. control group were 4.8±0.3 vs. 5.8±0.3 ng/ml, p=0.06 and 17-beta estradiol levels were 45.6±14.9 vs. 34.7±14.8, p=0.7). CIMT was modestly lower among CSHT vs. controls (0.35±0.01 vs. 0.38±0.01, p=0.09). The average duration of CSHT use was 6.65±0.522 years. Among CSHT users, for every 1-year increase in duration of CSHT use total cholesterol decreased by -2.360 ± 1.096, p=0.0341 mg/dL, LDL-cholesterol decreased by -3.076 ± 1.182, p=0.0109 mg/dL, ABI decreased by -0.006 ± 0.002, p=0.0087 while FPG increased by 2.558 ± 0.899 mg/dL, p=0.0055. Conclusion: Among MtF transgender persons, using CSHT was not associated with increased CVD risk factors levels.


Maturitas ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Løkkegaard ◽  
Lene Falgaard Eplov ◽  
Anne Køster ◽  
Karin Garde

Author(s):  
Hannah Lui Park

Environmental and lifestyle factors are believed to account for >80% of breast cancers; however, it is not well understood how and when these factors affect risk and which exposed individuals will actually develop the disease. While alcohol consumption, obesity, and hormone therapy are some known risk factors for breast cancer, other exposures associated with breast cancer risk have not yet been identified or well characterized. In this paper, it is proposed that the identification of blood epigenetic markers for personal, in utero, and ancestral environmental exposures can help researchers better understand known and potential relationships between exposures and breast cancer risk and may enable personalized prevention strategies.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
A O Mueck ◽  
H Seeger

Endometrial carcinoma is listed under the absolute contraindications to hormone therapy (HT). According to current opinion, HT after stage I or II is still considered an option, and continuous combined oestrogen/progestogen replacement therapy (CCEPT) would be recommended. However, up to now, only observational studies have been put forward. Although none of these studies have established an increased rate of recurrence or mortality, alternatives such as phytopreparations and tibolone, or particular psychotherapeutic drugs, such as venlafaxine, should be considered for the relief of climacteric complaints. Progestogen-only therapy (PT) particularly has been considered. However, the currently discussed possible progestogen effects regarding an increased risk of breast cancer have to be taken into account. Indeed, the wider discussion about the gestagen effects regarding the risk of breast cancer is to be considered. Generally, after hysterectomy, at least for patients with cardiovascular risk factors, the preference today is to use low-dose oestrogen therapy (patches or gels) instead of CCEPT, and this is also now recommended for patients after endometrial cancer. This is to be noted because of the risk factors for endometrial carcinoma, such as hypertension, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCO) and diabetes mellitus. However, each form of HT should be only exceptionally recommended, and the patients must be informed about the risks that exist and the use of alternatives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document