The Boulder Model Revisited: The Training of the Clinical Psychologist for Research
The participants at the 1949 Boulder Conference on training espoused noble goals, amongst them being that clinicians should be contributors to the science of psychology as well. The error they made was to think that all students in clinical psychology should be or even could be interested in learning how to do research. Participants of the 1965 Chicago Conference on training recommended revising the Boulder philosophy; viz., not every student in a clinical program should have to learn how to do research, but those students who do, should have a program which could train them accordingly. The opinion was expressed at this Conference that the Boulder Model program did not do an effective job in training people for research. Since the current formulation of the Boulder Model program is not that different from the 1965 model, we must assume that the recommendation to develop a doctoral program for students of clinical psychology who are interested in being researchers has not been done. Sophisticated researchers now take years to develop; they do not enter their professional positions well trained; many years of trial-and-error groping with research strategies eventually helps a person become a competent researcher. However, that is an inefficient way of educating clinical psychologists for research and unsound pedagogically. Suggestions are made as to how the current clinical program can be modified so as to help train researchers more effectively.