scholarly journals Influences of Material Properties on Analogue Model Experiments of Geologic Structures

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 452-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro YAMADA ◽  
Kokoro KANEDA ◽  
Toshifumi MATSUOKA
Keyword(s):  
Material Properties ◽  
Analogue Model ◽  
Model Experiments

Listric extensional fault systems - results of analogue model experiments

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. Ellis ◽  
K. R. McClay
Keyword(s):  
Analogue Model ◽  
Model Experiments ◽  
Fault Systems

Abstract: 4-D Analysis of Analogue Model Experiments

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (1998) ◽  
Author(s):  
Schreurs, Guido, and Reto Hanni
Keyword(s):  
Analogue Model ◽  
Model Experiments

Grain boundary segregation in metals

1992 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 1204-1205
Author(s):  
C.L. Briant
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Surface ◽  
Grain Boundary ◽  
Grain Boundaries ◽  
Material Properties ◽  
Electron Spectroscopy ◽  
High Vacuum ◽  
Boundary Segregation ◽  
Grain Boundary Segregation ◽  
Local Concentration ◽  
The One

Grain boundary segregation is the process by which solute elements in a material diffuse to the grain boundaries, become trapped there, and increase their local concentration at the boundary over that in the bulk. As a result of this process this local concentration of the segregant at the grain boundary can be many orders of magnitude greater than the bulk concentration of the segregant. The importance of this problem lies in the fact that grain boundary segregation can affect many material properties such as fracture, corrosion, and grain growth.One of the best ways to study grain boundary segregation is with Auger electron spectroscopy. This spectroscopy is an extremely surface sensitive technique. When it is used to study grain boundary segregation the sample must first be fractured intergranularly in the high vacuum spectrometer. This fracture surface is then the one that is analyzed. The development of scanning Auger spectrometers have allowed researchers to first image the fracture surface that is created and then to perform analyses on individual grain boundaries.

Relationships Between Grain Boundary Structure and Material Properties

1980 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 366-369
Author(s):  
Brian Ralph ◽  
Barlow Claire ◽  
Nicola Ecob
Keyword(s):  
Grain Boundary ◽  
Material Properties ◽  
Main Property ◽  
Grain Structure ◽  
Boundary Structure ◽  
Grain Boundary Structure ◽  
Property Changes

This brief review seeks to summarize some of the main property changes which may be induced by altering the grain structure of materials. Where appropriate an interpretation is given of these changes in terms of current theories of grain boundary structure, and some examples from current studies are presented at the end of this paper.

Cognitive Components of Ingroup Projection

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Machunsky ◽  
Thorsten Meiser
Keyword(s):  
Mental Representation ◽  
Cognitive Representation ◽  
Social Categories ◽  
Projection Model ◽  
Minimal Group ◽  
Model Experiments ◽  
Superordinate Category ◽  
Cognitive Components ◽  
Per Se

This research investigated whether relative ingroup prototypicality (i.e., the tendency to perceive one’s own ingroup as more prototypical of a superordinate category than the outgroup) can result from a prototype-based versus exemplar-based mental representation of social categories, rather than from ingroup membership per se as previously suggested by the ingroup projection model. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that a prototype-based group was perceived as more prototypical of a superordinate category than an exemplar-based group supporting the hypothesis that an intergroup context is not necessary for biased prototypicality judgments. Experiment 3 introduced an intergroup context in a minimal-group-like paradigm. The findings demonstrated that both the kind of cognitive representation and motivational processes contribute to biased prototypicality judgments in intergroup settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document