scholarly journals Financial development and income inequality

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (54) ◽  
pp. 84-100
Author(s):  
Ewa Weychert
Keyword(s):  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Financial Variables ◽  
Short Run ◽  
Fixed Panel ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractThis paper analyses the influence of financial development on income inequality. Throughout this work, one may find the overview of theoretical and empirical literature as well as the empirical model using fixed panel data method. This research paper tries to disentangle the opposing views on the relationship between finance and income distribution, by evaluating the impact of the different dimensions of financial development on the level of income inequality. The important added value of this research is the usage of quintiles of income distribution as a dependent variable that may help to recognise the effect of financial development on the poorest and richest. Another novelty of the paper is the consideration of the effects of financial variables on Gini coefficient in the long and short run. The main results of the analysis using dataset from 2003 to 2014 indicate that financial access decreases income inequality.

scholarly journals Research on Property Income Inequality Effect of Fiscal Finance

Economies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaozhun Peng ◽  
Hongyou Lu
Keyword(s):  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Chinese Family ◽  
Inequality Decomposition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Property Income ◽  
Fiscal Expenditure ◽  
The Impact

“Creating conditions for more people to have property income” has become a national policy after the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Based on the micro survey data from Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016 and the macro panel data at the provincial level, a logarithmic linear equation was built to estimate the impact of micro and macro factors on property income. Furthermore, the contribution of fiscal expenditure and financial development on property income equality can be recognized using the regression-based inequality decomposition method. This research revealed that fiscal expenditure improves residents’ property income and slightly reduces the inequality of property income distribution. With respect to financial development, it improves residents’ property income but aggravates the inequality of property income distribution. However, there is a significant difference between the different regions. In eastern and central regions, inequality of property income distribution greatly benefits from fiscal expenditure, while in northwest regions, fiscal expenditure makes property income inequality even worse. Therefore, the focus of financial sustainable development is to reduce property income inequality through the establishment of an effective government and the improvement of the rule of laws.

Does Nominal Devaluation Improve Income Distribution? Evidence from Bangladesh

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-77
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahbaz ◽  
Mohammad Mafizur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Trade Openness ◽  
Bounds Testing ◽  
Correction Model ◽  
Distributed Lag ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Short Run ◽  
Auto Regressive ◽  
The Impact

The article aims to investigate the impact of nominal devaluation on income distribution in Bangladesh both in short and long runs. In doing so, Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing has been employed for cointegration, and Error Correction Model (ECM) has been used for short-run dynamics. The empirical psychology has confirmed the existence of long-run relationship between the variables. Furthermore our estimated results reveal that nominal devaluation tends to decrease income inequality. Though economic growth appears to improve income distribution, non-linear link between both the variables, however, depicts Kuznets’ inverted-U curve (1955). Financial development causes further deterioration in income distribution. Trade openness contributes to income inequality as discussed in Leontief Paradox.

scholarly journals The Conditional Relationship between Inequality and Development

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 645-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carles Boix
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Political Institutions ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Economic Stagnation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Persistent Inequality ◽  
Do So

In recent years political scientists and economists have spent considerable efforts investigating the impact of income inequality both on political institutions and social conflict (Boix 2003, 2008; Acemoglu and Robinson 2006; Geddes 2007) and on growth and development (Atkinson and Bourguignon 2000). In this article I focus on the latter question: I discuss the extent to which (that is, the conditions under which) inequality may hinder economic growth. I do so by moving away from the current literature, which models the relationship between development and inequality in a linear fashion—with the latter unconditionally distorting (or boosting) the incentives to invest and therefore reducing (or increasing) the rate of growth. Instead, I claim that the potential correlation between inequality and development will be always conditional on the (mostly political and institutional) causes that generate the existing income distribution to start with. Hence it is not surprising to find instances in which growth and (mostly temporary) inequality come hand in hand as well as other periods and countries where there is both high and persistent inequality jointly with economic stagnation.

Financial development and income inequality in India: an application of ARDL approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Sehrawat ◽  
A K Giri
Keyword(s):  
Income Inequality ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Trade Openness ◽  
Development Economic ◽  
Annual Data ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Integration Test ◽  
Short Run ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between financial development and income inequality in India using annual data from 1982-2012. Design/methodology/approach – Stationarity properties of the series are checked by using ADF, DF-GLS, KPSS and Ng- Perron unit root tests. The paper applied the auto regressive distributed lag (ARDL) bound testing approach to co-integration to examine the existence of long run relationship; and error correction mechanism for the short run dynamics. Findings – The co-integration test confirms a long run relationship between financial development and income inequality for India. The ARDL test results suggest that financial development, economic growth, inflation aggravates the income inequality in both long run and short run. However, trade openness reduces the gap between rich and poor in India. Research limitations/implications – The present recommend for appropriate economic and financial reforms focussing on financial inclusion to reduce income inequality in India. Originality/value – Till date, there is hardly any study that makes a clear comparison between market-based indicator and bank based indicator of financial development in India and those examining the relationship between finance and income inequality nexus. Further there is hardly any study to include gini coefficient as a proxy for inequality for India and apply ARDL techniques of co-integration, using the basic principles of GJ hypothesis and provide short run and long run dynamics for India. So the contribution of the paper is to fill these research gaps.

scholarly journals Analysis of Indonesia Inequality Income Distribution

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fakhruddin . ◽  
Raudhatil Wirda. Z ◽  
Muhammad Ilhamsyah Siregar ◽  
Fitriyani .
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Annual Data ◽  
Panel Ardl ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Short Run ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Ideal

The relationship between income distribution inequality and inflation is widely discussed in economics. The different concepts of macroeconomic management in various countries have different implications for each country. This paper aims to examine the relationship between inequality in income distribution and inflation. Panel ARDL with semi-annual data from 33 provinces in Indonesia for the period of 2012-2018 is used in this model. The results show that changes in poverty and economic growth are not statistically significant in affecting the changes of income disparity in short run. Inflation is too low, thus it is less effective at encouraging income inequality in Indonesia. In addition, in the long run, inflation does not affect the inequality of income distribution, it is assumed that the benefits of inflation are concentrated in groups of people with high-income levels. Moreover, economic growth has a negative impact on income inequality and poverty that eventually will aggravate the imbalance in income distribution. Therefore, its is recommended for Indonesia’s economy to be directed at increasing inflation to reach the ideal level in order to be able to reduce the imbalance in income distribution. Keywords: Inequality, inflation, poverty, growth, Panel ARDL

scholarly journals The Impact of Financial Development on Investment: a Review of International Literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-192
Author(s):  
Brian Muyambiri ◽  
Nicholas M. Odhiambo
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Research ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
International Literature ◽  
Macroeconomic Variables ◽  
Development Indicators ◽  
Investment Determinants ◽  
Topical Analysis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

This article summarises the empirical literature on the impact of financial development on investment. It presents a topical analysis of empirical research that focuses mainly on the interaction between financial development and investment, determinants and measurement of both financial development and investment, and empirical findings on the relationship between the two variables under discussion. The study concludes that most of the research done on the relationship between financial development and investment is highly skewed towards assessing the relationship using mostly bank-based financial development indicators, as compared to the market-based financial development indicators. Given the number of studies assessed, the impact of financial development on investment appears to be inconclusive, at best. Moreover, the study shows that the relationship between these two macroeconomic variables seems to differ from country to country; it is dependent on the proxies used to measure the level of financial development, as well as the methodology employed.

scholarly journals The Impact of Financial Development on Investment: A Review of International Literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-192
Author(s):  
Brian Muyambiri ◽  
Nicholas M. Odhiambo
Keyword(s):  
Full Article ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
International Literature ◽  
Macroeconomic Variables ◽  
Development Indicators ◽  
Investment Determinants ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

[full article and abstract in English] This article summarises the empirical literature on the impact of financial development on investment. It presents a topical analysis of empirical research that focuses mainly on the interaction between financial development and investment, determinants and measurement of both financial development and investment, and empirical findings on the relationship between the two variables under discussion. The study concludes that most of the research done on the relationship between financial development and investment is highly skewed towards assessing the relationship using mostly bank-based financial development indicators, as compared to the market-based financial development indicators. Given the number of studies assessed, the impact of financial development on investment appears to be inconclusive, at best. Moreover, the study shows that the relationship between these two macroeconomic variables seems to differ from country to country; it is dependent on the proxies used to measure the level of financial development, as well as the methodology employed.

Financial Development and Income Inequality in Vietnam: An Empirical Analysis

2012 ◽  
pp. 5-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoi Chu Minh ◽  
Hoi Le Quoc
Keyword(s):  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Empirical Analysis ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Joint Effects ◽  
The Relationship

The pattern of income distribution can be influenced by financial evelopment. Using provincial data, this paper empirically investigates the relationship between financial development and income inequality in Vietnam from 2002 to 2008. The results show that financial development has a positive impact on reducing income inequality, which is consistent with the bulk of theoretical and empirical research. The results also confirms that financial development when it interacts with education has joint-effects on reducing income inequality. We also find no evidence supporting the Greenwood-Jovanovic hypothesis of an inverted U-shaped relationship between the financial sector of development and inequality.

scholarly journals Linkage between Financial Development and Income Inequality in India

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Sharma ◽  
Suman Dahiya
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Income Inequality ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Government Expenditure ◽  
Testing Procedure ◽  
Economic Policies ◽  
Monetary And Fiscal Policy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Financial Development Index

Abstract A sound financial system is a prerequisite for the inclusive and stable development of an economy, especially it plays a key role in dealing with the menace of inequality in income distribution. Economic policies including monetary and fiscal policy framed by the policymakers influence the accessibility to the financial resources by the poor. This study intends to examine the relationship between financial development and income inequality in India over the period 1973 to 2015. To analyze this relationship, the financial development index was constructed using the PCA approach. The study also checks the presence of the Greenwood–Jovanovich (GJ) hypothesis in the Indian economy. In this study, the ARDL Bound testing procedure is followed to assess the impact of financial development on income inequality. Besides financial development, the impact of economic development and government expenditure is also observed. Results confirm the existence of an inverted U-shaped linkage between financial development and income inequality in India, whereas economic development deteriorates the gap between the income of poor and rich. Furthermore, a U-shaped relationship between government expenditure and income inequality is revealed in this study. The findings of this study may provide new insight to the policymakers for framing suitable economic policies to encourage sustainable development in India.

The effects of debt restructurings on income inequality in the developing world

2021 ◽  
pp. 135406612110014
Author(s):  
Glen Biglaiser ◽  
Ronald J. McGauvran
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Income Inequality ◽  
Income Distribution ◽  
Government Spending ◽  
Tax Reform ◽  
Social Spending ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The Rich ◽  
The Impact

Developing countries, saddled with debts, often prefer investors absorb losses through debt restructurings. By not making full repayments, debtor governments could increase social spending, serving poorer constituents, and, in turn, lowering income inequality. Alternatively, debtor governments could reduce taxes and cut government spending, bolstering the assets of the rich at the expense of the poor. Using panel data for 71 developing countries from 1986 to 2016, we assess the effects of debt restructurings on societal income distribution. Specifically, we study the impact of debt restructurings on social spending, tax reform, and income inequality. We find that countries receiving debt restructurings tend to use their newly acquired economic flexibility to reduce taxes and lower social spending, worsening income inequality. The results are also robust to different model specifications. Our study contributes to the globalization and the poor debate, suggesting the economic harm caused to the less well-off following debt restructurings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document