scholarly journals Kewenangan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Mengeluarkan Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 Perihal Penyumpahan Advokat

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-444
Author(s):  
Muttaqin Asyura ◽  
Faisal A. Rani ◽  
Ilyas Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Official ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Chief Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Uncertainty

Angka 6 Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 perihal Penyumpahan Advokat (SK KMA Penyumpahan Advokat) menimbulkan polemik hukum karena substansi materi keputusan tersebut memperluas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi berkaitan dengan Organisasi Advokat yang dapat mengajukan penyumpahan Advokat di Pengadilan Tinggi. Terkait dengan hal tersebut apakah Ketua Mahkamah Agung memiliki kewenangan untuk mengeluarkan SK KMA Penyumpahan Advokat? Teori freies ermessen menekankan bahwa setiap pejabat pemerintahan memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat keputusan agar dapat berperan secara maksimal dalam melayani kepentingan masyarakat, namun keputusan yang dibuat harus sesuai dengan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Berlakunya SK KMA Penyumpahan Advokat memperluas makna Organisasi Advokat yang telah diatur sebelumnya dalam  Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Ketidakpastian hukum yang ditimbulkan oleh keputusan pejabat pemerintahan bertentangan dengan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik, sehingga dengan demikian, Ketua Mahkamah Agung tidak berwenang mengeluarkan SK KMA Penyumpahan Advokat untuk mengatur mengenai Organisasi Advokat yang dapat mengajukan sumpah di Pengadilan Tinggi.Clause 6 a Decree Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 on the Oath of an Advocate leads to legal issues due to expanding the decision of the Constitutional Court regarding advocate organization that can submit an oath of an advocate in the high court. Based on that issue, Is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court authorized to issue a Decree Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 on the Oath of an Advocate? Freies Ermessen’s theory states that every government official has authority to make a decree in order to serving public administration. But, the decree must be in accordance with the General  Principles of Proper Administration (GPPA). The enactment of the  Decree on the Oath of an Advocate leads to legal issues due to expanding the decision of the Constitutional Court. Legal uncertainty caused by the Decree is contrary to the General Principles of Proper Administration (GPPA). Therefore, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court  is not authorized to issue a Decree Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 on The Oath of an Advocate to regulate an Advocate Organization that can submit an oath in a High Court.

Equity and certainty in contract law

Acta Juridica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 141-176
Author(s):  
F Brand
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
Contractual Relationships ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Do So

The role of abstract values such as equity and fairness in our law of contract has been the subject of controversy for a number of years. In 2002 the Supreme Court of Appeal took the position that these values do not constitute self-standing grounds for interfering with contractual relationships. Despite this being consistently maintained by the SCA in a number of cases, some High Court judges deviated from this position on the basis that they were permitted to do so by some minority judgments and obiter dicta in the Constitutional Court. The uncertainty thus created has fortunately now been removed by the judgment of the Constitutional Court in Beadica v The Trustees for the Time being of the Oregon Trust.

scholarly journals «El caso BILDU» : continuidad y ruptura en la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional sobre la ilegalización de formaciones políticas

2011 ◽  
pp. 555
Author(s):  
Mercedes Iglesias Bárez
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court

The case is somewhat Bildu a break with the doctrine that the Constitutional Court has constructed about the outlawing of political parties. The control of political parties in the process of proclamation of candidates, the value of the condemnation of terrorism and the role to be played to the High Court in monitoring the decisions of the Supreme Court, are in part a new meaning in the controversial decision the Constitutional Court.El caso Bildu representa, en cierta forma, una ruptura con la doctrina que el Tribunal Constitucional ha construido acerca de la ilegalización de partidos políticos. El control de formaciones políticas en la fase de proclamación de candidatos, el valor de la condena del terrorismo o el papel que le corresponde desempeñar al Alto Tribunal en la fiscalización de las decisiones del Tribunal Supremo, tienen en parte un nuevo sentido en la controvertida decisión del Tribunal Constitucional.

scholarly journals KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENEGASAN HIEARAKI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF STUFEN THEORIE

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Uncertainty

Rule lower against the rules of higher then lower regulation it can test the material (judicial review) to be canceled entirely or partially canceled. The assertion of hierarchy intended to prevent overlap between legislation that could give rise to legal uncertainty. Position regulations set by the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) House of Representatives (DPR), the Regional Representatives Council (DPD), the Supreme Court (MA), the Constitutional Court (MK), the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), Commission Judicial (KY) , Bank Indonesia (BI), the Minister, the Agency, Organization, or commissions, in the Indonesian legal system recognized by Act No. 12 of 2011 either were born because of higher regulatory mandate and within the scope and authority of the minister. Thus, no doubt that the regulations set by state institutions, have binding force that must be obeyed by the parties set forth therein. While the Regulations issued policy also recognized as an Freies Ermessen in the execution of its duties and functions.<br /><br />

scholarly journals TITIK SINGGUNG WEWENANG MAHKAMAH AGUNG DENGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Saldi Isra
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Hierarchical System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The mixing of authority between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court has raised a range of issues. In turn, there is the contact authority of the two institutions which could lead to the occurrence of legal uncertainty. In connection with the authority testing regulations, for example, although the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court have the same right to test the legislation, but with different types and hierarchy of legislation being tested, then the interpretation of the rules of the legislation for which they were these institutions must be subject to a hierarchical system of laws and regulations that apply. Therefore, the validity of the norm is derived from the legislation is higher. Moreover, any decision of the judicial review of the UUD, this decision is erga omnes, including for judges of the Supreme Court and judges of the court under the Supreme Court.Keywords : Authority, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court

scholarly journals DEFAMATION OF SCHOOL TEACHERS BY LEARNERS Le Roux v Dey 2011 3 SA 274 (CC)

Obiter ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Neethling ◽  
JM Potgieter
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Sexual Activity ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
School Teachers ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Vice Principal ◽  
Court Of Appeal

In Le Roux v Dey a vice-principal at a well-known secondary school in Pretoria instituted two separate claims for sentimental damages under the actio iniuriarum for insult (infringement of dignity) and defamation (infringement of reputation) against three school learners. The defendants published manipulated pictures of the plaintiff and the principal of the school depicting them both naked and sitting alongside each other with their hands indicative of sexual activity or stimulation. The school crests were superimposed over their genital areas. The plaintiff succeeded with both claims in the High Court (Dey v Le Roux 2008-10-28 case no 21377/06 (GNP)) butthe Supreme Court of Appeal (Le Roux v Dey 2010 4 SA 210 (SCA)) held that the separate claim for insult was ill-founded because in assessing damages for defamation, the court should also take the plaintiff’s humiliation into account. The Supreme Court of Appeal nevertheless confirmed the trial court’s award of R45 000. The defendants appealed to the Constitutional Court.

The Mechanism of Case Reopening Based on New and Newly Discovered Circumstances: Aims, Meaning, Judicial Interpretation (the final part)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Elvina I. Fagmanova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Final Part ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Judicial Interpretation ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the research of the mechanism in the reconsidering judicial acts under reopened or new circumstances as providing the necessary deviation from the requirement of stability in judicial practice to correct an erroneous judicial act, an analysis of the grounds for reviewing and the importance of judicial review procedures in the system. The author pays an attention to discussions about the possibility of reconsidering a judicial act, due to the development of the position of the supreme court on legal issues, on its borders. The article also analyzes the most important judicial practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the ECHR, and the Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme court of the Russian Federation, which substantively reveal the approach of these courts to the mechanism in reconsidering judicial acts under reopened or new circumstances.

Managing the Supreme Court: The Chief Justice, Management, and Consensus

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Daniel Ura ◽  
Carla M. Flink
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Public Management ◽  
Judicial Politics ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Chief Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court

In this article, we draw on a prominent model of public management to develop a preliminary theoretical approach to understanding the role of the chief justice in Supreme Court decision-making. In particular, we argue that the Court may seek legitimacy through greater unanimity and discuss how the leadership of the chief justice can facilitate that effort. We assess a hypothesis derived from this theory, showing greater agreement among the justices as the incumbent chief justice’s tenure in office increases. We argue that these results provide support for further attention to and development of a public administration-based approach to the study of Supreme Court decision-making. The application of public administration to judicial politics provides further evidence of management dynamics in American institutions.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 447
Author(s):  
R. Nazriyah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
High Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Direct Elections

The problem to be studied in this paper is which body has the authority to resolve election disputes after the decision of the Constitutional Court? What  are the considerations that the court overturned its own authority to resolve dispute elections? Based on the results of analysis it can be concluded that; first, based on the decision No. 97 / PUU-XI / 2013 of the Constitutional Court, it is considered that, “... the legislators are also able to determine that direct elections were not part of  the formal Election as mentioned in section 22E of the 1945 Constitution. So that the dispute of the result is determined as an additional authority of the Supreme Court .. . “The second, the most appropriate agency to handle election disputes is the Supreme Court, which then delegates to the High Court in each region. If litigants are not satisfied with the decision of the High Court, they may appeal to  the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Law No. 1 2015 About Election of governors, regents, and mayors, was handed over to the Constitutional Court (although temporary) to resolve the election disputes. Therefore, it is immediate to establish regulations particularly the governing competent institution to resolve election disputes.

scholarly journals EKSEKUTABILITAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TERHADAP PENCALONAN ANGGOTA DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 287
Author(s):  
Tahegga Primananda Alfath
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
Election Commission

ABSTRAKKomisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) membuat Peraturan KPU Nomor 26 Tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan KPU Nomor 14 Tahun 2018 tentang Pencalonan Perseorangan Pemilu Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah yang khususnya diatur dalam Pasal 60A. Akan tetapi ketentuan pada peraturan tersebut diputus telah bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, dan tidak boleh dimaknai berlaku surut oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam Putusan Nomor 65P/ HUM/2018. Atas adanya fakta hukum yang tidak koheren tersebut, diambil isu hukum terkait kepastian hukum dapat atau tidaknya calon anggota Dewan Perwakilan Daerah yang juga merupakan pengurus (fungsionaris) partai. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini, pertama, terdapat kesesatan dalam penalaran hukum pada ratio decidendi Putusan Nomor 65P/HUM/2018. Kedua, putusan Mahkamah Agung tersebut dapat disimpangi oleh KPU, karena sebagaimana dalam kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi melakukan pengujian konstitusionalitas terhadap undang-undang yang bersifat erga omnes.Kata kunci: racio decidendi; penalaran hukum; Dewan Perwakilan Daerah.  ABSTRACT The General Election Commission (KPU) has enacted KPU Regulation Number 26 of 2018 concerning the Second Amendment to KPU Regulation Number 14 of 2018 over the Nomination of Individual Election of Regional Representative Council Members. The provisions of this regulation, especially Article 60A, contravene with Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Legislation Drafting Process. In the Decision Number 65P/HUM/2018, the Supreme Court should not retroactively interpret the KPU regulation. Due to the incoherent legal facts, legal issues raised in this article is about legal certainty whether a candidate of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) member can also become a political party official. This research uses legal research methods with normative, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research are as follows. The results of this research are as follows. First, there are errors in legal reasoning on the ratio decidendi of the Supreme Court Decision Number 65P/ HUM/2018. Second, the Supreme Court Decision can be distorted by the KPU because the court acted like the Constitutional Court reviewing an erga omnes law. Keywords: racio decidendi; legal reasoning; Regional Representative Council.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document