Government programmes as a tool for managing social and economic development at the meso-level: Analyzing and evaluating the implementation practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-54
Author(s):  
Boris G. PREOBRAZHENSKII

Subject. This article considers the processes of forming, developing and implementing State-run programmes at the meso-level. Objectives. The article aims to substantiate the requirements, principles and particularities of the formation of State-run programmes for regional development and analyze and evaluate the practices of their implementation. Methods. For the study, I used the methods of selective analysis, generalization, and the systems and logical framework approaches. Results. The article identifies certain positive and critical aspects of State-run programmes and formulates reasoned proposals to eliminate side effects arising when developing and implementing various State-run programmes. Conclusions. The article concludes that it is necessary to ensure the relevance of State-run programmes to the goals and objectives of the socio-economic development strategy at the meso-level. It is necessary to expand the scope of the simulated management of programme formation and implementation tools, as well, and meet and take into account the criteria and specifics of programme development.

2008 ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Senchagov

The core of Russia’s long-term socio-economic development strategy is represented by its conceptual basis. Having considered debating points about the essence and priority of the strategy, the author analyzes the logic and stages of its development as well as possibilities, restrictions and risks of high GDP rates of growth.


Author(s):  
M. S. Mokiy ◽  
E. K. Borzenko

The article on the basis of extrapolation of system laws of management of social and economic development illustrates the system reason of the Cobra effect, that is, a situation where, despite the rather attractive goals that managers formulate, the result of the activities of subordinates is opposite to what was intended. The main problem of management is the development of a system of indicators, in which, working on the indicator, employees would change the state in the right direction. The reason for the Cobra effect is the manifestation of systemic patterns of socio-economic development. The main system regularity is the desire of the system for stability and self-preservation. This state of the system is achieved using the least energy-consuming way. It is shown that any worker, realizing system regularities, aspires to stability and self-preservation. Therefore, the employee is always forced to work for achieving the indicator. The article analyzes the manifestation of these laws at the level of enterprises and state. When managers understand these patterns explicitly or covertly, changes in the economic system are moving in the right direction. It is shown that the existing system of target indicators used as indicators to assess the effectiveness of management does not meet the goals and objectives of socio-economic development. At the meso- and macrolevel, absolute, volumetric indicators, such as gross national product and others, reduce the range of benefits to the population. The article defines the vector of change in the system of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of management at the regional and state levels, based on the fact that the key element is the family. At the same time, the targets should be indicators to assess the availability of benefits for households.


Author(s):  
Vasyl Papp ◽  
Nelya Boshota

The main task that determines the effective functioning of the country is the formation of a strategy for its socio-economic development based on a long-term innovation strategy. An innovative development strategy of the country is defined as a fundamental, basic element of the overall strategy of socio-economic development. The purpose of the article is to develop the conceptual foundations for shaping the country's socio-economic development strategy in modern conditions, adjusting the priority directions of the strategy and the peculiarities in using the means of achieving the goals, taking into account European experience. The article examines the European practice of developing and implementing the strategy of socio-economic development of the country as the most important instrument of the state's influence on social and economic development. Recommendations on the use of advanced strategic planning tools are developed. It is proved that without the scientific and methodological support of the plan of socio-economic development of the country it is impossible to count on the successful solution of important tasks and the democratization of public relations. The concept of strategy formation is designed to take into account the interests of economic entities and territory and to cover not only the traditionally used sectoral aspect of development, but also the territorial, which includes the creation and development of clusters and special economic zones. European experience shows that transition of a country to an innovative socially oriented type of development requires an increase in the efficiency of the state strategic planning process, the achievement of which is possible only with the co-ordinated activity of state authorities, business structures, science and society. It should be emphasized that in the prevailing conditions there is a need to form a single integrated system of social and economic development planning that optimally combines both the use of strategic planning and the program-target method for solving urgent problems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Jonathan Allan

<p>What are the most important factors related to economic development? This paper explores the essential variables necessary for destination development and inward direct investment. These variables include: quality of living, quality of infrastructure, and quality of workforce. Quality of living is considered the most important of these to spur on economic development. Many business operators would rather live where they invest making quality of place an equally important variable that is intrinsically linked to quality of living. Destination development through place-building techniques, informed by the concept of <em>baukultur,</em>is assessed using quality of living, economic development and economic diversification as markers. Quality of living and quality of place are inherently connected when attracting business and growing employment, therefore, these two terms will be referred to as QLP throughout this paper..  Intended to help program and policy planners understand these concepts, this paper will explore cases of successful exercises of destination development that involve recreation and culture-oriented place building. The paper will then look at how to apply learned QLP concepts toward a culture- and recreation-led economic development strategy for the small foothills community of Sundre, Alberta. </p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>place building, quality of place, quality of living, <em>baukultur</em>, QLP, development, economic development, destination development, inward direct investment, creative class</p>


Author(s):  
Riri Lestari

Abstract The purpose of this research is to create Economic Development Strategy in Halal Tourism Area in Sembalun of East Lombok Regency and formulate economic development strategy by doing analysis of AHP (Analythical Hierarchy Process). How to take informants in this study using Purposive Sampling. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion that has been done before, the strategy of Economic Development of Halal Tourism Area In Sembalun, East Lombok Regency is still in the low category seen from the income of society and life is still very simple. To overcome these problems then need some strategies that are growth strategy, development strategy and equity, and strategy with insight of space. The criteria for economic development are 1) capital assistance for society (0.863) 2) IT based technology (0.819) 3) Increasing employment opportunities for the community (0.781) 4) Higher education 0.716 5) Reducing Unemployment (0.673).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document