Russia’s Development Strategy: Guidelines and Restrictions

2008 ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Senchagov

The core of Russia’s long-term socio-economic development strategy is represented by its conceptual basis. Having considered debating points about the essence and priority of the strategy, the author analyzes the logic and stages of its development as well as possibilities, restrictions and risks of high GDP rates of growth.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Elena Yurevna Legchilina

The paper studies the organizational and institutional problems in the field of labor relations transformation and substantiates novel principles of their designing aimed at achieving the balance between the interests of the parties. We used a system-axiological approach based on a combination of analytical, institutional and systemic methods. The concept of co-evolution was applied while considering organizational and institutional aspects of social and labor relations. The study proposes axiological dialectics as a systemic and meaning-forming factor in the transformation of labor relations. The author understands the transformation of labor relations as a construction of their novel organizational and inter-organizational structure intended to ensure the long-term functioning and development of the company. The analysis of organizational and institutional bases of labor relations is carried out and four principles for the construction of labor relations in the transformation state in respect to economic systems are developed. The proposed organizational and institutional methodology and principles for labor relations designing can reduce contradictions in the system of labor relations and help achieve a balance of its participants’ interests. They can also serve as a conceptual basis for building the system of labor relations under transformation, as well as a way to shape the socio-economic development strategy of a company and/or an economic system.


2017 ◽  
pp. 34-47
Author(s):  
Hoi Le Quoc ◽  
Nam Pham Xuan ◽  
Tuan Nguyen Anh

The study was targeted at developing a methodology for constructing a macroeconomic performance index at a provincial level for the first time in Vietnam based on 4 groups of measurements: (i) Economic indicators; (ii) oriented economic indicators; (iii) socio-economic indicators; and (iv) economic - social – institutional indicators. Applying the methodology to the 2011 - 2015 empirical data of all provinces in Vietnam, the research shows that the socio-economic development strategy implemented by those provinces did not provide balanced outcomes between growth and social objectives, sustainability and inclusiveness. Many provinces focused on economic growth at the cost of structural change, equality and institutional transformation. In contrast, many provinces were successful in improving equality but not growth. Those facts threaten the long-term development objectives of the provinces.


Author(s):  
Ilan Sherr ◽  
Katrien Miclotte ◽  
Rebecca Fawcett-Feuillette

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role in the economic development strategy of the European Union. However, while SMEs are important for job creation and economic development, the Commission has highlighted that they often encounter problems accessing finance and necessary information. In order to address certain market failures which impact SMEs most significantly, SMEs now have a favoured status under the state aid rules. The most important and recent changes are a consequence of the Commission’s state aid modernization (SAM) reform package. As part of the SAM package, the Commission has adopted ten guidelines and five regulations to render existing state aid control instruments and procedures more efficient. This chapter gives a brief but practical overview of those new guidelines and regulations and highlights the core principles that need to be taken into account when assessing aid possibilities for SMEs.


Author(s):  
Alla Yu. Trusova ◽  
Vladimir I. Aksenov

The complexity of the socio-economic situation at all levels requires a detailed study of the regional development strategy issues and monitoring the implementation of presidential and government decrees. Various approaches to management were considered, for example, the national projects development implementation issues. National projecting, as a new tool for implementing state concepts, is an effective management method. The set of the project office functions provides control over the implementation of national projects at the level of development of municipalities of the Russian Federation. Historically, the level of socio-economic development of the territory has been measured and is measured using the identification of long-term trends in the development of key socio-economic indicators. The article presents a methodology that allows you to evaluate the effectiveness of project management tools since based on the results of its assessment, you can make informed management decisions and judge the effectiveness of the work of local authorities. Therefore, the aim of the scientific article was to develop an effective methodology that allows us to evaluate the effectiveness of the project office functions implemented in the management of the socio-economic development of the municipality. As a result of the study, systemic relationships were revealed of the impact of the project office on the indicators of the socio-economic development of the municipality, which was presented in the work as an important aspect of the study, the significance of which is due to the priorities of sustainable, balanced, competitive, integrated development of the Russian regions. In connection with the socio-economic policy pursued by the state, which requires speedy acceleration of the socio-economic development of municipalities, the effectiveness of the result of the application of the project approach in the municipal authorities was studied in detail.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
pp. 60-83
Author(s):  
Yurii RADIONOV ◽  

The article substantiates the need for the formation and implementation of the socio-economic development strategy of the country as a basis for sustainable and dynamic development. International and domestic experience, formation and approval of the strategy are analyzed. Based on the study and analysis of the situation, the author proposed a mechanism for determining the priorities of the strategy, the application of criteria of relevance and feasibility as a basis for setting priorities. Relevance criteria are divided into critical, important and desirable, where a critical priority is the event that must be carried out at a certain time despite the necessary resources; an important priority is one that has a positive effect on efficiency, but is determined by the resource limit, and a desirable priority is one that can have a positive effect on efficiency, but resources and deadlines depend on their availability after the implementation of other measures. The implementation criterion is divided into political, technical and financial. Political implementation involves the support of the government and the parliament in the adoption of relevant laws, regulations and more. The technical implementation of the strategy is based on the appropriate infrastructure, potential, complexity, timing, as well as the sequence of implementation of certain activities. The financial criterion is based on financial needs, capital and other expenditures, the need to increase efficiency or mobilize additional financial resources. The need to prepare an operational plan, which should be holistic, clear, specific, flexible, clear, controlled, easy to manage and interrelated with the budget, is justified. The operational plan should encourage executors to act without confusion or misinterpretation of what should be done, how and when.


Author(s):  
Yevhen Kachan ◽  
Andrii Kotsur

The article outlines the main factors of the formation and implementation of regional policy at the micro-region level in order to ensure the proper economic capacity of the territorial community. In the conditions of decentralization, the local self-government bodies are almost independent and fully responsible for the state of socio-economic development of communities. The main factors that should be taken into account in the development of socio-economic regional policy at the level of the united territorial communities are the following: the state of the regional labor market development; the state of use of internal regional factors for the development of productive forces; the state of the road infrastructure; social needs of the region population. It is necessary to implement the regional policy of the united territorial communities for the sake of solving complex problems on the basis of the development strategy of this community, in particular with a view of ensuring the financial autonomy and economic capacity. In the developing of the socio-economic development strategy of the microregion, the main principles should be: focusing on the needs and interests of people living in the microregion; longterm vision of the territory development; a comprehensive and holistic approach of solving current problems; grounding on a comprehensive analysis of the status of local regional development; active and effective public participation. The key components of the socio-economic development strategy of the micro-region should be: assessment of its resource potential; analysis of the demographic situation in the microregion; analysis of labor potential and its employment; modern state of micro-region economic development; study of the state infrastructure available to it; a generalized analysis of the socio-economic situation in the microregion and challenges in the future; priority directions of microregion development; regional micro-region development programs.


2022 ◽  
pp. 72-89
Author(s):  
B. N. Porfiriev ◽  
A. A. Shirov ◽  
A. Y. Kolpakov ◽  
E. A. Edinak

The climate agenda involves significant economic dimension and component. This is precipitated, on the one hand, by the climate change impact on the economy and its implications for economic development that necessitate costs for planning and implementing adaptation measures, and, on the other hand, by the imperatives of structural and technological modernization of the economy to strengthen its competitiveness and sustainability of socio-economic development including reduction of industrial greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions and increasing the ecosystems’ carbon sink capacity. The above implies harmonization of ecological, climatic, socio-economic, and technological characteristics to produce an effective national low GHG emissions socio-economic development strategy required by the Paris Climate Agreement. This in turn calls for comprehensive assessment of the impact produced by new low-carbon technologies on economic dynamics using the framework of macrostructural calculations and scenarios of economic development of Russia with different volumes of funding invested in decarbonization. It is argued that the most efficient is a group of so-called moderate scenarios that provide for both GHG reduction and economic growth rates above the global average. More ambitious scenarios involve risks of slowing GDP growth given weighty additional investment which constrains the dynamics of household consumption. The key role of the Russian ecosystems capacity to absorb and sequester carbon in implementation of the low GHG emissions socio-economic development strategy is substantiated and the imperative for the complex of measures to improve the efficiency of land use and forestry resources (LULUCF), primarily the quality of R&D and the national monitoring system development, is emphasized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document