scholarly journals PENERAPAN PEMBERIAN HIBAH BERDASARKAN PASAL 920 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DILIHAT DARI ASAS LEGITIEME PORTIE (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 2954K/PDT/2017)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
Vanessa Vanessa ◽  
Stanislaus Atalim
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

The problem that often occurs in the case of grants is that legal grants are often found or grants that are legally flawed or canceled. The event of a grant which was declared legally flawed was also found in the case of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2954K/Pdt/2017. Article 920 of the Civil Code about reduced, by which the article is not listed in the decision. On this basis, a problem arises namely how the application of grants based on Article 920 of the Civil Code can be seen from the principle of legal inheritance share. In answering these problems, the author uses normative legal research methods. Based on the results of the study, it can be seen that with the cancellation of the grant deed by the court's decision and if the heirs who demanded the cancellation of the grant be accompanied by demanding a legal inheritance share, a reduction must be made. Then the author can conclude that the implementation of Article 920 of the Civil Code important to be carried out by the heirs concerned, because by the judge's decision regarding the distribution according to legal inheritance share, so the Article 920 of the Civil Code automatically applicable. The advice that can be given is better for the community to distribute inheritance and provide grants during their lifetime in a fair and equitable manner to avoid problems regarding the grant being declared null and void.

scholarly journals Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia dalam Menciptakan Hakim Agung Yang Berkualitas dan Berintegritas

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Muslim Mamulai
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Kajian ini untuk mengkaji eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesa dalam menciptakan hakim agung yang berkualitas dan berintegritas. Metode peneltia yang digunaka menggunakan metode peneltian hukum normatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 24B ayat (1) UUD 1945 mengalami dinamika dan perubahan dalam penafsiran baik pada tingkat legislasi di DPR, ajudikasi di Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung, maupun pada tingkat regulasi di Mahkamah Agung dan Komisi Yudisial.Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial mengusulkan pengangkatan hakim agung telah mengalami perluasan makna mencakup hakim ad hoc di Mahkamah Agung serta penguatan dengan dihapuskan kewenangan DPR untuk memilih calon hakim agung dan hanya menyetujui atau tidak menyetujui calon hakim agung usulan Komisi Yudisial. This study is to study the existence of the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia in creating high-quality judges with integrity. The research method used uses normative legal research methods. The results showed that the authority of the Judicial Commission as referred to in Article 24B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution experienced dynamics and changes in interpretation both at the legislative level in the DPR, adjudication in the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court, as well as in the Supreme Court and Judicial Commission. The existence of the Judicial Commission proposing the appointment of a Supreme Court judge has broadened the meaning including ad hoc judges in the Supreme Court and strengthened by abolishing the authority of the DPR to elect candidate judges and only approving or not approving candidates for the proposed Judicial Commission.

Law, Custom, and Social Norms: Civil Adjudications in Qing and Republican China

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-104
Author(s):  
Xiaoqun Xu
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Social Norm ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Chinese History ◽  
Republican China ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
Republican Period ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Moral Universe ◽  
The Republic

This study examines how law, custom, and social norm interacted in civil justice in Qing and Republican China by looking into 152 civil cases tried in 1912, right after the founding of the Republic of China, and a body of legal interpretations from the Supreme Court during 1912-1929, and certain provisions in the Civil Code of 1929-30--the very first one in Chinese history. It shows that both law and custom were invoked by judges within their moral universe or social norm. It traces how the Supreme Court allowed local customs to be a legal ground for rulings in certain civil disputes, and which customs in civil matters in the Qing and the early Republic were, and which were not, “hardened” into the Civil Code. The interplay between law and custom, mediated by judges with their normative sense of right and wrong, constituted both continuity and change in civil justice between the Qing era and the Republican period. Ultimately, the issues addressed here speak to a larger question of how Chinese jurists, within their judicial discretions, tried to strike a difficult but necessary balance between “law-on-books” and “law-in-action,” while law on the books was undergoing important revisions.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS KONSENSUALISME DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI ONLINE

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Bunga Sasmita ◽  
I Wayan Novy Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Online Trading ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Penelitian ini bertujuan untukemahami bagaimanakah pengaturan jual beli online dalam hukum di Indonesia dan bagaimanakah aspek hukum jual beli secara online dalam perjanjian.  Penelitian ini, menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Sedangkan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah menggunakan pendekatan fakta dan statute approach. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pengaturan mengenai jual beli secara online diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 18 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, yang mana sebagai penerapan pasal 1313 KUHPerdata. Para pihak yang mengadakan perjanjian bisa menerapkan KUHPerdata yang jadi dasar diakui sahnya perjanjian dimana keabsahannya tercantum syarat 1320 KUHPerdata yakni:   kecakapan, kesepakatan, suatu sebab yang halal dan suatu hal tertentu.Sedangkan penerapan asas Konsensualisme dalam perjanjian online yang didasarkan oleh ketentuan dalam Pasal 1313 KUHPerdata yang menegaskan bahwa adanya suatu perjanjian berarti pihak satu dengan pihak lainnya setuju untuk mengikatkan dirinya.   This study aims to understand how the online arrangement in the sale and purchase agreement and how the legal aspects of buying and selling online in the agreement. This research uses normative legal research methods. While the approach used is to use the fact approach and statute approach. The results of this study indicate that the regulation regarding online trading is regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, which is the legal basis for applying article 1313 of the Civil Code. The parties who entered into the agreement can apply the KUHPer which is the basis for the validity of the agreement where the validity is stated in the terms of the 1320 KUHPer, namely: skill, agreement, a halal cause and a certain thing. While the application of the principle of consensualism in an online agreement based on the provisions in Article 1313 of the KUHPer which confirms that an agreement means that one party with another party agrees to bind themselves.

PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MENANGANI KASASI PERKARA KARTEL PUTUSAN KPPU YANG MENGGUNAKAN ALAT BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG (INDIRECT EVIDENCE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-101
Author(s):  
Fransiska Lestari Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Republic

Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an institution authorized to handle unfair business competition violation. In fact, in several KPPU decisions it was revealed that KPPU prioritizes indirect evidence in handling cartel cases in Indonesia. KPPU's decision is not final and binding. Business actors who do not accept the decision of KPPU may file an objection at the District Court. The parties who do not accept the decision of the district court, may file an appeal in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The type of research is used in this research is normative legal research, that is research done by reviewing the rules of law applicable or applied to a certain legal problem. The result of the research shows that in the Supreme Court appeal, KPPU's decision was upheld and canceled by Supreme Court to KPPU's decision uses indirect evidence in handling cartel case. The basis of consideration of the Supreme Court Justices ruling the KPPU's decision in the case of the tire cartel and the cement cartel is the Chief Justice accepting and acknowledging the indirect evidence as valid evidence, since the evidence is sufficient and logical evidence, and there is no evidence the more powerful that can weaken the indirect evidence. While the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge overturning the KPPU's decision in the case of cartel fuel surcharger is not accepting and acknowledging indirect evidence as valid evidence, because the evidence is insufficient and illogical, and there is stronger evidence that can weaken the tool indirect evidence

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Pengajuan Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali pada Perkara Pidana dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
I Made Widi Adi Peremana ◽  
A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
The Republic

The study of this research is the submission of requests for reconsideration in criminal cases in the Indonesian legal system which became a polemic after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 34 / XI-PUU / 2013 and Circular Letter of the Supreme Court (SEMA) Number 7 of 2014 concerning Submission of Reappeals in Cases Criminal. The research objectives to be achieved, in this case, are the regulation of legal reconsideration efforts in Indonesia and the procedure for submitting a request for review in the Indonesian system. Researchers use a normative juridical approach or library research or doctrinal legal research which can be interpreted as legal research by examining library materials and secondary materials. This study illustrates that the regulations for reconsideration in the legal system in Indonesia are based on various regulations, namely Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Supreme Court, Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2014 concerning Review of Criminal Cases and Submission of Reconsiderations at this time refers to the provisions of the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2014 concerning Reconsideration in Criminal Cases.  

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Pencurian sebagai Tindak Pidana Ringan Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Gede Mahadi Waisnawa Hanata Putra ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
East Indies ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
A Minor

Indonesian Criminal Law is currently a legacy from the Dutch East Indies Government which has been adapted and passed by Law No. 16 of 1946 to be implemented nationally. The purpose of this research is to describe the regulation of theft of minor crimes in the Criminal Code before the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 and to describe the juridical consequences of Supreme Court Regulation No.2 of 2012 on theft as a minor criminal act in the Criminal Code. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results show that according to Article 206 of the Criminal Procedure Code, procedures for granting authority to investigate and review cases are carried out by the investigator himself and should not be disturbed by the prosecutor. This Perpres adjusts articles 364, 373, 379, 384, 407 and article 482 of the Criminal Code to Rp. 2,500,000.00. Therefore, fulfill this element of the requirement and enter a case where the value of the commodity does not exceed Rp. 2,500,000.00. Therefore, the case is examined by expedited procedure, which is tried by a judge, and the assignment and review of the case is carried out by the investigator himself without the interference of the prosecutor.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA KONSUMEN (Studi Putusan No 481 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1087
Author(s):  
Takenia Tifany ◽  
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law

Consumer Protection Law regulates the legal protection of consumer and including Consumer Dispute Completion Firm who autorhized to resolve consumer disputes who feel harmed over the acts of business from people that sometimes arbitrary, but decisions taken by Consumer Dispute Completion Firm often incriminate business actors, and usually seem to exceed the limit of their authority even wrong in applying the law. Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to adjudicate and decide a dispute is induced by Supreme Court’s decision which makes Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to limited. Therefore, the writer proposed an issue about how are the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority in adjudicate and decide a consumer disputes? And how are the implementation and Supreme Court’s views regarding the limitation of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority? The writer examines the problem using normative legal research methods that use secondary data. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm authority in solving consumer disputes are limited to the agreement between both parties. In sense the Supreme Court believes that all transactions based on an agreement become the jurisdiction of the court

scholarly journals KONSEP PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA DALAM PERKARA KEPAILITAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Nelson Kapoyos
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Simple Proof ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mempermasalahkan pembuktian sederhana dalam proses kepailitan terkait kewajiban pemberitahuan adanya peralihan piutang (cessie) kepada debitur. Putusan Nomor 02/PDT.SUS.PAILIT/2014/PN.Niaga.Mks telah mengabulkan permohonan kreditur cessionaries yang dikuatkan oleh Putusan Nomor 19 K/PDT.SUSPAILIT/2015, namun pada upaya hukum peninjauan kembali majelis hakim justru mengabulkan permohonan peninjauan kembali dengan alasan pembuktian sederhana terhadap cessie belum diberitahukan kepada debitur secara resmi melalui juru sita pengadilan. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini ialah bagaimana konsep pembuktian sederhana dalam kepailitan terhadap kewajiban pemberitahuan pengalihan piutang (cessie) pada pertimbangan majelis hakim peninjauan kembali Nomor 125 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2015. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah konsep pembuktian sederhana di dalam pembuktian kepailitan tidak ada kewajiban pemberitahuan secara resmi melalui juru sita pengadilan karena Pasal 613 BW tidak mengaturnya, pemberitahuan hanya diajukan secara tertulis dan bisa kapanpun diberitahukan kepada debitur. Kata kunci: kepailitan, pembuktian sederhana, cessie.ABSTRACTThis analysis intends to question the simple proof in bankruptcy proceedings related to the transition of receivable notification obligation (cessie) to the debtors. The Commercial Court Decision Number 02/PDT.SUS.PAILIT/2014/PN.Niaga.Mks has granted the petitions of creditor’s cessionary which was strengthened by the Supreme Court Decision Number 19 K/PDT.SUSPAILIT/2015, but on the judicial review attempt, the Supreme Court has granted the petition for the judicial review on the grounds that a simple proof of cessie has not been officially disclosed to the debtor through a court bailiff. The formulation of this research problem is how the concept of simple proof in bankruptcy proceeding to the obligation of notification of transfer of receivables (cessie) in the consideration of Court Decision Number 125 PK/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2015. The research method of this analysis is normative legal research. This analysis resolves thatin the simple proof concept of the bankruptcy proceedings, there is no obligation of official notice through the court bailiff because it is not set on Article 613 of Indonesia Civil Code Law, so the notification is only submitted in writing and may at any time be notified to the debtor. Keywords: bankruptcy, simple proof, cessie.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TUGAS MEDIATOR PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DENGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Mardalena Hanifah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Materials Processing ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Article 3 (2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures, Case Examining Judges in the consideration of a decision must state that the case has been pursued peace through mediation by mentioning the mediator. The court is not only tasked with examining, trying, and resolving cases it receives but also seeks to reconcile the parties. The court, which has been impressed as a law enforcement and justice institution, now appears as an institution that seeks peaceful solutions for the parties. The implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts can be an eff ort to resolve civil disputes so that the settlement of civil disputes through mediation is the main choice. The research method used is normative legal research which includes research on legal principles which is very basic in guided law. The nature of the research carried out is descriptive, namely research that describes and explains in clear and detailed sentences. The data used are secondary data obtained from literature, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Processing and data analysis used qualitative methods. The defi nition of mediation according to the Religious Courts in Indonesia and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia is the eff ort of the judges and courts to reconcile the parties so that the divorce process does not continue at the next trial. When the mediation process was carried out at the Indonesian Religious Court and the Syari’ah Court in Malaysia, there was a similarity, namely the mediation process was carried out at the fi rst trial and it was an obligation for the disputing parties in a divorce case to take mediation. according to the procedure for the appointment of mediators at the Indonesian Religious Courts and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia and the appointments of these mediators are both made by the judges. 

scholarly journals Kedudukan dan Efektivitas Justice Collaborator di dalam Hukum Acara Pidana

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-256
Author(s):  
Adi Syahputra Sirait
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Analysis Instrument ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Illicit Trafficking

This article aims to analyze and explain the position of justice collaborator in criminal procedural law and the effectiveness of justice collaborator in proof, as an analysis instrument this research uses a case study of a narcotics-specific criminal decision in the Supreme Court where narcotics is an extraordinary crime committed in an organized manner by a drug syndicate narcotics, this research uses a social legal research approach using juridical type, the research data is obtained from an analysis of the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 920K / Pid.Sus / 2013 which is then analyzed using the effectiveness theory. The Supreme Court Judge determines the defendant as a justice collaborator based on the Supreme Court circular number 4 of 2011 regarding the treatment of whistleblowers and witnesses of collaborating actors (justice collaborator). The results of this study are that the supreme court judge considered the defendant's petition as a justice collaborator who could reveal the illicit trafficking network of international channels and also reveal the main perpetrators of the narcotics distribution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document