The Moderating Effects of Social Support on the Relationship between Emotional Labor and Job Performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-151
Author(s):  
John Jeong ◽  
Sang-hee Lee
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Job Performance ◽  
Emotional Labor ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
The Relationship

Unpacking the combined effects of job scope and supervisor support on in-role performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1170-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabia Mushtaq ◽  
Usman Raja ◽  
Mohammad Bashir Khan
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Job Performance ◽  
Design Research ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Supervisor Support ◽  
Job Design ◽  
Role Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Work Settings ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore how the relationship between job scope and in-role performance is contingent upon the level of social support (i.e. supervisor support) received in the workplace. Design/methodology/approach A total of 640 questionnaires were distributed to employees of Pakistani companies, yielding 328 useable responses for analysis. Regression analysis was used to test for both hypotheses. Findings The results support the role of supervisor support as a moderator in the relationship between in-role performance, a dimension of job performance and job scope. The findings show that a higher job scope would facilitate higher job performance from employees who receive high levels of supervisor support. Practical implications The results provide useful insights for managers and consultants, especially HR professionals involved in job design and redesign. Organizations that encourage high levels of social support can help employees improve their job performance as they foster an environment where employees can get direct assistance and advice from their supervisors. Originality/value This paper makes three key contributions to the literature on job design. First, this inquiry shows that a strong link does exist between job scope and job performance; previous studies have failed to find a strong relationship. Second, it highlights how social context, especially in highly challenging work settings, can shape employees’ proficiencies and behaviors. Third, this paper offers a novel perspective in job design research by incorporating a contextual moderator (i.e. supervisor support).

Workplace Arrogance and Job Performance

2018 ◽  
pp. 83-116
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Job Performance ◽  
Task Performance ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Theoretical Study ◽  
Contextual Performance ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Theoretical Contribution ◽  
The Relationship

This chapter is an attempt to clarify the relationship between workplace arrogance and job performance. Thus, the authors focus and define a set of four fundamental concepts—task performance, contextual performance, social support, and self-efficacy—in order to examine and explore this relationship. Hence, the main result of this theoretical study is that workplace arrogance is negatively related to job performance. Although this finding could be considered as a theoretical contribution, more studies are requested to investigate the specific relationship between workplace arrogance and job satisfaction with its two dimensions: task and contextual factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document