scholarly journals PENGARUH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP AGRESIVITAS PAJAK PERUSAHAAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Delitha Magfira E.G ◽  
Murtanto Murtanto

<p>The objective of this research is to examine and analyze the effect of corporate governance, firm size and profitability towards tax aggressiveness. The sampel was extracted using purposive sampling method, which is 61 mining companies that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2017-2019. This research uses multiple linear regression analysis method. The result from this research showed that independent commissioners and firm size have negative impact towards tax aggresiveness, while institusional ownership have a positif impact towards tax aggressiveness, and audit committee and profitability have no impact towards Tax Aggressiveness.</p>

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Liki Melati ◽  
Ardiani Ika Sulistyawati

This study aimed to analyze the effect of firm size, firm size, solvency, and profitability to the audit delay. This study uses secondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This population is a mining company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2012-2014 period as many as 12 companies. The samples in this study using purposive sampling method. Performed during the observation period of 3 (three) years ie 2012-2014.Data analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the research that company size and profitability significantly influence audit delay. While the size of the firm and the solvency does not significantly influence audit delay.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvia Launa ◽  
Novita Weningtyas Respati

The purpose of this research is to examine the influence of the corporate governance mechanism and firm size concerning to the earnings management. Corporate governance mechanism in this study include managerial ownership, independent commissioner and audit committee. The samples of this research are 7 real estate companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2009-2013. This study using a purposive sampling method to determining the number of samples used. The method of analysis on this research is using multiple linear regression analysis. The result of the study shows that managerial ownership, independent commissioner, auditcommittee and firm size are not influence to earnings management. Managerial ownership has no influence to earnings management due to low managerial ownership owned by the samplecompany, while the independent commissioner has no influence because the placement of theindependent commissioner only act to fulfill the formal provisions. Audit committee has noinfluence to earnings management because the member size of audit committee still relativelystandard with the Capital Market Supervisory Agency regulation and firm size has no influenceto earnings management because earnings management’s action not influenced by the firm size.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 105-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulia Saftiana ◽  
Mukhtaruddin ◽  
Krisna Winda Putri ◽  
Ika Sasti Ferina

Earnings management (EM) is manipulation done by management in preparing financial statement in order to gain management advantages or to increase the firm value. EM can reduce the quality of financial statements because it does not show the real earning periodical. This research aims to identify the effect of good corporate governance (GCG) (institutional ownership, managerial ownership, frequency of board meetings, frequency of audit committee (AC) meetings), firm size, and leverage on the EM. Population comprises the companies in LQ 45 index of Iindonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2010–2014. Samples of the research were taken using purposive sampling method, and the variables are tested using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the research show that partially, only leverage has significant effect on EM, while institutional ownership, managerial ownership, frequency of board meeting, frequency of AC meetings, and firm size have no significant effect on EM, but all of the variables have simultaneously significant effect on EM. Limitations of the research are the only used 6 independent variables and 21 companies as samples of the research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-117
Author(s):  
Sylvi Angelia ◽  
Rizal Mawardi

Objective – The purpose of this study is to examine the effect between financial distress, corporate governance, auditor switching and audit delay. This research sample using data on a manufacturing company on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Methodology – The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis technique. Findings– The research finding show that financial distress and the size of the audit committee have a significant effect on audit delay, while the concentration of ownership, managerial ownership, change of directors, and auditor switching has no significant effect on audit delay. Second finding explain that consideration for companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange to pay attention to the timeliness of submitting financial reports and independent auditor reports so as not to get sanctions from the Financial Services Authority. Novelty – Our novelty research using the relationship of Financial Distress, Corporate Governance and Auditor Switching on new research model to Audit Delay. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: M41, M42 Keywords: Financial Distress, Corporate Governance, Auditor Switching, Audit Delay


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Putri Nurmala ◽  
Akhmad Sigit Adiwibowo

<em>Bond ratings are a scale of risk of all bonds traded, which indicates how safe a bond is. The security of a bond is indicated by its ability to pay interest and repay the loan principal. The purpose of this study is to find out empirical evidence that good corporate governance has an effect on bond ratings. This study uses secondary data. The population in this study are non-financial companies listed on the IDX in 2014-2018. The research sample was selected using purposive sampling method. After subtraction with several criteria, as many as 20 companies were set as the sample. The analysis technique in this study uses multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership and audit committee have a significant effect on bond ratings. Meanwhile, the independent board of commissioners has no significant effect on bond ratings</em>


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-57
Author(s):  
Loh Wenny Setiawati

Economic growth that affects the welfare of the people can be pursued by investing. Investors will be interested to invest when the value of the company is high. Corporate value is an important concept for investors, because it is an indicator for the market to assess the company as a whole.  This study aims to examine the effect of profitability, firm size, leverage, and social disclosure of corporate value. This research uses purposive sampling method in conducting sample selection. The statistical method used to test the hypothesis is multiple linear regression analysis. This study uses 81 manufacturing industry companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011-2015.  The results of this study indicate that profitability, firm size, leverage, and social disclosure affect the value of the company.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Pipit Rabiatun ◽  
Irianto Irianto ◽  
Indah Ariffianti ◽  
Baiq Kisnawati

This study is aimed to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanisms, such as, independent board of. commissioner composition, board of commisioner size, audit committee, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership toward profit management. This research used 5 of food company and Baverages that was listed in Indonesia stock Exchange since 2014-2018. The sample of this research are selected by purposive sampling method. Analysis method of this research used multiple regression. Earnings management measured by using discretionary accrual. The result of this study showed that the result of regression as follow: = 7,365 + 0,631 XI + 0,553 X2 + 0,583 X3 + 0,674 X4 + 0,768 X5 + e. However the result of variable: (1) Composition of independent commissioner council has the effect of significant at profit management. It was proved by t value is higher than t table that was 4,291 > 2,085. (2) Standard of commissioner council has the effect of significant at profit management, it was proved by the result of t value is higher than t table that was 3,148 > 2,085. (3) the committee of audit has the effect of significant at profit management. It was proved by t value is higher than t value 3,569 > 2.085. (4) The ownership of constitutional has the effect of significant at profit management. It was proved by t value is higher than t table that was 4,422 > 2,085. (5) The ownership of managerial at profit management. It was proved by t value is higher than t table 5,618 > 2,085. (6) Composition of independent commissioner council, standard of commissioner council, the committee of audit, the ownership of constitutional, the ownership of managerial have the effect of significant at profit management. The result of calculation showed that f value that is 22,861, while f table 2,74 (22,861 > 2,74). It means that f value is higher than f table. The result of calculation of Composition of independent commissioner council, standard of commissioner council, the committee of audit, the ownership of constitutional, and the ownership of managerial showed that the value coofesien was 0,730 (73%) and the balance 0,270 (27%) it is described by other variable was not include in this research.


2019 ◽  
pp. 2154
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Shinta Oktaviani ◽  
Dodik Ariyanto

This study aims to determine the effect of financial distress, company size, and corporate governance on audit delay. This research was conducted at mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The number of samples taken was 32 companies so that there were 96 observations, with a purposive sampling method. The analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression. Based on the results of the analysis found that financial distress and independent board of commissioners have positive effect on audit delay. Firm size, audit committee and institutional ownership have negative effect on audit delay. Keywords: Financial distress, firm size, corporate governance, audit delay


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-213
Author(s):  
Farida Citra Dewi ◽  
Heikal Muhammad Zakaria

This study aims to determine the Effect of Third Party Funds and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) on Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted at SOE Banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2010-2019. This study uses multiple linear regression analysis method with a total sampling method. The results showed that: Third Party Funds had a positive and significant effect on Return on Assets (ROA). Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) has no significant effect on Return on Assets (ROA). Simultaneous Third Party Funds and Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) have a significant effect on Return on Assets (ROA).


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-107
Author(s):  
Anggi Aditya Fahmi ◽  
Priyo Hari Adi

The purpose of this study is to find out how the influence of companies with family ownership and liquidity on tax aggressiveness which is moderated by corporate governance in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013 to 2016. Corporate governance is proxied using independent commissioners and audit committees. The sample used in this study amounted to 212 selected using the purposive sampling method. The data analysis technique used are moderated regression analysis (MRA). The results showed that family ownership did not affect the tax aggressiveness, this means that companies with family ownership do not determine the company's actions in conducting tax aggressiveness. Liquidity has a significant positive effect on tax aggressiveness. The moderating variable of independent commissioners can moderate the influence of family ownership and liquidity on tax aggressiveness, while the moderating variable of the audit committee can moderate liquidity but cannot moderate family ownership against tax aggressiveness.    


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document