Factors Affecting Wound Healing in Individuals With Pressure Ulcers: A Retrospective Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azize Karahan ◽  
Aysel Abbasoglu ◽  
Sevcan Isik ◽  
Banu Cevik ◽  
Cigdem Saltan ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 986-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Taverna ◽  
Alonda C. Pollins ◽  
Giovanni Sindona ◽  
Richard M. Caprioli ◽  
Lillian B. Nanney

1999 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Misra ◽  
M. Mutha Rao ◽  
R. Kasiraj ◽  
N.S. Ranga Reddy ◽  
H.C. Pant

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 954.3-954
Author(s):  
S. Okita ◽  
H. Ishikawa ◽  
A. Abe ◽  
S. Ito ◽  
A. Murasawa ◽  
...  

Background:It has been suggested that perioperative use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients carries risks for the surgical-site infection and the delayed wound healing (DWH); however, the risk of DWH with perioperative use of bDMARDs has not reached a general consensus.Objectives:This retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with DWH after orthopedic surgery in RA patients treated with bDMARDs.Methods:We reviewed medical records of 277 orthopedic procedures for 188 RA patients treated with bDMARDs between from 2014 to 2017 in Niigata Rheumatic Center. As preoperative nutritional status assessment, we evaluated body mass index (BMI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and CONtrolling NUTritional status (CONUT). In addition, we evaluated DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR, face scale for pain, global health (GH), and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) to assess the disease activity. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factor for DWH.Results:The major characteristics of the patients in 277 procedures were mean age of 63.2 years old and mean disease duration of 18.2 years. Surgical site were hand and wrist (145 procedures), foot and ankle (76), hip and knee (31), elbow and shoulder (24), and spine (1). Seventy-four patients were treated with tocilizumab, 62 with etanercept, 55 with golimumab, 49 with abatacept, 16 with infliximab, 15 with adalimumab, and 6 with certolizumab. According to nutritional assessment in PNI and CONUT, 63% (n=175) and 47% (n=130) were normal nourished patients, respectively.In 277 procedures, DWH were identified in 24 patients (8.6%). The following variables were significant in the univariate analyses: disease duration (OR 1.053; 95% CI 1.010–1.099; p=0.016), foot and ankle surgery (OR 7.091; 95% CI 2.130–23.603; p=0.001), tocilizumab (OR 0.286; 95% CI 0.093–0.881; p=0.029) (Table 1). These variables were entered into a multivariate model, and it was revealed that pre-operative use of tocilizumab (OR 0.265; 95% CI 0.074–0.953; p=0.042) and procedures in the foot and ankle (OR 6.915; 95% CI 1.914–24.976; p=0.003) were associated with an increased risk of DWH (Table 1).Conclusion:As previous study on tocilizumab described, the current retrospective study suggested that pre-operative use of tocilizumab and procedures in the foot and ankle were risk factors for DWH. Pre-operative disease activity and nutritional status were not independent risk factors for an increase in the prevalence of DWH.References:[1] Momohara S, Hashimoto J, Tsuboi H et al. Analysis of perioperative clinical features and complications after orthopaedic surgery in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab in a real-world setting: Results from the multicentre tocilizumab in perioperative period (TOPP) study. Modern rheumatology. 2013, 23: 440-9.Disclosure of Interests:Shunji Okita: None declared, Hajime Ishikawa: None declared, Asami Abe: None declared, Satoshi Ito Speakers bureau: Abbvie,Eisai, Akira Murasawa: None declared, Keiichiro Nishida Grant/research support from: K. Nishida has received scholarship donation from CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL Co., Eisai Co., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma and AbbVie GK., Speakers bureau: K. Nishida has received speaking fees from CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL Co., Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Eisai Co. and AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation., Toshifumi Ozaki: None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Srivastava ◽  
P Khanal ◽  
D Zargaran ◽  
F Zoller ◽  
A Zargaran ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Pressure ulcers (PUs) affect over 700,000 patients per annum and are associated with an up to fourfold increase in mortality rate in older populations with complex pathologies. NICE guidelines for PU management involve a combination of low-grade technological interventions, including dressings and foam mattresses, while technology-centric therapies are not offered. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of any novel and high-grade technological PU interventions. Method The PubMed, Embase (via Ovid), Web of Science and CINAHL databases were electronically searched using free-text and MeSH search strings. Results evaluating the type of technological intervention, outcome measures and wound healing rates, duration of hospital stay, requirement for surgical debridement, infection and mortality rates were methodically assessed. Results An initial search identified 900 articles. Using the PRISMA guidance, 25 studies were included, encompassing 845 patients. 28 novel modalities of high-grade innovations were identified, with distinguished technologies including smart wireless bandages and 3D-printed wound repair scaffolds. Overall, 92.8% of devices demonstrated an improvement in wound healing (P < 0.05). A novel framework was created from the different innovations identified to approach adopting innovation in PU management. Conclusions The majority of high-technology innovations identified in this systematic review significantly improve PU healing, thus offering an additional pathway to standard care. Given the annual cost of PUs (£531 million), it is vital innovative technologies are considered as the NHS transitions into a digital age. Therefore, further studies are essential and recommended to evaluate the potential benefit of the promising, innovative technologies identified.


2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S1011-S1012
Author(s):  
F. Kraja ◽  
J. Dervishi ◽  
A. Hoti ◽  
E. Karaulli ◽  
I. Akshija ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
GF PEREIRA ◽  
M BALMITH ◽  
M NELL

Objective: A chronic wound fails to progress through the phases of wound healing in an orderly and appropriate process, and poses a major challenge to wound care professionals. Pressure ulcers (PUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are classified as chronic wounds. Antiseptics, such as povidone-iodine (PVP-I), are often used to treat bacterial infections in chronic wounds; however, their efficacy and ability to accelerate wound healing has come into question. As a result, current medical research is now focusing on alternative and natural antiseptic agents, such as honey, for the treatment of chronic wounds. The aim of this study was to analyze the wound healing effects of honey in PU and DFU treatment in comparison to standard antiseptic care. Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalKey was conducted to identify all published data of clinical trials and narrative reviews that investigated or reported the use of honey and standard antiseptics in the treatment of PUs and DFUs in adults. A keyword search was then performed using the following keywords: “PUs”, “DFUs”, “antiseptics”, “PVP-I”, “honey”, “Manuka honey (MH)”, and “wound healing”. Database restrictions were implemented based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, notably the report’s availability, completion status and language, the sample populations’ age, as well as, the date of publication. A preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyzes) diagram was constructed illustrating the study selection process. The eligibility of articles was assessed by the screening of titles, abstracts and full texts. A total of 12 articles were included in this study comprising of 775 patients with PUs, DFUs or a combination of PUs and DFUs. Results: Results indicated that honey reduced bacterial infection, reduced pain and edema experienced by patients, reduced the odor of the wound and promoted wound healing in the treatment of chronic ulcers. Honey was also found to be effective in the process of debridement and exudate removal. Conclusion: Honey was found to be highly effective in the treatment of PUs and DFUs and should be considered as an alternative to standard antiseptic care in the treatment of chronic wounds. However, the literature in this study is limited and so further research into honey and its antiseptic-promoting activity in wound healing is recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document