GUARANTEES AS AN ELEMENT OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF A JUDGE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaliy Hudyma ◽  
◽  
Myroslav Kovaliv ◽  
Andriy Pryveda ◽  
Khrystyna Kaydrovych ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Independent Judiciary ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article is devoted to the study of guarantees as an element of the legal status of a judge. The article considers the effectiveness of justice by the judiciary as an independent branch of state power, which is entrusted with the function of protecting the rights and legitimate interests of persons in the state. It is argued that the right to judicial protection can be properly realized only if there is an effective mechanism of judicial protection, which becomes real if there are guarantees for the activity of a judge. The independence and independence of the judiciary is due to the constitutional principle of separation of powers, proclaimed in the Constitution of Ukraine. However, it is in democracies that this principle acquires special significance, because we are talking about legally enshrined guarantees and effective mechanisms of «containment and balances» in the organization and activities of various branches of government. Each of the branches of government – legislative, executive and judicial, independently performs only its inherent functions, not obeying each other. Decisions are made by the judiciary due to their independence, because no additional approval by the bodies of other branches of government is required. The most important prerequisite for this is the protection of the judiciary from unlawful influence or interference from other actors. Only an independent judiciary can become the guarantor of the rule of law, the implementation of effective and accessible justice and a fair judicial decision of cases in the state. The guarantees of the judge's activity in the administration of justice are divided into three groups: guarantees of the procedural activity of the judge as the bearer of judicial power, the subject of the process; organizational and legal guarantees for the activity of a judge as a person holding a public office and is a member of the judicial community; social and legal guarantees of a judge as a citizen with a special legal status, limited in civil rights by legislation on the status of judges and occupying a separate position in society.

LEGAL STATUS NON-MUSLIM COMMUNITIES IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN THE XVI-XIX CENTURIES

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-110
Author(s):  
Александр Сквозников ◽  
Aleksandr Skvoznikov
Keyword(s):  
Ottoman Empire ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Religious Affiliation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Muslim Communities ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

The aim of the article is to investigate the legal status of non-Muslim communities in the Ottoman Empire. The author concluded that the sources of Islamic law, including the Koran and Islamic legal doctrine, formed the basis of the legal system of the Ottoman Empire, recognized the equality of people regardless of their racial, ethnic or religious affiliation. Non-Muslim subjects of the Ottoman Empire guaranteed the right to life, security of person and property, freedom of religion, freedom of economic activity, the right to judicial protection and protection against external enemies. However, the scope of rights and duties of citizens depend on their religious affiliation. The Ottoman Empire was essentially theocratic state, where Islam is the state religion and regularly held a dominant position among the other denominations. Served non-Muslim were somewhat limited in their rights: they could not come to the state, including military service, which does not allow us to talk about full equality of all subjects of the Ottoman Empire, regardless of religion.

scholarly journals SYNCHRONIZATION OF PROCEDURAL AND FINANCIAL (BANKING) FUSE OF THE IMMUNITY OF PROPERTY RIGHTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (37) ◽  
pp. 503-509
Author(s):  
V. Kantsir ◽  
V. Kushpit ◽  
A. Palyukh ◽  
I. Tsylyuryk ◽  
I. Kantsir
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Social Reproduction ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Context ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

Abstract. The article is devoted to analysis of the effectiveness of the main procedural legal and financial (banking) mechanisms designed to ensure the protection of property rights’ immunity. The legally regulated procedures of such protection are analyzed on platforms — both procedural and legal as well as financial and economic. There is no doubt that only in a state where the immunity of property is declared and guaranteed to the person can be provided the development of economic, intellectual, socially oriented activities. The effect of the principle of immunity of property rights is not absolute, but its restrictions are possible only on the grounds and in the manner prescribed by law. The topicality of the inviolability of property rights is due to the role of law as a platform for citizens’ property independence and their participation in the processes of social reproduction. The guarantee of property independence is the right of ownership of property and non-property rights, which is realized by giving a person the right to freely, unimpededly, and fully exercise the rights of the owner of personal property. The compliance of the inviolability of property rights during criminal proceedings is not properly ensured in the current CPC (The Criminal Procedure Code) of Ukraine; in particular, the movement of confiscated property is not regulated, which questions the novelty of inviolability. To improve the procedure for the protection of property rights, this is necessary to regulate at the legislative level the mechanism of protection and restoration of property rights of persons victimized by criminal offenses. The etymology of «inviolability» guarantees by law the protection of the status of the person from any encroachment. Inviolability in the economic and legal context is mainly understood as a person’s legal status, which is an unalterable guarantee against unauthorized restrictions by the state institutions — law enforcement, financial, court, and individuals and legal entities. An attempt is made to accumulate most of the latest achievements (both legislative, theoretically investigative and applied) on the issues of legal regulation of the studied financial and legal relations, based on which scientific views are substantiated, and proposals are developed to improve regulations in this area. The main vectors of economic and legal mechanisms for the protection of the inviolability of property rights, which would correlate with generally accepted European and world standards, have been identified. Keywords: the inviolability of property rights, property rights, principles of proceedings, judicial protection, seizure of property, financial guarantee, financial risks. JEL Classification G28; К14 Formulas: 0; fig.: 0; tabl.: 0; bibl.: 12.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Pemisahan Hak Beragama dengan Hak Berkepercayaan dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 274
Author(s):  
Muwaffiq Jufri ◽  
Mukhlish Mukhlish
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
Indigenous Religion ◽  
Local Religion ◽  
Religious Convictions ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Pemisahan agama dan kepercayaan dalam konstitusi adalah suatu kebijakan yang menimbulkan beragam permasalahan. Seringkali para penghayat kepercayaan mengalami intimidasi ataupun hal-hal lain yang mengganggu pelaksanaan hak sipilnya untuk menganut dan mengamalkan ajaran kepercayaan yang dianutnya. Dengan dalih kepercayaan bukan agama, para pelaku anarkisme seringkali melakukan pelarangan dan kekerasan terhadap para penganut kepercayaan. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Sedangkan hasil penelitiannya ialah bahwa 1) Alasan hukum pemisahan pengaturan antara agama dengan aliran kepercayaan disebabkan oleh politik pembedaan pendefinisian keduanya dimana kepercayaan diamsusikan sebagai tradisi dan ajaran luhur masyarakat yang bersumber dari budaya yang keberadaannya di luar agama. 2) Pemisahan agama dan kepercayaan berakibat hukum tidak diakuinya aliran kepercayaan sebagai agama resmi negara, padahal status aliran kepercayaan merupakan agama lokal yang diyakini sebagai agama oleh para penganutnya. Pemisahan ini juga mengakibatkan hadirnya beragam sikap diskriminatif yang berpotensi mengganggu dan merampas hak setiap warga negara dalam meyakini suatu agama, dalam hal ini hak beragama yang diganggu dan dirampas ialah hak untuk meyakini agama lokal sebagai agama warisan leluhur bangsa Indonesia. The separation of religion and indigenous religion in the constitution is a policy that causes various problems. Often the beliefs of the indigenous religion are intimidating or other things that interfere with the exercise of civil rights to embrace and put into practice the beliefs embraced. Under the pretext of non-religious convictions, the perpetrators of anarchism often make prohibitions and violence against believers. This research uses normative legal methods. The results of the research are: The first, the legal reason for the separation of rules between religion and indigeneous religion is caused by the politics of defining both of them in which beliefs are interpreted as traditions and noble teachings of society originating from cultures which are outside of religion; The second, that the separation of religion and indigenous religion that is caused in the law does not recognize the indigenous religion as the official religion of the state, while the status of the indigenous religion is a local religion that is considered as a religion by his believers. This separation also makes several of discriminatory attitudes come up to have potency in disrupting and robbing every citizen’s right to believe in a religion. In this case, the right which is bullied is the right to believe in local religion as the religion of the Indonesian ancestral heritage.

scholarly journals Political ideology in the legislation of the UkrSSR 1950–1960: anthropological aspect

2020 ◽  
pp. 128-137
Author(s):  
Muzyka Iryna
Keyword(s):  
Political Ideology ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
Central Committee ◽  
The State ◽  
Entire Population ◽  
The Status ◽  
Post War ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Masses

In modern legal science, the anthropological approach that makes it possible to investigate, in particular, the orientation of the right to the human problem in law becomes of great relevance. In the perspective of legal anthropology, an important issue is the status of a person in the state mechanism (the place of the person in the hierarchy of values, the scope and guarantees of his rights and freedoms, the duties of the person) within the relation of state-centrism and anthropocentrism in the normative acts of the UkrSSR authorities of the post-war period. The draft Constitution of the UkrSSR in 1964 provided for a change in the legal status of the inpidual in the UkrSSR. For the first time in the history of "Soviet constitutional law" the concept of "freedom of the inpidual" was introduced, the whole complex of citizens' rights was revised, some new categories of rights were introduced, such as the supreme and fundamental human rights, the mechanism of their guarantees by society and the state was first laid. It was envisaged to consolidate various forms of direct exercise of political power by citizens, to create new forms of influence of citizens on the state power in general. Thus, in the early 1960s, the Soviet state had the potential to change qualitatively if the new UkrSSR Constitution was adopted. Therefore, the dismissal of MS Khrushchev from the duties of the First Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee and the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR appears to be conditioned, including, by the radical significance of the Constitutional project, which has never been adopted. It is possible to draw the following conclusion: in the period under study in the UkrSSR (as well as the USSR), the center of legal reality was not the person, but the norms of legal prescriptions of the state, formulated on the basis of political and ideological doctrine developed by the leadership of the CPSU – Communist Party. It is possible to characterize the status of a person under the legislation of 1950–1960 as a result of the implementation in the normative acts of political and ideological guidelines of the leadership of the CPSU – CPU. According to the communist ideology of that time, the life of society was regarded as the existence of the entire population of inpiduals, masses of people, and therefore the decisive role in the life of society belongs not to inpidual inpiduals, but to their entire population. This meant a significant overriding of the "necessary" relative to the "freedom" of man, that is, the interests of party-state leadership, collective interests over the interests of the inpidual; the non-recognition of the inpidual sovereignty of a person who was largely considered part of the collective subject – the "masses"; lack of reconciliation of interests of inpiduals and the state, which in many cases gave rise to conflict situations.

scholarly journals Foreigners and persons without citizenship as subjects of administrative judiciary

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saadulaev A.I. ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Domestic Law ◽  
Legal Entities

The right to go to court, including administrative, is one of the most important rights of citizens guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. In addition to the general constitutional right to judicial protection, in particular, Art. 7 of the Law of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges» of 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII, guarantees everyone the protection of his rights, freedoms and interests within a reasonable time by an independent, impartial and fair court established by law. Foreigners, stateless persons and foreign legal entities have the right to judicial protection in Ukraine on an equal footing with citizens and legal entities of Ukraine. Access to justice for every person is ensured in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine and in the manner prescribed by the laws of Ukraine. However, along with the guaranteed right to apply to the court of foreigners, stateless persons (refugees, migrants, immigrants), such a category of subjects of administrative proceedings as apartheid remained outside the scope of domestic law. In order to eliminate the shortcomings of the legislative regulation of the legal status of apartheid in Ukraine, the author came to the conclusion that it is necessary to eliminate the existing shortcoming by amending the Law of Ukraine «On Legal Status of Foreigners and Stateless Persons» of 22.09.2011 № 3773-V. Keywords: legal status, foreigners, migrants, apartheid, justice, legislation

scholarly journals Improvement of legal support of training of members of civil formations by National Police bodies

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-109
Author(s):  
Svitlana Ryzhkova
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Order ◽  
The Public ◽  
Special Training ◽  
Village Council ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
National Police

The administrative and legal status of public formations in the protection of public order and the state border is regulated by the Law of Ukraine "On Participation of Citizens in the Protection of Public Order and the State Border". This law gives members of public formations the right to apply preventive measures to offenders, to draw up reports on administrative offenses, to apply in the established order measures of physical influence, special means of protection. To deliver to the bodies of the National Police, to the units of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, the headquarters of the public formation for the protection of public order or public order, the premises of the executive body of the village, village council of persons who have committed administrative offenses, in order to terminate it other measures of influence, identification of the violator, drawing up a report on an administrative offense in case of impossibility to draw it up at the place of the offense, if drawing up a report is mandatory, etc. important in this context is the observance of the law by members of public formations (hereinafter - GF), human and civil rights and freedoms, respect for the rights to liberty and security of person while ensuring public order and security. Given the specifics of the implementation of members of public formations of law enforcement functions, relevant issues of organizational and legal nature related to preparation by authorized subjects of power, which are defined by the Law "On participation of citizens in the protection of public order and state border" of candidates, as well as members of public formations. The current problems of legal and special training of candidates, as well as members of public formations by the National Police have been identified. The state and international experience of this issue are studied. It is proposed to improve the legal provision of training of members of public formations by the National Police, namely the need to adopt a departmental legal act of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (Instructions) to establish requirements for professional legal and special training of candidates and members of public formations in public order by the National Police.

INDEPENDENCE OF PROFESSIONAL JUDGES AS A CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR THEIR LEGAL STATUS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruslan Skrynkovskyy ◽  
◽  
Mariana Khmyz ◽  
Vitaliy Hudyma ◽  
Valentyn Liubarskyi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Professional Status ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Inaccurate Information ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legal Foundations ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article reveals the main aspects of the independence of professional judges as a constitutional basis of their legal status. It is established that the main aspects of the independence of judges as the constitutional basis of their legal status in Ukraine are regulated by the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges», the Law of Ukraine «On the High Council of Justice», the Law of Ukraine «On Ensuring the Right to a Fair Court», the Law of Ukraine «On Restoring Confidence in the Judiciary in Ukraine», the Law of Ukraine «On Purification of Power». It is determined that the independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the state and acts as a constitutional and legal basis for the functioning and activity of the judiciary. It was found that the independence of judges is a key element of the professional status of judges. It has been determined that a judge, in administering justice, must be independent of influence, pressure or interference from unlawful sources. It was noted that state authorities and local self-government bodies, as well as their officials and officials, individuals and legal entities, are obliged to respect the independence of judges, as well as not to encroach on it. It has been established that a judge in the context of administering justice is independent, therefore, taking measures to ensure the independence of judges is one of the main responsibilities of the High Council of Justice. It has been established that every year the number of violations by offenders on the independence of judges in the context of their administration of justice is increasing. It was determined that most often encroachment on the independence of judges in Ukraine occurs on the part of law enforcement agencies, people's deputies, deputies of local councils, other representatives of state authorities and local self-government bodies, lawyers, as well as in cases of violation of law and order in a court session, disruption of court hearings, blocking courts, making various threats to judges, committing physical pressure on judges or members of their families, damaging their property, as well as the property of courts, disseminating inaccurate information in relation to judges. It was found that the low level of guarantees for the independence of judges has an indirect effect on reducing the possibilities of exercising the right to exercise judicial protection. It is noted that the prospects for further research in this direction are the study of the legal foundations of the procedure for the selection and appointment of professional judges in the context of constitutional and legal requirements for candidates.

scholarly journals FUNGSI PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN DIKAITKAN DENGAN UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SETELAH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR: 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atikah Rahmi ◽  
Sakdul
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Status ◽  
The One ◽  
State Registration ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Two Sides

Registration of marriage is very important for the parties in the household, as a requirement for recognition or non-recognition of marriage by the state. Registration of marriages provides authentic evidence against a person's legal status through marriage publication book or marriage certificate. Marriages that are not listed will lead the legal status of the parties to the marriage are not clear. Pursuant to Article 43 of Law No. 1 in 1974, the children born of the marriage were not recorded, did not receive judicial protection. Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 implicates on changing values in society regarding the status and rights of children outside of marriage. The Constitutional Court makes decision as two sides of a coin. On the one hand protect the rights of children outside of mating, but on the other hand the decision may weaken impressed marriage function and can lead to the institution of marriage becomes less are not sacred.

JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS IN UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruslan Skrynkovskyy ◽  
◽  
Svitlana Hlushchenko ◽  
Mariana Khmyz ◽  
Valentyn Serdiuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Legal Character

The article reveals the features of the implementation of judicial protection of economic human and civil rights in Ukraine on the basis of theory and practice. It has been established that the provision of judicial protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in Ukraine is regulated by the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as the provisions of other legislative and regulatory documents. It is determined that ensuring the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a person is the main duty of Ukraine as a democratic state governed by the rule of law. It has been established that the rights and freedoms of man and citizen must be protected by the court. It has been proven that there is no restriction on persons who can apply for the protection of their rights, freedoms and interests in the judicial branch of government, however, a person who receives the right to go to court has no guarantees that he will be provided with protection and application on this basis of a number of procedural procedures. It has been established that the right to obtain judicial protection should be based on satisfaction by court of the requirement of material and legal character that the subject put forward to the person who violated the rights of this subject and/or interests protected by law. It has been established that the provision of judicial protection of the economic rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen consists in the fact that such provision should proceed from guarantees provided by the state, therefore everyone has the right to apply to specially authorized public authorities in accordance with the current constitutional order to protect their economic rights, freedoms and interests. It is noted that the right to judicial protection of economic rights and freedoms of man and citizen is the right to a comprehensive and open trial, so everyone has this right and it is not affected by participation in the trial or the specifics of the case. It is noted that the prospects for further research in this area are to study the features of judicial protection of social rights and freedoms of man and citizen in Ukraine.

scholarly journals Justifying the culture of justification

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1078-1097
Author(s):  
Kai Möller
Keyword(s):  
Public Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Moral Foundation ◽  
The Status ◽  
Moral Case ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Democratic Vote

Abstract The ideas of the culture of justification—according to which it is the role of the courts to ensure that every act of the state that affects a person is substantively justifiable—and the related right to justification—which claims that every person possesses a moral and, ideally, constitutional right to the justification that the culture of justification recommends—are intuitively powerful and widely discussed ideas in public law scholarship, but their moral foundation is not yet well understood. This article presents the moral case for these two concepts, which centers on the status of every person as a justificatory agent. It argues that under conditions of reasonable disagreement in politics, this status requires that any law or act be justified not only procedurally (e.g. in terms of a democratic vote) but also substantively, and it further demonstrates the necessity of the judicial protection of the right to justification as a matter of principle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document