Mulching with almond hull and olive leaves for weed control in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) and flower beds

Weeds are a major problem in cropping systems and in urban areas. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of organic mulching with olive leaves and almond hulls to control weeds in fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) and in flower beds (urban areas). A 3-cm thick layer of olive leaves or almond hulls was applied as mulching material in fennel. Control consisted of both an unmulched treatment and a weed free control. Moreover, in a flower bed of a railway station, plots mulched with 3 cm layer of olive leaves and almond hulls were compared with an unmulched treatment. Weed infestation was evaluated and the weights of the whole plant and of the marketable part of fennel (grumolo) measured. Mulching with olive leaves and almond hulls reduced weed infestation in both vegetable crop and flower beds. However, olive leaves reduced the weights of the whole plant and of the grumolo. The adoption of almond hulls and olive leaves as organic mulches could be an effective strategy for weed control. Further investigations should be carried out to assess whether the effectiveness of these mulching materials is mainly due to a mechanical activity or allelopathic compounds also play a significant role in weed suppression

Download Full-text

Assessment of Crop Residue Mulches on Morphological Traits and Yield of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) in North Bihar Region

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology ◽

10.9734/cjast/2019/v37i630332 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 1-5

Author(s):

Abhishek Pratap Singh ◽

M. D. Ojha ◽

Seema Kumari ◽

Divya Tiwari ◽

Mahender Pal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soil Temperature ◽

Weed Control ◽

Thick Layer ◽

Fruit Weight ◽

Fruit Yield ◽

Tomato Seedlings ◽

Neem Leaves ◽

Different Types ◽

Weed Infestation ◽

Number Of Branches

Organic mulches are easily available and cheap in North Bihar region. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to find out the suitability of different types of organic mulches in tomato cultivation. Among the vegetables tomato cultivation faces challenges in producing crop without chemicals for effective weed control. Use of several kinds of mulches gives the opportunity to control weeds effectively, regulate soil temperature and also lower down evaporation from the soil. The experiment was conducted in Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jalalgarh, Purnea during 2015 and 2016. The treatments were designed by using different organic materials as mulch i.e. pea straw, dry neem leaves, paddy straw and one control without mulch. The observations were recorded on plant height (cm), number of branches per plant, days to 50% flowering, average fruit weight (gm) and total fruit yield (q/ha). The mulches were spread after twenty days of the transplanting of tomato seedlings in 10 cm thick layer. The result of the experiment indicates that organic mulches reduced soil temperature and weed infestation. All these enhanced the growth and fruit yield of tomato as well as weed control, soil moisture conservation and temperature modification resulted good crop growth with more quality fruit yield.

Download Full-text

Integrated management of living mulches for weed control: A review

Weed Technology ◽

10.1017/wet.2021.52 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-39

Author(s):

Vinay Bhaskar ◽

Anna S. Westbrook ◽

Robin R. Bellinder ◽

Antonio DiTommaso

Keyword(s):

Weed Control ◽

Cover Crops ◽

Systems Approach ◽

Cultural Practices ◽

Cropping Systems ◽

Integrated Management ◽

Weed Suppression ◽

Living Mulch ◽

Cash Crops ◽

Crop Competition

Abstract Living mulches are cover crops grown simultaneously with and in close proximity to cash crops. Advantages of living mulches over killed cover crops may include increased weed suppression, erosion and leaching control, soil health, and resource-use efficiency. Advantages of living mulches over synthetic mulches may include enhanced agroecosystem biodiversity and suitability for a wider range of cropping systems. A major disadvantage of this practice is the potential for competition between living mulches and cash crops. The intensity and outcome of mulch-crop competition depend on agroecosystem management as well as climate and other factors. In this review, we consider the management of living mulches for weed control in field and vegetable cropping systems of temperate environments. More than 50 years of research have demonstrated that mechanical or chemical suppression of a living mulch can limit mulch-crop competition without killing the mulch and thereby losing its benefits. Such tactics can also contribute to weed suppression. Mechanical and chemical regulation should be combined with cultural practices that give the main crop a competitive advantage over the living mulch, which in turn outcompetes the weeds. Promising approaches include crop and mulch cultivar selection, changes to planting time, density, and planting pattern, and changes to fertilization or irrigation regimes. A systems approach to living mulch management, including an increased emphasis on the interactions between management methods, may increase the benefits and lower the risks associated with this practice.

Download Full-text

Influence of Management on Long-Term Seedbank Dynamics of Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Cropping Systems of Southern Australia

Weed Science ◽

10.1614/ws-d-15-00119.1 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 64 (2) ◽

pp. 303-311 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Samuel G. L. Kleemann ◽

Christopher Preston ◽

Gurjeet S. Gill

Keyword(s):

Weed Control ◽

Weed Management ◽

Plant Density ◽

Cropping Systems ◽

Management Strategies ◽

Crop Productivity ◽

Field Pea ◽

Spike Density ◽

Weed Infestation ◽

Rigid Ryegrass

A field study was undertaken to investigate the influence of different management strategies on rigid ryegrass plant density and seedbank dynamics over 4 yr. Even though weed seedbank declined by 86% after oaten hay in year 1, the residual seedbank enabled rigid ryegrass to reinfest field peas the next year, and the population rebounded sharply when weed control relied solely on PPI trifluralin. However, use of POST clethodim followed by crop-topping for seed-set prevention of rigid ryegrass in field pea was highly effective and caused a further decline in the weed seedbank. Integration of effective management tactics over 3 yr significantly reduced rigid ryegrass weed and spike density (90 and 81%) in the final year of the 4-yr cropping sequence. Use of oaten hay in year 1, followed by effective weed control in field pea and wheat crops, depleted the high initial seedbank (4,820 seeds m−2) to moderate levels (< 200 seeds m−2) within 3 yr. Effective weed-management treatments depleted the rigid ryegrass seedbank, reduced in-crop weed infestation, and returned higher grain yields and profitability. The results of this study clearly show that large rigid ryegrass populations can be managed effectively without reducing crop productivity and profitability provided multiyear weed-management programs are implemented effectively.

Download Full-text

Weed management boosts yield in fine rice under system of rice intensification

Planta Daninha ◽

10.1590/s0100-83582014000200006 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (2) ◽

pp. 291-299 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

A.R. Chadhar ◽

M.A. Nadeem ◽

A. Tanveer ◽

M. Yaseen

Keyword(s):

Weed Control ◽

Weed Management ◽

Control Method ◽

Weed Suppression ◽

System Of Rice Intensification ◽

Water Extracts ◽

System A ◽

Rice Intensification ◽

Weed Infestation ◽

Kernel Yield

The system of rice intensification has emerged as a promising rice production package but weed infestation could lead to incomplete benefits from the system. A two-year field study was performed to determine an appropriate method of weed management in SRI. Weed management treatments were manual hoeing 20, 40 and 60 days after transplanting (DAT), hoeing with rotary hoe at 20, 40 and 60 DAT, hoeing with rotary hoe at 20 DAT + spray with sorghum and sunflower water extracts at 15 L ha-1 40 DAT, manual hoeing 20 DAT + spray with sorghum and sunflower water extracts, both in equal amount, at 15 L ha-1 40 DAT, orthosulfamuron at 145 g a.i. ha-1 7 DAT, weedy check and weed free. Manual hoeing at 20, 40 and 60 DAT was the treatment that exhibited the maximum kernel yield i.e. 5.34 and 4.99 t ha-1., which was 8.4 and 7.2% higher than orthosulfamuron and 61.0 and 64.9% higher than weedy check, during both years of study, respectively. The highest weed suppression was also achieved by manual hoeing at 20, 40 and 60 DAT with weed control efficiency of 87.89 and 82.32% during 2010 and 2011, respectively. Manual hoeing at 20, 40 and 60 DAT is an eco-friendly, non-chemical weed control method to increase kernel yield of fine rice under SRI.

Download Full-text

Spring-planted cover crops for weed control in soybean

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems ◽

10.1017/s1742170521000107 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Katja Koehler-Cole ◽

Christopher A. Proctor ◽

Roger W. Elmore ◽

David A. Wedin

Keyword(s):

Weed Control ◽

Biomass Production ◽

Cover Crops ◽

Weed Management ◽

Block Design ◽

Weed Suppression ◽

Crop Species ◽

Cold Temperatures ◽

Weed Biomass ◽

Small Grains

Abstract Replacing tillage with cover crops (CC) for weed management in corn (Zea mays L.)-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] systems with mechanical weed control has many soil health benefits but in the western Corn Belt, CC establishment after harvest is hampered by cold temperatures, limited labor and few compatible CC species. Spring-planted CC may be an alternative, but information is lacking on suitable CC species. Our objective was to evaluate four spring-planted CC with respect to biomass production and weed suppression, concurrent with CC growth and post-termination. Cover crop species tested were oat (Avena sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), brown mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.] and yellow mustard (Brassica hirta Moench). They were compared to no-CC treatments that were either tilled pre- and post-planting of soybean (no-CC tilled) or not tilled at all (no-CC weedy). CC were planted in late March to early April, terminated 52–59 days later using an undercutter, and soybean was planted within a week. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with four replications and was repeated for 3 years. Mustards and small grains produced similar amounts of biomass (1.54 Mg ha−1) but mustard biomass production was more consistent (0.85–2.72 Mg ha−1) than that of the small grains (0.35–3.81 Mg ha−1). Relative to the no-CC weedy treatment, mustards suppressed concurrent weed biomass in two out of 3 years, by 31–97%, and small grains suppressed concurrent weed biomass in only 1 year, by 98%. Six weeks after soybean planting, small grains suppressed weed biomass in one out of 3 years, by 79% relative to the no-CC weedy treatment, but mustards did not provide significant weed suppression. The no-CC tilled treatment suppressed weeds each year relative to the no-CC weedy treatment, on average 87%. The ineffective weed control by CC reduced soybean biomass by about 50% six weeks after planting. While spring-planted CC have the potential for pre-plant weed control, they do not provide adequate early season weed suppression for soybean.

Download Full-text

Weed Control with Reduced Rates of Chlorimuron Plus Metribuzin and Imazethapyr in No-Till Narrow-Row Soybean (Glycine max)

Weed Technology ◽

10.1017/s0890037x00042536 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 32-36 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

William G. Johnson ◽

Jeffrey S. Dilbeck ◽

Michael S. Defelice ◽

J. Andrew Kendig

Keyword(s):

Glycine Max ◽

Weed Control ◽

Field Studies ◽

Weed Suppression ◽

Crop Response ◽

Soybean Production ◽

No Till ◽

Giant Foxtail ◽

The Difference ◽

Narrow Row

Field studies were conducted at three locations in 1993 and 1994 to evaluate weed control and crop response to combinations of glyphosate, metolachlor, 0.5 X and 1 X label rates of chlorimuron plus metribuzin applied prior to planting (PP), and 0.5 X and 1 X label rates of imazethapyr applied early postemergence (EPOST) or postemergence (POST) in no-till narrow-row soybean production. Giant foxtail densities were reduced with sequential PP followed by (fb) EPOST or POST treatments. Large crabgrass was reduced equivalently with all herbicide combinations involving chlorimuron plus metribuzin PP fb imazethapyr. Common cocklebur control was variable but was usually greater with treatments that included imazethapyr. Ivyleaf morningglory densities were not reduced with any herbicide combinations. Sequential PP fb EPOST or POST treatments tended to provide slightly better weed suppression than PP-only treatments, but the difference was rarely significant. Soybean yields with treatments utilizing 0.5 X rates were usually equal to 1 X rates.

Download Full-text

Effects of alternative winter cover cropping systems on weed suppression in organically grown tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

Phytoparasitica ◽

10.1007/s12600-009-0048-1 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 37 (4) ◽

pp. 385-396 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Husrev Mennan ◽

Mathieu Ngouajio ◽

Dogan Isık ◽

Emine Kaya

Keyword(s):

Solanum Lycopersicum ◽

Cropping Systems ◽

Weed Suppression ◽

Cover Cropping ◽

Winter Cover ◽

Organically Grown

Download Full-text

Effect of herbicides on the weed infestation and grain yield of soybean (Glycine max)

Acta Agronomica Hungarica ◽

10.1556/aagr.52.2004.2.11 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 52 (2) ◽

pp. 199-203 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

G. Singh ◽

R. S. Jolly

Keyword(s):

Glycine Max ◽

Grain Yield ◽

Weed Control ◽

Negative Correlation ◽

Rainy Season ◽

Dry Matter ◽

Field Experiments ◽

Sand Soil ◽

Loamy Sand Soil ◽

Weed Infestation

Two field experiments were conducted during the kharif (rainy) season of 1999 and 2000 on a loamy sand soil to study the effect of various pre- and post-emergence herbicides on the weed infestation and grain yield of soybean. The presence of weeds in the weedy control plots resulted in 58.8 and 58.1% reduction in the grain yield in the two years compared to two hand weedings (HW) at 30 and 45 days after sowing (DAS), which gave grain yields of 1326 and 2029 kg ha-1. None of the herbicides was significantly superior to the two hand weedings treatment in influencing the grain yield. However, the pre-emergence application of 0.75 kg ha-1 S-metolachlor, and 0.5 kg ha-1 pendimethalin (pre-emergence) + HW 30 DAS were at par or numerically superior to this treatment. There was a good negative correlation between the weed dry matter at harvest and the grain yield of soybean, which showed that effective weed control is necessary for obtaining higher yields of soybean.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of yield quality and weed infestation of common valerian (Valeriana officinalis L.) in dependence on weed control method and forecrop.

Acta Agrobotanica ◽

10.5586/aa.2010.046 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 63 (2) ◽

pp. 179-188 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Cezary Kwiatkowski

Keyword(s):

Winter Wheat ◽

Weed Control ◽

Cover Crop ◽

Crop Protection ◽

Field Pea ◽

Raw Material ◽

Wheat Field ◽

Protection Method ◽

Weed Infestation ◽

Positive Effect

A field experiment involving the cultivation of common valerian was conducted on loess soil in Abramów (Lublin region) in the period 2007-2009. Qualitative parameters of herbal raw material obtained from this plant as well as in-crop weed infestation were evaluated depending on the protection method and forecrop. Hand-weeded plots, in which a hand hoe was used, were the control. In the other treatments, weeds were controlled using various herbicides and a mechanical implement (brush weeder). Potato and winter wheat + field pea cover crop were the forecrops for common valerian crops. A hypothesis was made that the use of a brush weeder and herbicides not registered for application in valerian crops would have a positive effect on this plant's productivity and weed infestation in its crops. It was also assumed that the introduction of a cover crop would allow the elimination of differences in the forecrop value of the crop stands in question. The best quantitative and qualitative parameters of common valerian raw material as well as the largest reduction of incrop weed infestation were recorded after the application of the herbicides which were not type approved. The use of the brush weeder in the interrows also had a beneficial effect on productivity of the plant in question, but secondary weed infestation at the end of the growing season of common valerian turned out to be its disadvantage. Traditional crop protection methods used in common valerian crops were less effective in weed infestation reduction and they resulted in lower plant productivity and raw material quality. Potato proved to be a better forecrop for common valerian than winter wheat + field pea; however, this positive effect was not confirmed statistically. The following annual weeds: Chenopodium album, Galinsoga parviflora, Stellaria media, were predominant in the common valerian crop. Traditional weed control methods resulted in the dominance of some dicotyledonous weeds, such as Viola arvensis, Galium aparine, Capsella bursa-pastoris.

Download Full-text