scholarly journals ANALISIS KEUNGGULAN KOMPARATIF DAN KOMPETITIF SERTA IMPLIKASI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH PADA KOMODITAS JAGUNG DI KABUPATEN BENGKAYANG

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
DODY RADIANSAH ◽  
RADIAN RADIAN ◽  
NURLIZA NURLIZA

The aims of this research are (1) To Analyze the comparative and the competitive advantages of maize in Kabupaten Bengkayang (2) To analyze the impact of the government policy of maize in Kabupaten Bengkayang. The Analyze method use a Policy Analisys Matrix (PAM). The analisys showed that Domestic Resource of Ratio were 0,59 and Private Cost Ratio were 0,81. Both of them are less than one that’s mean the maize had the comparative and competitive advantages. To see the government policy of input can be shown from the Nominal Protection Coefficient on Output (NPCO). To see the government policy of input can been shown from the Nominal Coefficient on Input (NPCI) and factor Transfer. Simultanly the government policy if input and output can be shown from the Effective Protection Coefficient Value (EPC), Profitability Coefficient (PC) and Surplus Ratio to Producer (SRP). The analisys result shown that there is no government policy that have been made to the maize output in Kabupaten Bengkayang, right in buying  price subsidiary or protection of actual buying price. The government policy to maize input has been shown to the farmer side, but the subsidiary input price not profitable enough to increasment and development of maize product in Kabupaten Bengkayang if not followed by output price policy.Keyword : Comparative and Competitive Advantages, Policy Analisys Matrix, Maize

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-52
Author(s):  
Syahrul Ganda Sukmaya ◽  
Dwi Rachmina ◽  
Saptana Saptana

The low productivity of domestic soybeans to be one of the problems why the national soybean production can not meet the needs of the domestic market. Besides government policy is not optimal and sometimes contradictory in increasing domestic soybean production contributing to the competitiveness of domestic soybeans to soybean imports this time. The purpose of this study was to analyze the level of financial and economic advantages of farming. Analyze the competitiveness of soybean status. Analyzing the impact of government policy on the competitiveness of soybean in Lamongan, East Java. Analyzing sensitivity on the competitiveness of soybean. In this research using policy analysis the matrix ( PAM ) , the results of the analysis this is used for saw two basic indicators measuring competitiveness , namely private cost ratio ( PCR ) , domestic resource cost ratio ( DRCR ) is an indicator the comparative advantages. The sample of the in this research as many as 120 respondents. The analysis showed that soybean cultivation in Lamongan unprofitable and inefficient financially and economically. Based competitiveness indicators that PCR and DRCR, showed that soybean systems in Lamongan not competitive. PCR coefficient values> 1 and DRCR> 1. This means soybean systems uncompetitive and inefficient. Based on indicators of the impact of government policy divergence to the input-output soybean showed that existing government policies detrimental exploitation of soybean farming in Lamongan. Changes in domestic soybean prices by 15 and 20 percent increases the competitiveness of domestic soybean competitive.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Mira Mira ◽  
Riesti Triyanti ◽  
Yayan Hikmayani

<p>Program revitalisasi pada sektor perikanan telah berjalan sejak 8 tahun yang lalu dan telah berdampak pada usaha budidaya dan daya saing rumput laut di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dinamika daya saing rumput laut yang banyak dibudidayakan di daerah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survey dan wawancara dengan pembudidaya rumput laut di Nusa Penida dan Lombok Timur. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dengan membandingkan daya saing rumput laut tahun 2005 dan 2013. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan bahwa di dua lokasi penelitian dengan adanya intervensi pemerintah dari tahun ke tahun menyebabkan keuntungan yang diterima pembudidaya pada tahun 2013 rumput laut lebih besar (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) &gt; 1)) jika dibandingkan tanpa kebijakan (PC &lt; 1) (tahun 2005). Keefektifan perhatian pemerintah tersebut bisa dilihat dari nilai SRP <em>(Subsidy Ratio to Producers)</em> dan EPC <em>(Effective Protection Coofficient)</em> yang berubah dari tahun 2005 dan 2013, bila pada tahun 2005 nilai SRP bertanda negatif dan EPC &lt; 1, yang artinya subsidi dan kebijakan pemerintah belum efektif melindungi usaha rumput laut. Tahun 2013, nilai SRP bertanda positif dan EPC ) &gt; 1 di masing-masing lokasi penelitian, yang artinya kebijakan pemerintah dan subsidi efektif mengembangkan usaha rumput laut. Dalam kurun waktu 8 tahun usaha rumput laut memiliki keunggulan kompetitif dan keunggulan komparatif yang bisa dilihat dari nilai DRC dan PCR (Private Cost Ratio), meskipun ada tren penurun keungulan kompetitif, karena pada tahun 2013 di Nusa Penida menggunakan BBM yang memiliki komponen impor yang lebih besar. Implikasi kebijakan pemerintah (kebijakan input) di dua lokasi penelitian yang diindikasikan dengan nilai NPCI <em>(Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input)</em> yang semakin meningkat maka keberpihakan pemerintah Nusa Penida lebih tinggi dibandingkan keberpihakan pemerintah Lombok Timur terhadap input usaha rumput laut baik itu tahun 2005 maupun pada tahun 2013.</p><p> </p><p><em>(Competitive and Comparative Dinamics of the Seaweed Busineses)</em></p><p>Revitalization policy programs in the fisheries sector which has been creating since 8 years ago have the impact on the competitiveness seaweed at Small Islands. The purpose of this study examines competitive and comparative of seaweed. Survey and interview with seaweed cultivators were conducted at The Eastern Nusa Penida and The Eastern Lombok. Data analysis method uses a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results of the analysis indicate that in the two study sites government intervention have a positive impact. Benefits received by farmers in 2013 (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) &gt; 1) greater than without a policy of revitalization in 2005 ( PC &lt;1). The effectiveness of government policies showed by SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) and EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) values were changed from 2005 and 2013. The value of the SRP in 2005 is negative and EPC &lt;1, it means subsidies and government policies have not been effective in protecting the seaweed business. SRP value is positive and EPC)&gt; 1 in each of the research sites after 8 years of revitalization was launched (2013), it means government policies and subsidies effectively develop seaweed business. Seaweed business has also a competitive advantage and comparative advantages, it shown the DRC (Dosmetic Cost Ratio) and PCR (Private Cost Ratio) value. There is trend-lowering competitive advantage in Nusa Penida, because farmers in 2013 using a fuel that has a greater import components. Intervention of government (in terms of policy input) at two study sites increases the value of NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input). The concern of Nusa Penida government on input seaweed business is higher than in the Eastern Lombok government.</p><p><em><br /></em></p>


Author(s):  
M. Mustopa Romdon

Development   of small-scale   coconut  sugar  industry  take into  account  as national  sector  in economic  region development    planning   has to  comparative    and   competitive    advantages.eEspecially,      expectation    to  gill contribution    enough   to  prosperity   improvement.    Using   The  Policy  Analysis    Matrix   (PAM)   approaches,    thl study    was   aimed    to   measure    the   comparative     advantage    and   the   impact    government's     policies    in development    on  coconut   sugar  in  Banyumas.    Its  expected   to  contribution    to  development    of  smail-scalE industry  specially  coconut-sugar   industry  at Banyumas   regency.   The results  showed  that small-scale   coconu: industries    had   having   positive   profits   both private    and   social   and   had   comparative    and   compettitiv~ advantages.   While  impact  of government   policy  to the small-scale   industry   rise  in toim of price  of input  and output.   Impact   on  input  and  output  price   respectively    indicated   that  producer    (tappers)   didn't   take  input subsidy  and experienced   disincentive   in coconut  sugar  production.   It could  be concluded   that the government policy  didnot  fully  supported   development   of small-scale   coconut  sugar  industry,   its  marked  by lowest  privat value-added    than   social    value-added    which  could    be  taken   by   actors    (tappers).    For   supporting    the development    of  the   industry    are  needed   reorientation    and   integrated    mechanism    of  institution    mainlyempowering   and marketing  institution  at least Key words:   Coconut   sugar,  small-scale industry,comparative     and   competitive    advantages 


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-146
Author(s):  
Ulpah Jakiyah ◽  
Lukman M Baga ◽  
Netti Tinaprilla

Salah satu kebijakan Menteri Pertanian berkenaan dengan ekspor dan impor beras adalah peningkatan ekspor jenis beras khusus, seperti beras organik. Permintaan pasar global beras organik semakin meningkat, tetapi Indonesia menghadapi pesaing seperti Thailand dan Vietnam. Meskipun demikian, petani beras organik di Provinsi Jawa Barat menunjukkan kemampuan daya saingnya dengan keberhasilannya melakukan ekspor ke negara Amerika Serikat, Jerman, Malaysia, Singapura, Belanda, Italia, dan Dubai. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis daya saing beras organik, dan mengidentifikasi dampak kebijakan pemerintah terhadap kegiatan usaha tani beras organik. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa varietas beras organik memiliki daya saing yang cukup untuk ekspor, terlihat pada keunggulan kompetitif (Private Cost Ratio) dan komparatif (Domestic Resource Cost Ratio). Penerimaan secara finansial maupun sosial dapat memenuhi biaya input domestik. Keunggulan kompetitif dan komparatif melemah akibat dari adanya pengaruh biaya sertifikasi lahan pada biaya domestik dan biaya kemasan, sedangkan dampak kebijakan pemerintah terhadap input dan output menguntungkan petani. Kebijakan bersifat efektif namun belum efisien akibat belum adanya lembaga penyediaan input seperti pupuk dan benih organik. One of the agriculture minister policies related to rice exports and imports is the increased number of certain type of rice export such as organic rice.The global demand of organic rice market has been increasing but Indonesia is facing competitors, such as Thailand and Vietnam. Nevertheless, organic rice farmers in west java province are showing their competitive capability by exporting to a United States, Germany, Malaysia, Singapore, The netherlands, Italy, and Dubai. This study aims to analyze the competitiveness of organic rice, and identify the impacts in government policy for the organic rice farming.The result shows that some varieties of organic rice have adequate export competitiveness, seen from the competitive advantage (private cost ratio) and the comparative advantage (domestic cost ratio) which are positive. The analysis method used was Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The financial and social revenue could cover the input of domestic cost. The competitive and comparative advantages were weakened as a result of the influence of land certification in the domestic and packaging cost, whereas the impact of government policy to input and output is profitable for farmers. The policy is effective but has not been efficient due to lack of input providers such as fertilizer and organic seeds.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Mira Mira ◽  
Riesti Triyanti ◽  
Yayan Hikmayani

Program revitalisasi pada sektor perikanan telah berjalan sejak 8 tahun yang lalu dan telah berdampak pada usaha budidaya dan daya saing rumput laut di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dinamika daya saing rumput laut yang banyak dibudidayakan di daerah pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan metode survey dan wawancara dengan pembudidaya rumput laut di Nusa Penida dan Lombok Timur. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) dengan membandingkan daya saing rumput laut tahun 2005 dan 2013. Hasil analisis mengindikasikan bahwa di dua lokasi penelitian dengan adanya intervensi pemerintah dari tahun ke tahun menyebabkan keuntungan yang diterima pembudidaya pada tahun 2013 rumput laut lebih besar (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) > 1)) jika dibandingkan tanpa kebijakan (PC < 1) (tahun 2005). Keefektifan perhatian pemerintah tersebut bisa dilihat dari nilai SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) dan EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) yang berubah dari tahun 2005 dan 2013, bila pada tahun 2005 nilai SRP bertanda negatif dan EPC < 1, yang artinya subsidi dan kebijakan pemerintah belum efektif melindungi usaha rumput laut. Tahun 2013, nilai SRP bertanda positif dan EPC ) > 1 di masing-masing lokasi penelitian, yang artinya kebijakan pemerintah dan subsidi efektif mengembangkan usaha rumput laut. Dalam kurun waktu 8 tahun usaha rumput laut memiliki keunggulan kompetitif dan keunggulan komparatif yang bisa dilihat dari nilai DRC dan PCR (Private Cost Ratio), meskipun ada tren penurun keungulan kompetitif, karena pada tahun 2013 di Nusa Penida menggunakan BBM yang memiliki komponen impor yang lebih besar. Implikasi kebijakan pemerintah (kebijakan input) di dua lokasi penelitian yang diindikasikan dengan nilai NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input) yang semakin meningkat maka keberpihakan pemerintah Nusa Penida lebih tinggi dibandingkan keberpihakan pemerintah Lombok Timur terhadap input usaha rumput laut baik itu tahun 2005 maupun pada tahun 2013. (Competitive and Comparative Dinamics of the Seaweed Busineses)Revitalization policy programs in the fisheries sector which has been creating since 8 years ago have the impact on the competitiveness seaweed at Small Islands. The purpose of this study examines competitive and comparative of seaweed. Survey and interview with seaweed cultivators were conducted at The Eastern Nusa Penida and The Eastern Lombok. Data analysis method uses a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results of the analysis indicate that in the two study sites government intervention have a positive impact. Benefits received by farmers in 2013 (PC (Profitabity Coofficient) > 1) greater than without a policy of revitalization in 2005 ( PC <1). The effectiveness of government policies showed by SRP (Subsidy Ratio to Producers) and EPC (Effective Protection Coofficient) values were changed from 2005 and 2013. The value of the SRP in 2005 is negative and EPC <1, it means subsidies and government policies have not been effective in protecting the seaweed business. SRP value is positive and EPC)> 1 in each of the research sites after 8 years of revitalization was launched (2013), it means government policies and subsidies effectively develop seaweed business. Seaweed business has also a competitive advantage and comparative advantages, it shown the DRC (Dosmetic Cost Ratio) and PCR (Private Cost Ratio) value. There is trend-lowering competitive advantage in Nusa Penida, because farmers in 2013 using a fuel that has a greater import components. Intervention of government (in terms of policy input) at two study sites increases the value of NPCI (Nominal Protection Coofficient on Input). The concern of Nusa Penida government on input seaweed business is higher than in the Eastern Lombok government.


Author(s):  
Andika Ibrahim ◽  
Marhawati Mappatoba ◽  
Yulianti Kalaba

This study aims to determine the competitiveness of cocoa commodity in the district of  Sigi and the impact of government policies by analyzing the effects of cocoa price changes, cocoa’s input price and cocoa production to the competitiveness of cocoa. Data collection is done in Sub-district of Palolo with the number of respondents 31 farmers and also data supported by data from other related agencies. The research objective answered by using analytical tools Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). Results of the study found that cocoa in Sigi District has comparative and competitive advantages with the value of Domestic Cost Ratio (DCR) and the Private Cost Ratio (PCR) i.e. 0.45 and 0.50. Results for Nominal Protection coefficient of output value (NPCO) is 0.88 and Nominal Protection Coeffisients of Input (NPCI) is 0.80 respectively show the government's policies are protective for cocoa farmers in the district, while the EPC value is 0.89 indicates the policy is inhibiting the production of farmers with effect of ratio 0.09. The sensitivity analysis of changes in production, the price of cocoa bean and Subsidized- fertilizer prices, shows that the change in production is an indicator that most influence the competitiveness of cocoa in Sigi District.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Mulia Simatupang

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper in to assess the impact of financial inclusion and  government expenditures in education and health sectors in order to increase human development index. Government expenditures has important role to support economic growth and welfare for its people. Fiscal policy expenditures in education and health sectors are kind of significant government policy to increase human development. It is believed that financial inclusion has also important role  to reduce poverty and indirectly increase human development index. Financial inclusion  has positive impacts to human development index component along with government  expenditures in education and health sector. In the years ahead, The Government should prioritize and increase budget in order to increase human  resources quality in Indonesia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Woo Ro ◽  
Nathan Allen ◽  
Weiwei Ai ◽  
Debi Prasad ◽  
Partha S. Roop

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges globally. Countries have adopted different strategies with varying degrees of success. Epidemiologists are studying the impact of government actions using scenario analysis. However, the interactions between the government policy and the disease dynamics are not formally captured. We, for the first time, formally study the interaction between the disease dynamics, which is modelled as a physical process, and the government policy, which is modelled as the adjoining controller. Our approach enables compositionality, where either the plant or the controller could be replaced by an alternative model. Our work is inspired by the engineering approach for the design of Cyber-Physical Systems. Consequently, we term the new framework Compositional Cyber-Physical Epidemiology. We created different classes of controllers and applied these to control the disease in New Zealand and Italy. Our controllers closely follow government decisions based on their published data. We not only reproduce the pandemic progression faithfully in New Zealand and Italy but also show the tradeoffs produced by differing control actions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rotimi Joseph ◽  
David Proverbs ◽  
Jessica Lamond ◽  
Peter Wassell

Purpose – There has been a significant increase in flooding in the UK over the past ten years. During this time, Government policy has moved from investment in flood defences towards encouraging property owners to take responsibility for reducing the impact of flooding. One of the ways in which this can be achieved is for homeowners to adapt their properties to flood risk by implementing property level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures. While there has been some attempt to develop an understanding of the benefits of such measures, these previous studies have their limitations in that the intangible benefits have not been fully considered. As such, there remains a need for further development of these studies towards developing a more comprehensive understanding of PLFRA measures. It is against this background the purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual cost benefit analysis (CBA) framework for PLFRA measure. This framework brings together the key parameters of the costs and benefits of adapting properties to flood risk including the intangible benefits, which have so far been overlooked in previous studies. Design/methodology/approach – A critical review of the standard methods and existing CBA models of PLFRA measures was undertaken. A synthesis of this literature and the literature on the nature of flooding and measures to reduce and eliminate their impacts provides the basis for the development of a conceptual framework of the costs and benefits of PLFRA measures. Within the developed framework, particular emphasis is placed on the intangible impacts, as these have largely been excluded from previous studies in the domain of PLFRA measures. Findings – The framework provides a systematic way of assessing the costs and benefits of PLFRA measures. A unique feature of the framework is the inclusion of intangible impacts, such as anxiety and ill health, which are known to be difficult to measure. The study proposes to implement one of the stated preference methods (SPM) of valuation to measure these impacts, known as the willingness to pay method, as part of a survey of homeowners. The inclusion of these intangible impacts provides the potential to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the benefit cost ratio (BCR) for different stakeholders. The newly developed CBA conceptual framework includes four principal components: the tangible benefits to insurers; the tangible benefits to the government; the tangible benefits to homeowners; and the intangible benefits to homeowners. Originality/value – This tool offers the potential to support government policy concerned with increasing the uptake of PLFRA measures through increasing the information available to homeowners and thereby supporting the decision-making process.


AGRIMOR ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 66-68
Author(s):  
Umbu Joka ◽  
Yohanes Pebrian Vianney Mambur

Penelitian inibertujuan untuk menganalisis daya saing ( keunggulan komparatif dan keunggulan kompetitif) serta menganalisa dampak kebijakan pemerintah pada harga input (subsidi pupuk) dan output (harga dasar gabah) terhadap pendapatan usahatani padi sawah di Kecamatan Biboki Moenleu, Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara. Penelitian ini dilaksanakandari bulan Juli s/d Agustus tahun 2020. Penentuan sampel mengunakan teknik simple random samplingyaitu secara acak berjumlah 100 petani. Jenis data yang digunakan yaitu data primer dan data sekunder. Metode analisis data yang digunakan yaitu metode deskriptif kualitatif dan Policy Analisys Matrix(PAM). Hasil penelitian: 1)Usahatani padi sawah di Kecamatan Biboki Moenleu,Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utaramemilki keunggulan kompetitif nilai Private Cost Ratio(PCR) sebesar 0,19 dan keunggulan komparatif nilai Domestic Resource Cost Ratio(DRCR) sebesar 0,13 sehingga usahatani padi sawah layak untuk diteruskan. 2). Kebijakan pemerintah pada harga input-output pada usahatani padi sawah di Kecamatan Biboki Moenleu,Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utaraberdampak nyata terhadap pendapatan petani padi sawah pada harga privatdengan nilai Nominal Protection Coefficient on Tradable Output(NPCO) sebesar 1,13 dan nilai Subsidy Ratio of Producer(SRP) sebesar0,05.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document